Skip to main content

Is Drug Patent Protection a Determinant of the Location of Pharmaceutical FDI? China’s Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation, Catch-up and Sustainable Development

Abstract

The economic literature reveals that the relationship between patents and Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) depends on industries and countries’ features. Our research considers the pharmaceutical industry in China. This choice stems from a contradictory observation: China is known for its important imitation capacities, but at the same time, it is becoming one of the most attractive destinations to technology intensive FDI, for instance, pharmaceutical FDI. To explore whether patent protection plays a role in attracting pharmaceutical FDI in China we conduct a documentary analysis over the 1980–2015 period. Data is compiled from specialized press and international and national economic institutions (such as the World Trade Organization-WTO and the Chinese Intellectual Property Office—SIPO). Using these statistics, we construct a composite index measuring the pharmaceutical patent protection in China (PPP index) to analyze its correlation with inward pharmaceutical FDI. For a better reliability of the results, the study considers only the forms of FDI that are—according to economic literature—the most sensitive to patent protection, i.e., drugs producing and/or research and development (R&D) FDI. Our analysis suggests that enhancing drug patent protection could have had a positive impact on inward pharmaceutical FDI in China, especially R&D subsidiaries. However, this impact is conditioned by the existence of other advantages for FDI location such as the development of technology parks and the knowledge-based human capital policy. Hence, drug patent protection would be a determinant for attracting pharmaceutical FDI provided that it is a part of a strong innovation system and active innovation policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ownership, Location, Internalization.

References

  • Aho, E. (2013). Les déterminants des investissements directs étrangers dans la Communauté des Etats de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (CEDEAO), Revue d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, Volume 3 – Numéro 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, D., & Yang, D. (2000). Intellectual Property law, technology flow and licensing opportunities in China. International Business Review, 9(4), 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEIC. (2017). China foreign direct investment. CEIC Institutional Investor Company. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/china/foreign-direct-investment

  • Combe, E., & Pfister, E. (2001). Le Renforcement International des Droits de Propriété Intellectuelle, Economie Internationale, La Revue du CEPII, N°85, Premier Trimestre 2001, pp 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coriat, B., & Orsi, F. (2004). Les Enjeux de L’Innovation. Droits de Propriété Intellectuelle et Innovation. Cahiers Français, N°323, pp. 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drug Patent Watch. (2017). Profile for patents. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/

  • Fai, F. M. (2005). Using intellectual property data to analyze china’s growing technological capabilities. World Patent Information, 27, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrantino, M. J. (1993). The effect of intellectual property rights on international trade and investment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 129, 300–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, C. (1997). Intellectual property rights and US and German international transactions in manufacturing industries. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 9, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26(3), 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (2002). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 56, 387–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, E., Yaqub, O., & Diepeveen, S. (2010). Intellectual property and developing countries: A review of literature. RAND Corporation prepared for the UK Intellectual Property Office and the UK Department for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • IHEST. (2015). « L’industrie pharmaceutique, l’innovation et la Chine ». Institut des Hautes Études pour la Sciences et la Technologie, Septembre 2015. http://www.ihest.fr/IMG/pdf/l_industrie_pharmaceutique_en_chine_maj_2015_final.pdf

  • IRACM. (2017). Définition de la falsification de médicaments. Institut International de Recherche Anti-contrefaçon des médicaments. http://www.iracm.com/falsification/definition/

  • Kirkilis, D., & Koboti, S. (2015). Intellectual property rights as determinant of foreign direct investment entry mode: The case of Greece. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (2000). Explaining the geography and depth of international production: The case of US and Japanese multinational enterprises. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 136(3), 442–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Croix, S. J., & Liu, M. (2014). A cross-country index of intellectual property rights in pharmaceutical inventions. Research Policy, 44, 206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre, M. (2007) « Les différentes formes de délocalisations ». https://www.mlasserre.com/educpop/dossierdelocs/lesdifferentesformesdedelocalisations.htm

  • Lee, J.-Y., & Mansfield, E. (1996). Intellectual property protection and U.S. foreign direct investment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEEM. (2019). Les entreprise du médicament. https://www.leem.org/marche-mondial

  • Lesser, W. (2000) The effects of TRIPS mandated intellectual property rights on economic activities in developing countries. Cornell University/WIPO. http://www.wipo.org/about-ip/en/index.html?wipo_content_frame=/aboutip/en/studies/index.html

  • Lesser, W. (2011). Measuring intellectual property ‘strength’ and effects: An assessment of patent scoring systems and causality. The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law, 4(2), 345–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippoldt, D., & Park, W. G. (2003). The impact of trade-related intellectual property rights on trade and foreign direct investment in developing countries. OECD working papers: Special Issue on trade policy, 4(11), 294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. H. (2016). Intellectual property rights, FDI, R&D and economic growth: a cross-country empirical analysis. The World Economy, 39(7), 983–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, T. K., Lian, B. A., York, P., & Kubic, T. A. (2015). Counterfeit drug penetration into global legitimate medicine supply chains: A global assessment. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 92, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskus, K. E. (1998). The role of intellectual property rights in encouraging foreign direct investment and technology transfer. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 9(1), 109–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskus, K. E. (2004). Encouraging International Technology Transfer, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskus, K. E., & Eby-Konan, D. (1994). Trade-related intellectual property rights: Issues and exploratory results. In A. V. Deardorff & R. M. Stern (Eds.), Analytical and negotiation issues in the global trading system. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair-Reichert, U. (2000). Patent regimes and the internationalization of economic activities: Some empirical evidence from US multinationals. Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noury, M. (2017). Après les paradis fiscaux, les « paradis » des essais cliniques ? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/apres-les-paradis-fiscaux-les-paradis-des-essais-cliniques-86375

  • Park, W. G., & Lippoldt, D. C. (2005). International licensing and the strengthening of intellectual property rights in developing countries during the 1990s. OECD Economic Studies, 2005(1), 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, E. (2003). Propriété Intellectuelle et Choix de Localisation. Une Modélisation Théorique. Revue Économique, 54(3), 697–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, E., & Mayer, T. (2001). Investissements Directs et Droits de Propriété Intellectuelles dans les Pays En Voie de Développement. Une Étude Empirique des Choix de Localisation des Multinationales Françaises. Revue Région et Développement, 13, 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratomo, M., & Hastiadi, F. F. (2017). Patent Rights protection system and foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 126, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primo-Braga, C. A., & Fink, C. (1998). The relationship between intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 9, 163–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugatch, N. P. (2006). Measuring the strength of national pharmaceutical intellectual property regimes: Creating a new pharmaceutical IP index. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 16(4), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. T. & Rozek, R. P. (1990). Benefits and costs of intellectual property protection in developing countries. National Economic Research Associations, Inc., Working Paper No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, J. (2013). « La contrefaçon des produits de santé dans le monde: moyens de lutte et implication du pharmacien d’officine », Thèse de Doctorat Es science pharmaceutiques et ingénierie de la santé, soutenue publiquement le 26 Avril 2013, Universités Angers, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggi, K. (2000). Trade, Foreign direct investment, and international technology transfer: A survey. World Trade Organization, WT/WGTI/W/88, 19 September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samedan Ltd. (2011). International clinical trials. Samedan Pharmaceutical Publisher. http://www.samedanltd.com/magazine/13/issue/162/article/3073

  • Seyoum, B. (1996). The impact of intellectual property rights on foreign direct investment. Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(1), 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smarzynska, B. (2002). Composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. World Bank working papers, WP No. 2786, February, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarzynska Javorcik, B. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. J. (1999). Are weak patent rights a barrier to U.S. exports? Journal of International Economics, 48, 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. J. (2001). How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? Journal of International Economics, 55, 411–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigarelli, F., & Wei, H. (2014). The Chinese pharmaceutical market: Driving forces and emerging trends. L’Industria, Rivista di Economia e Politica Industrial, 35(3), 505–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H., & Iwaisako, T. (2014). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A welfare analysis. European Economic Review, 67, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzunidis, D. (2010). Innovation et Proximité: Entreprises, Entrepreneurs et Milieux Innovateurs. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 241, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2013). Intellectual property protection in China. International Information & Library Review, 36(3), 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIPO. (2020). Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle dans le monde, différents rapports. http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/fr/

  • Yacoub, L., & Yacoub, N. (2011) « Quelles politiques d’attractivité ? Les Déterminants de la localisation des investissements directs étrangers pharmaceutiques en Tunisie. ». In Uzunidis D, Laperche B, Boutillier S (Eds) « L’Entreprise dans la Mondialisation. Contexte et Dynamiques d’Investissement et de Développement », 536p, Éditions LeManuscrit, Paris, pp. 405–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacoub, N. (2007). « Renforcement de la Protection des Brevets, Impact sur les Flux Mondiaux de Commerce et d’Investissements Directs Étrangers. Étude Théorique et Validation Empirique pour L’économie Chinoise », Mémoire de Master de Recherche en Économie, soutenu publiquement le 23 Janvier 2007, Institut Supérieur de Gestion de Sousse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacoub, N. (2012). « Brevetabilité des Médicaments et Innovation Pharmaceutique. Étude Théorique et Validation Empirique pour le cas de la Tunisie », Thèse de Doctorat en Économie de l’innovation, soutenue publiquement le 27 Janvier 2012, Université de Lille Nord de France & Université de Tunis el Manar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacoub, N. (2017). The role of public policies in building up a national pharmaceutical innovation system in Tunisia: Challenges after the Jasmine Revolution. In A. Tsvetkova et al. (Eds.), Innovation in developing and transition countries (pp. 68–85). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. (2003). The development of intellectual property in China. World Patent Information, 25, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yacoub, N., Souei, H. (2021). Is Drug Patent Protection a Determinant of the Location of Pharmaceutical FDI? China’s Experience. In: Pyka, A., Lee, K. (eds) Innovation, Catch-up and Sustainable Development. Economic Complexity and Evolution. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84931-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics