Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-Cultural Considerations in Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Quality of Life in Cancer

Abstract

With the world becoming a global village, it is imperative for healthcare providers (HCPs) to provide patient-centered care in a culturally competent way to improve patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Cancer care is no exception, with HCPs having to navigate through difficult topics of breaking the diagnosis, treatment options, pain management, and at times end-of-life care, not just with the patient but with their family as well.

The perception of HRQOL in cancer patients can vary across different cultures. It is, therefore, vital to have research instruments that cater to the diverse patient population. Developing new culture-specific questionnaires or adaptation of existing survey instruments are different approaches that can be utilized. The process of translation and achieving cultural equivalence poses significant challenges, particularly in the absence of having standardized methodologies.

This chapter highlights the influence of socio-cultural factors on the perceptions of cancer patients regarding their HRQOL. It will also highlight the challenges both HCPs and researchers face while encountering cancer patients belonging to different cultural backgrounds. In addition, it will also suggest ways to inculcate a culturally competent approach to providing healthcare and conducting research for such patients and their families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Betancourt J. Cultural competency: providing quality care to diverse populations. Consult Pharm. 2006;21:988–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McAuliffe M, Khadria B, Bauloz C. World migration report 2020. Geneva: IOM; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi SK, Strohschein FJ, Saraf G, Loiselle CG. Communication in cancer care: psycho-social, interactional, and cultural issues. A general overview and the example of India. Front Psychol. 2014; https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01332.

  4. Rochmawati E, Wiksuarini E, Rahmah R. Depression and quality of life among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Palliat Med Pract. 2020;1:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen CH, Tang ST, Chen CH. Meta-analysis of cultural differences in Western and Asian patient-perceived barriers to managing cancer pain. Palliat Med. 2012;26:206–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, De Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, Van Kleef M, Patijn J. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1437–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bates MS. Ethnicity and pain: a biocultural model. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24:47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Atiyyat NMH. Cultural diversity and cancer pain. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2009;11:154–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crombez P, Bron D, Michiels S. Multicultural approaches of cancer pain. Curr Opin Oncol. 2019;31:268–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pillay T, van Zyl HA, Blackbeard D. Chronic pain perception and cultural experience. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;113:151–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lovering S. Cultural attitudes and beliefs about pain. J Transcult Nurs. 2006;17:389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamilton JB, Galbraith KV, Best NC, Worthy VC, Moore LTCAD. African-American cancer survivors’ use of religious beliefs to positively influence the utilization of cancer care. J Relig Health. 2015;54:1856–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai M, Lazenby M. A systematic review of associations between spiritual well-being and quality of life at the scale and factor levels in studies among patients with cancer. J Palliat Med. 2015;18:286–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peteet JR, Balboni MJ. Spirituality and religion in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:280–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koffman J, Morgan M, Edmonds P, Speck P, Higginson IJ. “I know he controls cancer”: the meanings of religion among Black Caribbean and White British patients with advanced cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:780–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsiao A-F, Wong MD, Goldstein MS, Yu H-J, Andersen RM, Brown ER, Becerra LM, Wenger NS. Variation in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use across racial/ethnic groups and the development of ethnic-specific measures of CAM use. J Altern Complement Med. 2006;12:281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gall A, Leske S, Adams J, Matthews V, Anderson K, Lawler S, Garvey G. Traditional and complementary medicine use among indigenous cancer patients in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: a systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018;17:568–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shahid S, Bleam R, Bessarab D, Thompson SC. “If you don’t believe it, it won’t help you”: use of bush medicine in treating cancer among aboriginal people in Western Australia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeba J, Jacob A, Kandasamy R, George R. The patient who ‘must not be told’: demographic factors associated with collusion in a retrospective study in South India. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92:659–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muckaden MA, Marathe M, Tulshan R, Carvalho M, Pinto M. Psychosocial issues faced by women with incurable cervical cancer in India-how can we help? Indian J Palliat Care. 2005;11:94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaturvedi SK, Loiselle CG, Chandra PS. Communication with relatives and collusion in palliative care: a cross-cultural perspective. Indian J Palliat Care. 2009;15:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jacob J, Palat G, Verghese N, Chandran P, Rapelli V, Kumari S, Malhotra C, Teo I, Finkelstein E, Ozdemir S. Health-related quality of life and its socio-economic and cultural predictors among advanced cancer patients: evidence from the APPROACH cross-sectional survey in Hyderabad-India. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shubha R. End-of-life care in the Indian context: the need for cultural sensitivity. Indian J Palliat Care. 2007;13:59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Victor A, George CE, Inbaraj LR, Norman G. Benefit or harm? A study on impact of collusion on the quality of life among palliative care patients. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018;24:61.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Montazeri A, Tavoli A, Mohagheghi MA, Roshan R, Tavoli Z. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis and quality of life in cancer patients: should it be the same everywhere? BMC Cancer. 2009;9:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Granek L, Nakash O, Ariad S, Shapira S, Ben-David MA. The role of culture/ethnicity in communicating with cancer patients about mental health distress and suicidality. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2020;44(2):214–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mosher CE, DuHamel KN, Egert J, Smith MY. Self-efficacy for coping with cancer in a multiethnic sample of breast cancer patients: associations with barriers to pain management and distress. Clin J Pain. 2010;26:227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiener L, McConnell DG, Latella L, Ludi E. Cultural and religious considerations in pediatric palliative care. Palliat Support Care. 2013;11:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Beach MC, Saha S, Cooper LA. The role and relationship of cultural competence and patient-centeredness in health care quality. Citeseer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bosma H, Apland L, Kazanjian A. Cultural conceptualizations of hospice palliative care: more similarities than differences. Palliat Med. 2010;24:510–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Arruda-Colli MNF, Sansom-Daly U, dos Santos MA, Wiener L. Considerations for the cross-cultural adaptation of an advance care planning guide for youth with cancer. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2018;6:341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hagiwara N, Lafata JE, Mezuk B, Vrana SR, Fetters MD. Detecting implicit racial bias in provider communication behaviors to reduce disparities in healthcare: challenges, solutions, and future directions for provider communication training. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102:1738–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hall A, Nguyen SM, Mackenzie L, Sanson-Fisher R, Olver I, Thuan TV, Huong TT. What caused my cancer? Cancer patients’ perceptions on what may have contributed to the development of their cancer: a cross-sectional, cross-country comparison study. Cancer Contr. 2019;26:1073274819863786.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Green EC, Murphy EM, Gryboski K. The health belief model. In: The Wiley encyclopedia of health psychology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2020. p. 211–4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the Health Belief Model. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008;12:232–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kagawa-Singer M, Blackhall LJ. Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: you got to go where he lives. JAMA. 2001;286:2993–3001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hochbaum GM. Public participation in medical screening programs: a socio-psychological study. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service …; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenstock IM. What research in motivation suggests for public health. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1960;50:295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:354–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kirscht JP. The health belief model and illness behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Becker MH. The health belief model and sick role behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown O, Goliath V, van Rooyen DR, Aldous C, Marais LC. Strategies and challenges for communicating the diagnosis of cancer in cross-cultural clinical settings—perspectives from South African healthcare professionals. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2017;35:758–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Roider-Schur S, Rumpold T, Kirchheiner K, Masel EK, Nemecek R, Amering M, Watzke H, Schrank B. Migrate your mind: the role of palliative care in transcultural cancer treatment. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019;131:191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Prakash V, Shah S, Hariohm K. Cross-cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures: a solution or a problem? Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;62:174–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tripathy S, Myatra SN. Are the instruments for quality of life assessment comparable between cultures? No. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1746–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kuyken W, Orley J, Hudelson P, Sartorius N. Quality of life assessment across cultures. Int J Ment Health. 1994;23:5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Fitzpatrick R, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. II: design, analysis, and interpretation. BMJ: Br Med J. 1992;305:1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sinha D. The family scenario in a developing country and its implications for mental health: the case of India. In: Health and cross-cultural psychology: toward applications. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1988. p. 48–70.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Deyo RA. Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:569–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. WHOQOL – Measuring Quality of Life. The World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol. Accessed 31 Dec 2020.

  52. EORTC, the European Platform of Cancer Research. In: EORTC. https://www.eortc.org/. Accessed 4 Jan 2021.

  53. Aaronson NK, Bullinger M, Ahmedzai S. A modular approach to quality-of-life assessment in cancer clinical trials. In: Cancer clinical trials. Springer; 1988. p. 231–49.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:435–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Stevelink SAM, van Brakel WH. The cross-cultural equivalence of participation instruments: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1256–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. McKown S, Acquadro C, Anfray C, Arnold B, Eremenco S, Giroudet C, Martin M, Weiss D. Good practices for the translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of clinician-reported outcome, observer-reported outcome, and performance outcome measures. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4:89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Corless IB, Nicholas PK, Nokes KM. Issues in cross-cultural quality-of-life research. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33:15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Marshall PA. Cultural influences on perceived quality of life. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1990;6:278–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wagner AK, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, et al. Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: results from the IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:925–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N. Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:451–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hui CH, Triandis HC. Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison of strategies. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1985;16:131–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Acquadro C. Language and translation issues. In: Quality of life and pharmacoeconomice in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 575–85.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hunt SM. Cross-cultural comparability of quality of life measures. Drug Inf J. 1993;27:395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. “Equivalence” and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:237–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. In: Quality of life assessment: international perspectives. Springer; 1994. p. 3–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  68. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:369–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Bravo M, Woodbury-Fariña M, Canino GJ, Rubio-Stipec M. The Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) in Puerto Rico. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1993;17:329–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18:66–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lapin BR. Considerations for reporting and reviewing studies including health-related quality of life. Chest. 2020;158:S49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Rusticus S. Content Validity. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 1261–2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  73. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Leplege AP, Wilkin D. International use and application of generic health-related quality of life instruments. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 613–23.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Anderson RT, McFarlane M, Naughton MJ, Shumaker SA. Conceptual issues and considerations in cross-cultural validation of generic health-related quality of life instruments. In: Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 605–12.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Gill PS, Jones D. Cross-cultural adaptation of outcome measures. Eur J Gen Pract. 2000;6:120–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Epner DE, Baile WF. Patient-centered care: the key to cultural competence. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:iii33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Alizadeh S, Chavan M. Cultural competence dimensions and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Health Soc Care Community. 2016;24:e117–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing And Midwifery, Joint appointment Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

    Laila Akbar Ladak

  2. Honorary Faculty, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Laila Akbar Ladak

  3. The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

    Syeda Fatima Raza & Sadori Khawaja

Authors
  1. Laila Akbar Ladak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Syeda Fatima Raza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sadori Khawaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laila Akbar Ladak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK

    Angelos P. Kassianos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ladak, L.A., Raza, S.F., Khawaja, S. (2022). Cross-Cultural Considerations in Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer. In: Kassianos, A.P. (eds) Handbook of Quality of Life in Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84702-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84702-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84701-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84702-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation