Abstract
This chapter demonstrates the benefits that local researchers afford to the decision-making of receptive international practitioners. Strategic communication and the building of positive, informal, working relationships with international practitioners is critical for local researchers, and provides a means to strengthen the political compass or anthropological knowledge of international practitioners. Three case studies of researcher-practitioner interaction reveal the critical importance of the nature of the individual and the everyday agency and experience of international practitioners and local researchers. The outcome of researcher-practitioner engagement, whether it results in a contribution to practitioner learning or decision-making, is largely determined by the personalities and attitudes of those involved. Yet, the insights provided in this chapter indicate that following engagement with local research, international SSR practitioners may consider local context in greater depth and think more critically about SSR implications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge University Press.
Bjelos, M. Elek, B., & Raifi, F. (2014). Police integration in North Kosovo: Progress and remaining challenges in implementation of the Brussels agreement. Belgrade and Pristina: BCSP and KCSS [online]. Available from http://www.bezbednost.org/upload/document/police_integration_nk_%5Bweb%5D.pdf. June 2016.
CDA Collaborative Learning Projects. (2006). Has peacebuilding made a difference in Kosovo? A study of the effectiveness of peacebuilding in preventing violence: Lessons learned from the March 2004 Riots in Kosovo [online]. Available from http://live-cdacollaborative.pantheonsite.io/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Has-Peacebuilding-Made-a-Difference-in-Kosovo.pdf. June 2016.
FIQ. (2007). Kosovo at the crossroads: Perceptions of conflict, access to justice and opportunities for peace in Kosovo. Pristina: FIQ and Saferworld [online]. Available from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/9FD629145FC2F21BC12573AA0034C978-Full_Report.pdf. June 2017.
FIQ. (2008). Through the cross-hairs: A survey of changing attitudes towards small arms in Kosovo. Pristina: FIQ and Saferworld [online]. Available from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/94629/Through_the_crosshairs_English.pdf. June 2017.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Jones, H., Jones, N., Shaxson, L., & Walker, D. (2012). Knowledge, policy and power in international development: A practical guide. Policy Press.
KCSS. (2017). Conference in Gracanica: Kosovo Army – To whom and what for? [online]. Available from http://www.qkss.org/en/News/Conference-in-Gracanica-Kosovo-Army-To-Whom-and-What-for-930. September 2017.
Kelmendi, V., & Balaj, S. (2017). New Battlegrounds: Extremist groups’ activity on social networks in Kosovo, Albania and FYROM. Pristina: KCSS [online]. Available from http://www.qkss.org/repository/docs/New_Batelgrounds_Extremist_Groups_in_Social_Media_738865.pdf. December 2017.
Kursani, S. (2015). Report inquiring into the causes and consequences of Kosovo citizens’ involvement as foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. KCSS.
Lei, Y. W. (2011). The political consequences of the rise of the internet: Political beliefs and practices of Chinese netizens. Political Communication, 28(3), 291–322.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucrats: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2016). The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: A reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 219–239.
Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.
Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: A ‘contributions’ approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419.
Muharremi, R. (2016a). The Kosovo specialist chambers and specialist prosecutors office. American Society of International Law Insights, 20(11) [online]. Available from https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/20/issue/11/kosovo-specialist-chambers-and-specialist-prosecutors-office. September 2017.
Muharremi, R. (2016b). Kosovo Security Force is an army: Legal arguments. Pristina: KCSS [online]. Available from http://www.qkss.org/repository/docs/KSFArmy_ENG_42532.pdf. June 2016.
Perteshi, S. (2018). Journalists guide – Violent extremism: Definition and terminology. Pristina: KCSS [online]. Available from http://www.qkss.org/repository/docs/Guideline_669605_187367.pdf. June 2018.
Phillipps, J. (2018). The role of epistemic communities: local think tanks, international practitioners and security sector reform in Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 281–329.
Qehaja, F., Vrajoli, M., & Perteshi, S. (2009). Assessment of private security companies in Kosovo. Pristina: KCSS [online]. Available from http://www.qkss.org/repository/docs/Assessment_of_Private_Security_Companies_in_Kosovo_413420.pdf. June 2016.
Richmond, O. P., & Pogodda, S. (2016). Introduction: The contradictions of peace, international architecture, the state, and local agency. In O. P. Richmond & S. Pogodda (Eds.), Post-liberal peace transitions: Between peace formation and state formation (pp. 1–27). Edinburgh University Press.
Shaxson, L., Bielak, A., Ahmed, I., Brien, D., Conant, B., Fisher, C., Gwyn, E., Klerkx, L., Middleton, A., Morton, S., Pant, L., & Phipps, D. (2012). Expanding our understanding of K* (Kt, KE, Ktt, KMb, KB, KM, etc.). Concept paper emerging from the K* conference. Hamilton: UNU-INWEH [online]. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235434226_Shaxon_et_al_2012_K_concept_paper_Expanding_our_understanding_of_K_KT_KE_KTT_KMb_KB_KM_etc. March 2015.
Sugden, J. (2006). Security sector reform: The role of epistemic communities in the UK. Journal of Security Sector Management, 4(4), 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phillipps, J. (2022). The Contribution of Local Researchers. In: Local Researchers and International Practitioners . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82661-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82661-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82660-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82661-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)