Skip to main content

Sanitary Landfill Operation and Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solid Waste Engineering and Management

Abstract

As part of the transformation to achieve sustainable resource recovery and waste management, landfills play an important role. The landfill’s primary function is to accept solid wastes that cannot be “avoided, reduced, reused, recycled, or recovered.” Recognizing that residual waste composition has changed and will continue to evolve over time in response to technological advancements in recovery operations, it is critical that a precautionary approach be taken to properly mitigate the environmental risks of landfill facilities. Landfills must be built to have the least amount of negative environmental effects possible. The landfill’s design must take into account the surrounding area, the amount and nature of waste to be disposed of, the host community’s concerns, adjacent land use, and economic and social factors. Landfills should be planned and maintained in such a way that pollutants such as landfill gas, leachate, and stormwater are effectively managed. Monitoring is crucial for having a better understanding and trust in the site’s controls and risks, which advises management and treatment options. Rather than a monitoring program that validates impacts that have occurred, a monitoring program should be developed to cover all emissions and put a priority on monitoring to verify the efficacy of current controls, such as by monitoring leachate content, leachate levels, and surface water (groundwater monitoring).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ADC:

Alternate daily cover

BOD:

Biochemical oxygen demand

BOD5:

Biochemical oxygen demand 5 days

C2H5COOH:

Propionic acid

CH3COCOOH:

Pyruvic acid

CH3COOH:

Acetic acid

CH4:

Methane

CO:

Carbon monoxide

CO2:

Carbon dioxide

COD:

Chemical oxygen demand

FID:

Flame ionization detection

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

GPS:

Global positioning system

H2S:

Hydrogen sulfide

ISWA:

International Solid Waste Association

LFG:

Landfill gas

MSW:

Municipal solid waste

N2:

Nitrogen

NH3:

Ammonia

PPE:

Personal protective equipment

RDF:

Refuse derived fuel

VOAs:

Volatile organic acids

WTE :

Waste-to-energy

References

  1. Aziz, H. A., Alias, S., Assari, F., & Adlan, M. N. (2007). The use of alum, ferric chloride and ferrous sulphate as coagulants in removing suspended solids, colour and COD from semi-aerobic landfill leachate at controlled pH. Waste Management & Research, 25(6), 556–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fauziah, S. H., & Agamuthu, P. (2012). Trends in sustainable landfilling in Malaysia, a developing country. Waste Management & Research, 30(7), 656–663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Idris, A., Inanc, B., & Hassan, M. N. (2004). Overview of waste disposal and landfills/dumps in Asian countries. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 6(2), 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. JPSPN. (2015). Jabatan Pengurusan Sisa Pepejal Negara. Accessed from: http://jpspn.kpkt.gov.my

  5. Abd Manaf, L., Samah, M. A. A., & Zukki, N. I. M. (2009). Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: Practices and challenges. Waste Management, 29(11), 2902–2906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buenrostro, O., & Bocco, G. (2003). Solid waste management in municipalities in Mexico: Goals and perspectives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 39(3), 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alrukaibi, D. S., & Alsulaili, A. D. (2017). GIS-based modelling for appropriate selection of landfill sites. Journal of Engineering Research, 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crowley, D. (2003). Health and environmental effects of landfilling and incineration of waste: A literature review. 1014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kjeldsen, P., Barlaz, M. A., Rooker, A. P., Baun, A., Ledin, A., & Christensen, T. H. (2002). Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 32(4), 297–336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ngoc, U. N., & Schnitzer, H. (2009). Sustainable solutions for solid waste management in Southeast Asian countries. Waste Management, 29(6), 1982–1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. United States Envitonmental Protection Agency. Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. United States Envitonmental Protection Agency. Viewed 10 June 2021. https://www.epa.gov/landfills/municipal-solid-waste-landfills#whatis

  12. Artiola, J. F. (2019). Industrial waste and municipal solid waste treatment and disposal. In Environmental and pollution science (pp. 377–391). Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Akinjare, O. A., Oluwatobi, A. O., & Iroham, O. C. (2011). Impact of sanitary landfills on urban residential property value in Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(2), 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reichert, A., Small, M., & Mohanty, S. (1992). The impact of landfills on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Research, 7(3), 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Danthurebandara, M., Van Passel, S., Nelen, D., Tielemans, Y., & Van Acker, K. (2012). Environmental and socio-economic impacts of landfills. Linnaeus Eco-Tech, 2012, 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Timothy, A. (2008). A guide for Development, implementation and monitoring. The Florida Development, Implementation and Monitoring.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kamaruddin, M. A., Yusoff, M. S., & Ahmad, M. A. (2012). Optimization of preparation conditions for Durian peel-based activated carbon for the removal of COD and ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N) using response surface methodology. Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering, 39(1B), 37–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimaoka, T., Matsufuji, Y., & Hanashima, M. (2000, December). Characteristic and mechanism of semi-aerobic landfill on stabilization of solid waste. In Proceedings of the first intercontinental landfill research symposia, Lulea, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aziz, H. A., Yusoff, M. S., Adlan, M. N., Adnan, N. H., & Alias, S. (2004). Physico-chemical removal of iron from semi-aerobic landfill leachate by limestone filter. Waste Management, 24(4), 353–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hunce, S. Y., Akgul, D., Demir, G., & Mertoglu, B. (2012). Solidification/stabilization of landfill leachate concentrate using different aggregate materials. Waste Management, 32(7), 1394–1400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamaruddin, M. A., Yusoff, M. S., Aziz, H. A., & Hung, Y. T. (2015). Sustainable treatment of landfill leachate. Applied Water Science, 5(2), 113–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, P.G., & Crawford, J. B. (1985). Landfill technology.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deublien, D., & Steinhauser, A. (2008). Biogas from waste and renewable resources (pp. 27–83). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Daniel, D. E. (1993). Landfills and impoundments. In Geotechnical practice for waste disposal (pp. 97–112). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhambulkar, A. V. (2011). Municipal solid waste collection routes optimized with arc GIS network analyst. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Technologies, 11, 202–207.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jördening, H. J., & Winter, J. (Eds.). (2005). Environmental biotechnology: Concepts and applications. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aziz, S. Q., Aziz, H. A., Yusoff, M. S., Bashir, M. J., & Umar, M. (2010). Leachate characterization in semi-aerobic and anaerobic sanitary landfills: A comparative study. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(12), 2608–2614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Adhikari, B., Dahal, K. R., & Khanal, S. N. (2014). A review of factors affecting the composition of municipal solid waste landfill leachate. International Journal of Innovative Science Engineering and Technology, 3(5), 272–281.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dos Santos, R. E., Dos Santos, I. F. S., Barros, R. M., Bernal, A. P., Tiago Filho, G. L., & da Silva, F. D. G. B. (2019). Generating electrical energy through urban solid waste in Brazil: An economic and energy comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kale, S. S., Kadam, A. K., Kumar, S., & Pawar, N. J. (2010). Evaluating pollution potential of leachate from landfill site, from the Pune metropolitan city and its impact on shallow basaltic aquifers. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 162(1), 327–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mayakaduwa, S. S., Siriwardana, A. R., Wijesekara SSRMDHR, B. B., Vithanage, M. (2012, October). Characterization of landfill leachate draining from Gohagoda municipal solid waste open dump site for dissolved organic carbon, nutrients and heavy metals. In Proceedings of the 7th Asian Pacific Landfill Symposium, Bali, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Welikannage, K., & Liyanage, B. C. (2009). Organic waste composing by low cost semi aerobic converted trench method at Central Province. Proceedings of Annual Academic Sessions, Open University of Sri Lanka, 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao, X., Qu, J., Liu, H., Wang, C., Xiao, S., Liu, R., Liu, P., Lan, H., & Hu, C. (2010). Photoelectrochemical treatment of landfill leachate in a continuous flow reactor. Bioresource Technology, 101(3), 865–869.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Abbas, A. A., Jingsong, G., Ping, L. Z., Ya, P. Y., & Al-Rekabi, W. S. (2009). Review on landfill leachate treatments. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 5(5), 534–545.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, W., Hua, T., Zhou, Q., Zhang, S., & Li, F. (2010). Treatment of stabilized landfill leachate by the combined process of coagulation/flocculation and powder activated carbon adsorption. Desalination, 264(1–2), 56–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu, Z. Y., Zeng, G. M., Yang, Z. H., Xiao, Y., Cao, M., Sun, H. S., Ji, L. L., & Chen, Y. (2010). Biological treatment of landfill leachate with the integration of partial nitrification, anaerobic ammonium oxidation and heterotrophic denitrification. Bioresource Technology, 101(1), 79–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Renou, S., Givaudan, J. G., Poulain, S., Dirassouyan, F., & Moulin, P. (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150(3), 468–493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shouliang, H. U. O., Beidou, X. I., Haichan, Y. U., Liansheng, H. E., Shilei, F. A. N., & Hongliang, L. I. U. (2008). Characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in leachate with different landfill ages. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20(4), 492–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Castrillón, L., Fernández-Nava, Y., Ulmanu, M., Anger, I., & Marañón, E. (2010). Physico-chemical and biological treatment of MSW landfill leachate. Waste Management, 30(2), 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H., & Vigil, S. (1993). Integrated solid waste management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Williams, P. T. (2005). Waste treatment and disposal. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Worrell, W., & Vesilind, P. (2011). Solid waste engineering, SI Version. Nelson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kamaruddin, M. A., Yusoff, M. S., Rui, L. M., Isa, A. M., Zawawi, M. H., & Alrozi, R. (2017). An overview of municipal solid waste management and landfill leachate treatment: Malaysia and Asian perspectives. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(35), 26988–27020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vilar, V. J., Rocha, E. M., Mota, F. S., Fonseca, A., Saraiva, I., & Boaventura, R. A. (2011). Treatment of a sanitary landfill leachate using combined solar photo-Fenton and biological immobilized biomass reactor at a pilot scale. Water Research, 45(8), 2647–2658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Silva, A. C., Dezotti, M., & Sant’Anna, G. L., Jr. (2004). Treatment and detoxification of a sanitary landfill leachate. Chemosphere, 55(2), 207–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kang, Y. W., & Hwang, K. Y. (2000). Effects of reaction conditions on the oxidation efficiency in the Fenton process. Water Research, 34(10), 2786–2790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Monje-Ramirez, I., & De Velasquez, M. O. (2004). Removal and transformation of recalcitrant organic matter from stabilized saline landfill leachates by coagulation–ozonation coupling processes. Water Research, 38(9), 2359–2367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tatsi, A. A., Zouboulis, A. I., Matis, K. A., & Samaras, P. (2003). Coagulation–flocculation pretreatment of sanitary landfill leachates. Chemosphere, 53(7), 737–744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Amokrane, A., Comel, C., & Veron, J. (1997). Landfill leachates pretreatment by coagulation-flocculation. Water Research, 31(11), 2775–2782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zamora, R., de Velasquez, M. O., Moreno, A., & Ramirez, I. (2000). Treatment of landfill leachates by comparing advanced oxidation and coagulation–flocculation processes coupled with active carbon adsorption. Water Science Technology, 41, 231–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rettenberger, G. (2018a). Quality of landfill gas. Solid waste landfilling: Concepts, processes, technology. In Solid waste landfilling (p. 439). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Rettenberger, G. (2018). Collection and disposal of landfill gas. Solid waste landfilling (pp. 449–462). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. A. for T.S. and D.R. ATSDR, Chapter 5: Landfill Gas Control Measures. In: Landfill gas primer – An overview environment health professional, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Janson, O. (1991). Analytik, Bewertung und Bilanzierung gasförmiger Emissionen aus anaeroben Abbauprozessen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schwefelverbindungen. In Stuttgarter Berichte zur Abfallwirtschaft (Vol. 32). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Janson, O., & Bardtke, D. (2005). Analytik der Spurenstoffe im Deponiegas in Rettenberger, G. (publisher): Neue Vrfahren und Methoden zur Sicherung und Sanierung von Altlasten am Beispiel der Deponie Gerolsheim e Kurzfassungen des Verbundvorhabens, Trierer Berichte zur Abfallwirtschaft, vol. 15. Verlag Abfall aktuell, Stuttgar.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rettenbeger, G., & Stegmann, R. (1996). Landfill gas components. In T. H. Christensen, R. Cossu, & R. Stegmann (Eds.), Landfilling of waste: Biogas. E&FN Spon. ISBN 0419194002.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Solov’yanov, A. A. (2011). Associated petroleum gas flaring: Environmental issues. Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 81(12), 2531–2541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ménard, C., Ramirez, A. A., Nikiema, J., & Heitz, M. (2012). Biofiltration of methane and trace gases from landfills: A review. Environmental Reviews, 20(1), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Brown, K. A., & Maunder, D. H. (1994). Exploitation of landfill gas: A UK perspective. Water Science and Technology, 30(12), 143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Han, H., Long, J., Li, S., & Qian, G. (2010). Comparison of green-house gas emission reductions and landfill gas utilization between a landfill system and an incineration system. Waste Management & Research, 28(4), 315–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Niskanen, A., Värri, H., Havukainen, J., Uusitalo, V., & Horttanainen, M. (2013). Enhancing landfill gas recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 55, 67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Jewaskiewitz, B. (2010). Landfill gas recovery, green energy, and the clean development mechanism. Civil Engineering Management South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 18(7), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ujang, Z., 2004. Part 1—conventional landfill design & operation from design to problem solving. In Workshop on New Technologies for Cost-effective Landfill Management. UTM, Kuala Lumpur (Vol. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Taylor, M. A. (2000). Landfill final cover storm drainage. MSW Management, p. 7. Retrieved from: https://foresternetwork.com/weekly/mswmanagement-weekly/landfill-management/landfill-final-cover-stormwater-drainage

  65. Bader, C. D. (1998). The articulated dump truck: workhorse of the landfill. MSW Management, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ramke, H. G. (2001). Appropriate design and operation of sanitary landfills. In University of Applied Sciences Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Germany. Prepared for the international conference on sustainable economic development and sound resource management in Central Asia (p. 30).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Salvato, J. A., Nemerow, N. L., & Agardy, F. J. (2003). Solid waste disposal. Environmental engineering. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Koerner, R. (2003). Linear system design and materials. In USEPA Workshop on bioreactor landfills. Arlington: (CDROM).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Bagchi, A., & Bagchi, A. (1994). Design, construction, and monitoring of landfills (2nd ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Curro, J. (2000). Using the global positioning system in landfill gas system monitoring. MSW Management.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rees, J. F. (1980). Optimisation of methane production and refuse decomposition in landfills by temperature control. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 30(1), 458–465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Farquhar, G. J., Rovers, F. A., & McBean, E. A. (1995). Solid waste landfill engineering and design. PTR Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Frechen, F. B. (1989). 6.4 Odour emissions and controls. Sanitary landfilling: Process, technology and environmental impact, 425.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Feinbaum, R. 2000. Odor control: Going the extra mile. Journal for Municipal Solid Waste Professional. Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  75. O’Malley, P. G. (2003). Controlling odor at transfer stations and MRFs: There’s more than one way to reduce complaints. MSW Management, 13(2), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  76. International Solid Waste Association. (2019). ISWA – Landfill operational guidelines, 3rd edition. A report from ISWA’s working group on landfill 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Gilbert, N. I., Correia, R. A., Silva, J. P., Pacheco, C., Catry, I., Atkinson, P. W., Gill, J. A., & Franco, A. M. (2016). Are white storks addicted to junk food? Impacts of landfill use on the movement and behaviour of resident white storks (Ciconia ciconia) from a partially migratory population. Movement Ecology, 4(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Treweek, J. (1999). Ecological impact assessment. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Mellanby, K. (1992). Waste and pollution: The problem for Britain. Somerset: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Shen, T. T., Nelson, T. P., & Schmidt, C. E. (1990). Assessment and control of VOC emissions from waste disposal facilities. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 20(1), 43–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Dent, C. G., Scott, P., & Baldwin, G. (1986). Study of landfill gas composition at three UK domestic waste disposal sites. US and UK Departments of Energy, Chilton. Oxfordshire: DoE, Harwell Research Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Emam, E. A. (2015). Gas flaring in industry: An overview. Petroleum & Coa, 57(5).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ghadyanlou, F., & Vatani, A. (2015). Flare-gas recovery methods for olefin plants. Chemical Engineering, 122(5), 66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Lagerkvist, A. (1987). Sanitary landfills. A Swedish point of view-In: Process, technology, and environmental impact on sanitary landfill. Proceedings of the International Symposium, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Augenstein, D. (1991). Greenhouse effect contributions of US landfill methane. In: Landfill gas: Energy and environment.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Gardner, N., Manley, B. J. W., & Pearson, J. M. (1993). Gas emissions from landfills and their contributions to global warming. Applied Energy, 44, 165–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Thornoloe, S., & Peers, R. L. (1990). Landfill gas and the greenhouse effect. In G. E. Richards & Y. R. Alston (Eds.), Landfill gas: Energy and environment (pp. 361–368). Harwell Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Shammas, N. K., Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., & Chen, S. L. (2020). Ecological impact and anagement of solid waste landfill gas. In Y. T. Hung, L. K. Wang, & N. K. Shammas (Eds.), Handbook of environment and waste management: Acid rain and greenhouse gas pollution control (pp. 455–482). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  89. Wang, L. K., Shammas, N. K., & Hung, Y. T. (2008). Biosolids engineering and management. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press. 800 pages.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  90. Hung, Y. T., Wang, L. K., & Shammas, N. K. (2014). Handbook of environment and waste management: Land and groundwater pollution control. Singapore: World Scientific. 1091 pages.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamad Anuar Kamaruddin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Glossary

Aerobic composting

A method of composting organic wastes that involve the use of bacteria that require oxygen. This necessitates exposing the waste to sunlight, either by turning it or pushing air into pipes that pass through it.

Anaerobic digestion

A form of composting that does not necessitate the use of oxygen. Methane is generated by this composting process. Anaerobic composting is another name for it.

Ash

Solid by-products of incineration or other burning processes that are noncombustible.

Autoclaving

A pressurized, high-temperature steam process is used to sterilize the products.

Baghouse

An emission control system for a combustion plant that consists of a series of fabric filters that carry flue gases via an incinerator flue. Particles are suspended, preventing them from entering the atmosphere.

Basel Convention

The Basel Convention is a treaty that was signed by over 100 countries on the management of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal, which was drafted in March 1989 in Basel, Switzerland.

Biodegradable material

Any organic material that microorganisms can break down into simpler, more stable compounds. The majority of organic wastes (such as food and paper) are biodegradable.

Bottom ash

The incinerator residue that accumulates on the grate of a furnace is relatively coarse, noncombustible, and generally toxic.

Bulky waste

Big wastes, such as machinery, furniture, and trees and branches, cannot be processed using standard MSW methods.

Cell

The fundamental building block of a landfill. It is where incoming waste is flipped, scattered, compacted, and sealed.

Cleaner production

Processes that aim to reduce the amount of waste produced during processing.

Co-disposal

Generation of both electricity and steam from the same fuel source in a single plant.

Collection

Paper, plastics, wood, and food and garden wastes are all combustible materials in the waste stream.

Combustion

Materials are burned in an incinerator.

Commingled

After being isolated from mixed MSW, mixed recyclables are collected together.

Communal collection

A waste disposal system in which people carry their trash to a central location where it is processed.

Compactor vehicle

To minimize the amount of solid waste, a recycling vehicle with high-power mechanical or hydraulic equipment is used.

Composite liner

A land-fill liner system made up of an engineered soil layer and a synthetic sheet of material.

Compost

The content that results from a composting. Compost, also known as humus, is a soil conditioner that can also be used as a fertilizer in some cases.

Composting

Biological decomposition of solid organic materials into a soil-like substance by bacteria, fungi, and other species.

Construction and demolition debris

Waste includes bricks, asphalt, drywall, lumber, miscellaneous metal parts and sheets, packaging products, and other materials.

Controlled dump

A proposed landfill with some of the characteristics of a sanitary landfill: hydrogeological suitability, grading, compaction in some cases, leachate control, partial gas management, frequent (but not always daily) cover, access control, simple record-keeping, and managed waste picking.

Curbside collection

Compostables, recyclables, and garbage are collected at the edge of a sidewalk in front of a home or business.

Disposal

Following collection, sorting, or incineration, the final handling of solid waste. The most common method of disposal is to deposit waste in a landfill or a dump.

Emissions

Gases that have been emitted into the atmosphere.

Energy recovery

The method of extracting useful energy from waste, usually by using the heat produced by incineration or landfill methane gas.

Environmental impact assessment (EIA)

An assessment aimed at determining and forecasting the effect of a policy or project on the climate, human health, and well-being. Risk evaluation, as well as economic and land use assessments, are all possible components.

Environmental risk assessment (EnRA)

A study of the relationships between agents, humans, and natural resources. Usually assessing the probabilities and magnitudes of harm that may be caused by environmental pollutants, it is made up of human health risk assessment and ecological risk assessment.

European Commission’s Waste Landfill Directive

Aims to protect both human health and the environment. With the goal to prevent, or reduce as much as possible, any negative impact from landfill on surface water, groundwater, soil, air, and human health by introducing rigorous operational and technical requirements.

Flaring

At a landfill, methane released from storage pipes is burned.

Fluidized-bed incinerator

The stoker grate is replaced by a bed of limestone or sand that can withstand high temperatures in this form of an incinerator. The word “fluidized” comes from the fact that the bed is heated and high air velocities are used, causing the bed to bubble.

Fly ash

The extremely toxic particulate matter captured by an air pollution control device from an incinerator’s flue gas.

Geomembrane

A low permeability synthetic membrane liner or barrier used with any geotechnical engineering related material to control fluid migration in a human-made project, structure, or system.

Groundwater

Water that fills underground pockets (known as aquifers) and supplies wells and springs under the earth’s surface.

Hazardous waste

Reactive, poisonous, corrosive, or otherwise harmful to living things and/or the atmosphere waste. Hazardous manufacturing by-products abound.

Heavy metals

Metals with a high atomic weight and density that are poisonous to living organisms, such as mercury, lead, and cadmium.

Household hazardous waste

Items used in homes that are harmful to living organisms and/or the atmosphere, such as paints and certain cleaning compounds.

Incineration

The method of burning waste by reducing the weight and volume of solid waste while still producing energy under regulated conditions.

Inorganic waste

Sand, dust, glass, and a variety of synthetics are examples of waste made up of materials other than plant or animal matter.

Integrated solid waste management

Usage of a coordinated collection of waste management strategies, each of which may play a role in a larger MSVVM strategy.

In-vessel composting

Composting in a closed vessel or drum with a balanced internal setting, mechanical mixing, and aeration are all options.

Landfill gas (LFG)

Consists of a mixture of different gases produced by microorganisms within a landfill as they decompose organic waste. It is approximately 40–60% methane, with the remainder being mostly carbon dioxide.

Landfill gases

Methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide are the main gases produced by the decomposition of organic wastes. Landfills can experience explosions as a result of these gases.

Landfilling

The final disposal of solid waste by depositing it in a regulated manner in a long-term location. This concept is used in the Source Book to describe both supervised dumps and sanitary landfills.

Leachate pond

A pond or tank built at a landfill to collect leachate from the surrounding area. Typically, the pond is built to handle the leachate in some way, such as allowing solids to settle or allowing for aeration to facilitate biological processes.

Leachate

Any liquid, in the course of passing through matter, extracts soluble or suspended solids or any other component of the material through which it has passed. Referring to liquid produced from landfills or dumpsites.

Liner

A protective layer made of soil and/or synthetic materials, which is built along the bottom and sides of a landfill to prevent or minimize leachate from entering the atmosphere.

Lysimeter

A device used to measure the amount of actual evapotranspiration.

Materials recovery facility (MRF)

A facility for manually or mechanically separating commingled recyclables. Some MRFs are planned to distinguish recyclables from mixed municipal solid waste. The recovered materials are then baled and sold by MRFs.

Materials recovery

Obtaining goods that are recyclable or can be reused.

Methane

Is an odorless, colorless, flammable, and explosive gas formed by landfills anaerobically decomposing MSW.

Mixed waste

Materials that have been discarded into the waste stream without being sorted.

MSW

The term “municipal solid waste” refers to all solid waste generated in a given region, except industrial and agricultural waste. Construction and demolition debris, as well as other special wastes, can sometimes join the municipal waste stream. Hazardous wastes are generally excluded, except to the degree that they join the industrial waste stream. Occasionally, the term is used to refer to all solid wastes for which a city government takes responsibility in some way.

MSWM

Municipal solid waste management.

Municipal solid waste (MSW)

Commonly known as trash or garbage, which consists of everyday items we use and then throw away. The sources include homes, schools, hospitals, and businesses.

Open dump

An impromptu “landfill” with a few, if any, of the characteristics of a managed landfill. Usually, there is no leachate monitoring, no access control, no cover, no management, and a large number of waste pickers.

Organic waste

Is described as carbon-based waste, which includes paper, plastics, wood, food waste, and yard waste. In MSWM practice, the term is often used in a more limited context to refer to material that is derived more directly from plant or animal sources and can be decomposed by microorganisms.

Pathogen

Organism that is capable of causing disease.

Processing

Using processes such as baling, magnetic isolation, grinding, and shredding, MSW materials are prepared for future use or management. Separation of recyclables from mixed MSW is another word for the same thing.

Putrescible

Decomposition or decay is a term used to describe the process of decomposition or decay. Food wastes and other organic wastes that decompose easily are often referred to as “biodegradable.”

Pyrolysis

In the absence of oxygen, heat causes chemical decomposition of a material, resulting in various hydrocarbon gases and carbon-like residue.

Recyclables

Things that can be reprocessed into new product feedstock. Paper, glass, iron, corrugated cardboard, and plastic containers are all common examples.

Recycling

The method of converting materials into raw materials for the production of new goods that may or may not be identical to the original.

Refuse

A word that is often interchanged with solid waste.

Refuse-derived fuel (RDF)

MSW that has been processed and is used to make diesel. Separation of recyclables and noncombustible materials, shredding, size reduction, and pelletizing are all examples of processing.

Resource recovery

Utilization of resources and energy from wastes is referred to as resource recovery.

Reuse

The use of a commodity in its original form more than once for the same or a different reason.

Rubbish

Solid waste is referred to as “waste” in general. Food wastes and ashes are sometimes excluded.

Sanitary landfill

An engineered method of disposing of solid waste on land that meets most of the standard requirements, such as proper siting, comprehensive site planning, proper leachate and gas management and tracking, compaction, regular and final cover, full access control, and record-keeping.

Secured landfill

A waste management facility that is built to keep wastes out of the atmosphere indefinitely. This involves burying the wastes in a landfill with clay and/or synthetic liners, leachate collection, gas collection (if gas is produced), and an impermeable cover.

Sewage sludge

A semi-liquid residue found at the bottom of canals and pipes containing sewage or industrial wastewaters, as well as the bottom of wastewater treatment tanks.

Site remediation

Removing hazardous solids or liquids from a contaminated site or handling them on-site.

Source reduction

The process of designing, manufacturing, acquiring, and reusing materials in order to reduce the amount and/or toxicity of waste generated.

Source separation

To promote reuse, recycling, and composting, compostable and recyclable materials are separated from the waste stream before being collected with other MSW.

Special wastes

Wastes that are preferably kept out of the MSW stream but occasionally find their way in and must be dealt with by local governments. Household hazardous waste, medical waste, building and demolition debris, war and earthquake debris, tires, oils, wet batteries, sewage sludge, human excreta, slaughterhouse waste, and industrial waste are all examples of these.

Tipping fee

Unloading or dumping waste at a landfill, transfer station, incinerator, or recycling plant is subject to a levy.

Tipping floor

A place, usually on the outskirts of a neighborhood, where small collection vehicles move waste to larger vehicles for transport to disposal sites.

Vectors

Organisms that bear pathogens that cause disease. The key vectors that disperse pathogens outside the landfill site are mice, flies, and birds.

Virgin materials

Any raw material for industrial processes that has never been used before, such as wood pulp trees, iron ore, crude oil, and bauxite.

Waste characterization study

The analysis of samples from a waste stream to determine its composition is known as waste characterization.

Waste collector

An individual hired by a municipality or a private company to collect trash from homes, businesses, and community bins.

Waste management hierarchy

A rating of waste management operations based on the environmental or energy benefits they have. The waste management hierarchy was created with the aim of making waste management activities as environmentally friendly as possible.

Waste picker

An individual who separates recyclables from mixed waste wherever it is temporarily accessible or discarded.

Waste reduction

All methods of minimizing the amount of waste generated at the outset and collected by solid waste authorities. This includes everything from regulations and product design to community-based initiatives aimed at keeping recyclables and compostables out of the final waste stream.

Waste stream

A community’s, region’s, or facility’s complete waste flow.

Waste-to-energy (WTE) plant

A plant that generates energy from solid waste materials (processed or unprocessed). Incinerators that produce steam for district heating or industrial use, as well as facilities that convert landfill gas to electricity, are examples of WTE plants.

Water table

The depth below which the earth’s crust becomes filled with water.

Wetland

For at least part of the year, an area that is constantly wet or flooded and has a water level that is at or above the ground surface.

Working face

The length and width of the waste-disposal row at a landfill. The tipping face is another name for it.

Yard waste

Yard and garden waste includes leaves, grass clippings, prunings, and other natural organic matter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kamaruddin, M.A., Norashiddin, F.A., Yusoff, M.S., Hanif, M.H.M., Wang, L.K., Wang, MH.S. (2021). Sanitary Landfill Operation and Management. In: Wang, L.K., Wang, MH.S., Hung, YT. (eds) Solid Waste Engineering and Management. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84180-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics