Advertisement

Palliative Animal Law: The War on Animal Cruelty

Chapter
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology book series (PSGC)

Abstract

In 2019 President Donald Trump signed into law the Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act (Pub. L. No. 116–72, 133 Stat. 1151 [2019] [codified at 18 U.S.C. § 48].) Although every state already permitted felony animal cruelty liability, animal lawyers hailed the PACT Act as a “defining moment” for animal law because it allowed acts of animal cruelty to be charged as federal felonies.

References

  1. Bagaric, M., Kotzmann, J., & Wolf, G. (2019). A rational approach to sentencing offenders for animal cruelty: A normative and scientific analysis underpinning proportionate penalties for animal cruelty offenders. South Carolina Law Review, 71, 385–427.Google Scholar
  2. Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. A. (Eds.). (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. UPNE.Google Scholar
  3. Beirne, P. (1999). For a nonspeciesist criminology: Animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology, 37(1), 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, T. L. (2010). Denying animals childhood and its implications for animal-protective law reform. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 6(1), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Black, D. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, L., & Rosengard, D. B. (2017). Comment: A dog is not a stereo: The role of animal sentience in determining the scope of owner privacy interests under Oregon law. Animal Law Review, 23(2), 451–477.Google Scholar
  8. Francione, G. (1996). Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gruber, A. (2007). The feminist war on crime. Iowa Law. Review, 92, 741–843.Google Scholar
  10. Gruber, A. (2018). Equal protection under the Carceral state. University of Colorado-Northwestern University Law Review, 112(6), 1337–1384.Google Scholar
  11. Gruber, A. (2020). The feminist war on crime: The unexpected role of women’s liberation in mass incarceration. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kleinfeld, J. (2013). A theory of criminal victimization. Stanford Law Review, 65, 1087–1152.Google Scholar
  13. Levin, B. (2019). Mens rea reform and its discontents. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 109(3), 491–558.Google Scholar
  14. Marceau, J. (2019). Beyond cages: Animal law and criminal punishment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. NeJaime, D. (2013). Constitutional change, courts, and social movements. Michigan Law Revew, 111, 877–902.Google Scholar
  16. Phillips, S., & Marceau, J. (2020). Whom the state kills. Harvard Civil Rights—Civil Liberties Law Review, 55, 2–69.Google Scholar
  17. Ristroph, A. (2018). Farewell to the felonry. Harvard Civil Rights—Civil Liberties Law Review, 53, 563–618.Google Scholar
  18. Sanders, S. R. (2020). The corporate privacy proxy. Cornell Law Review, 105, 1171–1210.Google Scholar
  19. Satz, A. B. (2009). Animals as vulnerable subjects: Beyond interest-convergence, hierarchy, and property. Animal Law Review, 16, 65–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brooks InstituteUniversity of Denver, Sturm College of LawDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations