Skip to main content

The Role of Individuals in SSR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local Researchers and International Practitioners

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explains how the key concepts of ‘hybridity’ and the ‘everyday’ encourage an understanding of the role of individuals in Kosovo’s SSR. It begins with a critique of the epistemological limitations of the liberal peace framework as a means to highlight the utility of ‘hybridity’. An analysis of the liberal peace-building framework and the assumptions that drive the international understanding of post-conflict contexts is critiqued from an epistemological standpoint, suggesting that an institutional focus obscures understanding of the complex realities of post-conflict state-building. Subsequently, the ‘everyday’ lens encourages analysis to contemplate SSR from the perspectives and actions of local actors, such as researchers, or those international practitioners on the frontlines of SSR. The chapter ends by demonstrating the benefit of observing post-conflict contexts through a hybrid framework of analysis by reflecting on studies that have contributed to a detailed deconstruction of Kosovo’s SSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bendana, A. (2005). From peacebuilding to state building: One step forward and two steps back? Development, 48(3), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernabeu, I. (2007). Laying the foundations of democracy? Reconsidering SSR under UN auspices in Kosovo. Security Dialogue, 38(1), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2016). Decentring security governance. Global Crime, 17(3–4), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beysoylu, C. (2018). Implementing Brussels agreements: EU’s facilitating strategy and contrasting local perceptions of peace in Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An agenda for peace. Available from http://www.un-documents.net/a47-277.htm. May 2016.

  • Boutros-Ghali, B. (1994). An agenda for development. Available from https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/226-initiatives/32314-an-agenda-for-development-report-of-the-secretary-general.html. May 2016.

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2014). State fragility and failure as wicked problems: Beyond naming and taming. Third World Quarterly, 35(2), 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2011). The interplay of international institutions in Kosovo between convergence, confusion and niche capabilities. European Security, 20(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Gravingholt, J., & Raddatz, R. (2016). The securitisation of foreign aid: Trends, explanations and prospects. In S. Brown & J. Gravingholt (Eds.), The securitization of foreign aid (pp. 237–255). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2006a). Empire in denial: The politics of statebuilding. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2006b). Peace without politics? Ten years of state-building in Bosnia. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, S. (2002). Justice under international administration: Kosovo, East Timor and Afghanistan. Available from http://portal.uned.es/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/UNED_MAIN/LAUNIVERSIDAD/DEPARTAMENTOS/0614/INVESTIGACION/DOC_ASPJUDICIALES/JUSTICE_UNDER_INTL.PDF. [June 2016].

  • Dijkstra, H. (2011). The planning and implementation of the rule of law mission of the European Union in Kosovo. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 5(2), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distler, W. (2016). Intervention as a social practice: Knowledge formation and transfer in the everyday of police missions. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 326–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2001). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2012). Risk management and the bunkering of the aid industry. Development Dialogue, 58, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dursun-Ozkanca, O., & Crossley-Frolick, K. (2012). Security sector reform in Kosovo: The complex division of labour between the EU and other multilateral institutions in building Kosovo’s police force. European Security, 21(2), 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhard, S. (2016). Political guidance or autonomy in peacebuilding? EU police reform in Afghanistan and Kosovo. International Peacekeeping, 23(3), 363–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, S. S. (2011). State failure’ in theory and practice: The idea of the state and the contradictions. Review of International Studies, 37(1), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, A. (2011). Fuzzy governance: State building in Kosovo since 1999 as interaction between international and local actors. Democracy and Security, 7(2), 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2004). State building: Governance and world order in the twenty-first century. Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gippert, B. J. (2016). Exploring local compliance with peacebuilding reforms: Legitimacy, coercion and reward-seeking in police reform in Kosovo. International Peacekeeping, 23(1), 52–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeger, N. (2016). European security as practice: EU-NATO communities of practice in the making? European Security, 25(4), 478–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (2016). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathershaw, J., & Lambach, D. (2008). Introduction: Post-conflict spaces and approaches to statebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2(3), 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. (2015). Parades, parties and pests: Contradictions of everyday life in peacekeeping economies. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9(3), 372–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holohan, A. (2016). Peacebuilding and SSR in Kosovo: An interactionist perspective. Global Crime, 17(3–4), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (2018). Explaining municipal governance in Kosovo: Local agency, credibility and party patronage. Southeast Europe and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (2004). Sharing sovereignty: New institutions for collapsed and failing states. International Security, 29(2), 85–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kursani, S. (2018). Salafi pluralism in national contexts: The secular state, nation and militant Islamism in Kosovo, Albania, and Macedonia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. (2015). Motivations for local resistance to international peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(8), 1437–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemay-Hébert, N. (2009). Statebuilding without Nation-building? Legitimacy, state failure and the limits of the institutionalist approach. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3(1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemay-Hébert, N. (2013). Review essay: Critical debates on liberal peacebuilding. Civil Wars, 15(2), 242–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 840–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2016). The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: A reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannitz, S. (2014). From paternalism to facilitation: SSR shortcomings and the potential of social anthropological perspectives. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWha, I. (2011). The roles of, and relationships between, expatriates, volunteers, and local development workers. Development in Practice, 21(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkhaus, K. (2010). State fragility as a wicked problem. Prism, 1(2), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: A ‘contributions’ approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah, S., & Rampton, D. (2015). The limits of hybridity and the crisis of the liberal peace. Review of International Studies, 41(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narten, J. (2008). Post-conflict peacebuilding and local ownership: Dynamics of external-local interaction in Kosovo under United Nations Administration. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2(3), 369–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. M. (1994). How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security, 19(2), 87–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, P., & Sisk, T. (2008a). Conclusion: Confronting the contradictions. In R. Paris & T. Sisk (Eds.), The dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of post-war peace operations (pp. 304–316). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, P., & Sisk, T. (2008b). Introduction: Understanding the contradictions of post-war statebuilding. In R. Paris & T. Sisk (Eds.), The dilemmas of statebuilding: confronting the contradictions of post-war peace operations (pp. 1–21). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2010). Saving liberal peacebulding. Review of International Studies, 36(2), 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qehaja, F., & Prezelj, I. (2017). Issues of local ownership in Kosovo’s security sector. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17(3), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2005). The transformation of peace. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2006). The problem of peace: Understanding the liberal peace. Conflict, Security and Development, 6(3), 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2009). Becoming liberal, unbecoming liberalism: Liberal-local hybridity via the everyday as a response to the paradoxes of liberal peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3(3), 324–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2010). Resistance and the post-liberal peace. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 38(3), 665–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2011). A post-liberal peace. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O., & Franks, J. (2009). Liberal peace transitions: Between statebuilding and peacebuilding. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O., & Mitchell, A. (2012). Hybrid forms of peace: From everyday agency to post-liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P., & Pogodda, S. (2016). Introduction: The contradictions of peace, international architecture, the state, and local agency. In O. P. Richmond & S. Pogodda (Eds.), Post-liberal peace transitions: Between peace formation and state formation (pp. 1–27). Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. I. (2004). The failure and collapse of nation-states: Breakdown, prevention, and repair. In R. I. Rotberg (Ed.), When states fail: Causes and consequences (pp. 1–49). Princeton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, S. B. (2017). The rhetoric and practice of the ‘ownership’ of security sector reform processes in fragile countries: The case of Kosovo. International Peacekeeping, 24(3), 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheye, E. (2008). UNMIK and the significance of effective programme management: The case of Kosovo. In H. Hanggi & V. Scherrer (Eds.), Security sector reform and UN integrated missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti and Kosovo (pp. 169–229). DCAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, U. C., & Chappuis, F. (2014). New perspectives on security sector reform: The role of local agency and domestic politics. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selenica, E. (2018). Education for whom? Engineering multiculturalism and liberal peace in post-conflict Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 239–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selim, Y. (2018). Contestation and resistance: The politics of and around transitional justice in Nepal. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sending, O. J. (Ed.). (2010). Learning to build a sustainable peace: Ownership and everyday peacebuilding no. 4. Available from https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/3732-learning-to-build-a-sustainable-peace.pdf. February 2016.

  • Simangan, D. (2018). Domino effect of negative hybrid peace in Kosovo’s peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebulding, 12(1), 120–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadic, K., & Elbasani, A. (2018). State building and patronage networks: How political parties embezzled the bureaucracy in post-war Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadjbakhsh, S. (2011). Introduction: Liberal peace in dispute. In S. By Tadjbakhsh (Ed.), Rethinking the liberal peace: External models and local alternatives (pp. 25–42). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Troncota, M. (2018). The association that dissociates’—Narratives of local political resistance in Kosovo and the delayed implementation of the Brussels agreement. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council. (1999a). Resolution 1244. UNSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council. (1999b). Resolution 1272. UNSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council. (2002). Resolution 1410. UNSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visoka, G. (2012). Three levels of hybridisation practices in post-conflict Kosovo. Peacebuilding and Development, 7(2), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visoka, G. (2016a). Peace figuration after international intervention: Intentions, events and consequences of liberal peacebuilding. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visoka, G. (2016b). Peace multitudes: Liberal peace, local agency, and peace formation in Kosovo. In O. P. Richmond & S. Pogodda (Eds.), Post-liberal peace transitions: Between peace formation and state formation (pp. 65–82). Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visoka, G., & Richmond, O. (2017). After liberal peace? from failed state-building to an emancipatory peace in Kosovo. International Studies Perspectives, 18(1), 110–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Carlowitz, L. (2011). Local ownership in practice: Justice system reform in Kosovo and Liberia no. 23. DCAF. Available from https://www.dcaf.ch/local-ownership-practice-justice-system-reform-kosovo-and-liberia. February 2016.

  • Wild, L., & Elhawary, S. (2012). The UK’s approach to linking development and security: Assessing policy and practice. Available from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/7658.pdf. September 2018.

  • Zaum, D. (2009). States of conflict: A case study on statebuliding in Kosovo. Available from https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2011/05/states%20of%20conflict%20-%20Kosovo_1735.pdf. June 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Phillipps .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Phillipps, J. (2022). The Role of Individuals in SSR. In: Local Researchers and International Practitioners . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82661-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics