Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the important physics and engineering issues related to imaging systems that perform PET and MR imaging simultaneously with a common field of view. We refer to this hereafter as simply PET/MRI, although it is sometimes referred to as hybrid, combined, integrated, or simultaneous PET/MRI. The scope includes issues that may be of interest to an audience with a primarily clinical outlook. After a summary of some of the relevant physics underlying PET and MRI, we discuss the technical challenges encountered in the integration of these technologies, how they have been addressed, and the potential impact of these issues on imaging in the clinic. Although data from scans acquired on separate PET and MRI scanners is also sometimes referred to as PET/MRI, and this approach may be sufficient for many applications, we do not address this here given that the physics of each modality are entirely independent and thoroughly addressed within its own sphere of academia and commerce. Similarly, research prototypes and animal systems are beyond the current scope. For the most part, the integration of PET and MRI for simultaneous imaging has largely retained traditional MRI approaches and geometries and requires a much greater degree of engineering on the PET side. Thus, much of this chapter pertains to the principles of PET, and MRI is included mainly in the context of understanding the requirements for a compatible PET design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:362–78.
Budinger TF. Time-of-flight positron emission tomography – status relative to conventional pet. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:73–6.
Surti S. Update on time-of-flight PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:98–105.
Delso G, et al. Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1914–22.
Lee BJ, Watkins RD, Chang CM, Levin CS. Low eddy current RF shielding enclosure designs for 3T MR applications. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1745–52.
Buther F, Vrachimis A, Becker A, Stegger L. Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:20.
Ferguson A, McConathy J, Su Y, Hewing D, Laforest R. Attenuation effects of MR headphones during brain PET/MR studies. J Nucl Med Technol. 2014;42:93–100.
Grant AM, et al. NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system. Med Phys. 2016;43:10.
Rezaei A, et al. Simultaneous reconstruction of activity and attenuation in time-of-flight PET. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31:2224–33.
Shah NJ, et al. Effects of magnetic fields of up to 9.4 T on resolution and contrast of PET images as measured with an MR-BrainPET. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95250.
Kraus R, Delso G, Ziegler SI. Simulation study of tissue-specific positron range correction for the new biograph mMR whole-body PET/MR system. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2012;59:1900–9.
Kolb A, et al. Shine-through in PET/MR imaging: effects of the magnetic field on positron range and subsequent image artifacts. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:951–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vaska, P., Saleh, L. (2022). Physics of PET/MRI Systems. In: Franceschi, A.M., Franceschi, D. (eds) Hybrid PET/MR Neuroimaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82367-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82367-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82366-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82367-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)