Abstract
The notion of unfairness of the financial burden resulting from the universal service obligation (‘USO’) finds its application in a number of contexts, among which the postal sector. Although the notion of the unfairness of the burden of the USO is embedded in the European postal regulatory framework since it was first introduced in 1997 by the first European postal directive, we observe a lack of a rigorous and robust methodology to assess unfairness by national regulators. Similarly, academic research on this subject matter has not yet developed a methodological framework to assess unfairness. Methodologies that rely exclusively on arbitrary thresholds based on ratios of revenues and costs of the USP, while easy to apply, are not supported by a clear economic rationale. This paper aims to fill the gap by developing a methodology to identify the difference in profitability between USPs that bear the USO and their comparators. We show that this method can be applied by means of a traditional non-parametric comparator approach, and by means of a regression analysis. We also describe how one can apply this profitability benchmarking approach to USPs that do not offer exclusively (or mainly) postal services, but operate across different sectors (e.g. financial services).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Court of Justice of the European Union (2010a).
- 5.
European Parliament and Council (2008)
- 6.
- 7.
For example, Gautier A., Paolini, D. (2010).
- 8.
- 9.
In this analysis, the net cost of the USO is known from public sources, so it does not need to be calculated.
- 10.
The underlying assumption here is that the other USPs used to estimate the regression are perfectly compensated for the USO. Notice that the sample of firms used in the regression may include both USPs and other firms that are not USPs.
References
AGCOM. (2014). Delibera n. 412/14/CONS - Servizio postale universale: analisi e applicabilità del meccanismo di ripartizione e valutazione dell’eventuale costo netto per gli anni 2011 e 2012. https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/1498186/Delibera+412-14-CONS/83320aff-13b2-4ed8-97c6-94bb79a4c7d2?version=1.1
AGCOM. (2017). Delibera N. 298/17/CONS – Servizio postale universale: analisi e applicabilità del meccanismo di ripartizione e valutazione dell’eventuale costo netto per gli anni 2013 e 2014. https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/8258848/Delibera+298-17-CONS/9641f4d6-bc6d-42be-9e11-44427f910b7e?version=1.0
AGCOM (2018). Allegato B alla delibera n. 571/18/CONS – Documento per la consultazione pubblica: Verifica del calcolo del costo netto del servizio postale universale per gli anni 2015 e 2016, para. 196. https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/13015920/Allegato+11-2-2019+1549885360248/6a594fe6-22fb-431c-8c85-91622d976d1b?version=1.0
AGCOM. (2019). Delibera N. 214/19/CONS - Verifica del calcolo del costo netto del servizio postale universale per gli anni 2015 e 2016. Link: https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/15184868/Delibera+214-19-CONS/2a84621f-9728-4587-990b-04b1657d4963?version=1.0
Court of Justice of the European Union (2010a). Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) 6 October 2010, Case C-222/08, ‘Commission v Belgium’ (C 222/08, EU:C:2010:583). http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en,T,F&num=c-222/08
Court of Justice of the European Union (2010b). Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) 6 October 2010, case C-389/08, ‘Base NV and Others’ (C 389/08, EU:C:2010:584). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62008CA0389
European Parliament and Council (1997). Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of community postal services and the improvement of quality of service. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31997L0067&from=IT
European Parliament and Council (2002). Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32002L0022&from=FR
European Parliament and Council (2008). Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 20 February 2008 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32008L0006&from=EN
Gautier, A., & Paolini, D. (2010). Universal service financing in competitive postal markets: One size does not fit all. Review of Network Economics, 10(3), 6–6.
Jaag, C. (2011). What is an unfair burden? Compensating the net cost of universal service provision. Review of Network Economics, 10(3), Article 7.
Jaag, C., Trinkner, U., & Topias, U. (2014). Regulation and the burden of the net cost resulting from universal service obligations. In M. A. Crew & T. J. Brennan (Eds.), The role of postal service in a Digital age. Edward Elgar.
Ofcom. (2011a). Securing the Universal Postal Service – Consultation. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/63003/Securing-the-Universal-Postal-Service-Proposals-for-the-future-framework-for-economic-regulation.pdf
Ofcom. (2011b). Financeability of the Universal Service. Final Report. Submitted by Cambridge Economics Policy Associates Ltd. October. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/71683/financeability.pdf
Ofcom. (2012). Securing the Universal Postal Service, Decision on the new regulatory framework. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0029/74279/Securing-the-Universal-Postal-Service-statement.pdf
Ofcom. (2015). Relevance of margin based approach. Final Report. Submitted by Cambridge Economics Policy Associates Ltd. November. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/79830/relevance-of-margin-based-approach.pdf
Ofcom. (2017). Review of the regulation of Royal Mail. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033/97863/Review-of-the-Regulation-of-Royal-Mail.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alimonti, R., Ippolito, F., Stammati, L. (2022). A Method to Assess the Impact of the Universal Postal Service Obligation. In: Parcu, P.L., Brennan, T.J., Glass, V. (eds) The Economics of the Postal and Delivery Sector. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82692-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82692-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82691-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82692-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)