Abstract
Automated multi-stage manufacturing systems serve as the backbone of mass industrial production. Increasing the efficiency of these systems represents a key challenge for manufacturing companies, which continuously cope with planning the sequence of optimal improvement actions according to budget and implementation time constraints. Improvement actions related to different areas, as quality, maintenance, logistics, are usually evaluated independently among each other. Recent developments in data gathering support the evaluation of the effect of improvement actions at local level, i.e. single machine, without accounting for the interactions at system-level among machines. This work presents an optimization method for the sequencing of improvement actions in automated multi-stage manufacturing systems. It combines dynamic programming with a stochastic analytical model for the performance evaluation of manufacturing systems. Results from a real industrial case in the furniture sector prove the usefulness of this novel methodology, compared to traditional bottleneck identification and improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chiang SY, Kuo CT, Meerkov SM (2000) DT-bottlenecks in serial production lines: theory and application. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 16(5):567–580
Chiang SY, Kuo CT, Meerkov SM (2001) c-Bottlenecks in serial production lines: identification and application. Math Probl Eng 7(6):543–578
Roser C, Nakano M, Tanaka M (2001, December) A practical bottleneck detection method. In: Proceeding of the 2001 winter simulation conference (Cat. No. 01CH37304) (Vol. 2, pp. 949–953). IEEE
Grünberg T (2004) Performance improvement: towards a method for finding and prioritising potential performance improvement areas in manufacturing operations. Int J Prod Perform Manage
Tam AS, Price JW (2008) A maintenance prioritisation approach to maximise return on investment subject to time and budget constraints. J Qual Maint Eng
Lin LC, Li TS, Kiang JP (2009) A continual improvement framework with integration of CMMI and six‐sigma model for auto industry. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(5):551–569
Barad M, Bennett G (1996) Optimal yield improvement in multi-stage manufacturing systems. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):549–565
Kang N, Zhao C, Li J, Horst JA (2016) A hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems. Int J Prod Res 54(21):6333–6350
Stricker N, Echsler Minguillon F, Lanza G (2017) Selecting key performance indicators for production with a linear programming approach. Int J Prod Res 55(19):5537–5549
Colledani M, Tolio T, Yemane A (2018) Production quality improvement during manufacturing systems ramp-up. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 23:197–206
Schmitt R, Heine I, Jiang R, Giedziella F, Basse F, Voet H, Lu S (2018) On the future of ramp-up management. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 23:217–225
Magnanini MC, Terkaj W, Tolio T (2021) Robust optimization of manufacturing systems flexibility. Procedia CIRP 96:63–68
Colledani M, Magnanini MC, Tolio T (2018) Impact of opportunistic maintenance on manufacturing system performance. CIRP Ann 67(1):499–502
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magnanini, M.C., Tolio, T.A.M. (2022). Robust Improvement Planning of Automated Multi-stage Manufacturing Systems. In: Carrino, L., Tolio, T. (eds) Selected Topics in Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82627-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82627-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82626-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82627-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)