Abstract
In “Self-Exceptionism and its Counternarrative: An Autonetnography of Shifting Diabetes Identity,” Heather R. Walker contemplates diabetes identity formation in a social environment that makes assumptions about what being diabetic must mean. Walker argues that bringing diabetes into her self-concept was a political act requiring unlearning and deconditioning. She describes moments of reckoning with internalized ableism, where she tried to locate herself within and apart from stereotypical formulations of diabetes. First, Walker deconstructs a representational strategy she calls self-exceptionism. Then, she offers an alternative framework for looking at diabetes identity which Walker terms radical trust.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As a young child, I interpreted the healthcare provider’s comment as a signal of my end. I thought they were telling me I would die at the age of 35. Now, having processed that memory with my parents, who were also there at the time, I realize I was told that if I kept my blood sugars in range, I could expect to reach at least age 35 before seeing complications (like kidney disease, blindness, or amputations).
- 2.
These messages are likely type-specific. I was not blamed, shamed, or belittled for my diagnosis—an experience many with type 2 diabetes have described (Liu et al. 2017), especially those with fat embodiment (Rogge et al. 2004; Teixeira and Budd 2010). On the contrary; I recall hearing many times that I was “innocent”. These welcome to type 1diabetes narratives set the groundwork of a diabetes identity built upon self-exceptionism. And my self-exceptionism was taught by my medical team, authenticated by comments I heard first-hand, and affirmed by popular media. By the age of 20, then 9 years post diagnosis, I had firmly internalized the idea that the diabetes stereotype (the rule) did not apply to me, nor to most others with type 1 diabetes (the exception).
- 3.
Racism and classism are two factors impacting the way mainstream media portrays diabetes as well. While it is not within the scope of this paper to fully unpack these factors, they will be mentioned herein.
- 4.
In U.S. culture, self-exceptionism can also be interpreted as a function of whiteness because it centers the ideals of individualism and subscribes to a belief in meritocracy (see: Sumerau and Grollman 2018; Nakayama and Krizek 1995; Meeuf 2014; Jin and Ball 2018; Lardier et al. 2019; Ellis 2017). Hiding behind these ideals can stall social justice and policy reform that would make for a more just and equitable society. Similarly, hiding behind self-exceptionism or using it to form identity in diabetes works to maintain the splintering of diabetic groups by type, race, and class.
- 5.
This argument may not apply to people who were diagnosed so early in life that they do not remember what life without diabetes was like. With that said, I would argue that even those diabetic people who do not remember non-diabetic life go through periods of asking “why me?”.
- 6.
I make this observation noting that my research in this area primes me to attend to such ideological shifts in community narrative. Skeptics might argue that such a statement is a sign of confirmation bias. However, I argue that it is more attributable to priming and insider knowledges of where to look than bias.
- 7.
This cultural tendency can likely be found elsewhere. However, it is not within the scope of this chapter to explore global perspectives. Future research from countries outside of United States where the particularities of diabetes experience differ is warranted.
References
Bock, Sheila. 2017. Contextualization, Reflexivity, and the Study of Diabetes-Related Stigma. Journal of Folklore Research 49 (2): 153–178.
Brueggemann, B. J. 2009. Introduction: The Deaf Subject Places Herself. In Deaf Subjects: Between Identities and Places. New York, NY: NYU Press.
Ellis, Christopher. 2017. Social Class, Meritocracy, and the Geography of the ‘American Dream’. The Forum 15 (1): 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0004.
Evans, Heather D. 2017. Un/Covering : Making Disability Identity Legible. Disability Studies Quartly 37 (1): 1–29.
———. 2019. ‘Trial by Fire’: Forms of Impairment Disclosure and Implications for Disability Identity. Disability and Society 34 (5): 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1580187.
Ezzell, M.B. 2009. ‘Barbie Dolls’ on the Pitch: Identity Work, Defensive Othering and Inequality in Women’s Rugby. Social Problems 56: 113–131.
Fahey, Tracy. 2015. Blood Sugar: Gothic Bodies and Diabetes. Gothic Studies 17 (1): 92–103. https://doi.org/10.7227/gs.17.1.7.
Gill, C.J. 1997. Four Types of Integration in Disability Identity Development. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 9 (97): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-2263(97)00020-2.
Goffman, Erving. 1963, 1986. Stigma: Notes on the Mamnagement of Spoiled Identity. Simon & Schuster.
Golden, Sherita Hill, Joshua J. Joseph, and Felicia Hill-Briggs. 2021. Casting a Health Equity Lens on Endocrinology and Diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 106 (4): e1909–11916. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa938.
Holup, Amanda A., Katherine Hyer, Hongdao Meng, and Ladislav Volicer. 2017. Profile of Nursing Home Residents Admitted Directly From Home. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 18 (2): 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.017.
Jalata, Asafa. 2002. Revisiting the Black Struggle: Lessons for the 21st Century. Journal of Black Studies 33 (1): 86–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193470203300105.
Jin, Jin, and Stephen J. Ball. 2018. Meritocracy, Social Mobility and a New Form of Class Domination. British Journal and Sociology and Education 41 (1): 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1665496.
Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Indiana University Press.
Kozinets, Robert V. 2015. Netnography: Redefined. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.
Lardier, David T., Katherine G. Herr, Veronica R. Barrios, Pauline Garcia-Reid, and Robert J. Reid. 2019. Merit in Meritocracy: Uncovering the Myth of Exceptionality and Self-Reliance Through the Voices of Urban Youth of Color. Education and Urban Society 51 (4): 474–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517727583.
Lietaer, G. 1980. Unconditional Positive Regard: A Controversial Basic Attitude in Client-Centered Therapy. In Client-Centered Therapy and the Person-Centered Approach: New Directions in Theory, Research, and Practice, ed. R.F. Levant and J.M. Shlien, 41–58. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Meeuf, Russell. 2014. The Nonnormative Celebrity Body and the Meritocracy of the Star System: Constructing Peter Dinklage in Entertainment Journalism. Journal of Communication Inquiry 38 (3): 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859914532947.
Nakayama, Thomas K., and Robert L. Krizek. 1995. Whiteness: A Strategic Rhetoric. Article in Quarterly Journal of Speech 81 (August): 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384117.
Nancy F., Liu Adam S., Brown Alexandra E., Folias Michael F., Younge Susan J., Guzman Kelly L., Close Richard, Wood. 2017. Stigma in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes. Clinical Diabetes 35 (1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd16-0020
Rice, Carla, Eliza Chandler, Jen Rinaldi, Nadine Changfoot, Kirsty Liddiard, Roxanne Mykitiuk, and Ingrid Mündel. 2017. Imagining Disability Futurities. Hypatia 32 (2): 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12321.
Rogge, M. M., Greenwald, M., and Golden, A. (2004). Obesity, Stigma, and Civilized Oppression. Advances in Nursing Science 27 (4): 301–315.
Rogers, Carl R. 1961. On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disbaility Theory. University of Michigan Press.
Spanakis, Elias K., and Sherita Hill Golden. 2013. Race/Ethnic Difference in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications. Current Diabetes Reports 13 (6): 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9.
Sumerau, J.E., and Eric Anthony Grollman. 2018. Obscuring Oppression: Racism, Cissexism, and the Persistence of Social Inequality. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 4 (3): 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649218755179.
Teixeira, M. E., and Budd, G. M. (2010). Obesity Stigma: A Newly Recognized Barrier to Comprehensive and Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 22 (10): 527–533.
Travis, Shirley S., Robert J. Buchanan, Suojin Wang, and MyungSuk Kim. 2004. Analyses of Nursing Home Residents With Diabetes at Admission. Journal of Medical Directors Association 5 (5): 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70021-3.
Walker, Heather R. 2014a. Bother Me Tomorrow, Today, i’ll Buy No Sorrows. Unexpected Blues. https://unexpectedblues.com/2014/12/28/bother-me-tomorrow-today-ill-buy-no-sorrows/
———. 2014b. Ground Control to Major Tom. Unexpected Blues. https://unexpectedblues.com/2014/10/23/ground-control-to-major-tom/
———. 2015. I’m Coming out, i Want the World to Know, Gonna Let It Show. Unexpected Blues. https://unexpectedblues.com/2015/11/17/im-coming-out-i-want-the-world-to-know-gonna-let-it-show/
Walker, Heather R., and Bianca Claire Frazer. 2021. The Metanarrative of Diabetes: Should You Be Eating That? In Metanarratives of Disability: Culture, Assumed Authority, and the Normative Social Order, ed. David Bolt, 156–168. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Walker, Heather R., and Michelle L. Litchman. 2021. Diabetes Identity: A Mechanism of Social Change. Qualitative Health Research, January. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320984740
Wilkins, Paul. 2000. Unconditional Positive Regard Reconsidered. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/030698800109592.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walker, H.R. (2021). Self-Exceptionism and its Counternarrative: An Autonetnography of Shifting Diabetes Identity. In: Frazer, B.C., Walker, H.R. (eds) (Un)doing Diabetes: Representation, Disability, Culture. Palgrave Studies in Science and Popular Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83110-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83110-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83109-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83110-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)