Abstract
This chapter explains how the key concepts of ‘hybridity’ and the ‘everyday’ encourage an understanding of the role of individuals in Kosovo’s SSR. It begins with a critique of the epistemological limitations of the liberal peace framework as a means to highlight the utility of ‘hybridity’. An analysis of the liberal peace-building framework and the assumptions that drive the international understanding of post-conflict contexts is critiqued from an epistemological standpoint, suggesting that an institutional focus obscures understanding of the complex realities of post-conflict state-building. Subsequently, the ‘everyday’ lens encourages analysis to contemplate SSR from the perspectives and actions of local actors, such as researchers, or those international practitioners on the frontlines of SSR. The chapter ends by demonstrating the benefit of observing post-conflict contexts through a hybrid framework of analysis by reflecting on studies that have contributed to a detailed deconstruction of Kosovo’s SSR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge University Press.
Bendana, A. (2005). From peacebuilding to state building: One step forward and two steps back? Development, 48(3), 5–15.
Bernabeu, I. (2007). Laying the foundations of democracy? Reconsidering SSR under UN auspices in Kosovo. Security Dialogue, 38(1), 71–92.
Bevir, M. (2016). Decentring security governance. Global Crime, 17(3–4), 227–239.
Beysoylu, C. (2018). Implementing Brussels agreements: EU’s facilitating strategy and contrasting local perceptions of peace in Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 203–218.
Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An agenda for peace. Available from http://www.un-documents.net/a47-277.htm. May 2016.
Boutros-Ghali, B. (1994). An agenda for development. Available from https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/226-initiatives/32314-an-agenda-for-development-report-of-the-secretary-general.html. May 2016.
Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2014). State fragility and failure as wicked problems: Beyond naming and taming. Third World Quarterly, 35(2), 333–344.
Brosig, M. (2011). The interplay of international institutions in Kosovo between convergence, confusion and niche capabilities. European Security, 20(2), 185–204.
Brown, S., & Gravingholt, J., & Raddatz, R. (2016). The securitisation of foreign aid: Trends, explanations and prospects. In S. Brown & J. Gravingholt (Eds.), The securitization of foreign aid (pp. 237–255). Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press.
Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.
Chandler, D. (2006a). Empire in denial: The politics of statebuilding. Pluto Press.
Chandler, D. (2006b). Peace without politics? Ten years of state-building in Bosnia. Routledge.
Chesterman, S. (2002). Justice under international administration: Kosovo, East Timor and Afghanistan. Available from http://portal.uned.es/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/UNED_MAIN/LAUNIVERSIDAD/DEPARTAMENTOS/0614/INVESTIGACION/DOC_ASPJUDICIALES/JUSTICE_UNDER_INTL.PDF. [June 2016].
Dijkstra, H. (2011). The planning and implementation of the rule of law mission of the European Union in Kosovo. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 5(2), 193–210.
Distler, W. (2016). Intervention as a social practice: Knowledge formation and transfer in the everyday of police missions. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 326–349.
Duffield, M. (2001). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. Zed Books.
Duffield, M. (2012). Risk management and the bunkering of the aid industry. Development Dialogue, 58, 21–37.
Dursun-Ozkanca, O., & Crossley-Frolick, K. (2012). Security sector reform in Kosovo: The complex division of labour between the EU and other multilateral institutions in building Kosovo’s police force. European Security, 21(2), 236–256.
Eckhard, S. (2016). Political guidance or autonomy in peacebuilding? EU police reform in Afghanistan and Kosovo. International Peacekeeping, 23(3), 363–388.
Eriksen, S. S. (2011). State failure’ in theory and practice: The idea of the state and the contradictions. Review of International Studies, 37(1), 229–247.
Ernst, A. (2011). Fuzzy governance: State building in Kosovo since 1999 as interaction between international and local actors. Democracy and Security, 7(2), 123–129.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). State building: Governance and world order in the twenty-first century. Profile Books.
Gippert, B. J. (2016). Exploring local compliance with peacebuilding reforms: Legitimacy, coercion and reward-seeking in police reform in Kosovo. International Peacekeeping, 23(1), 52–78.
Graeger, N. (2016). European security as practice: EU-NATO communities of practice in the making? European Security, 25(4), 478–501.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Haas, P. M. (2016). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. Routledge.
Heathershaw, J., & Lambach, D. (2008). Introduction: Post-conflict spaces and approaches to statebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2(3), 269–289.
Henry, M. (2015). Parades, parties and pests: Contradictions of everyday life in peacekeeping economies. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9(3), 372–390.
Holohan, A. (2016). Peacebuilding and SSR in Kosovo: An interactionist perspective. Global Crime, 17(3–4), 331–351.
Jackson, D. (2018). Explaining municipal governance in Kosovo: Local agency, credibility and party patronage. Southeast Europe and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 165–184.
Krasner, S. (2004). Sharing sovereignty: New institutions for collapsed and failing states. International Security, 29(2), 85–120.
Kursani, S. (2018). Salafi pluralism in national contexts: The secular state, nation and militant Islamism in Kosovo, Albania, and Macedonia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 301–317.
Lee, S. Y. (2015). Motivations for local resistance to international peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(8), 1437–1452.
Lemay-Hébert, N. (2009). Statebuilding without Nation-building? Legitimacy, state failure and the limits of the institutionalist approach. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3(1), 21–45.
Lemay-Hébert, N. (2013). Review essay: Critical debates on liberal peacebuilding. Civil Wars, 15(2), 242–252.
Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412.
Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 840–856.
Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2016). The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: A reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 219–239.
Mannitz, S. (2014). From paternalism to facilitation: SSR shortcomings and the potential of social anthropological perspectives. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 269–285.
McWha, I. (2011). The roles of, and relationships between, expatriates, volunteers, and local development workers. Development in Practice, 21(1), 29–40.
Menkhaus, K. (2010). State fragility as a wicked problem. Prism, 1(2), 85–100.
Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: A ‘contributions’ approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419.
Nadarajah, S., & Rampton, D. (2015). The limits of hybridity and the crisis of the liberal peace. Review of International Studies, 41(1), 49–72.
Narten, J. (2008). Post-conflict peacebuilding and local ownership: Dynamics of external-local interaction in Kosovo under United Nations Administration. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2(3), 369–390.
Owen, J. M. (1994). How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security, 19(2), 87–125.
Paris, P., & Sisk, T. (2008a). Conclusion: Confronting the contradictions. In R. Paris & T. Sisk (Eds.), The dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of post-war peace operations (pp. 304–316). Routledge.
Paris, P., & Sisk, T. (2008b). Introduction: Understanding the contradictions of post-war statebuilding. In R. Paris & T. Sisk (Eds.), The dilemmas of statebuilding: confronting the contradictions of post-war peace operations (pp. 1–21). Routledge.
Paris, R. (2010). Saving liberal peacebulding. Review of International Studies, 36(2), 337–365.
Qehaja, F., & Prezelj, I. (2017). Issues of local ownership in Kosovo’s security sector. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17(3), 403–419.
Richmond, O. (2005). The transformation of peace. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richmond, O. (2006). The problem of peace: Understanding the liberal peace. Conflict, Security and Development, 6(3), 291–314.
Richmond, O. (2009). Becoming liberal, unbecoming liberalism: Liberal-local hybridity via the everyday as a response to the paradoxes of liberal peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3(3), 324–344.
Richmond, O. (2010). Resistance and the post-liberal peace. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 38(3), 665–692
Richmond, O. (2011). A post-liberal peace. Routledge.
Richmond, O., & Franks, J. (2009). Liberal peace transitions: Between statebuilding and peacebuilding. Edinburgh University Press.
Richmond, O., & Mitchell, A. (2012). Hybrid forms of peace: From everyday agency to post-liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richmond, O. P., & Pogodda, S. (2016). Introduction: The contradictions of peace, international architecture, the state, and local agency. In O. P. Richmond & S. Pogodda (Eds.), Post-liberal peace transitions: Between peace formation and state formation (pp. 1–27). Edinburgh University Press.
Rotberg, R. I. (2004). The failure and collapse of nation-states: Breakdown, prevention, and repair. In R. I. Rotberg (Ed.), When states fail: Causes and consequences (pp. 1–49). Princeton.
Sahin, S. B. (2017). The rhetoric and practice of the ‘ownership’ of security sector reform processes in fragile countries: The case of Kosovo. International Peacekeeping, 24(3), 461–488.
Scheye, E. (2008). UNMIK and the significance of effective programme management: The case of Kosovo. In H. Hanggi & V. Scherrer (Eds.), Security sector reform and UN integrated missions: Experience from Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti and Kosovo (pp. 169–229). DCAF.
Schroeder, U. C., & Chappuis, F. (2014). New perspectives on security sector reform: The role of local agency and domestic politics. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 133–148.
Selenica, E. (2018). Education for whom? Engineering multiculturalism and liberal peace in post-conflict Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 239–259.
Selim, Y. (2018). Contestation and resistance: The politics of and around transitional justice in Nepal. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(1), 39–60.
Sending, O. J. (Ed.). (2010). Learning to build a sustainable peace: Ownership and everyday peacebuilding no. 4. Available from https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/3732-learning-to-build-a-sustainable-peace.pdf. February 2016.
Simangan, D. (2018). Domino effect of negative hybrid peace in Kosovo’s peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebulding, 12(1), 120–141.
Tadic, K., & Elbasani, A. (2018). State building and patronage networks: How political parties embezzled the bureaucracy in post-war Kosovo. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 185–202.
Tadjbakhsh, S. (2011). Introduction: Liberal peace in dispute. In S. By Tadjbakhsh (Ed.), Rethinking the liberal peace: External models and local alternatives (pp. 25–42). Routledge.
Troncota, M. (2018). The association that dissociates’—Narratives of local political resistance in Kosovo and the delayed implementation of the Brussels agreement. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(2), 219–238.
United Nations Security Council. (1999a). Resolution 1244. UNSC.
United Nations Security Council. (1999b). Resolution 1272. UNSC.
United Nations Security Council. (2002). Resolution 1410. UNSC.
Visoka, G. (2012). Three levels of hybridisation practices in post-conflict Kosovo. Peacebuilding and Development, 7(2), 23–36.
Visoka, G. (2016a). Peace figuration after international intervention: Intentions, events and consequences of liberal peacebuilding. London and New York: Routledge.
Visoka, G. (2016b). Peace multitudes: Liberal peace, local agency, and peace formation in Kosovo. In O. P. Richmond & S. Pogodda (Eds.), Post-liberal peace transitions: Between peace formation and state formation (pp. 65–82). Edinburgh University Press.
Visoka, G., & Richmond, O. (2017). After liberal peace? from failed state-building to an emancipatory peace in Kosovo. International Studies Perspectives, 18(1), 110–129.
von Carlowitz, L. (2011). Local ownership in practice: Justice system reform in Kosovo and Liberia no. 23. DCAF. Available from https://www.dcaf.ch/local-ownership-practice-justice-system-reform-kosovo-and-liberia. February 2016.
Wild, L., & Elhawary, S. (2012). The UK’s approach to linking development and security: Assessing policy and practice. Available from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/7658.pdf. September 2018.
Zaum, D. (2009). States of conflict: A case study on statebuliding in Kosovo. Available from https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2011/05/states%20of%20conflict%20-%20Kosovo_1735.pdf. June 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phillipps, J. (2022). The Role of Individuals in SSR. In: Local Researchers and International Practitioners . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82661-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82661-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82660-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82661-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)