Skip to main content

Segregating Infrastructure: The Nazareth Border-Road

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Tensions in Urban Design

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 253 Accesses

Abstract

Walls, fences and barriers are essential components of ethnically divided cities, forming an integral part of contested areas and their landscape. Whether in Berlin, the US–Mexico border, Ceuta, Palestine or Korea, separation infrastructure constitutes a physical materialisation of political and ethnic conflicts, reproducing them through built space. In the case of Israel, one might immediately think of the West-Bank Separation Barrier, the Gaza Strip land obstacle, or the fences and entrance gates that decorate most of the Israeli settlements. Nevertheless, alongside these usual martial techniques, roads have been functioning as a complementary mechanism, which continues, enhances and serves the overt territorial land development policy. However, while the use of segregated bypass roads in the West-Bank creates parallel and ethnically segregated networks, inside official Israeli territory they function as the border itself, preventing integration while highlighting the spatial stratification which the local society is based upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2019 the municipality changed the name to Nof HaGalil. In this chapter we will be using the name Upper Nazareth instead.

  2. 2.

    Government of Israel, Treaty between the Government of Israel and the JNF. 1960. Israel Land Administration.

References

  • Adalah (2006) The accused. Shafa’amr: Adalah: the legal center for Arab minority rights in Israel

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt H (2017) The origins of totalitarianism. Random House, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenazi E (2008) New tunnel-road will connect Afula with Nazareth and Nazareth Illt. News. Haaretz. https://www.haaretz.co.il/science/1.1361812

  • Benvenisti M (1984) The west bank data project: a survey of Israel’s Policies. Aei Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezalel A (1982) Nazareth Illit. Cardom Biannual Journal for Israel Studies 19(2):105–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Davar (1967) 150 Trucks assembled in Nazareth. Davar Newspaper. Israel Library, Israel

    Google Scholar 

  • Eran Mabel Architects (2002) Outline plan G/11017. Israel Land Administration. Israel Land Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman G (2006) Military rule, political manipulation, and Jewish settlement: Israeli mechanisms for controlling Nazareth in the 1950s’. J Israeli History 25(2):335–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Israel. Treaty between the Government of Israel and the JNF. Government of Israel, 1960. Israel Land Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel Planning Administration (1976). NOP 3 - Roads. Government of Israel, Israel Land Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendal H (1941) Outline plan 365/41/B. Galilee District. Town Planning Committee, Israel Land Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalidi W (1992) All that remains: the Palestinian villages occupied and depopulated by Israel in 1948. Institute for Palestine Studies, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lany-Waldner A (2016) Nazareth Illit: two decades of change. Israeli Ministry of Economics, Tel Aviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Lein Y (2004) Forbidden roads: Israel’s discriminatory road regime in the west bank. B’tselem, Jerusalem. https://www.btselem.org/download/200408_forbidden_roads_eng.pdf

  • Morris B (2004) The Birth of The Palestinian refugee problem revisited. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullan W, Misselwitz P, Nasrallah R, Yacobi H (2007) Jerusalem’s road 1: an inner city frontier? City 11(2):176–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D (1997) Overlooking Nazareth: the ethnography of exclusion in Galilee. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D, Abu-Baker K (2005) Coffins on our shoulders: the experience of the Palestinian citizens of Israel. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Said E (1979) The question of Palestine. Times Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwake G (2020a) The community settlement: a neo-rural territorial tool. Plan Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2020.1728569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwake G (2020b) An officer and a Bourgeois: Israeli Military Personnel, Suburbanization and Selective Privatization. Planning Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2020.1781683

  • Schwake G (2020c) Financialising the frontier: Harish City. Cities 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102945

  • Schwake G (2020d) Supply-side territoriality: re-shaping a geopolitical project according to economic means. Space Polity. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1788930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwake G (2021) Settle and rule: the evolution of the Israeli National Project. Architect Culture 8(2):350–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1730624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharon A, Idelson B (1955) Nazareth construction plan 5. Sharon Archive in David J. Azrieli Central Archives and Israeli Research Center for Architecture, Tel Aviv Museum of Art

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon A, Idelson B (1956) Nazareth housing plan 13/3/56. Sharon Archive in David J. Azrieli Central Archives and Israeli Research Center for Architecture, Tel Aviv Museum of Art

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon A (1951) Physical planning in Israel. Israeli Government, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Toker B (2021) Shimon gaps: Upper Nazareth, in our hands. News. https://www.inn.co.il/news/232839

  • Weizman E (2007) Hollow land. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizman E (2006) Principles of frontier geography. In: Misselwitz P, Rieniets T, Efrat Z, Khamaisi R, Nasrallah R (eds) City of collision. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 84–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel O (2006) Ethnocracy. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel O (2010) From Sharon to Sharon: spatial planning and separation regime in Israel/Palestine. HAGAR Stud Culture Polity Ident 20(1):73–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Yozgof-Orbach N, Soffer A (2016) Between judaization and loss: the case of Nazareth Illit 1956–2016. The University of Haifa, Haifa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Schwake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schwake, G. (2021). Segregating Infrastructure: The Nazareth Border-Road. In: Vassallo, I., Cerruti But, M., Setti, G., Kercuku, A. (eds) Spatial Tensions in Urban Design. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84083-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84083-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84082-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84083-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics