Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Directions of Standardization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 212))

  • 1739 Accesses

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can have a significant positive impact on health and healthcare. AI can be used to improve the quality, efficiency and equity of health care. However, AI has the potential to have significant negative impacts. Therefore, AI medical applications should be designed and deployed in accordance with established guidelines and legislation. There may be gaps or questions in the current regulatory framework related to the interpretation and application of the existing regulatory framework to healthcare applications that include artificial intelligence solutions. Global standardization maintains a consistent approach and can reduce the burden on stakeholders when it comes to establishing regulatory frameworks, interpreting and complying with regulatory requirements. While AI is far from new, it has only recently become mainstream. This chapter outlines the research of the authors who are members of the Hoc Group on Application of AI Technologies in Health Informatics (ISO AHG2 TC215), which was formed by ISO Technical Committee 215 to define goals and directions for standardization in the field of AI in health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A definition of AI: main capabilities and disciplines. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence.08.4.2018.- https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=56341.

  2. M. Chen, M. Decary, Artificial intelligence in healthcare: an essential guide for health leaders. Healthc. Manag. Forum. 33(1), 10–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419873123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K.H. Yu, A.L. Beam, I.S. Kohane, Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2(10), 719–731 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Tohka, M. van Gils, Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for health and wellness applications: A tutorial. Computers in Biology and Medicine 132, (May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104324

  5. S.P. Morozov, A.V. Vladzymyrskyy, V.G. Klyashtornyy, A.E. Andreychenko et al., Clinical acceptance of software based on artificial intelligence technologies (radiology), in Best Practices in Medical Imaging, vol. 57 (2019), p. 45

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Society of Radiology (ESR), Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 10(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0798-3 (2019)

  7. B. Heinrichs, S.B. Eickhoff, Your evidence? Machine learning algorithms for medical diagnosis and prediction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 41(6), 1435–1444 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Ploug, S. Holm, The four dimensions of contestable AI diagnostics—a patient-centric approach to explainable AI. Artif. Intell. Med. 107, 101901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bioethics briefing note: artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and research. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2018). https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Artificial-Intelligence-AI-in-healthcare-and-research.pdf

  10. A. Jobin, M. Ienca, E. Vayena, The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 389–399 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the leadership of Technical Committee ISO/TC 215 “Health Informatics” and Subcommittee ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 “Artificial Intellegence” of ISO Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1 “Information Technology” for providing the opportunity to bring together such a wonderful international team and do useful and meaningful work.

*Hoc Group on Application of AI Technologies in Health Informatics (AHG2 TC215 ISO)

Paolo Alcini1, Pat Baird2, Peter Williams3, SB Bhattacharyya6, Todd Cooper7, Rich de la Cruz8, Chandan Kumar9, Gora Datta10, Dorotea Alessandra De Marco11, Andreas Franken12, Regina Geierhofer13, Peter G. Goldschmidt14, Ilkka Juuso15, 16, Herman Klimenko4, Antonio Kung17, Frederic Laroche18, Joe Lewelling19, Martin Meyer20, Sergey Morozov21, Anna Orlova22, Telonis Panagiotis23, Thomas Penzel24, Derek Ritz25, Gaur Sander26, Soo-Yong Shin27, Alpo Värri28, Anton Vladzimerskiy4, 21, Georgy Lebedev4, 5 (lebedev@d-health.institute).

Affiliations

1European Medicines Agency, 2Royal Philips, Pleasant Prairie, USA, 3Oracle Corporation, 4I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 5Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics, 6Bhattacharyyas Clinical Records Research & Informatics, 7Trusted Solutions Foundry, Inc., San Diego, USA, 8Silver Lake Group, Inc., Minnetonka, USA, 9Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India, 10CAL2CAL Corporation, Irvine, USA, 11Italian Data Protection Authority, 12Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Hersteller e.V. (BAH), Bonn, Germany, 13Medizinische Universität Graz, Austria, 14World Development Group, Inc., 15Cerenion Ltd., 16Center for Machine Vision and Signal Analysis at the University of Oulu, 17Trialog, Paris, France, 18LCI Consulting Inc, Montreal, Canada, 19Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Arlington, USA, 20Siemens Healthineers, 21Research and Practical Center of Medical Radiology, Department of Health Care of Moscow, 22School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, USA, 23European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24Charite University Hospital, Interdisciplinary Center of Sleep Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 25ecGroup Inc, 26Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC), India, 27SungKyunKwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 28Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoc Group on Application of AI Technologies. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Directions of Standardization. In: Lim, CP., Chen, YW., Vaidya, A., Mahorkar, C., Jain, L.C. (eds) Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83620-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics