Skip to main content

Nurses and the Military Medical Services in the Great War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nurse Memoirs from the Great War in Britain, France, and Germany

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

  • 213 Accesses

Abstract

The conditions of nurses’ employment and their experiences were dictated by the military medical services, incorporating the national Red Cross organisations. Their planning had been an integral part of military preparations, but they were inadequate for the new industrialised war. Even when modified and improved during the war, the standards of care were always a compromise between military and medical demands; this was especially clear in triage and logistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Harrison (2010) contains extensive discussion of these differences.

  2. 2.

    With some partial exceptions: those military health systems which were so overwhelmed that they accepted independent groups of volunteers, who were able to operate more or less autonomously; the best-known examples were in Belgium and Serbia, partly because volunteers wrote about their experiences there (e.g. St. Clair Stobart , 1916; Sturzenegger, 1915; Mitton, 1916).

  3. 3.

    Sir John French was the first overall commander of British forces on the Western Front, in 1914–15. The mistake was further compounded by the belief, especially prevalent in the French military hierarchy, that all-out attack was the best strategy (Bertschy, 2018: 310–16); this was belatedly recognised by French commanders. The German army made the same mistake in the early months (Hartmann, 2014).

  4. 4.

    Dunant had been moved to found the Red Cross after seeing the aftermath of the Battle of Solferino in 1859 (https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/feature/2010/solferino-feature-240609.htm)

  5. 5.

    Some caution is needed in the interpretation of these figures. Each unit is a treatment admission and discharge, thus a soldier who was wounded four times and died after the fifth would count as four recoveries and one death. Many soldiers were wounded multiple times—Ernst Jünger was hit 14 times, on seven separate occasions (Segal & Ferrandis, 2012: 123).

  6. 6.

    However, as Harrison points out, rates of death by disease varied substantially between theatres, in part due to different levels of attention given to medical matters by local commanders (2010: 298–9).

  7. 7.

    See also Carden-Coyne, 2014: 11; Dwyer, 2017: 2. It is probably not a coincidence that the nineteenth century also sees the birth of soldiers’ memoirs as a literary genre; as Harari as shown, military memoirs moved from being the preserve of the elite to become also the property of the ordinary soldier recounting their personal experience (quoted Ramsey, 2017: 48).

  8. 8.

    This document established the legal basis of the purpose and organisation of the military medical system in 1907 (earlier versions from 1874) (Zischek et al., 2018).

  9. 9.

    In law this was not entirely true: in France, soldiers had the same right as anyone else to refuse surgery. The same principle applied in Germany (Peske, 2012: 66–7).

  10. 10.

    This theme is at the heart of other texts about the medical history of the Great War, notably Carden-Coyne (2014).

  11. 11.

    More exactly, the disastrous experiences of the first months of the war made them realise this; see below.

  12. 12.

    See Thébaud (1986: 84–93) for details.

  13. 13.

    See Schulte (1998: 99–100) for details.

  14. 14.

    Or, in an alternative formulation, “the manpower-intensive form of warfare” (Harrison, 2010: 65).

  15. 15.

    These figures include garrisons outside Europe, elsewhere in the Empire.

  16. 16.

    The total number of doctors is taken from the website of the military medical service https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sante/actualites/le-service-de-sante-des-armees-pendant-la-premiere-guerre-mondiale

  17. 17.

    This percentage was higher than the figures for Britain (around 45%) but lower than France (80%). The depletion of civilian health resources had an impact upon the health of the civilian populations (van Bergen, 2009: 24–5).

  18. 18.

    Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 41 (1), 7.1.15: 42. An editorial note explains that the article reproduces notes written in the previous October, that is, shortly after the defeat at the Marne and the retreat to the static positions that defined the Western Front. The figures therefore cover a period of roughly two months. From internal evidence, the doctor was stationed near Soissons.

  19. 19.

    See Harrison (2010) for detailed analyses of the British army’s medical record outside the Western Front.

  20. 20.

    Figures taken from the German Red Cross website: ww.drk.de/das-drk/geschichte; and Eckart, 2014: 104. The Ritterorden were semi-conventual nursing orders such as the Johanniter. According to Hrouda, conditions for Ritterorden nurses were very different to those in the Red Cross (1935: 85–6).

  21. 21.

    Hallett gives the total of enrolled nurses plus the reserve as 800 (2016: 13).

  22. 22.

    British Medical Journal, 1.7.24: 71.

  23. 23.

    See the contemporary account excerpted in Panke-Kochinke & Schaidhammer-Placke, 2002: 42–4.

  24. 24.

    Schulte, 1998: 99–100. See also German press reports of complaints from the “free sisters”, for example, Vorwärts, 9.9.14; Berliner Tageblatt, 17.9.14. On 6.9.14 the Norddeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung printed a public letter from the Military Inspection asking Red Cross organisers to accept them when they were as qualified as others. The rejection was caused by the perception that the professional nurses were motivated by the desire to earn a living whereas the Red Cross nurses were motivated by ethics. This principle was already stressed in the war surgery handbook of 1882, according to which “all nursing is to be refused that is not done for the Lord’s sake” (quoted Grundhewer, 1987: 150); perhaps organisational rivalries were also present (Smith, 2010: 165; Eckart, 2014: 108).

  25. 25.

    Thébaud gives the higher figure (1986: 85), Zacharini-Fournel the lower (2004: 35).

  26. 26.

    Gradmann (2004: 812–3) gives a higher figure for women involved in military health care, as the usual figure excludes some categories of auxiliary workers, many of whom were women.

  27. 27.

    Bertschy (loc. cit.) gives extensive details of French military medical observation of the Japanese wars of 1890 through 1905 and the Balkan wars of 1912–3 and how this was interpreted by the French military command. He argues that French military insistence on the primacy of rapid attack led them to prefer this interpretation of medical observations over alternatives.

  28. 28.

    Close to the beginning of the war, this fundamental untruth about the “humanitarian bullet” was publicly repeated in the French and German press. For example, on 5.8.14 the Freiburger Tagblatt sought to reassure its readership that “wounds are getting ever slighter and the new artillery weapons are by no means as dangerous as infantry” (quoted Hartmann, 2014: 428); Bertschy gives examples of similar reports in France (2018: 325–6).

  29. 29.

    It is sufficiently well known that the current (09.11.2018) French Ministry of Defence website notes that 1914–15 was a “sanitary disaster” (www.defense.gouv.fr/sante/actualites/le-service-de-sante-des-armees-pendant-la-premiere-guerre-mondiale)

  30. 30.

    As late as June 1915, Agnes Warner notes receiving a train of wounded direct from the front line at her hospital close to Geneva whose wounds have only been dressed once (1917: n.p.).

  31. 31.

    See, for example, L’Homme Enchainé, 30.12.14; Libre Parole, 4.1.15; L’Oeuvre, 18.11.15. Clemenceau received the information either from his daughter, the nurse Madeleine Clemenceau-Jacquemaire (Fell, 2011: 16–17), or from his son Michel.

  32. 32.

    This was not entirely true: the diary of a nurse excerpted in von Hadeln shows that she was in the firing area during the campaign that led to the battle of Tannenberg in December 1914 (1934: 23–4)—indeed, she received the Iron Cross for her rescue of wounded under fire, as did a few other German nurses (see the list of awards on germannursesofthegreatwar.wordpress.com); Wenzel (1931) talks about nurses in field hospitals in Flanders in 1915 (in Altonaer Nachrichten, 24.2.32). Eckart quotes a letter from nurses near the front in Belgium in the first weeks of the war (2014: 110–1); however, Riemann says that only male nurses and orderlies were sent to the front when she arrived in Ghent in 1914 (1930: 53).

  33. 33.

    Carden-Coyne quotes a similar experience by a British officer, whose wound was finally treated after four days’ travel (2014: 40).

  34. 34.

    Writing in the Preface to Kate Finzi’s (1916) memoir of the Western Front, General Arthur is frank about the inadequacy of the medical services near the front in 1914: “this was inseparable from the nature of things and has long since been righted” (Finzi, 1916: xvii).

  35. 35.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKjYSOwiHvc

  36. 36.

    In addition, many German doctors welcomed the war for Social Darwinist reasons, or saw it as a natural laboratory (Schmiedebach, 1987: 102; Eckart, 2014: 64). Machaon and Podilirius were the sons of Asclepius and were both skilled doctors and military leaders in the Trojan War.

  37. 37.

    There are detailed analyses of advances brought about by wartime needs in many medical histories , for example, Eckart, 2014. There are convenient summaries in Vanwijk and Reding (loc. cit.) and Barr et al., 2019. Van Bergen (2018) is a thorough discussion of the arguments.

  38. 38.

    The most thorough discussion of wounds and mortality across the combatant nations is van Bergen, 2009: 140–67.

Bibliography

(1) Nurse Memoirs

  • CrĂ©mieux, J. (1918). Souvenirs d’une Infirmière. Rauff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finzi, K. (1916). Eighteen Months in the War Zone. Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrouda, E. (1935). Barmherzigkeit. Als freiwillige Malteserschwester im Weltkrieg. Leykam-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, G. (1916). The Cellar-House of Pervyse. A.C. Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, H. (1930). Schwester der Vierten Armee. Karl Vögels Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturzenegger, A. (1915). Serbien in europäischen Kriege 1914–1915. Orell FĂĽssli.

    Google Scholar 

  • von RĂĽdgisch, E. (1916). Unterm Roten Kreuz. Heim und Herd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, A. (1917). My Beloved Poilus. Barnes. Available online at Project Gutenberg.

    Google Scholar 

(2) Other Contemporary Literature

  • Assistentarzt Dr. S. (1916). Aus einem östlichen Kriegslazarett. Zeitschrift fĂĽr Krankenpflege, 37(1), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, V. J. (1919). 1914. Constable. Cited in the online edition at Project Gutenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genevoix, M. (1923). Les Eparges. Flammarion. Cited in the Ceux de 14 edition, 1950. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, W. (1921). History of the Great War. Medical Services (Vol. 1). HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUSI. (1929). Journal of the Royal United Services Institute, 74(494), 370–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair Stobart, M. (1916). The Flaming Sword in Serbia and Elsewhere. Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

(3) Secondary Literature

  • Barr, J., Cancio, L., Smith, D., Bradley, M., & Elster, E. (2019). From Trench to Bedside: Military Surgery During World War I Upon Its Centennial. Military Medicine, 184 (11–12), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertschy, S. (2018) De la mĂ©decine de guerre Ă  la mĂ©decine en guerre: administration des blessĂ©s et malades de guerre et mĂ©tamorphoses du champ mĂ©dical en 14–18. PhD Thesis, University of Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertschy, S. (2020). Guerre, mĂ©decine et santĂ© en 14–18: retour sur un « moment » de l’historiographie. Lecture Sociale de la Guerre. Available at: https://lsg.hypotheses.org/420

  • Bilange, F. (1996). Justin Godart au Service de SantĂ© Militaire durant la Première Guerre Mondiale. Histoire des Sciences MĂ©dicales, XXX (1), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carden-Coyne, A. (2014). The Politics of Wounds. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castex, H. (1998). L’affaire du Chemin des Dames. Editions Imago.

    Google Scholar 

  • CrĂ©pin, A. (2009). Histoire de la conscription. Gallimard.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delaporte, S. (2004). MĂ©decine et blessures de guerre. In S. Audoin-Rouzeau & J.-J. Becker (Eds.), EncyclopĂ©die de la Grande Guerre (pp. 347–355). Bayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, H. (1997). Under the Cross: Why V.A.D.s Performed the Filthiest Task in the Dirtiest War: Red Cross Women Volunteers, 1914–1918. Journal of Social History, 30(3), 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, P. (2017). Making Sense of the Muddle. In P. Dwyer (Ed.), War Stories. The War Memoir in History and Literature (pp. 1–26). Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckart, W. (2014). Medizin und Krieg. Deutschland 1914–1918. Ferdinand Schöningh.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fell, A. (2011). Myth, Countermyth and the Politics of Memory: Vera Brittain and Madeleine Clemenceau-Jacquemaire’s Interwar Nurse Memoirs. Synergies Royaume-Uni et Irlande, 4, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandis, L., Lefort, H., Tabbagha, X., & Pons, F. (2014). Le triage des blessĂ©s pendant la Grande Guerre. Soins, 786, 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, R., & Metz, K. (1992). A History of Military Medicine (Vol. 2). Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradmann. (2004). Sanitätswesen. In G. Hirschfeld, G. Krummeich, & I. Renz (Eds.), Enzyklopädie Erster Weltkrieg (pp. 812–813). Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundhewer, H. (1987). Die Kriegskrankenpflege und das Bild der Krankenschwester im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. In J. Bleker & H.-P. Schmiedebach (Eds.), Medizin und Krieg. Vom Dilemma der Heilberufe 1865 bis 1985 (pp. 136–152). Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, C. (2016). Nurse Writers of the Great War. Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, E. (2017). How World War I Revolutionized Medicine. The Atlantic, 24(2), 17. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/02/world-war-i-medicine/517656/

  • Harrison, M. (2010). The Medical War. British Military Medicine in the First World War. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, V. (2014). Kriegsverletzungen und ihre Behandlung im Ersten Weltkrieg anhand von Präparaten der Wehrpathologischen Lehrsammlung der Bundeswehr. Wehrmedizinische Monatsschrift, 58(12), 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krödel, A. (2014). Medizingeschichte: Der medikalisierte Krieg. Deutsch Ă„rzteblatt, 111(42), A-1816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leese, P. (2002). Shell Shock. Traumatic Neurosis and the British Soldiers of the First World War. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osten, P. (2015). Erster Weltkrieg 1914–1918: Militärmedizin – unvorbereitet in der Krise. Deutsche Ă„rtzeblatt, 112(9), A 370–A 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panke-Kochinke, B., & Schaidhammer-Placke, M. (Eds.). (2002). Frontschwestern und Friedensengel. Mabuse-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peske, P. (2012). Ă„rzte, Pflegekräfte, Soldaten im Ersten Weltkrieg. In M. Caumanns, U. Dross, & A. Magowska (Eds.), Medizin und Krieg in Historischer Perspective (pp. 59–68). P.Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • PrĂĽll, L. (2014). Die Kriegsversehrten. Körperliche und seelische Leiden und die Medizin im Ersten Weltkrieg. Zeitwenden. 100 Jahre Erste Weltkrieg, 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, N. (2017). A Lively School of Writing. In P. Dwyer (Ed.), War Stories. The War Memoir in History and Literature (pp. 48–71). Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A. (2016). ExpĂ©rimenter la santĂ© des grands nombres: les hygiĂ©nistes militaires et l’armĂ©e française, 1850–1914. Le Mouvement Social, 257, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, F. (2017). Medicine in First World War Europe. Soldiers, Medics, Pacifists. Bloomsbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedebach, H.-P. (1987). Im Dienst der Vaterlandische Sache. Deutsche Medizin im Ersten Weltkrieg. In J. Bleker & H.-P. Schmiedebach (Eds.), Medizin und Krieg. Vom Dilemma der Heilberufe 1865 bis 1985 (pp. 93–121). Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, R. (1996). The Sick Warrior’s Sister. In L. Abrams & E. Harvey (Eds.), Gender Relations in Germany (pp. 121–141). UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, R. (1998). Die Verkehrte Welt des Krieges: Studien zu Geschlecht, Religion und Tod. Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, A., & Ferrandis, J.-J. (2012). Les Sept Blessures d’Ernst JĂĽnger dans la Grande Guerre. Histoire des Sciences MĂ©dicales, XLVI(2), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2010). A Legacy of Care: Hesse and the Alice Frauenverein, 1867–1918. PhD Thesis, University of Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThĂ©bauld, F. (1986/2014) La Femme aux Temps de la Guerre de 1914. : Stock/Payot et Rivages.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergen, L. (2009). Before My Helpless Sight. Suffering, Dying and Military Medicine on the Western Front 1914–18. Ashgate Press. (quoted in the 2016 edition, London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergen, L. (2014). Medicine and Medical Service. International Encyclopaedia of the First World War (online).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergen, L. (2018). Surgery and War: The Discussions About the Usefulness of War for Medical Progress. In T. Schich (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Surgery (pp. 389–408). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanwijk, R., & Reding, R. (2015). Les Leçons MĂ©dicales de la Grande Guerre. Louvain MĂ©dical, April, n.p. Available at: https://www.louvainmedical.be/fr/article/les-lecons-medicales-de-la-grande-guerre

  • Viet, V. (2012). Droit des blessĂ©s et intĂ©rĂŞt de la nation: une casuistique de guerre (1914–1918). Revue d’Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, 59(2), 85–107. Available at www.cairn.info/revue-d-histoire-moderne-et-contemporaine-2012-2.htm

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viet, V. (2015). La SantĂ© en Guerre: 1914–1918: Une politique pionnière en univers incertain. Presses de Science Po.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vollhardt, M. (2014). Es ist ein anständiger Beruf, Schwester zu sein. Zur Figuration der Krankenschwester in der Erinnerungsliteratur des Ersten Weltkrieges. Zeitschrift fĂĽr Germanistik, 24(3), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharini-Fournel, M. (2004). Travailler pour la Patrie? In E. Morin-Rotureau (Ed.), 1914–1918 Combats de Femmes (pp. 32–46). Editions Autrement.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zischek, C., Grunwald, E., & Engelhardt, E. (2018). Organization of the German Army Medical Service 1914–1918 and the Role of Academic Surgeons. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 61(4), 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palmer, J. (2021). Nurses and the Military Medical Services in the Great War. In: Nurse Memoirs from the Great War in Britain, France, and Germany. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82875-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics