Abstract
Gifted children in general and mathematically gifted children in particular represent a valuable societal asset in the twenty-first-century knowledge-based economy. Educating gifted students should be a priority for teachers and the education systems in order for society to tap on such students’ potential so that they can contribute to an economical and sustainable future. This can be achieved if teachers are able to identify gifted students’ characteristics. However, most of the tertiary institutions in South Africa do not cater for gifted education nor provide opportunities for pre-service teachers to get abreast with the characteristics of the mathematically gifted child. This chapter reports on a study that investigated pre-service teachers’ awareness of the characteristics of mathematically gifted children. The research was informed by the need to introduce a module on gifted education in mathematics education program at the Central University of Technology (CUT), in South Africa. The study followed a qualitative and quantitative approach in which purposive sampling was used to select 66 pre-service teachers. The results revealed that pre-service teachers have limited acquaintance regarding the characteristics of gifted students in mathematics. Thus, the inclusion of modules on gifted education in the mathematics training program is needed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bangel, N. J., Moon, S. M., & Capobianco, B. M. (2010). Preservice teachers’ perceptions and experiences in a gifted education training model. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 209–221.
Benson, L. (2002). Serving gifted students through inclusion: A teachers’ perceptive. Roeper Review, 24(3), 126–128.
Bicknell, B., & Holton, D. (2009). Gifted and talented mathematics students. In R. Averill & R. Harvey (Eds.), Teaching secondary school mathematics and statistics: Evidence-based practice (Vol. 1, pp. 173–186). NZCER Press.
Cashion, M., & Sullenger, K. (2000). Contact us next year: Tracing teachers’ use of gifted practices. Roeper Review, 23(1), 18–21.
Central University of Technology Calendar (CUT). (2019). Year programme. Author.
Chamberlin, M. T., & Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). Enhancing preservice teacher development: Field experiences with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(3), 381–416.
Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Collins, J. (Chair). (2001). The education of gifted children. Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee.
Department of Education (DoE). (2010). Early childhood. Supporting teachers to develop the talents of gifted students. Author.
Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2002). Summing up the education of mathematically gifted students. In Proceedings 25th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Auckland (pp. 219–226).
Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 547–555). Allyn & Bacon.
Friedman, H. S., & Martin, L. R. (2011). The longevity project: surprising discoveries for health and long life from the landmark eight decade study. New York, NY: Hudson Street Press.
Gagné, F. (1999). Tracking talents: identifying multiple talents through peer, teacher, and self-nominations (Waco, TX, Prufrock).
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60–74). Allyn & Bacon.
Gagné, F. (2015). From genes to talent: The DMGT/CMTD perspective. Revlsta de Educaclon, 368, 12–37.
Gallagher, J. J. (2003). Issues and challenges in the education of gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 11–23). Pearson Education.
Goodnough, K. (2000). Fostering liberal views of giftedness: A study of the beliefs of six undergraduate education students. Roeper Review, 23, 89–90.
Hatch, A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. SUNY Press.
Hudson, P., Hudson, S., Lewis, K., & Watters, J. J. (2010). Embedding gifted education in preservice teacher education: A collaborative school-university approach. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 19(2), 5–15.
Kokot, S. J. (1999). Help - our child is gifted. Guidelines for parents of gifted children (2nd ed). Lyttelton: Radford House.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). In J. Kilpatrick, & I. Wirszup (Eds.). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (J. Teller, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-45485-1.
Lassig, C. (2003). Gifted and talented education reforms: Effects on teachers’ attitudes. In B. Bartlett, F. Bryer, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Proceedings 1st Annual International Conference on Cognition, Language, and Special Education Research (pp. 141–152). School of Cognition, Language & Special Education, Griffith University. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/14299/1/14299.pdf
Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32–42.
Lubinski, D, Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2217–2232.
Manning, S. (2006). Recognizing gifted students: A practical guide for teachers. Kappa Delta PI Record.
McCoach, D. B. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–255.
Oswald, M., & de Villiers, J. M. (2013). Including the gifted student: Perceptions of South African teachers and principals. South African Journal of Education, 33, 603.
Pettersson, E. (2011). Studiesituationen för elever med särskilda matematiska förmågor [Mathematically gifted students’ study situation]. PhD thesis, Linnaeus University, The school of computer science, Physics and Mathematics.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2013). Serving the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Plunkett, M. (2002). Impacting on teacher attitudes toward gifted students. In W. Vialle & J. Geake (Eds.), The gifted enigma (pp. 240–249). Hawker Brownlow.
Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1–2), 31–46.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Re-examining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 150–159.
Sever, Z. (2011). Nurturing gifted and talented pupils as leverage towards a knowledge based economy. In Q. Zhou (Ed.), Applied Social Science—ICASS 2011. Volume One (pp. 454–458). Newark, DE: IERI Press.
Shayshon, B., Gal, H., Tesler, B., & Ko, E. S. (2014). Teaching Mathematically talented students: a cross-cultural study about their teachers’ views. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 409–438.
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worell, F. C. (2012). Rethinking giftedness and Gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54.
Toll, M. F. (2000). The importance of teacher preparation programs to appropriately serve students who are gifted. Understanding Our Gifted, 12, 14–16.
Acknowledgments
This project is supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) through the Thuthuka Project, TTK150721128642, UNIQUE GRANT NO: 99419. However, the results, conclusions, and suggestions expressed in this study belong to the authors and do not reflect the views of the NRF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalobo, L., Mhlolo, M. (2021). Pre-service Teachers’ Awareness of Gifted Students’ Characteristics. In: Luneta, K. (eds) Mathematics Teaching and Professional Learning in sub-Sahara Africa. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82723-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82723-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82722-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82723-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)