Skip to main content

Journaling the Design Science Research Process. Transparency About the Making of Design Knowledge

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 12807)

Abstract

Design Science Research (DSR) is a highly context-dependent and iterative process. Design processes in DSR projects represent the actual strategy and execution of design knowledge inquiry and are typically unique. However, details of the actual design process are often lost as there is a lack of transparency in published DSR projects. In this research in progress paper, we present the idea of “journaling” the DSR process. We introduce the concept, showcase it with a conceptual framework, present practical applications, discuss implications and outline future research.

Keywords

  • Design Science Research
  • Process Journal
  • Open Science

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_15
  • Chapter length: 6 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-82405-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://mydesignprocess.com/public/191/ Further journals of projects can be accessed here https://mydesignprocess.com/#projects-section.

References

  1. Abraham, R., et al.: Fail early, fail often: towards coherent feedback loops in design science research evaluation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems - Building a Better World through Information Systems. Association for Information Sytems, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., Maedche, A.: Special issue editorial –accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: a journey through time and space. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21(3), 520–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00611

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. vom Brocke, J., Fettke, P., Gau, M., Houy, C., Morana, S.: Tool-Support for Design Science Research: Design Principles and Instantiation. SSRN Electronic Journal (2017). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2972803

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. vom Brocke, J., Maedche, A.: The DSR grid: six core dimensions for effectively planning and communicating design science research projects. Electron. Mark. 29(3), 379–385 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00358-7

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Burton-Jones, A., et al.: Editor’s comments: advancing research transparency at MIS Quarterly a pluralistic approach. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 45(2), iii–xviii (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chandra Kruse, L., Nickerson, J.V.: Portraying Design Essence. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii January 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.560.

  7. Davenport, J.H., Grant, J., Jones, C.M.: Data without software are just numbers. Data Sci. J. 19, 1–3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Hevner, A.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Jepsen, L.O., et al.: Back to thinking mode: diaries for the management of information systems development projects. Behav. Inf. Technol. 8(3), 207–217 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449298908914552

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 489–504 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J.: Design theory indeterminacy: what is it how can it be reduced and why did the polar bear drown? J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21, 1–59 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Markus, M., et al.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26, 179–212 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/4132330

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Morana, S., Kroenung, J., Maedche, A., Schacht, S.: Designing process guidance systems. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20, 499–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00542

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Nosek, B.A., et al.: Promoting an open research culture. Science 348(6242), 1422–1425 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunamaker, J.F., et al.: Systems development in information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1990.11517898

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Sein, M.K., et al.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Sonnenberg, C., vom Brocke, J.: Evaluation patterns for design science research artefacts. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.) EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286, pp. 71–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_7

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Venable, J., et al.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 77–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Venable, J.: The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In: First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walls, J.G., et al.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.36

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Gau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

vom Brocke, J., Gau, M., Mädche, A. (2021). Journaling the Design Science Research Process. Transparency About the Making of Design Knowledge. In: Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Hausvik, G.I. (eds) The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design. DESRIST 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82404-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82405-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)