Abstract
Comparing a script with the finished film can demonstrate how the words on the page translate into action on the screen. Without the development of the screen work, understanding this process in their own scripts can be more difficult for learners of screenwriting. This practice-led research project employed a read-through of a narrative comedy screenplay to examine how the creative collaboration of director and actors affected the script development process. The two-hour table reading involved professional actors and an experienced television comedy director and live student audience. As an example of collaborative reflection, the table reading suggests a strategy for scriptwriting as ‘intervention’ or formative assessment, which can help learners of scriptwriting to identify how effectively their words on the page convey their intended meaning. Rather than suggesting a seamless progression in the script development process, the table reading highlighted creative possibilities arising from collaborative approaches to script development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Attardo, S. (2003). Introduction: The pragmatics of humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00178-9
Attardo, S. I. (2014). Encyclopedia of humor studies. In S. I. Attardo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies (Vol. 1). Sage.
Baker, D. J. (2016). The screenplay as text: Academic scriptwriting as creative research. New Writing, 13(1), 71–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2015.1133654
Batty, C., O’Meara, R., Taylor, S., Joyce, H., Burne, P., Maloney, N., Poole, M., & Tofler, M. (2018). Script development as a ‘wicked problem’. Journal of Screenwriting, 9(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.9.2.153_1
Berger, A. A. (2013). Why we laugh and what makes us laugh: “The enigma of humor.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i2.599
Christie, M., Carey, M., Robertson, A., & Grainger, P. (2015). Putting transformative learning theory into practice. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1), 9–30.
Goldman, W. (1983). Adventures in the screen trade: A personal view of Hollywood and screenwriting. Warner Books.
Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.08.001
Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2008). What is an authentic learning environment? In Online and distance learning: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 68–77). IGI Global.
Kerrigan, S., & Batty, C. (2016). Re-conceptualising screenwriting for the academy: The social, cultural and creative practice of developing a screenplay. New Writing, 13(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2015.1134580
Kreber, C. (2004). An analysis of two models of reflection and their implications for educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296044
Macdonald, I. W. (2004). Manuals are not enough: Relating screenwriting practice to theories. Journal of British Cinema & Television, 1(2), 260–274.
Macdonald, I. W. (2010). ‘...So it’s not surprising I’m neurotic’ The screenwriter and the screen idea work group. Journal of Screenwriting, 1(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.1.1.45/1
Nash, M. (2013). Unknown spaces and uncertainty in film development. Journal of Screenwriting, 4(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.4.2.149_1
Raskin, V. (2014). Humor theories. In S. I. Attardo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies (pp. 368–371). Sage.
Riley, G., & Turner, J. (2002–). Kath and kim. Riley Turner Productions.
Schaefer, Z. A. (2014). Humor and small group research In S. I. Attardo (Ed.), Encylopedia of humor theory. Sage.
Sedita, S. (2006). The eight characters of comedy: A guide to sitcom acting and writing. Atides Publishing.
Smith, S., & Henriksen, D. (2016). Fail again, fail better: Embracing failure as a paradigm for creative learning in the arts. Art Education, 69(2), 6.
Steers, J. (2009). Creativity: Delusions, realities, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 28(2), 126–138.
Vorhaus, J. (1994). The comic toolbox: How to be funny even if you’re not (1st ed.). Silman-James Press.
Vorhaus, J. (2012). The little book of sitcom. Bafflegab Books.
Westwood, R., & Johnston, A. (2012). Reclaiming authentic selves: Control, resistive humour and identity work in the office. Organization, 19(6), 787–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411422583
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cake, S. (2021). A Collaborative Reflection Between Writer, Director and Actors: Table Read as Scriptwriting ‘Intervention’. In: Taylor, S., Batty, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Script Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82233-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82234-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)