Skip to main content

The Politics of Social Impact Measurement in Indonesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future

Abstract

Unpacking the contestation surrounding the politics of social impact measurement allows for the development of consistent approaches. This chapter offers a brief history of the existing approaches in social impact measurement in Indonesia. It will show that despite the shift from a state-centred to private sector focus (including the third sector), the involvement of beneficiaries in social impact measurement is often neglected. The chapter will argue for the need to revisit strategies and policies regarding social impact measurement in Indonesia, by further showing the importance of participatory, multi-stakeholder, and beneficiary-centred approaches. It finishes with several recommendations for the government, the private, and the third sectors and discuss how the Sustainable Development Goals can support these participatory, community-focused recommendations [Relevant SDGs: SDG17: Partnerships for the Goals].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    President Suharto’s (the second Indonesian president) government between 1966–1998 was characterized as the ‘New Order’ by the administration. This was to show a break from the ‘Old Order’ of President Sukarno’s administration (1945–1966). The New Order departed from the expensive high-profile international projects that were central to the ‘Old Order’, for example, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), as well as the Games of Emerging Forces (GANEFO). The New Order focused more on poverty reduction initiatives and the improvement of the country’s economy.

References

  • Akbar, A., Flacke, J., Martinez, J., & van Maarseveen, M. F. (2020). Participatory Planning Practice in Rural Indonesia: A Sustainable Development Goals-Based Evaluation. Community Development, 51(3), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the Social? The Nature and Controversies of Measuring Social Return on Investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei–Skillern, J. (2006). Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing–Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisland, L. A., Djan, K. O., Mersland, R., & Randøy, T. (2020). Measuring Social Performance in Social Enterprises: A Global Study of Microfinance Institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1993). Counting the Poor in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 29(1), 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (2000). Poverty and Inequality in the Soeharto Era: An Assessment. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 36(1), 73–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Council. (2018). “The State of Social Enterprise in Indonesia”. Retrieved on September, 15, 2021. Available at https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/the_state_of_social_enterprise_in_indonesia_british_council_web_final_0.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J. H. (2000). Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Even-handedness. Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J. H. (2004). A Contextual Approach to Political Theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 7(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demuijnck, G., & Fasterling, B. (2016). The Social License to Operate. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social ENTERPRISEs as Hybrid Organisations: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The Governance of Social Enterprises: Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organisations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F., & Biggs, S. (2001). Evolving Themes in Rural Development 1950s–2000s. Development and Policy Review, 19(4), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idris, A., & Hijrah Hati, R. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship in Indonesia: Lessons from the Past. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 277–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comparing Social Value Creation. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kula, W. (2014). Measures and Men. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. M. (2015). The Politics and Consequences of Performance Measurement. Policy and Society, 34(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Social Impact Measurement: Classification of Methods. In Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management (pp. 171–202). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Macfeely, S. (2018). “The 2030 Agenda An Unprecedented Statistical Challenge.” Retrieved on September 15, 2021. Available at https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/14796.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier-Knapp, Naila. (2020). “The European Commission’s palm oil conundrum”. East Asia Forum. Retrieved on September 15, 2021. Available at https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/02/28/the-european-commissions-palm-oil-conundrum/

    Google Scholar 

  • Margiono, A., Kariza, A., & Heriyati, P. (2019). Venture Legitimacy and Storytelling in Social Enterprises. Small Enterprise Research, 26(1), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mursitama, T. N., Hasan, M. F., and Fakhrudin, I. Y. (2011). Corporate social responsibility di Indonesia: teori dan implementasi: studi kasus community development Riaupulp..

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugroho, Y. (2010). Non-government Organisations, the Internet, and Sustainable Rural Development: The Case of Indonesia. Information, Communication and Society, 13(1), 88–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, A. S. K. (2009). Ethical Corporate Social Responsibility and the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Happy Couple? Journal of Medical Marketing, 9(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam, G. B. (2007). “Impact Measurement and Accountability in Emergencies: The Good Enough Guide”. Retrieved on September 15, 2020. Available at https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/115510/bk-impact-measurement-accountability-090207-en.pdf;jsessionid=C9B265D387A90A6BA9185766C028C82B?sequence=1

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility Business as Usual? The Case of the Tobacco Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoli, G. D., Yaap, B., Wells, P. L., & Sileuw, A. (2010). CSR, Oil Palm and the RSPO: Translating Boardroom Philosophy into Conservation Action on the Ground. Tropical Conservation Science, 3(4), 438–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, M., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., and Pritchett, L. (2000). Measurements of Poverty in Indonesia, 1996, 1999, and Beyond. The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social Impact Measurement: Current Approaches and Future Directions for Social Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • RSPO Human Rights Working Group. (2015). “Free, Prior and Informed Consent Guide for RSPO Members”. Retrieved on September 15, 2021. Available at https://rspo.org/news-and-events/announcements/free-prior-and-informed-consent-guide-for-rspo-members-2015-endorsed

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajogyo, P., and Wiradi, G. (1985). Rural Poverty and Efforts for Its Alleviation in Indonesia,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F. M. (2012). A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., Koufopoulos, D. N., & Palmer, P. (2010). Partnership Formation for Change: Indicators for Transformative Potential in Cross Sector Social Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siahaya, I. A., & Smits, T. (2021). Sport Corporate Social Responsibility as a Hidden Marketing Strategy? A study of Djarum, an Indonesian Tobacco Company. Sport in Society, 24(9), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing Before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organisational Hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtler, L., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Coopetition as a Paradox: Integrative Approaches in a Multi-company, Cross-sector Partnership. Organization Studies, 37(5), 655–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Z. (2016). Social Justice and Educational Measurement: John Rawls, the History of Testing, and the Future of Education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waagstein, P. R. (2011). The Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (1973). The Politics of Impact Measurement. Policy Studies Journal, 1(3), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., & Baker, T. (2020). Moving Contexts onto New Roads: Clues from Other Disciplines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1042258720930996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ari Margiono .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Margiono, A., Mursitama, T.N., Wulandari, R. (2022). The Politics of Social Impact Measurement in Indonesia. In: Hazenberg, R., Paterson-Young, C. (eds) Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics