Abstract
In Costa Rica there are three management systems for coffee production: The oldest is traditional shade grown coffee used by small landholders, where yield is sacrificed for low maintenance and high sustainability. Control of the system is bottom-up, that is endosomatic by the species in the system; Sun grown coffee is favored by corporations. Control is top-down, that is exosomatic by the chemicals applied to the system. There is a tradeoff in sustainability for high yield; Organic coffee combines sustainability with economic yield through feedback. Control is both top-down and bottom-up.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Audubon Society Shade-Grown Coffee Project, Cited in Wisconsin Natural Resources Magazine (2004). http://dnr.wnrmag/html/stories/2004/feb04/shadechart.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2020
M.T. Brown, S. Ulgiati, Energy quality, emergy and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems. Ecol. Model. 178, 201–213 (2004)
Y. Carrillo, C.F. Jordan, K.L. Jacobsen, K.G. Mitchell, P. Raber, Shoot pruning of a hedgerow perennial legume alters the availability and temporal dynamics of root-derived nitrogen in a subtropical setting. Plant Soil 345(1–2), 59–69 (2011)
R. Cubero-Abarca, R. Moya, J. Valaret, M. Tomazello Filho, Use of coffee (Coffea arabaica) pulp for the production of briquettes and pellets for heat generation. Cienc. Agrotec. 38(5), 1–15 (2014)
M. Giampietro, Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Agroecosystems (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004)
M.V. Gilliland, Energy analysis and public policy. Science 189(4208), 1051–1056 (1975)
D.C. Huettner, Net energy analysis: An economic assessment. Science 192(4235), 102–104 (1976)
K.J. Hulsbergen, B. Feil, S. Biermann, G.W. Rathke, W.D. Kalk, W. Diepenbrock, A method of energy balancing in crop production and its application in a long-term fertilizer trial. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 86, 303–321 (2001)
C.F. Jordan, Energy analysis of coffee production systems: Implications for environmental and economic sustainability, in Integrating Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty, ed. by F. Montagnini, (Springer, New York, 2017), pp. 151–164
S.E. Jørgensen, J.C. Marques, S.N. Nielsen, Integrated Environmental Management: A Transdisciplinary Approach (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York, 2016)
G.L. Leach, Net energy analysis – Is it any use? Energ Policy 3(4), 332–344 (1975)
D.J. Murphy, M. Carbajales-Dale, D. Moeller, Comparing apples to apples: Why the net energy analysis community needs to adopt the life-cycle analysis framework. Energies 2016(9), 917 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/en9110917
H.T. Odum, Environment, Power and Society (Wiley, New York, 1971)
I. Perfecto, R.A. Rice, R. Greenberg, M.D. Van der Voort, Shade coffee: A disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46(8), 598–608 (1996)
D. Pimentel, T.W. Patzek, Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood: Biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Nat. Resour. Res. 14(1), 65–76 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-23
G. Quiroga, L. Castrillon, Y. Fernandez-Nava, E. Maranon, Physico-chemical analysis and calorific values of poultry manure. Waste Manag. 30(5), 880–884 (2010)
E. Rossi, F. Montagnini, E.M.V. Virginio Filho, Effects of management practices on coffee productivity and herbaceous species diversity in agroforestry systems in Costa Rica, in Agroforestry as a Tool for Landscape Restoration, ed. by F. Montagnini, W. Francesconi, E. Rossi, (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2011), pp. 115–132
E.M.V. Virginho Filho, F. Casanoves, J. Haggar, G.S. Staver, J. Avelino, A. Tapia, M. Merlo, J. Salgado, M. Noponen, Y. Perdomo, A. Vásquez, La productividad util, la materia orgánica y el suelo en los primeros 10 años de edad en sistemas de producción de café a pleno sol y bajo varios tipos de sombra y niveles de insumos organicos y convencionales en de Costa Rica, in Sistemas Agroforestales: Funciones Productivas, Socioeconomicas y Ambientales. Serie Tecnica Informe Tecnico No. 402.CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, ed. by F. Montagnini, E. Somarriba, E. Murgueitio, H. Fassola, B. Eibl, (Editorial CIPAV, Cali, Colombia, 2015), pp. 131–151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jordan, C.F. (2022). Top-Down Vs. Bottom-Up Control in Resource Management Systems. In: Evolution from a Thermodynamic Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85186-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85186-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85185-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85186-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)