Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Support Structures for Renewable Energy Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Renewable Energy Communities and the Low Carbon Energy Transition in Europe

  • 515 Accesses

Abstract

To further Renewable Energy Community (REC) development, support is needed to build their capacities. Institutional hurdles and barriers stemming from the fossil fuel-based energy regime need to be alleviated, and the energy system needs to open up for the uptake, acceptance or breakthrough of the RECs. Evidence suggests that so-called “intermediaries” form a part of the solution in addressing these issues. Although intermediaries can be different kinds of actors including governments themselves, in this chapter it is argued that non-governmental actors are most effective in performing the intermediary tasks due to the nature of this work. This work asks intermediaries to bridge dividing lines and try to overcome institutional inertia to which governments are often prone. The chapter presents an analytical framework on the various roles and strategies intermediaries can employ to support RECs. It addresses the question: What strategies, roles and activities of intermediaries represent an effective support structure for the further development and upscaling of RECs?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnolucci, P. (2007). Renewable electricity policies in The Netherlands. Renewable Energy, 32(5), 868–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, R., & Montezemolo, S. (2004). Supporting the Community Development Movement: The Achievements and Challenges of Intermediary Organizations Roland. In R. Anglin (Ed.), Building the Organizations That Build Communities (pp. 55–27). Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, J. (2010). Intermediaries as Innovating Actors in the Transition to a Sustainable Energy System. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 86–108. Retrieved from http://www.cejpp.eu/index.php/ojs/article/view/47

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (2017). User-Intermediaries and the Local Embedding of Low Carbon Technologies (2057-6668) (Vol. 15) https://doi.org/2057-6668

  • Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., & Holstenkamp, L. (2016). What Drives the Development of Community Energy in Europe? The Case of Wind Power Cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator Best Practice: A Framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008

  • Bird, C., & Barnes, J. (2014). Scaling up Community Activism: The Role of Intermediaries in Collective Approaches to Community Energy. People, Place and Policy Online, 8(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0008.0003.0006

  • Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The Networked Business Incubator – Leveraging Entrepreneurial Agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.005

  • Bomberg, E., & McEwen, N. (2012). Mobilizing Community Energy. Energy Policy, 51, 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.045

  • Boon, F. P., & Dieperink, C. (2014). Local Civil Society Based Renewable Energy Organisations in the Netherlands: Exploring the Factors That Stimulate Their Emergence and Development. Energy Policy, 69, 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, W. P. C., Moors, E. H. M., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2011). Demand Articulation in Emerging Technologies: Intermediary User Organisations as Co-producers? Research Policy, 40(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.006

  • Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing Demand and Supply of Business Incubation Services Across Different Incubator Generations. Technovation, 32(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003

  • Bulkeley, H., & Kern, K. (2006). Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK. Urban Studies, 43(12), 2237–2259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600936491

  • Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think Global, Act Local? The Relevance of Place Attachments and Place Identities in a Climate Changed World. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinica, V., & Arentsen, M. J. (2001). Green Electricity in the Netherlands. Report no 2/2001, Norwegian School of Management, Centre for Energy and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnie, E., & Holstead, K. L. (2017, January). The Influence of Public Funding on Community-Based Sustainability Projects in Scotland. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.003

  • Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and Failure of Grassroots Innovations for Addressing Climate Change: The Case of the Transition Movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, N., & Wiek, A. (2014). Learning from success – Toward Evidence-informed Sustainability Transitions in Communities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12, 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.01.003

  • Geels, F., & Deuten, J. J. (2006). Local and Global Dynamics in Technological Development: A Sociocognitive Perspective on Knowledge Flows and Lessons from Reinforced Concrete. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778984

  • Geels, F., & Raven, R. (2006). Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777143

  • Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). The Dynamics of Sustainable Innovation Journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292982

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerreiro, S., & Botetzagias, I. (2018). Empowering Communities–The Role of Intermediary Organisations in Community Renewable Energy Projects in Indonesia. Local Environment, 23(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1394830

  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x

  • Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked Incubators. Hothouses of the New Economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84, 199. https://doi.org/Article

  • Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots Innovations in Community Energy: The Role of Intermediaries in Niche Development. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 868–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008

  • Hasanov, M., & Zuidema, C. (2018). The Transformative Power of Self-organization: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Local Energy Initiatives in The Netherlands. Energy Research and Social Science, 37(September 2017), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.038

  • Hicks, J., & Ison, N. (2011). Community-Owned Renewable Energy (CRE): Opportunities for Rural Australia. Rural Society, 20(3), 244–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshelwood, E. (2001). Power to the People: Community-led Wind Energy–obstacles and Opportunities in a South Wales Valley. Community Development Journal, 36(2), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisschemöller, M., & Sioziou, I. (2013). Boundary Organisations for Resource Mobilisation: Enhancing Citizens’ Involvement in the Dutch Energy Transition. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 792–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.775724

  • Hodson, M., Marvin, S., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). The Intermediary Organisation of Low Carbon Cities: A Comparative Analysis of Transitions in Greater London and Greater Manchester. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1403–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013480967

  • Hoppe, T., Graf, A., Warbroek, B., Lammers, I., & Lepping, I. (2015). Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands). Sustainability, 7(2), 1900–1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021900

  • Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005

  • Huijben, J. C., & Verbong, G. P. (2013). Breakthrough without subsidies? PV business model experiments in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 56, 362–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310

  • Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated Intermediary Organisations as Actors in System-Level Transitions. Research Policy, 43(8), 1370–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007

  • Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., Klerkx, L., Rogge, K., Nightingale, P., & Bloom, M. (2017). SWPS 2017–17 (September). Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Transitions: A Systematic Review Editorial Assistance, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2017). Innovation, Low Energy Buildings and Intermediaries in Europe: Systematic Case Study Review. Energy Efficiency, 11(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9547-y

  • Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Dynamics of Policy Change and Intermediation: The Arduous Transition Towards Low-Energy Homes in the United Kingdom. Energy research & social science, 44, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and Embedding of Innovation Brokers at Different Innovation System Levels: Insights from the Dutch Agricultural Sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001

  • Kooij, H.-J., Lagendijk, A., & Oteman, M. (2018). Who Beats the Dutch Tax Department? Tracing 20 Years of Niche–Regime Interactions on Collective Solar PV Production in The Netherlands. Sustainability, 10(8), 2807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1996). Assets-based Community Development. National Civic Review, 85(4), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100850405

  • Lai, W.-H., & Lin, C.-C. (2015). Constructing Business Incubation Service Capabilities for Tenants at Postentrepreneurial Phase. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2285–2289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martiskainen, M. (2017). The Role of Community Leadership in the Development of Grassroots Innovations. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.05.002

  • Martiskainen, M., & Kivimaa, P. (2018). Creating Innovative Zero Carbon Homes in the United Kingdom – Intermediaries and Champions in Building Projects. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26(August 2017), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.002

  • Mathie, A., & Cunningham, G. (2003). From Clients to Citizens: Asset-based Community Development as a Strategy for Community-Driven Development. Development in Practice, 13(5), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452032000125857

  • Matschoss, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2017). Making It Experimental in Several Ways: The Work of Intermediaries in Raising the Ambition Level in Local Climate Initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037

  • Middlemiss, L., & Parrish, B. D. (2010). Building Capacity for Low-carbon Communities: The Role of Grassroots Initiatives. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7559–7566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.003

  • Moss, T. (2009). Intermediaries and the Governance of Sociotechnical Networks in Transition. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1480–1495. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4116

  • Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? – Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x

  • Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2013). Of Solar Collectors, Wind Power, and Car Sharing: Comparing and Understanding Successful Cases of Grassroots Innovations. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 856–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oteman, M., Wiering, M., & Helderman, J.-K. (2014). The Institutional Space of Community Initiatives for Renewable Energy: A Comparative Case Study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-4-11

  • Parag, Y., Hamilton, J., White, V., & Hogan, B. (2013). Network Approach for Local and Community Governance of Energy: The Case of Oxfordshire. Energy Policy, 62, 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.027

  • Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a New Generation Incubation Model: The Accelerator. Technovation, 50–51, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003

  • Proka, A., Hisschemöller, M., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition Without Conflict? Renewable energy initiatives in the Dutch Energy Transition. Sustainability, 10(6), 1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, C. (1998). Culture, Intellectual Property and Territorial Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00060

  • Ray, C. (1999a). Endogenous Development in the Era of Reflexive Modernity. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2

  • Ray, C. (1999b). Towards a Meta-Framework of Endogenous Development: Repertoires, Paths, Democracy and Rights. Sociologia Ruralis, 39(4), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00122

  • Rohracher, H. (2009). Intermediaries and the Governance of Choice: The Case of Green Electricity Labelling. Environment and Planning A, 41(8), 2014–2028. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41234

  • Ruggiero, S., Martiskainen, M., & Onkila, T. (2018). Understanding the Scaling-up of Community Energy Niches Through Strategic Niche Management Theory: Insights from Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.144

  • Ruggiero, S., Onkila, T., & Kuittinen, V. (2014). Realizing the Social Acceptance of Community Renewable Energy: A Process-outcome Analysis of Stakeholder Influence. Energy Research & Social Science, 4, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.09.001

  • Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651

  • Schwencke, A. M. (2017). Lokale Energiemonitor 2017. Retrieved from Utrecht: https://www.hieropgewekt.nl/uploads/inline/Lokale_Energie_Monitor_2017_3.pdf

  • Schwencke, A. M. (2021). Lokale Energie Monitor 2020. Retrieved from The Hague: https://www.hieropgewekt.nl/lokale-energie-monitor

  • Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Communitybased Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222

  • Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014). A Grassroots Sustainable Energy Niche? Reflections on Community Energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004

  • Shucksmith, M. (2000). Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: perspectives from leader in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00143

  • Smilor, R. W. (1987). Managing the Incubator System: Critical Success Factors to Accelerate New Company Development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-34(3), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1987.6498875

  • Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research policy, 41(6), 1025–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Martiskainen, M., & Seyfang, G. (2015). Making the Most of Community Energies: Three Perspectives on Grassroots Innovation. Environment and Planning A, 0308518X15597908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15597908

  • Stewart, J., & Hyysalo, S. (2008). Intermediaries, Users and Social Learning in Technological Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608002035

  • Süsser, D., Döring, M., & Ratter, B. M. W. (2017). Harvesting Energy: Place and Local Entrepreneurship in Community-based Renewable Energy Transition. Energy Policy, 101, 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.018

  • Van der Schoor, T., & Scholtens, B. (2015). Power to the People: Local Community Initiatives and the Transition to Sustainable Energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 666–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.089

  • Verbong, G., Geels, F. W., & Raven, R. (2008). Multi-niche Analysis of Dynamics and Policies in Dutch Renewable Energy Innovation Journeys (1970–2006): Hype-cycles, Closed Networks and Technology-focused Learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

  • Wade, J., Hamilton, J., Eyre, N., & Parag, Y. (2013). Local Energy Governance: Communities and Energy Efficiency Policy. In ECEEE Summer Study (pp. 637–648).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. T., & McCarthy, J. D. (2010). Legitimacy, Strategy, and Resources in the Survival of Community-Based Organizations. Social Problems, 57(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.315

  • Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2655–2663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warbroek, B., & Hoppe, T. (2017). Modes of Governing and Policy of Local and Regional Governments Supporting Local Low-carbon Energy Initiatives; Exploring the Cases of the Dutch Regions of Overijssel and Fryslân. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010075

  • Warbroek, B., Hoppe, T., Coenen, F., & Bressers, H. (2018). The Role of Intermediaries in Supporting Local Low-Carbon Energy Initiatives. Sustainability, 10(7), 2450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warbroek, W. D. B. (2019). The Grassroots Energy Transition: The Success and Governance of Local Low-carbon Energy Initiatives. PhD University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warbroek, B., Hoppe, T., Bressers, H., & Coenen, F. (2019). Testing the social, organizational, and governance factors for success in local low carbon energy initiatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2012). The Research Agenda on Social Acceptance of Distributed Generation in Smart Grids: Renewable as Common Pool Resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 822–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Beau Warbroek

Authors
  1. Beau Warbroek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beau Warbroek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Frans H. J. M. Coenen

  2. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Thomas Hoppe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Warbroek, B. (2021). Support Structures for Renewable Energy Communities. In: Coenen, F.H.J.M., Hoppe, T. (eds) Renewable Energy Communities and the Low Carbon Energy Transition in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84440-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84440-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84439-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84440-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation