Abstract
“Migration is closely interwoven with human history”—the saying sounds like a cliché but it surely remains valid. Time was when cross-border migration was relatively free and unfettered. Military conquests, armed conflicts, famine, pestilence, natural disasters and the like shaped the course of human mobility. Things changed in 1648 when the Westphalia agreement was signed and the concept of sovereignty of nation state was embodied in international law and started gaining ground in state practices. Cross border human mobility became a subject of inter-state negotiation and agreement. And, with the rising trend in economic globalisation, including expansion of trade in goods, services and capital, nation states felt compelled to cooperate in managing cross-border migration to enhance their respective interests, and contribute to global wealth. But not infrequently, the process also entails difficulties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a discussion on the superiority of regulated openness over unfettered open borders see Bimal Ghosh, “Managing Migration: Towards the Missing Regime” in Migration without Borders, UNESCO, Paris 2008.
- 2.
This is unlikely to be the case. Experience shows in Sweden foreigners are 2.6 times more likely to be out of work.
References
Agarwal A., D. Kapur, and J. McHale. 2008. Brain Drain or Brain Bank? The Impact of Skilled Emigration on Poor-country Innovation. NBER Working Paper 1459w2Mooe 2008, Brian Drain or Bran Bank.
Clemens, M.A. 2011. Economics and emigration: Trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 83–106.
Ghosh, B. 1998a. Tame Europe’s black economy in International Herald Tribune, 10 June 1998.
———. 1998b. Huddled masses and uncertain shores: Insight into irregular migration. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/Kluwer Law International.
Jaumotte, Florence et al. 2016. Impact of migration on income levels in advanced economies. IMF e Library, October 2016.
Krogstad, Passel and Cohen, 2017. Migration Data Portal 9 June 2020.
Kovacheva and Vogel, 2009. Migration Data Portal 9 June 2020.
Moses, Jonathan, et al. 2004. The economic costs to international labour restrictions: Revisiting the empirical discussion. In World development. World Bank.
OECD “Is Migration Good for the Economy” Migration Policy Debate 2014. Paris.
Rodrik, D. 2002. Feasible globalizations. In Globalization: What’s new? ed. M. Weinstein, 96–213. New York: Colombia University Press. Also, working paper series RWP02029, pp.19–20.
World Bank. “The Potential Gains from Migration” 2005. Washington DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ghosh, B. (2021). A Global Migration Agreement: Why So Important, Yet Why So Elusive. In: The 2018 Global Migration Compact. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82863-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82863-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82862-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82863-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)