Skip to main content

Reconstituting the Object: Black Male Studies and the Problem of Studying Black Men and Boys Within Patriarchal Gender Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Race and Gender

Abstract

Contemporary theories of Black masculinity often insist that Black men and boys seek to imitate white patriarchy through violence and deviance. These arguments rely on outdated criminological assumptions such as subculture of violence theory. Consequently, feminist gender theories restate classist and racist interpretations of Black males that are out of line with contemporary social scientific research. Black men and boys are objects defined by lack and interpreted as being in need of remedy from Black maleness. This chapter introduces Black Male Studies as a challenge to the mimetic theories of Black masculinity found within contemporary feminist and intersectional research. Through a historiographic reconstruction of the mid-twentieth century idea of gender, and an alternative account of patriarchy as a race-sex kinship system, this chapter argues that Black Male Studies provides a more accurate and verifiable account of Black male life and death in Western patriarchal societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 28 April 2022

    ∎∎∎

Bibliography

  • Ann T. Allen, “Feminism and Fatherhood in Western Europe, 1900–1950s,” Journal of Women's History 26.2 (2014): 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menachem Amir, Patterns in Forcible Rape (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan Barclay & D.R. Cusumano, “The Study of Man: Testing Masculinity in Boys without Fathers,” Transactions 5 (1967): 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick Bayer & Kerwin Kofi Charles, “Divergent Paths: A New Perspective on Earnings Differences Between Black and White Men Since 1940,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133.3 (2018), 1459–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry Biller, “A Note on Father Absence and Masculine Development in Lower Class Negro and White Boys,” Child Development 39.3 (1968): 1003–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabine Broeck, “Re-reading de Beauvoir ‘After Race’: Woman-as-Slave Revisited,” International Journal of Francophone Studies 14.1–2 (2011): 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susan Brownmiller, Against Her Will: Men, Women, and Rape (New York: Fawcett Columbine, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj Chetty et al., “Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: An Intergenerational Perspective,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135.2 (2020): 711–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.W.S. Connell, “Margin Becoming Centre: For a World-Centred Rethinking of Masculinities,’ Norma 9.4 (2014): 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank Rudy Cooper, “Against Bipolar Masculinity: Intersectionality, Assimilation, Identity Performance, and Hierarchy,” University of California Davis Law Review 39 (2006): 853–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberlé Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Review 43.6 (1991): 1241–1299, 1266 fn.73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry, “Thinking Through the Silence: Theorizing the Rape of Jewish Males During the Holocaust Through Survivor Testimonies,” Holocaust Studies 27.4 (2021a): 447–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry, “Decolonizing the Intersection: Black Male Studies as a Critique of Intersectionality’s Indebtedness to Subculture of Violence Theory,” in Critical Psychology Praxis: Psychosocial Non-Alignment to Modernity/Coloniality, ed. Robert Beshara (Advances in Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology Series) (New York: Routledge, 2021b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry, “Expendables For Whom?: Terry Crews and the Erasure of Black Male Victims of Sexual Assault and Rape,” Women Studies in Communication Journal 42.3 (2019): 287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry “Black Male Studies: How the Man-Not Is Establishing a Field to Disrupt the Mythologies of Racialized Men and Boys in Liberal Arts Disciplines That Assume Pathology,” The Acorn: Philosophical Studies in Pacifism and Nonviolence 18.1/2 (2018a): 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry, “Killing Boogeymen: Phallicism and the Misandric Mischaracterization of Black Males in Theory,” Res Philosophica 95.2 (2018b): 235–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry & Ebony Utley, “She Touched Me: Five Snapshots of Adult Violations of Young Black Boys,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 28.2 (2018): 205–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry, The Man-Not: Race, Class, Genre, and the Dilemmas of Black Manhood (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2017a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommy J. Curry, “This Nigger's Broken: Hyper-Masculinity, The Buck, and The Impossibility of Physical Disability in the Black Male Body,” Journal of Social Philosophy 48.3 (2017b): 321–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augusta C. Del Zotto “Gendercide in a Historical-Structural Context: The Case of Black Male Gendercide in the United States,” in Gendercide and Genocide, ed. Adam Jones (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2004), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Dollard, Class and Caste in a Southern Town, 289–290 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Edwards, Hedwig Lee, and Michael Esposito, “Risk of Being Killed by Police: Use of Force in the United States by Age, Race-Ethnicity, and Sex,” PNAS 116.34 (2019): 16793–16798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectics of Sex (New York: Bantam Book, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest Gibson, Salvific Manhood: James Baldwin’s Novelization of Male Intimacy (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2019).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charlotte Gilman, Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation Between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Evolution (Boston: Small, Maynard & Company, 1900).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helen Hacker, Engaging Helen Hacker: Collected Works and Reflections of a Feminist Pioneer, eds. Heather McLaughlin, Kyle Green & Christopher Uggen (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing, 2018), 330–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helen Hacker, “The New Burdens of Masculinity,” Marriage and Family 19.3 (1957): 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helen Hacker, “Women as a Minority Group,” Social Forces 30.1 (1951): 60–69, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wizdom P. Hammond & Jacqueline S. Mattis, “Being a Man About It: Manhood Meaning Among African American Men,” Psychology of Men & Masculinity 6.2 (2005): 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulf Hannerz, Soulside: Inquiries into Ghetto Culture and Community (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), 118–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catherine Harnois, “Complexity Within and Similarity Across: Interpreting Black Men’s Support of Gender Justice, amidst Cultural Representations that Suggest Otherwise,” in Hyper Sexual, Hyper Masculine?: Gender, Race, and Sexuality in the Identities of Contemporary Black Men, eds., Brittany C. Slatton & Kemesha Spates (Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2014), 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, “Race, Gender, and the Black Women’s Standpoint,” Sociological Forum 25.1 (2010): 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidi I. Hartmann, “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union,” in Feminist Frameworks: Alternative Theoretical Accounts of the Relations Between Women and Men, eds. Alison M. Jaggar & Paula S. Rothenberg (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978), 172–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • bell hooks, We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity (New York: Routledge, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Hasan Johnson, “Challenging the Myth of Black Male Privilege,” Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men 6.2 (2018): 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam Jones, “Gendercide and Genocide,” Journal of Genocide Studies 2.2 (2000): 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephanie Jones-Rogers, They Were Here Property: White Women as Slave Owners in the American South (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Lemelle Jr., Black Masculinity and Sexual Politics (New York: Routledge, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Leonhardt, “The Black-White Wage Gap Is as Big as It was in 1950,” The New York Times, June 25, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerda Lerner, “New Approaches to the Study of Women in American History,” Journal of Social History 3.1 (1969): 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot Liebow, Tally’s Corner: A Study of Negro Street Corner Men (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Errol Miller, Men at Risk (Kingston: Jamaica Publishing House Ltd, 1991), 342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errol Miller, “Male Marginalization Revisited,” in Gender in the 21st Century: Caribbean Perspectives, Visions, and Possibilities, eds. Elsa Leo-Rhynie & Barbara Bailey (Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers, 2004), 99–133, 102. Also see Marginalization of the Black Male: Insights from the Development of the Teaching Profession (Barbados: Canoe Publishing, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Juliet Mitchell, Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Freudian Psychoanalysis (New York: Basic Books, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patricia Moran & Allan Barclay, “Effects of Father’s Absence on Delinquent Boys: Dependency and Hyper-Masculinity,” Psychological Reports 62 (1988): 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alva Myrdal, Nation and Family (England: Macmillan, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alva Myrdal, “A Parallel to the Negro Problem,” in An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, ed. G. Myrdal (New York: Harpers and Brothers Publishers, 1944), 1073–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo Oluwayomi, “The Man-Not and the Inapplicability of Intersectionality to the Dilemmas of Black Manhood,” The Journal of Men’s Studies 28.2 (2020): 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard N. Pitt & George Sanders, “Revisiting Hypermasculinity: Shorthand for Marginalized Masculinities?,” in What’s Up with the Brothers: Essays and Studies on African-American Masculinities, eds. Whitney Stewart Harris & Ronald Theodore Ferguson (Harrimon: Men’s Studies Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Pleck, The Myth of Masculinity (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981), 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willie Lee Rose, Slavery and Freedom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayle Rubin, “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the Political Economy of Sex” in Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Rayna R. Reiter (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975), 157–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jim Sidanius & Felicia Pratto, Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evelyn Simien, “A Black Gender Gap? Continuity and Change in Attitudes to Black Feminism,” in African American Perspectives on Political Science, ed. Rich Wilbur (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2007), 130–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • David L. Smith, Less than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Susan Smith et al., The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 State Report (Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2017), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • James B. Stewart & Joseph W. Scott, “The Institutional Decimation of Black American Males,” Western Journal of Black Studies 2.2 (1978): 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia Walby, Theorizing Patriarchy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin Warren, Ontological Terror: Blackness, Nihilism, and Emancipation (Durham: Duke University Press, 2018).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Max Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce Williams & Karen Holmes, The Second Assault: Rape and Public Attitudes (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvin E. Wolfgang & Franco Ferracuti, The Subculture of Violence: Towards an Integrated Theory in Criminology (London: Tavistock Publications, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommy J. Curry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Curry, T.J. (2022). Reconstituting the Object: Black Male Studies and the Problem of Studying Black Men and Boys Within Patriarchal Gender Theory. In: Tate, S.A., Gutiérrez Rodríguez, E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Race and Gender. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83947-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83947-5_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83946-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83947-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics