Abstract
The advantages of a biosemiotic approach to the social effects of digitalization are explicated. Biosemiotics is a semiotic modeling theory that is inherent to a phenomenology of the body. Even though it offers an encompassing and comprehensive account of meaning as modeling, it has only recently been employed in analyzing cultural and social matters, which are the traditional foci of semiotic theories that tended to overlook the role of the body and its relation to the environment in meaning-making. Here, it is argued that biosemiotics offers a theoretical framework that captures the multimodal and fast communication dynamics of digital societies as affordances of the human body. As such, the chapter explores a biosemiotic perspective on sustainable development as fostered by digitalization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
As consensually accepted in semiotics, I take the meaning to be the product of interpretation. As interpretation continuously unfolds throughout an organism’s life, the meaning is never a complete and finalized product.
References
Anderson, B ([2006] 1983) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso, London, New York
Barthes, R (1991 [1957]) Mythologies. Trans. Cape, Jonathan. The Noonday Press, New York
Boehm G, Mitchell WJT (2009) Pictorial versus iconic turn: two letters. Culture, Theory and Critique 50(2–3):103–121
Boyer D (2008) Thinking through the anthropology of experts. Anthropology in Action 15(2):38–46
Brandt PA (2011) What is cognitive semiotics? A new paradigm in the study of meaning. Signata: Annales des sémiotique/Annals of Semiotics 2:49–60
Bringhurst R (2004 [1992]) The elements of typographic style. Version 3.0. Hartley & Marks, Vancouver
Campbell C (2017) Exploring the textual woods: Umberto Eco’s growing concept of text. In: Torkild T, Bent S (eds) Umberto Eco in his own words. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp 134–142
Campbell C, Olteanu A, Kalevi K (2019) Learning and knowing as semiosis: extending the cultural apparatus of semiotics. Sign Systems Studies 47(3/4):325–381
Ciula A, Eide Ø (2017) Modelling in digital humanities: signs in context. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32(1):i33–i46
Ciula A, Marras C (2016) Circling around text and language: towards “pragmatic modelling”. Digital humanities. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 10(3):17–29
Ciula A, Marras C (2019) Exploring a semiotic conceptualisation of modelling in digital humanities practices. In: Olteanu A, Stables A, Borţun D (eds) Meanings & co.: the Interdisciplinarity of communication, semiotics and multimodality. Springer, Cham, pp 33–52
Cobley P (2010) The cultural implications of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics 3(2):225–244
Cobley, P ([2014] 2001). Narrative, Second Edition. Routledge, New York
Cobley P (2016) Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht
Cobley P (2017) What the humanities are for – a semiotic perspective. In: Kristian B, Cobley P (eds) Semiotics and its masters. de Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp 3–23
Cobley P, Stjernfelt F (2015) Scaffolding development and the human condition. Biosemiotics 8(2):291–304
Danesi M (2002) Understanding media semiotics. Arnold, London
Descartes R (2008 [1643]) Meditations on first philosophy with selections from objections and replies. Oxford University Press, Trans. Michael Moriarty. Oxford
Eco U (1976) A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Eco U (1979) The role of the reader: explorations in the semiotics of texts. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Eco U (1999 [1997]) Kant and the platypus: essays on language and cognition. A Harvest Book, Harcourt, Inc, San Diego
Elleström L (2013) Spatiotemporal aspects of iconicity. In: Elleström L, Fischer O, Christina L (eds) Iconic investigations. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 95–117
Elleström L (2014) Media transformation: the transfer of media characteristics among media. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Elleström L (2018) A medium-centered model of communication. Semiotica 224:269–293
Elleström L (2019) Modelling human communication: Mediality and semiotics. In: Olteanu A, Stables A, Borţun D (eds) Meanings & co.: the Interdisciplinarity of communication, semiotics and multimodality. Springer, Cham, pp 7–32
Eriksen J-M, Stjernfelt F (2012) The democratic contradictions of multiculturalism. Telos, New York
Faraj S, Azad B (2012) The materiality of technology: an affordance perspective. In: Leonardi PM, Nardi B, Kallinikos J (eds) Materiality and organizing: social interaction in a technological world. Oxford University Press, New York
Fiske, J (1990 [1982]). Introduction to communication studies. Second Edition. Routledge, London
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1):4–15
Halliday MAK (1978) Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Arnold, London
Halliday MAK, Webster JJ (eds) (2009) Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum, New York
Hartley J (2015) Urban semiosis: creative industries and the clash of systems. Int J Cult Stud 18(1):79–101
Hoffmeyer J (2007) Semiotic scaffolding of living systems. In: Barbieri M (ed) Introduction to biosemiotics: the new biological synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 49–166
Hoffmeyer J (2008) The semiotic body. Biosemiotics 1(2):169–190
Hoffmeyer J, Stjernfelt F (2016) The great chain of semiosis. Investigating the steps in the evolution of semiotic competence. Biosemiotics 9(2):7–29
Hopkins J (2020) The concept of affordances in digital media. In: Friese H, Nolden M, Rebane G, Schrieter M (eds) Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 47–54
Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Jay P (2014) The humanities “crisis” and the future of literary studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Jesper H (2018) Knowledge is never just there. Biosemiotics 11(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9320-4
Kralemann B, Lattmann C (2013) Models as icons: modelling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese 190:3397–3420
Kress G (2010) Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge, London
Kress G, Selander S (2012) Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. Interned and Higher Education 15(4):265–268
Kress G, van Leeuwen T (2001) Multimodal discourse: the modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold, London
Kull K (2003) Ladder, tree, web: the ages of biological understanding. Sign Systems Studies 31(2):589–603
Lacković N (2020a) Inquiry graphics in higher education: new approaches to knowledge, learning and methods with images. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Lacković N (2020b) Thinking with digital images in the post-truth era: a method in critical media literacy. Postdigital sciences and education 2:442–462
Lacković N, Olteanu A (2020) Rethinking educational theory and practice in times of visual media: learning as image-concept integration. Educ Philos Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1799783
Lähteenmäki M (2010) Heteroglossia and voice: conceptualizing linguistic diversity from a Bakhtinian perspective. In: Lähteenmäki M, Vanhala-Aniszewski M (eds) Language ideologies in transition: multilingualism in Russia and Finland. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp 17–34
Lähteenmäki M, Varis P, Leppänen S (2011) Editorial: the shifting paradigm: towards a re-conceptualisation of multilingualism. Apples – Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(1):1–11
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books, New York
Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Locke J (1836 [1690]) An essay concerning human understanding. T. Tegg and Son, London
Lotman Y (1990) Universe of the mind: a semiotic theory of culture. Tauris, London
Machin D (2013) Introduction: what is multimodal critical discourse studies? Crit Discourse Stud 10(4):347–355
Majchrzak A, Faraj S, Kane GC, Azad B (2013) The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J Comput-Mediat Commun 19:38–55
Maran T (2014) Biosemiotic criticism: modelling the environment in literature. Green Letters 18(3):297–311
Maran T, Kull K (2014) Ecosemiotics: Main principles and current developments. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 96(1):41–50
Martinelli D (2016) Arts and humanities in Progress: a manifesto of Numanities. Springer, Cham
Martinet A (1962) A functional view of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Marwick AE, boyd d. (2010) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Soc 13(1):114–133
McCarty W (2005) Humanities computing. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
McLuhan M (1962) The Gutenberg galaxy: the making of the typographic man. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
McLuhan M (1997) In: McLuhan E, Zingrone F (eds) Essential McLuhan. Routledge, London
Mills KA (2016) Literacy theories of the digital age: social, critical, multimodal, spatial material and sensory lenses. Multilingual Matters, Bristol
Moxey K (2008) Visual studies and the iconic turn. J Vis Cult 7(2):131–146
Nöth W (2001) Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature. Sign Syst Stud 29(1):71–81. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2001.29.1.06
Nussbaum MC (2010) Not for profit – why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Olteanu A (2019) Multiculturalism as multimodal communication: a semiotic perspective. Springer, Cham
Olteanu A, Stables A (2018) Learning and adaptation from a semiotic perspective. Sign Systems Studies 46(4):409–434
Pagni E (2016) Why explicit semiotic grounding is essential to biology as science? The point of view in biosemiotics. HumanaMente Journal of Philosophical Studies 9(31):57–72
Peirce, CS (1931–1935, 1958) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Ed. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss and A. W. Burks. Belknap, Cambridge. [In-text references are to CP, followed by paragraph number]
Pérez-González L (2014) Multimodality in translation and interpreting studies: theoretical and methodological perspectives. In: Bermann S, Porter C (eds) A companion to translation studies. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, pp 119–131
Rifkin J (2011) The third industrial revolution: how lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Roli A, Kauffman SA (2020) Emergence of organisms. Entropy 22(10):1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22101163
Rorty RM (ed) (1967) The linguistic turn: essays in philosophical method with two retrospective essays. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Roth CE (1992) Environmental literacy: its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s. ERIC, Columbus, OH
Said EW (1994 [1993]) Culture and imperialism. Vintage Books, New York
Saussure F (1959 [1916]) Course in general linguistics [Course de linguistique générale]. Eds. Bally, C., Sechehaye, A. Trans. Baskin, W. The Philosophical Library, New York
Scolari Carlos A (2012) Media ecology: exploring the metaphor to expand the theory. Commun Theory 22:204–225
Scolari CA, Masanet M-J, Guerrero-Pico M, Establés M-J (2018) Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: teens’ transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. El Profesional de la Informacion 27(4):801–812
Sebeok T (1991) A sign is just a sign: advances in semiotics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis
Sebeok T (2001 [1994]) Signs: an introduction to semiotics. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Sowa J (2014) From existential graphs to conceptual graphs. In: Management Association, I (ed) Computational linguistics: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 439–472
Stables A (2001) Who drew the sky? Conflicting assumptions in environmental education. Educ Philos Theory 33(2):245–256
Stables A (2012) Be(com)ing human: semiosis and the myth of reason. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam
Stables A, Bishop K (2001) Weak and strong conceptions of environmental literacy: implications for environmental education. Environ Educ Res 7(1):89–97
Stjernfelt F (2006) The semiotic body. A semiotic concept of embodiment? In: Nöth W (ed) Semiotic bodies, aesthetic embodiments and Cyberbodies. Kassel University Press, Kassel, pp 13–48
Stjernfelt F (2007) Diagrammatology: and investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology and semiotics. Springer, Dordrecht
Stjernfelt F (2012) Liberal multiculturalism as political philosophy: will Kymlicka. Monist 95(1):49–71
Stjernfelt F (2015) Iconicity of logic – and the roots of the “iconicity” concept. In: Hiraga MK, Herlofsky WJ, Shinohara K, Kimi A (eds) Iconicity: east meets west. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 35–53
Strate L (2008) Studying media as media: McLuhan and the media ecology approach. MediaTropes 1:127–142
Torresi I (1998) 2009. Advertising. In: Baker M, Saldanha G (eds) Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies, 2nd edn. Routledge, Oxford, pp 6–10
Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2013) Social media use in organizations: exploring affordances of visibility, Editability, persistence, and association. Ann Int Commun Assoc 36(1):143–189
van Leeuwen T (2005) Introducing social semiotics. Routledge, London
von Uexküll, J (2010 [1934, 1940]) A foray into the worlds of animals and humans with a theory of meaning. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Verbeek, P-P (2005 [1992]) What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Trans. Crease, Robert P. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA
Wodak RE (2017) The “establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “people”: Who’s who? Journal of Language and Politics 16(4):551–565
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the Estonian Research Council (grant MOBJD346 “Towards a joint environmental and digital literacy: An ecosemiotic approach to digitalization”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olteanu, A. (2021). A Proposal for a Biosemiotic Approach to Digitalization: Literacy as Modeling Competence. In: Pagni, E., Theisen Simanke, R. (eds) Biosemiotics and Evolution. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85265-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85265-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85264-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85265-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)