Skip to main content

Introduction to Reflective Supervision: Through the Lens of Culture, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of reflective supervision (RS), a supportive relationship that develops over time between supervisor and supervisee, highlighting strengths and vulnerabilities, and inviting attention to the awakening of thoughts and feelings that occur in the presence of vulnerable children and their families. Research has shown that RS supports supervisees in building clinical and reflective strategies to better serve infants, young children, and families. Of additional importance, RS reduces burnout and compassion fatigue while awarding practitioners the opportunity to share personal and professional challenges to their work within the context of safe and trusting supervisory relationships. It is within this relationship that issues related to culture, diversity, equity, and inclusion, vital to self-awareness and effective service, can be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrera, I., Kramer, L., & MacPherson, D. (2012). Skilled dialogue for responding to cultural diversity in early childhood (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, 1(3). Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). Attachment, communication, and the therapeutic process. In A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development (pp. 137–157). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I., Ridgeway, D., & Cassidy, J. (1990). Assessing internal working models of the attachment relationship: An attachment story completion task for 3-year-olds. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on mental health and development) (pp. 273–308). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Hawkins Rodgers, Y., & Kapadia, K. (2008). Multicultural considerations for the application of attachment theory. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 62(4), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diversity-Informed Tenets for Work with Infants, Children & Families. (2018). https://diversityinformedtenets.org/

  • Eggbeer, L., Shamoon Shanock, R., & Clark, R. (2010). Reaching toward an evidence base for reflective supervision. Zero to Three Journal, 31(2), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emde, R. N. (1991). The wonder of our complex enterprise: Steps enabled by attachment and the effects of relationships on relationships. Infant Mental Health Journal, 12(3), 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, M. (2016). Race is a social construct, scientists argue. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh-Ippen, C., Noroña, C. R., & Thomas, K. (2012). From tenet to practice: Putting diversity-informed services into action. Zero to Three Journal, 33(2), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, S. P. (2000). A Multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: Implications for the well-being of people of color. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70(1), 42–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, S. P. (2014). Compassionate confrontation and empathic exploration: The integration of race related narratives in clinical supervision. In C. A. Falender, E. P. Shafranske, & C. J. Falicov (Eds.), Multiculturalism and diversity in clinical supervision. A competency-based approach (pp. 83–110). American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, S. S., & Ash, J. (2016). The provider reflective process assessment scales (PRAS): Taking a deep look into growing reflective capacity in early childhood providers. Zero to Three Journal, 37(2), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. J., Liu, S., Ge, L., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Liu, Q., & Pascalis, O. (2007). Cross-race preferences for same-race faces extend beyond the African versus Caucasian contrast in 3-month-old. Infants, 11(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000709336871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., Ge, L., & Pascalis, O. (2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8(6), F31–F36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.0434a.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., & Slater, A. (2013). Development of face processing abilities. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 338–370). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekas, H.M., Pahl K., & Fuller Lewis, C. (2020, December 20). Rethinking cultural competence: Shifting to cultural humility. Health Serv Insights, 13, 1178632920970580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632920970580. PMID: 33424230; PMCID: PMC7756036.

  • McIntosh, P. (2015). Extending the knapsack: Using the white privilege analysis to examine conferred advantage and disadvantage. Women & Therapy, 38(3–4), 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. A., Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of humility. Human Relations, 58(10), 1323–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noroña, C. R., Heffron, M. C., Grunstein, S., & Nalo, A. (2012). Broadening the scope: Next steps in reflective supervision training. Zero to Three Journal, 33(2), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, J. (2011). Clinical work with traumatized young children. Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, J. D., & Lieberman, A. F. (2011). A call for integrating a mental health perspective into systems for care for abused and neglected infants and young children. American Psychologist, 66(2), 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. (2012). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawl, J. H., & St. John, M. (1998). How you are is as important as what you do in making a positive difference for infants, children, and families. National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, W. (2007). Models and domain of supervision and their relationship to professional development. Zero to Three Journal, 28(2), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahmoon-Shanok, R. (2009). What is reflective supervision? In S. S. Heller & L. Gilkerson (Eds.), A practical guide to reflective supervision (pp. 7–24). Zero to Three.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, S. E. (2019). Reflective supervision for social work field instructors: Lessons learned from infant mental health. Clinical Social Work Journal, 47, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, M. S., Thomas, K., & Noroña, C. R. (2012). Infant mental health professional development. Zero to Three Journal, 33(2), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., Noroña, C. R., & St. John, M. S. (2019). Cross-sector allies together in the struggle for social justice: Diversity-informed tenets for work with infants, children, and families. Zero to Three Journal, 33(2), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. (2016). Using the reflective interaction observation scale as a framework for defining infant mental health reflective supervision. Alliance for the Advancement of Infant Mental Health Annual Retreat. Phoenix, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C., Harrison, M., Hennes, J., & Harris, M. (2016). Revealing the space between: Creating an observation scale to understand infant mental health reflective supervision. Zero to Three Journal, 37, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherston, D. J., & Barron, C. (2009). What does a reflective supervisory relationship look like? In S. S. Heller & L. Gilkerson (Eds.), A practical guide to reflective supervision (pp. 61–80). Zero to Three.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherston, D. J., & Ribaudo, J. (2020). The Michigan infant mental health home visiting model. Infant Mental Health Journal, 41(2), 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherston, D. J., & Tableman, B. (2015). Supporting competencies/reducing risks (3rd ed.). Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherston, D. J., Weigand, R., & Weigand, B. (2010). Reflective supervision: Supporting reflection as a cornerstone for competency. Zero to Three Journal, 31(2), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., Barron, C., Wheeler, R., & Estele-Avelini Jedrzejek, P. (2018). The importance of examining diversity in reflective supervision when working with young children and their families. Reflective Practice, 19(5), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1538956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeanah, C. H., Jr. (Ed.). (2019). Handbook of infant mental health (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karol A. Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wilson, K.A., Weatherston, D.J., Hill, S. (2021). Introduction to Reflective Supervision: Through the Lens of Culture, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. In: Lewis, M.L., Weatherston, D.J. (eds) Therapeutic Cultural Routines to Build Family Relationships. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83726-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics