Skip to main content

Population Health Management in the NHS: What Can We Learn from COVID-19?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organising Care in a Time of Covid-19

Abstract

Population health management is an increasingly popular concept in health systems. Driven by growth in ‘big data’, the approach uses aggregated data to identify and manage the health of those deemed ‘at risk’. We use the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic as a lens to critically examine this approach to improving population health, using the policy of ‘shielding’ those at high risk of harm as an exemplar. Firstly, we explore the policy as an example of categorisation, showing that criteria used to identify high-risk population ‘segments’ are never wholly objective, arising out of negotiations taking account of economic, political, or social issues, with the categorization of individuals as in/out of the high-risk group always approximate. Secondly, we consider the construction of risk and demonstrate that focusing on biomedical data brackets out societal factors driving individual risks including deprivation, racial discrimination, and employment status. Finally, we highlight how this framing of COVID-19-associated risk as a biomedical issue leads to a neoliberal focus upon individual rather than societal risk-mitigation approaches. We argue that population health management should be married with traditional public health advocacy and campaigning, digging beneath identified disparities to expose and interrogate the structural factors at work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, B. D. (2011). Epistemic fault lines in biomedical and social approaches to HIV prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 14(Suppl. 2), S2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, T. (2001). The social construction of risk by community psychiatric nurses and family carers for people with dementia. Health, Risk & Society, 3(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A. J., Unruh, L., Chukmaitov, A., & van Ginneken, E. (2014). Accountable care organizations in the USA: Types, developments and challenges. Health Policy, 118(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, P. U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaden, R., Dusheiko, M., Gravelle, H., Parker, S., Pickard, S., Roland, M., Sargent, P., & Sheaff, R. (2006). Evercare evaluation: Final report. NPCRDC, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, N. (2020, April 24). U-turn as splenectomy patients added to COVID-19 shielding list. GP Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L. (2020). We’re not all in this together: On COVID-19, intersectionality, and structural inequality. American Journal of Public Health, 110(7), 917–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. A. (1989). The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 14(4), 380–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, S. (2020). Covid vulnerable patient list balloons by 500,000. Health Services Journal. https://www.hsj.co.uk/primary-care/covid-vulnerable-patient-list-balloons-by-500000/7027503.article

  • British Medical Association, Royal College of General Practitioners and NHS England. (2020, March 23). Vulnerable patients—The role of general practice during COVID 19. https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/c_files/uploads/b/w/l/Shielded-letter---23-March.pdf

  • Busby, M. (2020). ‘Perverse’ to tell vulnerable to stop shielding from coronavirus, says Age UK. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, D., & Besio, K. (2009). Autoethnography. Geography Compass, 3(5), 1660–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo, J. C., & Lopez, C. A. (2018). Population stratification: A fundamental instrument used for population health management in Spain. World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Garrido, T., Chock, D., Okawa, G., & Liang, L. (2009). The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: Transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Affairs, 28(2), 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, D. (2016). Risk, power, and inequality in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeVore, S., & Champion, R. W. (2011). Driving population health through accountable care organizations. Health Affairs, 30(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4) (138), 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G., & Stoddart, G. L. (1990). Producing health, consuming health care. Social Science & Medicine, 31(12), 1347–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2016). An institutional perspective on accountable care organizations. Medical Care Research and Review, 73(6), 685–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A., Hammond, J., Bramwell, D., Coleman, A., Warwick-Giles, L., & Checkland, K. (2018). Beyond the parish pump: What next for public health? BMC Public Health, 18(1), 856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, A., Isaacson, A., & Muennig, P. (2020). The promise of big data for precision population health management in the US. Public Health, 185, 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havighurst, C. C. (1970). Health maintenance organizations and the market for health services. Law and Contemporary Problems, 35(4), 716–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. B., & Covello, V. T. (2012). The social and cultural construction of risk: Essays on risk selection and perception. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., & Exworthy, M. (2015). Framing in policy processes: A case study from hospital planning in the National Health Service in England. Social Science & Medicine, 124, 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, L. (2015). Routinely collected data as a strategic resource for research: Priorities for methods and workforce. Public Health Research & Practice, 25(4), e2541540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labonte, R., Polanyi, M., Muhajarine, N., McIntosh, T., & Williams, A. (2005). Beyond the divides: Towards critical population health research. Critical Public Health, 15(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M., & Ikeda, J. (2013). Neo-liberalism and responsibilisation in the discourse of social service workers. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 1006–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorne, C., Allen, P., Checkland, K., Osipovic, D., Sanderson, M., Hammond, J., & Peckham, S. (2019). Integrated care systems: What can current reforms learn from past research on regional co-ordination of health and care in England? (pp. 1–84).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, H. S. (1978). How do health-maintenance organizations achieve their savings? Rhetoric and evidence. New England Journal of Medicine, 298(24), 1336–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L., Hunter, D. J., Scalabrini, S., Gray, J., McCafferty, S., Payne, N., Peckham, S., Salway, S., & Thokala, P. (2015). The return of public health to local government in England: Changing the parameters of the public health prioritization debate? Public Health, 129(9), 1194–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, N. (2020). Asthma UK admits its earlier shielding guidance ‘caused confusion’. Pulse Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morciano, M., Checkland, K., Hammond, J., Lau, Y. S., & Sutton, M. (2020). Variability in size and characteristics of England’s Primary Care Networks: observational study. British Journal of General Practice, 70(701), e899–e905.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS Digital. (2020). Shielded patient list. https://digital.nhs.uk/coronavirus/shielded-patient-list

  • NHS England. (2019). The NHS long term plan. NHS England.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS England. (2020). At risk patients coronavirus. https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/publication/guidance-and-updates-for-gps-at-risk-patients/

  • Nott, G. (2020, April 17). How to get an online supermarket delivery slot if you are shielding by George Nott. The Groceer. https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/online/how-to-get-an-online-supermarket-delivery-slot-if-you-are-shielding/604081.article

  • Nygren, K. G., & Olofsson, A. (2020). Managing the Covid-19 pandemic through individual responsibility: The consequences of a world risk society and enhanced ethopolitics. Journal of Risk Research, 23, 1031–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health and Primary Care. (2019). Advancing our health: Prevention in the 2020s—Consultation document (Department of Health and Social Care, Ed.). https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/advancing-our-health-prevention-in-the-2020s/advancing-our-health-prevention-in-the-2020s-consultation-document

  • Raphael, D., & Bryant, T. (2002). The limitations of population health as a model for a new public health. Health Promotion International, 17(2), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, E., Shofer, S., Harter, M., & Clark, N. (2017). First guiding process: Problematizing what you know for new-self insight. In S. Hughes & J. Pennington (Eds.), Autoethnography: Process, product, and possibility for critical social research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, F. (2020). Disabled people left off coronavirus vulnerable list go without food. The Observer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serle, J. (2020a). 100,000 people incorrectly told they needed to self-isolate because of coronavirus. Health Services Journal. https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/100000-people-incorrectly-told-they-needed-to-self-isolate-because-of-coronavirus/7027575.article

  • Serle, J. (2020b). GPs given new deadline to identify ‘at risk’ patients. Health Services Journal. https://www.hsj.co.uk/coronavirus/gps-given-new-deadline-to-identify-at-risk-patients/7027390.article

  • Shortell, S. M., Gillies, R., & Wu, F. (2010). United States innovations in health care delivery. Public Health Reviews, 32(1), 190–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Robinson, D., & Kee, F. (2018). Precision public health—The Emperor’s new clothes. International Journal of Epidemiology, 48(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, T., Baker, P., Crocker-Buque, T., Rana, S., & Bouquet, B. (2014). Shortage of public health independence and advocacy in the UK. The Lancet, 383(9913), 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. (2020). Draft global strategy on digital health 2020–2024. WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kath Checkland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Checkland, K., Hammond, J., Spooner, S. (2021). Population Health Management in the NHS: What Can We Learn from COVID-19?. In: Waring, J., Denis, JL., Reff Pedersen, A., Tenbensel, T. (eds) Organising Care in a Time of Covid-19. Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82696-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics