Skip to main content

Metaphors as Conceptual Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Machines, Bodies and Invisible Hands
  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

The literature on the cognitive role of metaphors discussed in this chapter shows how scientific theories often develop, not in spite of metaphors, but thanks to them. This literature, although made up of heterogeneous lines of research, formulates a number of ideas that guide the present analysis. One is that metaphors reorganize our ideas about the world, help re-describe it and orient the search for causal links that explain phenomena.

For these reasons, many of our philosophical beliefs depend on how we conceptualize the world out there through metaphors. Complex and unknown events are first analyzed by transferring characteristics of known domains to them, on the basis of analogies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Black’s original example was “Man is a wolf”.

  2. 2.

    Many metaphors have been used in economic thought in the course of time (Mirowski, 1989; Henderson, 1994; Hodgson, 1999: 60–83), and some scholars have tried to interpret this use in light of what has been suggested by Black , Hesse and Boyd. McCloskey (1998), in contrast with the “methodology of positive economics”, has identified some traits of the rhetoric of economics. One thesis she puts forward is that analogy pervades economics, even when economists do not have explicit analogical intentions. Expressing ideas in terms of supply and demand curves, games theory and the invisible hand means unconsciously resorting to metaphors. Klamer and Leonard argued that “economics is metaphorical”. Following Boyd, they maintained that, in addition to pedagogical and heuristic metaphors, there are “constitutive metaphors”, that is, metaphors that “determine what makes sense and what does not; they will determine, among other things, the effectiveness of pedagogical and heuristic metaphors ” (Klamer & Leonard, 1994: 40). Lewis (1999) also adopted the critical realisms approach encapsulated in Boyd’s perspective, and maintained that metaphors play a “fundamental role” in the development of models. By contrast, Lagueux (1999: 5) remarks that “almost all metaphors used in economics are dead metaphors which no longer work as metaphors”.

  3. 3.

    According to Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969: 403), “Any analogy […] turns into metaphor quite spontaneously”. Cohen (1993: 35–36) remarks that the lack of a clear distinction between metaphor and analogy dates back to classical Greece, and etymologically the meaning of metaphor entails the use of analogy. Klamer and Leonard (1994: 35) maintain , “Analogy is an expanded metaphor; more precisely, analogy is sustained and systematically elaborated metaphor”.

References

  • Bailer-Jones, D. (2002). Models, Metaphors and Analogies. In P. Machamer & M. Silberstein (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science (pp. 108–127). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C. (1993). Money Talks: The Rhetorical Project of the Wealth of Nations. In W. Henderson, T. Dudley-Evans, & R. Backhouse (Eds.), Economics and Language (pp. 173–199). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri, C. (1988). Should a Scientist Abstain from Metaphor? In A. Klamer, D. N. McCloskey, & R. M. Solow (Eds.), The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric (pp. 100–114). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. (1993 [1979]). More About Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 19–41). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is “metaphor” a Metaphor for. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 481–532). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. L. (2003). Making Truth: Metaphor in Science. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. I. (1993). Analogy, Homology, and Metaphor in the Interaction Between the Natural Sciences and Social Sciences, Especially Economics. In N. de Marchi (Ed.), Non-Natural Science: Reflecting on the Enterprise of More Heat than Light. History of Political Economy (pp. 7–44) Annual Supplement to volume 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1978). What Metaphors Mean. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, W. (1994). Metaphor and Economics. In R. E. Backhouse (Ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology (pp. 343–367). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1987). Unfamiliar Noises: Tropical Talk: The Myth of the Literal. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 61, 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1999). Evolution and Institutions. On Evolutionary Economics and the Evolution of Economics. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W. S. (1975). Adam Smith’s Lectures on Rhetoric: An Historical Assessment. In A. S. Skinner & T. Wilson (Eds.), Essays on Adam Smith (pp. 11–43). Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1985 [1739–40]). A Treatise of Human Nature, E. G. Mossner (Ed.). Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (2007 [1748]). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, P. Millican (Ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kames, L. H. H. (1751). Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion. Fleming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. (2017). An Authentic Account of Adam Smith. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, A., & Leonard, T. C. (1994). So What’s an Economic Metaphor? In P. Mirowski (Ed.), Natural Images in Economic Thought (pp. 20–51). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1993 [1979]). Metaphor in Science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 533–542). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagueux, M. (1999). Do Metaphors Affect Economic Theory? Economics and Philosophy, 15, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2008). The Neural Theory of Metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). The Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. (1999). Metaphor and Critical Realism. In S. Fleetwood (Ed.), Critical Realism in Economics. Development and Debate (pp. 83–101). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1998). The Rhetoric of Economics (2nd ed.). University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, S. J. (2006). Adam Smith. The Rhetoric of Propriety. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J. (1803). An Historical View of the English Government (Vol. IV). Printed for J. Mawman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (1989). More Heat than Light. Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez, R. (2008). Conceptual Metaphor, Human Cognition, and the Nature of Mathematics. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 339–362). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. (1975). Scottish Philosophy and British Physics 1750–1880. A Study in the Foundation of the Victorian Scientific Style. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, S. C. (1942). World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, W. M. (1986). A Reassessment of Adam Smith’s Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Central States Speech Journal, 37(1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I. A. (1965 [1936]). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2006). So quel che fai. Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Raffaello Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1987). Unfamiliar Noises: Hesse and Davidson on Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 61, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1993 [1979]). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 83–111). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, H. F. (1965). Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 79(2), 212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trincado, E. (2019). The Birth of Economic Rhetoric. Communication, Arts and Economic Stimulus in David Hume and Adam Smith. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Fiori .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fiori, S. (2021). Metaphors as Conceptual Tools. In: Machines, Bodies and Invisible Hands. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85206-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85206-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85205-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85206-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics