Skip to main content

Digital Transformation: An Analysis of the Role of Technology Service Providers in Montreal’s Emerging AI Business Ecosystem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digitalization and Firm Performance

Abstract

This chapter is based on a qualitative survey, including 3 focus groups, 3 co-construction meetings and 25 semi-structured interviews with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and technology experts. This allows us to report on the dynamics of key actors in the AI business ecosystem and their contribution in supporting various forms of AI solution integration and digital transformation in general. Following a thematic analysis of our interviews, we present the results of our qualitative analysis of the needs of AI project managers that technology service providers can meet in order to help companies to make their digital shift. Indeed, some companies and industries are having difficulty with starting to modernise their facilities, especially in the manufacturing sector; many are wary of technological changes and are worried about data protection, amongst other preoccupations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “AI is not represented because in 2016, we did not yet talk much about AI” (Org1).

  2. 2.

    Refer to the document: “Roadmap for Digital Maturity & Industry 4.0”. Government of Quebec (PAEN, 2016a, p. 17).

References

  • Accenture. (2018). Artificial intelligence, genuine impact. Public services in the era of artificial intelligence. Accenture Consulting, 12 p. Accessed May 10, 2020. https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-75/accenture-ai-genuine-impact-pov-final-us.pdf

  • Barbaroux, P. (2014). Innovation disruptive et naissance d’un écosystème: Voyage aux origines de l’internet. Revue d’économie industrielle, 146, 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonollo, N., & Poopuu, P. (2019, may). The impact of digital platforms on roles and responsibilities in value creation among stakeholders of an ecosystem (Master thesis, Jönköping University, International Business School). Accessed April 10, 2021. http://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1321065/FULLTEXT01.pdf

  • Boutillier, S., & Uzunidis, D. (2010). Innovation et proximité entreprises, entrepreneurs et milieux innovateurs (Innovation and proximity entreprises, entrepreneurs and innovative milieus) (No. 10). Research Network on Innovation, 22 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brydges, T., & Pugh, R. (2021). Coming into fashion: Expanding the entrepreneurial ecosystem concept to the creative industries through a Toronto case study. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2019). Canada’s digital charter in action: A plan by Canadians, for Canadians. Report of Government of Canada, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, 1–22. Accessed February 20, 2021. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/062.nsf/vwapj/Digitalcharter_Report_EN.pdf/$file/Digitalcharter_Report_EN.pdf

  • CDGSC [Canadian Data Governance Standardization Collaborative]. (2019, November 26). Canadian data governance standardization collaborative. Standards Council of Canada. Accessed July 5, 2020. https://www.scc.ca/fr/programmes-phares/gouvernance-des-donnees

  • CEFRIO. (2016). Prendre part à la révolution manufacturière ? - Du rattrapage technologique à l’industrie 4.0 chez les PME. Rapport technique, 31 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 400, 0–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIFAR. (n.d.). About CIFAR. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://cifar.ca/our-story/

  • Cooper, H. M. (1984). The integrative research review: A systematic approach. Applied social research methods series. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 104–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilhac, M.-A., et al. (2018). The Montreal declaration for a responsible development of artificial intelligence. Montreal, QC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Vassilis Galanos, P., Ilavarasan, V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2019). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57(101994), 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, M., & Winston, E. (2009). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Management Review, 5(2), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossain, S.‚ & Kandiah, G. (1998). Reinventing value: The new business ecosystem. Strategy & Leadership26(5) Chicago, (Nov/Dec 1998): 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054622

  • Kiron, D. (2017). What managers need to know about artificial intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, D., Schiavone, F., Appio, F. P., & Chiao, B. (2021). How does artificial intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem. Journal of Business Research, 129, 849–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C., Rong, K., You, J., & Shi, Y. (2014). Business ecosystems and stakeholders’ role transformation: Evidence from Chinese emerging electric vehicle industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(10), 4579–4595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, G., & Pétry, F. (2010). Guide d'élaboration d'un projet de recherche en sciences sociales. De Boeck Supérieur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantha, Y., Yune, Y. J., Henderson, P., & Lin, W.-W. (2019). 2019 Canadian AI ecosystem. Jfgagn. Accessed February 7, 2021. https://jfgagne.ai/fr/carte-de-lecosysteme-de-lia-en-2019/

  • MEI—Ministry of Economy and Innovation. (2016). Industrie 4.0: les défis de la quatrième révolution industrielle. Government of Quebec. Accessed May 7, 2020. https://www.economie.gouv.qc.ca/bibliotheques/bulletins/bulletin-espace-conseils-pme/archives/

  • MEI—Ministry of Economy and Innovation. (2018). L’intelligence artificielle: pourquoi la PME manufacturière devrait-elle en tirer profit? Government of Quebec, SME Advice Area. Accessed May 7, 2020. https://www.economie.gouv.qc.ca/bibliotheques/outils/gestion-dune-entreprise/industrie-40/lintelligence-artificielle-pourquoi-la-pme-manufacturiere-devrait-elle-en-tirer-profit/

  • MESI—Ministry of Economy, Science and Innovation. (2017, June). Industrie 4.0. Enquête auprès des entreprises manufacturières du Québec. Analysis report, project team MESI and CEFRIO, pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazaud, F. (2006). De la firme sous-traitante de premier rang à la firme pivot. Une mutation de l’organisation du système productif «Airbus». Revue D’économie Industrielle, 113, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition. Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 31–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberer, B., & Erkollar, A. (2018). Leadership 4.0: Digital leaders in the age of industry 4.0. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (s.d. a). (2019). What are the OECD Principles on AI ? Consulted on July 4 2021, https://www.oecd.org/goingdigital/ai/principles/

  • PAEN [Digital Action Plan]. (2016a, October). Plan d’action en économie numérique. Feuille de route industrie 4.0. Quebec's digital strategy, Ministry of Economy, Science and Innovation (MESI), Government of Quebec, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAEN [Digital Action Plan]. (2016b). Plan d’action en économie numérique. Pour l’excellence numérique des entreprises et des organisations québécoises. Quebec's digital strategy, Government of Quebec, pp. 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2008). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau-Houle, D. (2019). Les effets de l’intelligence artificielle sur le monde du travail [The effects of artificial intelligence on the world of work]. Commission de l’éthique en science et en technologie, Quebec Government, 1–54. Accessed May 20, 2020. https://www.ethique.gouv.qc.ca/assets/documents/IA_travail/CEST_effets_intelligence_artificielle_travail_A.pdf

  • Rydning, D. R. J. G. J. (2018). The digitization of the world from edge to core. International Data Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilling, O. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research‚ 36(1)‚ 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00166-2

  • Staples, M., & Niazi, M. (2007). Experiences using systematic review guidelines. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1425–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, D. G., & Yagoubi, A. (2017a). Business model and wearables: What convergence and collaboration in the area of connected objects and clothing? Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 5(1), 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, D. G.‚ & Yagoubi‚ A. (2017b). “From open innovation to crowd sourcing: A new configuration of collaborative work?” in American Journal of Industrial and Business Management‚ 7(3). http://file.scirp.org/pdf/AJIBM_2017033115053775.pdf (AJIBM).

  • Trott, P.‚ & Hartmann‚ D. (2009). Why ‘open innovation' is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), pp. 715–736. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002509

  • Van der Maren, J. M. (1987). L’Interprétation des données dans la recherche qualitative: actes du colloque. In Actes de colloque. Université de Montréal, Faculté des sciences de l'éducation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, E., & Rego, R. (2019). Digitalization and public services: A labour perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagoubi, A., & Tremblay, D. G. (2017). L’innovation numérique et technologique dans le secteur vêtement-mode: Les politiques publiques en soutien à la création d’un écosystème d’affaires intersectoriel. Innovations, 2, 153–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagoubi, A., Tremblay, D.-G., & Psyché, V. (2021). What skills are required for an AI project manager? Development of a skills framework. Research report for the PIA-CO1 project. Montréal: Université Téluq. 80 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tremblay, DG., Yagoubi, A., Psyché, V. (2022). Digital Transformation: An Analysis of the Role of Technology Service Providers in Montreal’s Emerging AI Business Ecosystem. In: Ratajczak-Mrozek, M., Marszałek, P. (eds) Digitalization and Firm Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83360-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics