Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh University Press.
Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Dixon, R. M. W. (2014). The grammar of knowledge. A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press.
Anesa, P. (2011). Courtroom discourses: An analysis of the Westerfield jury trial. PhD dissertation, University of Verona.
Angouri, J., & Marra, M. (2011). ‘OK one last thing for today then’: Constructing identities in corporate meeting talk. In M. Marra & J. Angouri (Eds.), Constructing identities at work (pp. 85–100). Palgrave Macmillan.
Beach, W. A., & Metzger, T. R. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23, 560–585.
Bednarek, M. (2006). Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse—A text-driven approach. Text & Talk, 26(6), 635–660.
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204.
Bell, A. (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–169). Cambridge University Press.
Benveniste, E. (1971). Subjectivity in language. In M. E. Meek (Ed.), Problems in general linguistics (pp. 223–230). University of Miami Press.
Berk-Seligson, S. (1999). The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions. Forensic Linguistics, 6(1), 30–56.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Brandt, P. A. (2004). Evidentiality and enunciation. A cognitive and semiotic approach. In J. I. Marín-Arrese (Ed.), Perspectives on evidentiality and modality (pp. 3–10). Editorial Complutense.
Brennan, M. (1994). Cross-examining children in criminal courts: Child welfare under attack. In J. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the law (pp. 199–216). Longman.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.
Chaemsaithong, K. (2012). Performing self on the witness stand: Stance and relational work in expert witness testimony. Discourse and Society, 23(5), 465–486.
Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 261–272). Ablex.
Clarke, I., & Kredens, K. (2018). ‘I consider myself to be a service provider’: Discursive identity construction of the forensic linguistic expert. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 25(1), 79–107.
Cotterill, J. (2003). Language and power in court. A linguistic analysis of the O. J. Simpson trial. Palgrave Macmillan.
Coulthard, M. (2005). The linguist as expert witness. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 39–58.
Coulthard, M. (2020). Experts and opinions: In my opinion. In M. Coulthard, A. May, & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 523–538). Routledge.
de Candia, S., & Venuti, M. (2013). ʻI don’t know the answer to that questionʼ: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of White House press briefings. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 7(1), 66–81.
de Haan, F. (2005). Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier, D. Rood, & A. Hodges (Eds.), Linguistic variation and language theories. John Benjamins.
Dendale, P., & Tasmowski, L. (2001). Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 339–348.
Eades, D. (2010). Sociolinguistics and the legal process. Multilingual Matters.
Englebretson, R. (Ed.). (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 164). John Benjamins.
Fetzer, A. (2014). Foregrounding evidentiality in (English) academic discourse: Patterned co-occurrences of the sensory perception verbs seem and appear. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(3), 333–355.
Finegan, E. (1995). Subjectivity and subjectivisation: An introduction. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.
Gibbons, J. (2005). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell.
Givón, T. (2018). On understanding grammar (Rev. ed.). John Benjamins.
Haack, S. (2014). Evidence matters. Science, proof, and truth in the law. Cambridge University Press.
Heffer, C. (2005). The language of jury trial. A corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38.
Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 176–207). Oxford University Press.
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on ‘I thinkʼ (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 115). John Benjamins.
Li, C., & Ran, Y. (2016). Self-professional identity construction through other-identity deconstruction in Chinese televised debating discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 94, 47–63.
Lindström, J., & Karlsson, S. (2016). Tensions in the epistemic domain and claims of no-knowledge: A study of Swedish medical interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 129–147.
Linell, P. (1998). Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualisation and the blending of voices in professional discourse. TEXT, 18(2), 143–157.
Lymer, G., Lindwall, O., & Ivarsson, J. (2017). Epistemic status, sequentiality, and ambiguity: Notes on Heritage’s rebuttal. Unpublished manuscript. Uppsala University, Sweden.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2009). Commitment and subjectivity in the discourse of a judicial inquiry. In R. Salkie, P. Busuttil, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Modality in English (pp. 237–268). Mouton de Gruyter.
Matoesian, G. (1999). The grammaticalisation of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28(4), 491–521.
Mondada, L. (2013). Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597–626.
Mushin, I. (2001). Evidentiality and epistemological stance. Narrative retelling. John Benjamins.
Nuyts, J. (2001). Epistemic modality, language and conceptualisation: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. John Benjamins.
O’Barr, W. (1982). Linguistic evidence. Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. Academic.
Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socialising humanity. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407–437). Cambridge University Press.
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse. Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins.
Renoe, C. E. (1996). Seeing is believing: Expert testimony and the construction of interpretative authority in an American trial. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 9, 115–137.
Roseano, P., González, M., Borràs-Comes, J., & Prieto, P. (2015). Communicating epistemic stance: How speech and gesture patterns reflect epistemicity and evidentiality. Discourse Processes, 53(3), 135–174.
Scott, M. (2012). WordSmith Tools (version 6). Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
Shuy, R. W. (1993). Language crimes: The use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. Blackwell.
Shuy, R. W. (2006). Linguistics in the courtroom: A practical guide. Oxford University Press.
Sidnell, J. (2014). The architecture of intersubjectivity revisited. In N. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics) (pp. 364–399). Cambridge University Press.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Mouton de Gruyter.
Stein, D., & Wright, S. (Eds.). (1995). Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Storey-White, K. (1997). KISSing the Jury: The advantages and limitations of the ʻkeep it simpleʼ principle in the presentation of expert evidence to courts and juries. Forensic Linguistics, 4(2), 280–287.
Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis. Putting our worlds into words. Routledge.
Szczyrbak, M. (2021). ʻI’m thinkingʼ and ʻyou’re sayingʼ: Speaker stance and the progressive of mental verbs in courtroom interaction. Text & Talk, 41(2), 239–260.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. John Benjamins.
Tsui, A. B. M. (1991). The pragmatic functions of ‘I don’t knowʼ. TEXT, 11(4), 607–622.
Ward, T. (2017). Expert testimony, law and epistemic authority. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(2), 263–277.
White, P. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23, 259–284.
Zuczkowski, A., Bongelli, R., & Riccioni, I. (2017). Epistemic stance in dialogue. Knowing, unknowing, believing. John Benjamins.