Abstract
We prefer the transfemoral approach in a modified Wagner technique as an extended approach to femoral revision procedures. This technique is described in detail in this chapter, and the advantages and disadvantages of our technique compared to others are discussed. In our opinion, the transfemoral approach is indicated for the controlled removal of broken endoprosthetic stems, for the presence of significantly thinned bone at risk of fracture, for removal of a stable cement mantle or a partially fixed cementless prosthetic stem with a coarse, rough surface structure, and for revising infected, firmly seated total hip endoprostheses. It has the advantage of enabling adequate bony healing of the flap, avoiding unintentional fractures and perforations, protecting the vasto-gluteal sling and the gluteus medius muscle, saving time in difficult situations, and allowing bone remodeling of the femur induced by callus formation. Possible problems and the management of potential complications are also discussed in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Lerch M, van Lewinski G, Windhagen H, Thorey F. Revision of total hip arthroplasty: clinical outcome of extended trochanteric osteotomy and intraoperative femoral fracture. Technol Health Care. 2008;16:293–300.
Wolf JH. Julius Wolff und sein Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Orthopäde. 1995;24:378–86.
MacDonald SJ, Cole C, Guerin J, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, McCalden RW. Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(417):210–216.
Paprosky WG, Martin EL. Cemented stem failure requires extended trochanteric osteotomy. Orthopedics. 2003;26:28–38.
Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M. A modified transfemoral approach using modular cementless revision stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:105–14.
Fink B. Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts. Int J Med Sci. 2009;6:287–95.
Firestone TP, Hedley EL. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy for severe acetabular protrusion following total hip arthroplasty: a technical note. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:344–5.
Fink B. The transfemoral approach for controlled removal of well-fixed femoral stems in hip revision surgery. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:33–7.
Meek RM, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP. Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:480–5.
Park YS, Moon YM, Lim SJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:993–9.
McInnis DP, Horne G, Devane PA. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem. Seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:372–80.
Pretterklieber B, Pablik E, Dorfmeister K, Pretterklieber KL. There are no safe areas for avoiding the perforating arteries along the proximal part of the femur: a word of caution. Clin Anat. 2020;33:507–15.
Wagner H. Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk bei schwerem Knochenverlust. Orthopäde. 1987;16:295–300.
Wagner H. Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk. Orthopäde. 1989;18:438–53.
Wagner H, Wagner M. Femur-Revisionsprothese. Z Orthop. 1993;131:574–7.
Wagner H, Wagner M. Hüftprothesenwechsel mit der Femur-Revisionsprothese. Erfahrungen von 10 Jahren. Med Orthop Tech. 1997;117:138–48.
Fink B, Grossmann A. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007;19:32–55.
Warren PJ, Thompson P, Flechter MDA. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122:557–60.
Goldstein WM, Gleason TF, Kopplin M, Branson JJ. Prevalence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty through a posterolateral approach with partial capsulotomy and capsulorrhaphy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A Suppl 2(Pt 1):2–7.
Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(355):224–8.
White RE Jr, Forness TJ, Allman JK, Junick DW. Effect of posterior capsular repair on early dislocation in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393):163–7.
Miner TM, Momberger NG, Chong D, Paprosky WL. The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:188–94.
Wagner M, Knorr-Held F, Hohmann D. Measuring stability of wire cerclage in femoral fractures when performing total hip replacement. In vitro study on a standardized bone model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115:33–7.
Schab JH, Camacho J, Kaufman K, Chen Q, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT. Optimal fixation fort he extended trochanteric osteotomy: a pilot study comparing 3 cables ves. 2 cables. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:534–8.
Zhu U, Ding H, Shao H, Zhou Y, Wang G. An in-vitro biomechanical study of different fixation techniques for the extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA. J Orthop Surg Res. 2013;8:7.
Wilkes RA, Birch J, Pearse MF, Lee M, Atkins RM. The Wagner technique for revision arthroplasty of the hip: a review of 24 cases. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1994;7:196–8.
Mei XY, Gong YJ, Safir OA, Gross AE, Kuzyk PR. Fixation options following greater trochanter osteotomies and fractures in total hip arthroplasty: a systemic review. J Bone Joint Surg Rev. 2018;6:e4.
Abdel MP, Wyles CC, Viste A, Perry KI, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty. Contemporary outcomes of 612 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103:162–73.
Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A:1215–9.
Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Paprosky WG. Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:2385–90.
Glassman AH. Exposure for revision: total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(420):39–47.
Huffman GR, Ries MD. Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:273–7.
Mardones R, Gonzalez C, Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:79–83.
Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:329–38.
Peters PC Jr, Head WC, Emerson RH Jr. An extended trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75-B:158–9.
Morshed S, Huffman R, Ries MD. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for 2-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:294–301.
Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE. Modified extended trochanteric osteotomy with preservation of posterior structures. Hip Int. 2010;20:102–8.
Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lee P, Gross AE. The long modified extended sliding trochanteric osteotomy. Int Orthop. 2011;35:13–7.
Levine BR, Della Valle CJ, Lewis P, et al. Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:527–33.
Charity J, Tsiridis E, Gusmao D, Bauze A, Timperley J, Gie G. Extended trochanteric osteotomy followed by cemented impaction allografting in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:154–60.
Hartwig C-H, Böhm P, Czech U, Reize P, Küsswetter W. The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115:5–9.
Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:187–97.
Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop. 2000;24:139–42.
Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem. Evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:1023–31.
Böhm P, Bischel O. The uncemented diaphyseal fixation of femoral revision stems in case of large bone defects—analysis of twelve years experience with the Wagner SL revision stem. Z Orthop. 2001;139:229–39.
De Menezes DFA, Le Béguec P, Sieber HP, Goldschild M. Stem and osteotomy length are critical for success of the transfemoral approach and cementless stem revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:883–8.
Fink B, Oremek D. The transfemoral approach for removal of well-fixed femoral stems in two-stage septic hip revision. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1065–71.
Lim SJ, Moon YW, Park YS. Is extended trochanteric osteotomy safe for use in 2-stage revision of periprosthetic hip infection? J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1067–71.
Levine BR, Della Valle CJ, Hamming M, Sporer SM, Berger RA, Paprosky WG. Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:49–55.
Fink B, Grossmann A, Singer J. Hip revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B2 and B3. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:206–11.
Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW Jr. Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393):181–193.
Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case of porous-coated hip implants: the femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(261):63–81.
Beals RK, Tower SS. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(327):238–246.
Sledge JB 3rd, Abiri A. An algorithm for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:887–92.
O’Shea K, Quinlan JF, Kutty S, et al. The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87-B:1617–21.
Ko PS, Lam JJ, Tio MK, et al. Distal fixation with Wagner revision stem in treating Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures in geriatric patients. J Arthroplasty. 2003;13:446–52.
Mulay S, Hassan T, Birtwistle S, et al. Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:751–6.
Drexler M, Dwyer T, Chakravertty R, Backstein D, Gross AE, Safir O. The outcome of modified extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1598–604.
Ladurner A, Zurmühle P, Zdravkovic V, Grob K. Modified extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:2487–95.
Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M. Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:65–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fink, B. (2022). Technical Implementation of the Transfemoral Approach. In: Femoral Revision Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84821-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84821-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84820-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84821-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)