Skip to main content

Francisco de Vitoria on the Theology of Dominion and Secular Natural Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Empire, Humanism and Rights

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Law and Justice ((SHLJ,volume 21))

  • 200 Accesses

Abstract

The prestigious theologian founder of the School of Salamanca, Francisco de Vitoria, founded his analysis in the Relectio de Indis, arguably the most important text in the history of international law, both on the defence of Indians’ natural right of dominion as a right to use, and on the need to balance and, if necessary, limit that right through other natural rights and political considerations. This chapter recovers the tradition of dominion of the Parisian faculty of theology, where Vitoria studied, taught and conducted research from 1507 to 1523 and shows the influence of that tradition in Vitoria’s own understanding in his main writings. The argument is that Vitoria’s theologisation of the question of the Conquista enabled him to avail himself of the Parisian concept of dominion. The latter was, paradoxically, a naturalised and secularised understanding of property, detached to a large extent from considerations of the power of jurisdiction. In this sense, Vitoria’s contribution to the development of a global right to property must be recognised. The Spanish theologian transferred that concept of dominion into the new context of a Christian Empire trying to legitimise its accrued wealth in terms of commercial power and territories overseas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sprankling (2014), p. 250; Sprankling (2014), p. 288.

  2. 2.

    Sprankling (2014), p. 252.

  3. 3.

    In this vein, e.g., Brown Scott (1934), Schmitt (1974), Anghie (2004).

  4. 4.

    Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN GAR 217(III), UN Doc A/RES/217(III) (1948).

  5. 5.

    Gerad d’Abbeville, Sophronius Clasen (1939).

  6. 6.

    Feenstra (1971).

  7. 7.

    Renoux-Zagamé (1987).

  8. 8.

    de Soto (1995).

  9. 9.

    Pagden and Jeremy (1991), pp. 291–292.

  10. 10.

    On the ambiguity, see Garcia-Salmones (2017), Wagner (2020).

  11. 11.

    Stiening (2011), p. 148.

  12. 12.

    For recent discussion on the important apology by the jurist Juan López de Palacios Rubios, see Birr (2018).

  13. 13.

    While at the same time, the laws of war also found their way into the solution. Schüßler (2003).

  14. 14.

    Nys (1917), p. 219.

  15. 15.

    Zapatero Miguel (2017), p. 190.

  16. 16.

    Yo algunas veces pienso cuán grande desvarío es uno de nosotros no solo fablar, pero ni pensar en cosas públicas y de gobernación, que me paresce que es más fuera de términos que si lo señores fablasen en nuestras filosofías. Pero cuando se me acuerda que si algunos hay por cuyo acuerdo se gobiernan estas cosas, son hombres de carne y hueso como nosotros, y que podría ser que quedasen fuera otros tan sabios como los que entran dentro, no tengo por tan gran locura que no lo aciertan ni alcanzan todo.” (Urdanoz 1960, pp. 38–44, quote at 44) (translation mine).

  17. 17.

    Urdanoz (1960), p. 44.

  18. 18.

    Cruz (2007), p. 19; Belda (1995), Giustiniani Vito (1985).

  19. 19.

    Grotius (2006), p. 183.

  20. 20.

    Brown Scott (1934). Considered far-fetched by some Spanish authors, see (Fraga 1947, p. 11).

  21. 21.

    Pagden and Jeremy (1991), p. 237.

  22. 22.

    This is the view of another realist, see Schmitt (1991), pp. 105–106.

  23. 23.

    Lear (1988), Aristotle (2009), Book VI.

  24. 24.

    Aristotle (1952), Book VIII, 1248 a, pp. 20–21.

  25. 25.

    Brufau (1957).

  26. 26.

    Villoslada (1938).

  27. 27.

    Apparently, after he had absorbed its late condensed version (Kärkkäinen 2010).

  28. 28.

    Kitanov et al. (2015).

  29. 29.

    Grand (1965), pp. 210–211 (translation mine).

  30. 30.

    Muñoz (1980).

  31. 31.

    Belda (2000), p. 57; Beltrán de Heredia (1942).

  32. 32.

    Isabel (2005).

  33. 33.

    de Vitoria and Francisco (1934).

  34. 34.

    Schmitt (1974).

  35. 35.

    Koskenniemi (2011a, 2014).

  36. 36.

    Letter to the all the Christians thanking the College of Sorbonne, (22.6.1262), (Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis I 2014, I, 1889:423).

  37. 37.

    See also (Langella Simona Dic2005-Giu2006, p. 111).

  38. 38.

    Nys (1917), p. 223.

  39. 39.

    Nys (1917), p. 232.

  40. 40.

    Juan López de Palacios (2013), Birr (2018).

  41. 41.

    Nys (1917), p. 256; on ‘ditio’ see Scattola (2011).

  42. 42.

    Nys (1917), p. 260.

  43. 43.

    Nys (1917), p. 268.

  44. 44.

    Nys (1917), p. 238.

  45. 45.

    Wallace (1968), Hill (2018).

  46. 46.

    Koskenniemi (2011b).

  47. 47.

    Pereña (1984), Pereña (1988), Garcia-Salmones (2017).

  48. 48.

    Gaines (1964), Ryan (2015), du Plessis (2015).

  49. 49.

    Nys (1917), p. 234.

  50. 50.

    Dens (1832).

  51. 51.

    Lautz (1916), Feenstra (1971).

  52. 52.

    Baird (1925), pp. 249; 266; Renoux-Zagamé (1987), p. 142.

  53. 53.

    Juan López de Palacios (2013), p. 198.

  54. 54.

    Nys (1917), p. 242.

  55. 55.

    Birr (2018), p. 280.

  56. 56.

    de Vitoria (1765), p. 121 (translation mine).

  57. 57.

    Nys (1917), p. 224.

  58. 58.

    Kunkel and Wittmann (1995), pp. 22; 571–579.

  59. 59.

    Nys (1917), p. 218; 221.

  60. 60.

    Nys (1917), p. 223.

  61. 61.

    Villoslada (1938), p. 91.

  62. 62.

    ‘Secunda pars conclusionis probatur: quia quilquis dolosè aut iniustè extorquet rem aliquam a proximo ad restitutionem tenetur: ut frequenter ostensum est:s sed usurpans dominium in subditos, nihil iuris habet in eos; ideo quiequid extorquet ab eis iniuste extorquet. Excipit, qd in utilitatem subditorum convertit q. conservatione, aut defensione civitatis, aut bonorum ipsorum; quia per haec utiliter gessit negotia eorum, et ideo ad illorum restitutione non tenetur.’ (Biel 1574, IV, d. 15, q. 5, 327).

  63. 63.

    Renoux-Zagamé (1987), p. 43.

  64. 64.

    “Secunda propositio quae sequitur ex prima: Omne jus et dominium quod invenitur in creaturis est datum a Deo. Patet, quia ita ipse dicit: Per me reges regnant (Prov. 8, 15); non est potestas nisi a Deo (Rom 13.1) Non est dubium. Ego non haberem dominium mei nisi ipse dedisset mihi, qui nullum potest esse dominium, quomodumque capiatur dominium, nisi a Deo. Et quod dictum est, omnis potestas a Domino Deo est, potest dici de quocumque dominio. Fuit ipse proprietarius omnium. An ergo dederit hominibus aliquid dominium rei.” ( de Vitoria and Francisco 1934, III De Justitia (qq. 57/66): q. LXII, art. 1, 69).

  65. 65.

    Brett Annabel (1997), pp. 127–131.

  66. 66.

    de Vitoria and Francisco (1934), III De Justitia (qq. 57/66): q. LXII, art. 1, 67).

  67. 67.

    “Verum est quod est abusiva ista acceptio, non tamen ita quin ea saepe utamur in materia morali, ut dicit Conradus. Et probat hoc, quia si aliquis subriperet rem ab usurario vel usufructuario vel possessionario, diceretur fur, et teneretur illis restituere, dato quod non sint vere domini.” de Vitoria and Francisco (1934), III De Justitia (qq. 57/66): q. LXII, art. 1, 67); Brufau (1957), p. 127.

  68. 68.

    Nys (1917), p. 229; 230; 231.

  69. 69.

    Lambert (1998); Lambertini (2014).

  70. 70.

    The official Franciscan position in (Bonaventure 1898, pp. 310–316).

  71. 71.

    For a study of the controversy with a focus on property rights see (Mäkinen 2001).

  72. 72.

    ’Item, probatur ex diffinitione dominii, quia dominium est facultas ad utendum re pro arbitrio suo.’(de Vitoria and Francisco 1934, III De Justitia (qq. 57/66): q. LXII, art. 1, 82).

  73. 73.

    de Vitoria and Francisco (1934), III De Justitia (qq. 57/66): q. LXII, art. 1, 69; 73.

  74. 74.

    Providing e.g. in Durandus de Saint Pourçain pure and strengthening food that facilitate inmortality (Durandi Super Sent., lib. 2 d. 19 q. 1).

  75. 75.

    ‘Dubium aliud est de ligno paradisi: quomodo homo est dominus illius postquam vetitum est ei? Ergo aliquid Deus servavit sibi cujus non dedit homini dominium. Concedo. Parum est hoc quod aliquid sit cujus non dederit Deus homini dominium, postquam dedit multorum aliorum dominium. Vel dico quod etiam dedit ei dominium illius ligni, quia solum ei prohibuit ne comederet de illo. Poterat tamen uti eo ligno ad alios usus, scilicet ut daret brutis poma illius, vel excindere ramam illius ad usus suos, vel ad aliud; et hoc non prohibuit Deus. Sed solum ne comederet de illo. Ita quod homo non erat dominius omnium rerum ad omnes usus utamur illo, sicut ne dominus est dominus servi ad omnes usus, quia non ad occidendum. Et sic Deus communicavit homini dominium rerum, licet aliqui usus illarum sint excepti. Et sic propositio nostra generaliter sumpta est vera, quia homo habet dominium omnium rerum.’ de Vitoria and Francisco (1934), III De Justitia (qq. 57/66):q. LXII, art. 1, 73.

  76. 76.

    Nys (1917), pp. 234–235.

  77. 77.

    Renoux-Zagamé (1987), p. 62; 358.

  78. 78.

    ‘Ad primam rationem quia quamvis in acquisitione potestatis et iurisdictionis et in eius usu vel abusu possit esse deordinatio tamen in ipso ordine superioritatis et subiectionis in quo consistit dominium et auttoritas iurisdictionis non potest esse deordinatio sicut ordo non potest esse inordinatus quia iam non esset ordo. Ad secundas…potestas iurisdictionis est inter homines a deo inquantum deus indidit hominibus rationem per quam debitus est in hominibus esse talem potestatem propter bonum regimen eorum.’ (de Saint-Pourçain 1507).

  79. 79.

    Item, patet hoc de jure naturali, quia Deus hoc dominium habet a natura, et de jure naturali omnia sibi competent.’68.

  80. 80.

    ‘Item, patet etiam ex diffinitione dominii, quia est facultas utendi re secundum leges, et tamen licet Deo uti rebus ut voluerit; nec potest carere illo dominio, nec potest eo privare se, ita quod nos non possumus non esse sui.’68 See for this idea of the power of God (Henrici de 1518; Porro 2003).

  81. 81.

    de Vitoria and Francisco (1934), III De Justitia (qq. 57/66): 72.

  82. 82.

    de Vitoria and Francisco (1934), III De Justitia (qq. 57/66):68; 72; 73; see Deckers on Vitoria’s natural argument of necessity (Deckers 1991, p. 125).

  83. 83.

    John Duns Scotus. Political and Economic Philosophy (2001).

  84. 84.

    Couvreur (1961), Brian (2001).

  85. 85.

    Nys (1917), p. 257.

  86. 86.

    Wagner (2018), p. 93.

  87. 87.

    Pagden and Jeremy (1991), p. 279; 82; 84; 86; Nys (1917), p. 260.

  88. 88.

    Williams (1990), Anghie (2004).

  89. 89.

    Belda (2000).

  90. 90.

    Dunn (2005); see also in particular, (Koskenniemi 2014).

  91. 91.

    Fernández-Santamaría (1977), Cavallar (2002), Villanueva Fernández (2008).

  92. 92.

    de Vitoria and Francisco (1934), III De Justitia (qq. 57/66): 71.

  93. 93.

    Visible in the single moment in which he made a veiled reference to the system of encomiendas (Nys 1917, p. 267).

References

  • Anghie A (2004) Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1952) Eudemian ethics. with an English (trans: Rackham H). Loeb Classical Library 285. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (2009) The Nicomachean ethics (trans: Ross D); revised with and Introduction and notes by Lesley Brown. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird SD (1925) Roman law and political theory. Scottish Hist Rev 22:249–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Belda PJ (1995) Domingo de Soto y la defensa de la teología escolástica en Trento. Scripta Theologica 27:423–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Belda PJ (2000) La Escuela de Salamanca y la renovación de la teología en el siglo XVI. Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán de Heredia V (1942) Accidentada y efímera aparición del nominalismo en Salamanca. Ciencia Tomista 62:68–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel G (1574) In Quartum Librum Sententiarum. Bozolam, Brixiae

    Google Scholar 

  • Birr C (2018) Dominium in the Indies. Juan López de Palacios Rubios´Libellus de insulis oceanis quas vulgus indias appelat (1512-1516). Rechtsgeschichte - Legal Hist 26:264–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaventure (1898) Apologia pauperum. In: S. Bonaventurae. Opera omnia v, vol VIII. Quaracchi, Florence, pp 233–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett Annabel S (1997) Liberty, right and nature. Individual rights in later scholastic thought. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian T (2001) The idea of natural rights. Studies on natural rights, natural law, and church law 1150–1625. Grand Rapids. William B. Erdmans Publishing Company, Michigan/Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Scott J (1934) The Spanish origin of international law: Francisco de Vitoria and his law of nations. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brufau PJ (1957) La noción analógica del dominium en Santo Tomás, Francisco de Vitoria y Domingo de Soto. Salmanticensis 4:96–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallar G (2002) The rights of strangers: theories of international hospitality, the global community and political Justice since Vitoria. Ashgate Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis I (2014) By Heinrich Denifle and Emile Chatelaine. Vol. I, 1889. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Couvreur G (1961) Les pauvres ont’ils des droits? Recherches sur le vol en cas d’extrême nécessité depuis la concordia de Gratien (1140) jusqu’a Guillaume d’Auxerre (1231). Vol. 34. Analecta Gregoriana. Universitá Gregoriana, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz CJ (2007) Proyección ética de la ley natural en el derecho de gentes según Vitoria. In Ley natural y niveles antropológicos. Lecturas sobre Tomás de Aquino, by Juan Cruz Cruz. Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, pp 9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • de Saint-Pourçain D (1507) De origine potestatum et iurisdictionum quibus populus regitur quaestiones III. Pariisis

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto D (1995) De Dominio. Relecciones y Opúsculos. Introducción, edición y traducción de Jaime Brufau Prats. Vol. I. Editorial San Estebán, Salamanca

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vitoria F (1765) De Potestate Civili. In: Relectiones theologicae, vol. 1. Manuel Martín, Madrid, pp 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vitoria OP, Francisco (1934) Comentarios a la Secunda secundae de Santo Tomás. by Vicente Beltrán de Heredia. Vol. III De Justitia (qq. 57/66). Apartado, Salamanca, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers D (1991) Gerechtigkeit und Recht. Eine historische-kritische Untersuchung der Gerechtigkeitslehre des Francisco de Vitoria (1483-1546). Universitätsverlag, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Dens P (1832) Theologia Moralis et Dogmatica, vol III. Richardi Coyne, Dublinii

    Google Scholar 

  • du Plessis P (2015) Property. In: Cambridge companion to Roman law. Cambridge University Press, pp 175–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn J (2005) What history can show: Jeremy Waldron’s Reading of Locke’s Christian politics. Rev Polit 67:433–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra R (1971) Les origines du dominium utile chez les glossateurs (avec un appendice concernant l’opinion des Ultramontani). In: Flores Legum H.J. Scheltema Oblati, by R. Feenstra, J.H.A. Lokin and N. van der Wal. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, pp 49–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Santamaría JA (1977) Francisco de Vitoria (II). In: The State, war and peace. Spanish political thought in the Renaissance 1516–1559. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 97–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraga IM (1947) Luis de Molina y el derecho de la guerra. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines P (1964) Public law, the state, and nationalism. In: Studies in medieval legal thought: public law and the State 1100–1322. Princeton University Press, pp 434–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Salmones RM (2017) The disorder of economy? The First Relectio de Indis in a theological perspective. In: Kadelbach S, Kleinlein T, Roth-Isigkeit D (eds) System, order and international law. The early history of international legal thought from Machiavelli to Hegel. Oxford University Press, pp 443–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerad d’Abbeville, Sophronius Clasen OFM (1939) Tractatus Gerardi de Abbastivilla “Contra adversarium perfectionis christianae” Liber Secundus. Archivum Franciscanum Historicum XXXII:89–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Giustiniani Vito R (1985) Homo, Humanus, and the meanings of “Humanism.” J Hist Ideas 46:167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand P (1965) Le quodlibet XIV de Gérard d’Abbeville. La vie de Gérard d’Abbeville. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 39:207–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotius H (2006) Commentary on the law of prize and booty. edited with an Introduction by Martine Julia van Ittersum. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrici de G (1518) Quodlibet XI. In Disputationes Quodlibetica. Lodoci Badii, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill B (2018) Domingo de Soto. In: Domingo R, Martinez-Torrón J (eds) Great Christian Jurists in Spanish history. Cambridge University Press, pp 134–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabel I (2005) Durandus of St. Pourçain a Dominican theologian in the Shadow of Aquinas. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • John DS (2001) Political and economic philosophy. 2001. translation, with and Introduction and notes by Allan B. Wolter, O.F.M. St. Bonaventure (eds) The Franciscan Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan López de Palacios R (2013) De las Islas del Mar del Océano (Libellus de Insulis Oceanis). Introducción, texto crítico y traducción by Paulino Castañeda Delgado, José Carlos Martín de la Hoz y Eduardo Fernández. Eunsa, Pamplona

    Google Scholar 

  • Kärkkäinen P (2010) Martin Luther. In: Rosenmann PW (ed) Medieval commentaries on the sentences of Peter Lombard, vol 2. Brill, Leiden, Boston, pp 471–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitanov SV, Slotemaker JT, Witt JC (2015) John Major’s (Mair’s) Commentary on the sentences of Peter Lombard: scholastic philosophy and theology in the early sixteenth century. In: Rosenmann PW (ed) Mediaeval commentaries on the sentences of Peter Lombard, vol 3. Brill, Leiden, pp 369–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi M (2011a) Empire and international law: the real Spanish contribution. Univ Toronto Law J 61:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi M (2011b) The political theology of trade law: the scholastic tradition. In: Fastenrath U, Geiger R, Erasmus-Khan D, Paulus A, von Schorlemer S, Vedder C (eds) From Bilateralism to community interest: essays in Honour of Bruno Simma. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 90–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi M (2014) Vitoria and us. Thoughts on critical histories of international law. Rechtsgeschichte Leg Hist 22:119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel W, Wittmann R (1995) Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der Römischen Republik. Zweiter Abschnitt. Die Magistratur. C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert MD (1998) Franciscan poverty. The Doctrine of the absolute poverty of Christ and the apostles in the Franciscan order 1210-1323. The Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini R. 2014. The debate about natural rights in the middle ages: the issue of Franciscan poverty. In: Tuominen M, Heinämaa S, Mäkinen V (eds) New perspectives on Aristotelianism and its critics. Brill, Leiden, Boston, pp 111–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Langella S (Dic2005–Giu2006) Diritti delle genti e diriti umani in Francisco de Vitoria 8–9:107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautz K (1916) Entwicklungsgeschichte des Dominium utile. Universitätsbuchdruckerei, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear J (1988) Aristotle. The desire to understand. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen V (2001) Property rights in the late medieval discussion on Franciscan poverty. Peeters, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz DV (1980) Lógica, ciencia y humanismo en la renovación teológica de Vitoria y Cano. Instituto Francisco Suarez del C.S.I.C, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Nys E (ed) (1917) Franciscus de Vitoria De Indis et De Iure Belli Relectiones, being parts of Relectiones Theologicae XII. In De Indis et de Iure Belli Reflections, by John Pawley Bate translator, James Brown Scott Preface, Ernest Nys Introduction. The Classics of International Law, Carnegie Institution of Washington. Oceana Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagden A, Jeremy L (eds) (1991) On the American Indians. In Vitoria: political writings. Cambridge University Press, pp 233–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereña L (1984) La Escuela de Salamanca y la Duda Indiana. In: Etica en la Conquista de America. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, pp 291–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereña L (1988) Proyecto de reconversión colonial. In: Escuela de Salamanca. Carta Magna de los Indios. Fuentes Constitucionales, 1534–1602, by Luciano Pereña. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Porro P (2003) Henry of Ghent on ordained and absolute power. In: Guldentops G, Steel C (eds) Henry of Ghent and the transformation of scholastic thought. Studies in Memory of Jos Decorte. Leuven University Press, pp 387–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Renoux-Zagamé MF (1987) Origines théologiques du concept moderne de propriété. Librairie Droz, Genève, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M (2015) Political thought. In: The Cambridge companion to roman law. Cambridge University Press, pp 423–451

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scattola M (2011) Das Ganze un die Teile. Menschheit und Völker in der naturrechtlichen Kriegslehre von francsico de Vitoria. In: Brieskorn N, Stiening G (eds) Francisco de Vitorias De Indis in interdisziplinäre Perspektive. Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, pp 97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt C (1974) Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt C (1991) Glossarium. Aufzeichnungen der Jahre 1947-1951. by Eberhard Freiherr von Medem. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüßler R (2003) Moral im Zweifel. Die scholastische Theorie des Entscheidens unter moralischer Unsicherheit, vol I. Mentis, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprankling JG (2014) The international law of property. Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiening G (2011) Nach göttlichen oder menschlichen Gesetzen? Zum Verhältnis von Theologie und Philosophie in De Indis. In: Brieskorn N, Stiening G (eds) Francisco de Vitorias De Indis in interdisziplinäre Perspektive. Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, pp 123–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdanoz T (1960) Introducción. In: Obras de Francisco de Vitoria. Relecciones Teológicas. Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, Madrid, pp 1–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva Fernández JM (2008) Erasmismo o teología española del siglo XVI? In: Cervantes y las religiones, by Ruth Fine and Santiago López Navia. Iberoamericana, Madrid, pp 301–326

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Villoslada RG (1938) La Universidad de Paris durante los estudios de Francisco de Vitoria O.P. (1507-1522). Apud aedes Universitatis Gregorianae, Romae

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (2018) Francisco de Vitoria. In: Domingo R, Martínez-Torrón J (eds) Great Christian Jurists in Spanish History. Cambridge University Press, pp 84–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (2020) Francisco de Vitoria and the global commonwealth. In: Domingo R, Witte J Jr (eds) Christianity and global law. Routledge, London, pp 72–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace WA (1968) The Enigma of Domingo de Soto: Uniformiter difformis and falling bodies in late medieval physics. Isis 59:384–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RA Jr (1990) The American Indian in Western legal thought-the discourse of conquest. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapatero Miguel P (2017) Francisco de Vitoria and the Postmodern Grand Critique of International Law. In: Beneyto JM, Varela JC (eds) At the origins of modernity. Francisco de Vitoria and the discovery of international law. Springer, pp 177–195

    Google Scholar 

Documents

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN GAR 217(III), UN Doc A/RES/217(III). 1948

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mónica García-Salmones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

García-Salmones, M. (2022). Francisco de Vitoria on the Theology of Dominion and Secular Natural Rights. In: Beneyto, J.M. (eds) Empire, Humanism and Rights. Studies in the History of Law and Justice, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82487-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82487-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82486-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82487-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics