Skip to main content

Cross-Cultural Observations on English and German Wikipedia Entries at the Interface of Convergence and Controversy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing Digital Discourses

Abstract

Wikipedia represents the largest online encyclopedia worldwide. Its participatory functions enable its users to create entries dynamically and collectively. This may lead not only to convergence, but also to conflict at the micro-level of the contributions of individual users and in the interaction at the meso-level of the Wikipedia community. This study analyses Wikipedia’s sites for negotiating convergence, conflict and identity, concentrating on two aspects. First, convergence and conflict at the macro-level of intercultural comparison are investigated using the example of the construction of concepts of nationalism, citizenship, identity and tribe in their English and German language versions. Second, the English articles serve as a basis to examine the types of convergence and conflict tendencies at the micro-level of the Talk-section. The findings are interpreted against the background of the identity construction of single authors and on the meso-level of the Wikipedia community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/wikipedia-statistics/, latest version: 21 February 2020, retrieved 7 April 2020.

  2. 2.

    https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/wikipedia-statistics/, retrieved 7 April 2020.

  3. 3.

    https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/wikipedia-statistics/, latest version: 21 February 2020, retrieved 7 April 2020.

  4. 4.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars, retrieved 20 March 2018.

  5. 5.

    https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/wikipedia-statistics/, latest version: 21 February 2020, retrieved 7 April 2020.

  6. 6.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nation&offset=20070412225842&limit=500&action=history, retrieved 15 April 2020.

  7. 7.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars, retrieved 20 March 2018.

  8. 8.

    This is different in the German Talk1-section, where the ideological framing of the article is hotly debated against the backdrop of the NPOV principle: both concepts are at least mentioned as historical developments, and Nationalsozialismus (contrasted to Nationalismus) even gets a separate sub-heading of a very short passage, which, however, does not elaborate the relation of both concepts. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Nationalismus, retrieved 20 March 2020).

  9. 9.

    We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this interpretation.

  10. 10.

    For reasons of authenticity, postings are given as in the original, but for ethical reasons, anonymized and reduced to the material essential for illustration.

  11. 11.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stfg. Accessed 30 May 2020.

  12. 12.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Slrubenstein. Retrieved 30 May 2020.

References

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1996. Die Erfindung der Nation. Zur Karriere eines folgenreichen Konzepts. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher. 2012. Theorising disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1549–1553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baym, Nancy. 1996. Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (4): 315–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilić, Paško. 2015. ‘Searching for a centre that holds’ in the network society: Social construction of knowledge on, and with, English Wikipedia: New Media&society 17 (8): 1258–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilić, Paško, and Luka Bulian. 2014. Lost in translation: Contexts, computing, disputing on Wikipedia. iConference 2014 Proceedings, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.9776/14027.

  • Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher. 2017. Conflictual and consensual disagreement. In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. Wolfram Bublitz and Christian R. Hoffmann, 607–632. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater, Matt. 2017. History writing and Wikipedia. Computers and Composition 45: 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James J., Jr. 2010. Edit this page: Wikipedia and the responsibilities of digital rhetorics. In The Responsibilities of Rhetoric, ed. Michelle Smith and Barbara Warnick, 151–158. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2006. Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text&talk 26 (1): 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, Dietrich. 2012. Frame-Semantik. Ein Kompendium. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fina, Anna. 2010. The negotiation of identities. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 205–224. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Charles. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni Di Semantica 6 (2): 222–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens. 2007. Introducing cognitive linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974/1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press. [originally 1974, Harper Colophone: New York]

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Pamela. 2015. “An encyclopedia, not an experiment in democracy”: Wikipedia biographies, authorship, and the Wikipedia subject. Biography 38 (2): 222–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Helmut. 1996. Streitgespräche. Zur Pragmatik einer Diskursform. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, John, and J. Maxwell Atkinson 1984. Introduction. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, Sonja. 2020. Wikipedia: Quotations at the interface of encyclopedic and participatory practices. Journal of Pragmatics 157: 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös. 2015. Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora. Pragmatics 25 (1): 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, Sonja and Birte Bös. 2018. Indeterminate ‘us’ and ‘them’: the complexities of referentiality, identity and group construction in a public online discussion. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal—group—collective, ed. Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández, 153–176. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, Sonja, Nuria Hernández, and Birte Bös. 2018. Introduction: Identity construction in complex discourse contexts. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal—group—collective, ed. Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández, 1–12. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, Sonja, and Julia Schultz. 2019. Ist „Nation“ gleich „nation“? Zwei Wikipedia-Artikel im Sprach- und Kulturvergleich. Diskurse—digital 1, 62–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, Veronika. 2014. Applying social cognition research to critical discourse studies: The case of collective identities. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. Christopher Hart, 147–166. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locher, Miriam and Sage L. Graham. 2010. Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 1–13. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massa, Paolo, and Federico Scrinzi. 2013. Manypedia. Comparing language points of view of Wikipedia communities. First Monday 18: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mederake, Nathalie. 2016. Wikipedia: Palimpseste der Gegenwart. Text- und Wissensverfahren im kollaborativen Hypertext. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Greg. 2010. The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, Dan. 2009. Wikipedia: A New Community of Practice? Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Mary Bucholtz. 2009. Introduction. Public transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text and Talk 29: 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, James P. 2009. When the tenets of composition go public: A study of writing in Wikipedia. College Composition and Communication 61 (2): 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, Ernest. 1882. Qu’est-ce Qu’une Nation? Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubira, Rainer, and Gisela Gil-Egui. 2017. Wikipedia as a space for discursive constructions of globalization. International Communication Gazette 81 (1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Philip. 1993. Wishful thinking: Cultural politics, media, and collective identities in Europe. Journal of Communication 43 (2): 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics. Special Issue 39 (4): 639–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tereszkiewicz, Anna. 2010. Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias: The Case of Wikipedia. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tverski, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehling, Elisabeth. 2016. Politisches Framing: Wie eine Nation sich ihr Denken einredet - und daraus Politik macht. Köln: Herbert von Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, Hartmut, Christoph K. Theil, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Angelika Storrer, and Marc Debus. 2017. “Wikiganda”: Detecting bias in multimodal Wikipedia entries. In New Studies in Multimodality: Conceptual and Methodological Elaborations, ed. Ognyan Seizov and Janina Wildfeuer, 201–224. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Kleinke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kleinke, S., Landmann, J. (2021). Cross-Cultural Observations on English and German Wikipedia Entries at the Interface of Convergence and Controversy. In: Johansson, M., Tanskanen, SK., Chovanec, J. (eds) Analyzing Digital Discourses. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84602-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84602-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84601-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84602-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics