Skip to main content

Designer Drugs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Substance and Non-Substance Related Addictions

Abstract

Substance use, for the most part, encompasses plant products and diverted pharmaceuticals. Other substances called designer drugs, novel psychoactive substances (bath salts/flakka, spice/K2/Bombay Blue, pinky, N-bomb), possess similar chemical structures or pharmacological profiles to known or familiar substance use. According to the Monitoring the Future Survey of 2019, 3.3% of high school seniors used synthetic cannabinoids in the past year, 2.2% of them used methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (ecstasy/molly) and 4.6% of them used hallucinogens. The chemical properties of designer drugs are uncertain, posing a challenge to detect or identify them accurately. The risk of cardiac arrest, coma, cognitive impairment, and death is not uncommon among users. In this chapter, we will discuss several typical designer drug classes: synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic stimulants, synthetic hallucinogens, and synthetic opioids. We will cover their mechanism of action, metabolism, mode of detection, potential treatment, and management as well as their adverse reactions and life-threatening consequences, which are critical keys to mitigating potential dire health consequences associated with these substances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Algren DA, Monteilh CP, Punja M, Schier JG, Belson M, Hepler BR, et al. Fentanyl-associated fatalities among illicit drug users in Wayne County, Michigan (July 2005–May 2006). J Med Toxicol. 2013;9(1):106–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Banister SD, Stuart J, Kevin RC, Edington A, Longworth M, Wilkinson SM, et al. Effects of bioisosteric fluorine in synthetic cannabinoid designer drugs JWH-018, AM-2201, UR-144, XLR-11, PB-22, 5F-PB-22, APICA, and STS-135. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;6(8):1445–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumann MH, Ayestas MA Jr, Partilla JS, Sink JR, Shulgin AT, Daley PF, et al. The designer methcathinone analogs, mephedrone and methylone, are substrates for monoamine transporters in brain tissue. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(5):1192.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumann MH, Partilla JS, Lehner KR. Psychoactive “bath salts”: not so soothing. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;698(1–3):1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumann MH, Partilla JS, Lehner KR, Thorndike EB, Hoffman AF, Holy M, et al. Powerful cocaine-like actions of 3, 4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), a principal constituent of psychoactive ‘bath salts’ products. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(4):552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowdle TA. Adverse effects of opioid agonists and agonist-antagonists in anaesthesia. Drug Saf. 1998;19(3):173–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyer EW. Management of opioid analgesic overdose. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(2):146–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brewer TL, Collins M. A review of clinical manifestations in adolescent and young adults after use of synthetic cannabinoids. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2014;19(2):119–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carhart-Harris RL, King LA, Nutt DJ. A web-based survey on mephedrone. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;118(1):19–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chahl LA. Opioids-mechanisms of action. Aust Prescr. 1996;19(3):63–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chimalakonda KC, Bratton SM, Le VH, Yiew KH, Dineva A, Moran CL, et al. Conjugation of synthetic cannabinoids JWH-018 and JWH-073, metabolites by human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39(10):1967–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins M. Some new psychoactive substances: precursor chemicals and synthesis-driven end-products. Drug Test Anal. 2011;3(7–8):404–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper ZD. Adverse effects of synthetic cannabinoids: management of acute toxicity and withdrawal. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18(5):52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Crowther SM, Reynolds LA, Tansey EM. The medicalization of cannabis. London, UK: Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine; 2010. p. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dargan PI, Albert S, Wood DM. Mephedrone use and associated adverse effects in school and college/university students before the UK legislation change. QJM Int J Med. 2010;103(11):875–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dean BV, Stellpflug SJ, Burnett AM, Engebretsen KM. 2C or not 2C: phenethylamine designer drug review. J Med Toxicol. 2013;9(2):172–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dolengevich-Segal H, Rodríguez-Salgado B, Gómez-Arnau J, Sánchez-Mateos D. Severe psychosis, drug dependence, and hepatitis C related to slamming mephedrone. Case Rep Psychiatry. 2016;2016:8379562.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Drug Enforcement Administration - Department of Justice. 2015. FY 2015 Performance Budget Congressional Submission. Retrieeved from https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/jmd/legacy/2013/10/13/dea-justification.pdf.

  19. Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice. Schedules of controlled substances: temporary placement of three synthetic cathinones in Schedule I. Final Order. Federal register. 2011;76(204):65371.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fantegrossi WE, Murnane KS, Reissig CJ. The behavioral pharmacology of hallucinogens. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75(1):17–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fantegrossi WE, Moran JH, Radominska-Pandya A, Prather PL. Distinct pharmacology and metabolism of K2 synthetic cannabinoids compared to Δ9-THC: mechanism underlying greater toxicity? Life Sci. 2014;97(1):45–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Froberg BA, Levine M, Beuhler MC, Judge BS, Moore PW, Engebretsen KM, et al. Acute methylenedioxypyrovalerone toxicity. J Med Toxicol. 2015;11(2):185–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garcia-Romeu A, Kersgaard B, Addy PH. Clinical applications of hallucinogens: a review. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016;24(4):229–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibbons, S., & Arunotayanun, W. (2013). Natural product (fungal and herbal) novel psychoactive substances. In Novel psychoactive substances. Academic Press. pp. 345–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gourlay GK, Kowalski SR, Plummer JL, Cousins MJ, Armstrong PJ. Fentanyl blood concentration-analgesic response relationship in the treatment of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(4):329–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harrison Cook. 2018. FDA approves opioid 10 times stronger than fentanyl.Retrieved from https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/opioids/fda-approves-opioid-stronger-than-fentanyl.html.

  27. Hill SL, Thomas SH. Clinical toxicology of newer recreational drugs. Clin Toxicol. 2011;49(8):705–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hill SL, Doris T, Gurung S, Katebe S, Lomas A, Dunn M, et al. Severe clinical toxicity associated with analytically confirmed recreational use of 25I–NBOMe: case series. Clin Toxicol. 2013;51(6):487–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Holm NB, Nielsen LM, Linnet K. CYP3A4 mediates oxidative metabolism of the synthetic cannabinoid AKB-48. AAPS J. 2015;17(5):1237–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Holpuchin A. 2018. 'It's not just New Haven': mass K2 overdose symptom of national crisis. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/aug/17/k2-spice-synthetic-marijuana-new-haven-green-overdose.

  31. Hu X, Primack BA, Barnett TE, Cook RL. College students and use of K2: an emerging drug of abuse in young persons. Subst Abuse Treat Prevent Policy. 2011;6(1):16.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Iversen L, White M, Treble R. Designer psychostimulants: pharmacology and differences. Neuropharmacology. 2014;87:59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Izaguirre A, Parascandola R, Rayman G. 2016. Thirty-three people treated in Brooklyn from possible K2 synthetic marijuana overdoses; scene compared to 'The Walking Dead'. New York daily news. Retrieved from https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/multiple-people-hospitalized-k-2-overdoses-article-1.2708254.

  34. Johnson LA, Johnson RL, Portier RB. Current “legal highs”. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(6):1108–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Miech RA. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2013. Volume 2, college students & adults ages 19–55. Institute for Social Research. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Khan S, Shaheen F, Sarwar H, Molina J, Mushtaq S. “Bath salts”–induced psychosis in a young woman. The primary care companion for CNS disorders. 2013;15(1).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kelly, J. P. (2011). Cathinone derivatives: a review of their chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology. Drug testing and analysis, 3(7-8), 439-453.\.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kerrigan S, Savage M, Cavazos C, Bella P. Thermal degradation of synthetic cathinones: implications for forensic toxicology. J Anal Toxicol. 2016;40(1):1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kukanich B, Clark TP. The history and pharmacology of fentanyl: relevance to a novel, long-acting transdermal fentanyl solution newly approved for use in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:3–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Maxwell JC. Psychoactive substances—some new, some old: a scan of the situation in the US. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;134:71–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mechoulam R, Feigenbaum JJ, Lander N, Segal M, Järbe TUC, Hiltunen AJ, Consroe P. Enantiomeric cannabinoids: stereospecificity of psychotropic activity. Experientia. 1988;44(9):762–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mechoulam R, Lander N, Zahalka J. Synthesis of the individual, pharmacologically distinct, enantiomers of a tetrahydrocannabinol derivative. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 1990;1(5):315–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Meyer RP, Gehlhaus M, Knoth R, Volk B. Expression and function of cytochrome p450 in brain drug metabolism. Curr Drug Metab. 2007;8(4):297–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mills B, Yepes A, Nugent K. Synthetic cannabinoids. Am J Med Sci. 2015;350(1):59–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nelson L, Schwaner R. Transdermal fentanyl: pharmacology and toxicology. J Med Toxicol. 2009;5(4):230.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nichols DE, Frescas SP, Chemel BR, Rehder KS, Zhong D, Lewin AH. High specific activity tritium-labeled N-(2-methoxybenzyl)-2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenethylamine (INBMeO): a high-affinity 5-HT2A receptor-selective agonist radioligand. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16(11):6116–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Palamar JJ, Salomone A, Vincenti M, Cleland CM. Detection of “bath salts” and other novel psychoactive substances in hair samples of ecstasy/MDMA/ “Molly” users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;161:200–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Papaseit E, Pérez-Mañá C, Mateus JA, Pujadas M, Fonseca F, Torrens M, et al. Human pharmacology of mephedrone in comparison with MDMA. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(11):2704.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Peiper NC, Clarke SD, Vincent LB, Ciccarone D, Kral AH, Zibbell JE. Fentanyl test strips as an opioid overdose prevention strategy: findings from a syringe services program in the southeastern United States. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;63:122–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pertwee RG. Cannabinoid pharmacology: the first 66 years. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(S1):S163–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Rafaeli JS. 2017. The story of Mephedrone, the party drug that boomed and went bust. Vice magazine. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9aa53a/the-story-of-mephedrone-the-party-drug-that-boomed-and-went-bust.

  52. Reschly-Krasowski JM, Krasowski MD. A difficult challenge for the clinical laboratory: accessing and interpreting manufacturer cross-reactivity data for immunoassays used in urine drug testing. Acad Pathol. 2018;5:2374289518811797. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289518811797.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Shulgin AT, Shulgin A. PIHKAL: a chemical love story. Berkeley: Transform Press; 1995. p. 733–9.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Simmons J, Cookman L, Kang C, Skinner C. Three cases of “spice” exposure. Clin Toxicol. 2011;49(5):431–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Sivagnanam K, Chaudari D, Lopez P, Sutherland ME, Ramu VK. “Bath salts” induced severe reversible cardiomyopathy. Am J Case Rep. 2013;14:288.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Spiller HA, Ryan ML, Weston RG, Jansen J. Clinical experience with and analytical confirmation of “bath salts” and “legal highs” (synthetic cathinones) in the United States. Clin Toxicol. 2011;49(6):499–505.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Stanley TH. The history and development of the fentanyl series. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1992;7(3):S3–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Su MK, Seely KA, Moran JH, Hoffman RS. Metabolism of classical cannabinoids and the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97(6):562–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2011. The DAWN report: highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/DAWN2k11ED/DAWN2k11ED/DAWN2k11ED.pdf.

  60. Taba P, Lees AJ, Sikk K. The neuropsychiatric complications of stimulant abuse, vol. 120. Burlington: Academic Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Thornton SL, Gerona RR, Tomaszewski CA. Psychosis from a bath salt product containing flephedrone and MDPV with serum, urine, and product quantification. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8(3):310–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2013. "The challenge of new psychoactive substances: a report from the Global SMART Programme" (Vienna, Austria: UNODC Laboratory and Scientific Section, March 2013), pp. 10–11. Retrieved from http://www.unodc.org/documents...

  63. United Nations Office on Drugs, & Crime. 2011. 2011 World Drug Report.Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/Synthetic_Cannabinoids.pdfpdf.

  64. United Nations Office on Drugs, & Crime. 2016. 2016 world drug report. United Naetions Publications. Retrieved from http://www.unodc.org/doc/wdr2016/WORLD_DRUG_REPORT_2016_web.pdf.

  65. Vardakou I, Pistos C, Spiliopoulou C. Drugs for youth via internet and the example of mephedrone. Toxicol Lett. 2011;201(3):191–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Watanabe K, Itokawa Y, Yamaori S, Funahashi T, Kimura T, Kaji T, et al. Conversion of cannabidiol to Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and related cannabinoids in artificial gastric juice, and their pharmacological effects in mice. Forensic Toxicol. 2007;25(1):16–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Weaver MF, Schnoll SH. Addictions: a comprehensive guidebook. In: Stimulants: amphetamines and cocaine. New York: Oxford University Press USA; 1999. p. 105–20.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Weaver MF, Hopper JA, Gunderson EW. Designer drugs 2015: assessment and management. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2015;10(1):8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Weaver M, Schnoll S. Hallucinogens and club drugs. In: The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of substance abuse treatment. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc; 2008. p. 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Winstock A, Mitcheson L, Ramsey J, Davies S, Puchnarewicz M, Marsden J. Mephedrone: use, subjective effects and health risks. Addiction. 2011;106(11):1991–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zaami S, Giorgetti R, Pichini S, Pantano F, Marinelli E, Busardo FP. Synthetic cathinones related fatalities: an update. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(1):268–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zawilska JB, Wojcieszak J. Designer cathinones—an emerging class of novel recreational drugs. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;231(1–3):42–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neelambika Revadigar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Revadigar, N., Yu, C.T., Silverstone-Simard, I. (2022). Designer Drugs. In: Akerele, E. (eds) Substance and Non-Substance Related Addictions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84834-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84834-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84833-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84834-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics