Skip to main content

Current and Evolving Views of Learner Experience from the Field of Learning Design and Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning: Design, Engagement and Definition

Abstract

This chapter highlights the need for greater semantic and conceptual clarity around the emerging phenomenon of learner experience (LX) that increasingly is gaining prominence in the field of learning design and technology (LDT). The increasing application of user-centered design (UCD) and user experience design (UXD) methods in learning design contexts signals a shift in LDT. Amidst this transition, loose usage of related terminology and concepts by LDT practitioners and researchers frustrates efforts to situate and connect established traditions of our field with UCD and UXD methods and processes. In this chapter, we seek to approach this need by analyzing the language that LX researchers use and how they characterize LX. To this end, we performed a content analysis of 15 book chapters from the recently published edited volume Learner and User Experience Research: An Introduction for the Field of Learning Design & Technology (Schmidt et al., 2020b). Our aim was to explicate how the 50 contributing authors conceived of LX as evidenced by the definitions, characteristics, parameters, and contexts found in their book chapters. Analysis of key terminology provides insight into the lexicon of prominent nomenclature used by this segment of the LX discourse community. Discussion is provided regarding the character of LX as a human-centric, theoretically grounded, and socioculturally sensitive approach to learning design that is informed by user experience (UX) methods. Findings may serve as a signpost for future researchers toward better conceptually defining and operationalizing LX, as well as better locating LX within the theoretical foundations of LDT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, D. (2020). Intentional learning design for educational games: A workflow supporting novices and experts. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/11_intentional_learn

  • Abras, C., Maloney-krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10/gfcsb9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2008). Learning objects, learning objectives, and learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10/fnsbb4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, K., Forssell, K., & Rosier, S. (2020). Theories of change in Learning Experience (LX) Design. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/ucd_methods_for_lx

  • Chang, Y. K., & Kuwata, J. (2020). Learning experience design: Challenges for novice designers. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/LXD_challenges

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284. https://doi.org/10/ds968s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. (2018). Learning design and open education. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 1(1) https://doi.org/10/ggxvq4

  • Dalziel, J., et al. (2016). The Larnaca declaration on learning design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(7), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com/books?id=GTMrDwAAQBAJ

  • Gray, C. M. (2020). Paradigms of knowledge production in human-computer interaction: Towards a framing for learner experience (LX) design. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/paradigms_in_hci

  • Gregg, A., et al. (2020). Think-aloud observations to improve online course design: A case example and “How-to” guide. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/15_think_aloud_obser

  • Guzdial, M., Kafai, Y. B., Carroll, J. M., Fischer, G., Schank, R., & Soloway, E. (1995). Learner-centered system design: HCI perspective for the future. DIS ‘95, 143–147. https://doi.org/10/dfwn4p

  • Honebein, P. C., & Honebein, C. H. (2015). Effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal: Pick any two? The influence of learning domains and learning outcomes on designer judgments of useful instructional methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 937–955. https://doi.org/10/gg5wx3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, H., Manderveld, J., Tattersall, C., & Koper, R. (2004). Educational modelling language and learning design: New opportunities for instructional reusability and personalized learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10/bs7cjs

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO/DIS Standard No. 9241–210). https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html

  • Jahnke, I., Schmidt, M., Pham, M., & Singh, K. (2020). Sociotechnical-pedagogical usability for designing and evaluating learner experience in technology-enhanced environments. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/sociotechnical_pedagogical_usability

  • Kimmons, R. (2020). Color theory in experience design. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/color_theory

  • Koper, R. (2005). An introduction to learning design. In R. Koper & C. Tattersall (Eds.), Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training (pp. 3–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27360-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174. https://doi.org/10/dtzfj3

  • Law, E. L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., & Kort, J. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: A survey approach. CHI ’09, 719–728. https://doi.org/10/dxtf84

  • Lowenthal, P., & Wilson, B. G. (2010). Labels DO matter! A critique of AECT’s redefinition of the field. TechTrends, 54(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10/b839j7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. (2002). Dare we define user-interface design? Interactions, 9(5), 19–24. https://doi.org/10/br9cz4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, K. S., Watanabe, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2020). The design implementation framework: Guiding principles for the redesign of a reading comprehension intelligent tutoring system. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/9_the_design_impleme

  • Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10/fnvdjr

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates (CRC Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oprean, D., & Balakrishnan, B. (2020). From engagement to user experience: A theoretical perspective towards immersive learning. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrived from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/10_from_engagement_t

  • Quintana, R. M., Haley, S. R., Magyar, N., & Tan, Y. (2020). Integrating learner and user experience design: A bidirectional approach. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/integrating_lxd_and_uxd

  • Raza, A., Penuel, W. R., Jacobs, J., & Sumner, T. (2020). Supporting equity in schools: Using visual learning analytics to understand learners’ classroom experiences. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/supporting_school_equity

  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional-design theories and models, volume III: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M., Earnshaw, Y., Tawfik, A. A., & Jahnke, I. (2020a). Methods of user centered design and evaluation for learning designers. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/ucd_methods_for_lx

  • Schmidt, M., Tawfik, A., Jahnke, I., & Earnshaw, Y. (Eds.). (2020b). Learner and user experience research: An introduction for the field of Learning Design & Technology. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux

  • Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36–48. https://doi.org/10/d2kw7v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vann, S. W., & Tawfik, A. A. (2020). Flow theory and learning experience design in gamified learning environments. In Learner and user experience research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/flow_theory_and_lxd

  • Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223. https://doi.org/10/c7p4bt

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Schmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schmidt, M., Huang, R. (2021). Current and Evolving Views of Learner Experience from the Field of Learning Design and Technology. In: Hokanson, B., Exter, M., Grincewicz, A., Schmidt, M., Tawfik, A.A. (eds) Learning: Design, Engagement and Definition. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85078-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85078-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85077-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85078-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics