Skip to main content

Participatory Mapping: Supporting Community Identity Through a Focus on Territory. An Indigenous Tupiniquim Community in Espírito Santo, Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Territorialising Space in Latin America

Abstract

This chapter investigates the trajectory and impacts of territorial conflicts emerging from an attempt to establish a steel industry in the indigenous Tupiniquim community of Chapada do Á, Anchieta municipality, Espírito Santo state, as a part of Brazil’s late twentieth century strategy of capitalist development. This conflict with a powerful external actor stimulated resistance built on identity and territoriality in the community. In the face of the possible total loss of their territory, the Chapada do Á community self-identified as indigenous and they remained resistant to being relocated. The history of the community has seen a slow process of externally powered deterritorialization, both in terms of the dislocation or alienation from land and in cultural erosion and denigration. Beyond that, there has been a recent shorter period of reterritorialization, which we can term as auto-reterritorialization, because the awakened realization of territory is a form of resistance by the community as they re-value and re-activate their indigenous Tupiniquim identity. This chapter illustrates how a participatory approach to local spatial and historical knowledge, focused through participatory mapping, can reveal territorialization processes. In this case, the collaborative processes of mapping the territory led the local community actors together with the researchers, to revisit the customary practices, histories and local memories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The indigenous village of Iriritiba was named after the eponymous river which means ‘oyster bed’ (Mattos 2009).

  2. 2.

    FUNAI is the official indigenist organ of the Brazilian State, created by Law No. 5,371, of December 5, 1967, linked to the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. It is the coordinator and main executor of the Federal Government's indigenous policy, See: www.gov.br/funai/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/Institucional.

  3. 3.

    This infamous dam collapse released 43 million m3 of iron ore tailings into the Doce River system, causing severe social and environmental impacts (do Carmo et al. 2017),

  4. 4.

    https://www.agazeta.com.br/economia/anchieta-perde-74-do-pib-sem-a-operacao-da-samarco-1218.

  5. 5.

    The Companhia Siderúrgica Belgo-Mineira required charcoal for its pig iron furnaces ever since the 1930s. The eucalyptus plantations for charcoal resulted in the creation of Arcelor Mittal BioFlorestas in 1957. http://bioflorestas.arcelormittal.com.br/arquivos/florestas_02_anexo_148.pdf.

  6. 6.

    In the past, when there were no roads, people had to carry the coffins from their community to the cemetery of a neighbouring town.

  7. 7.

    Personal communication, Sonia Missagia Mattos, 2020.

References

  • ACT Brazil (2008) Methodology of collaborative cultural mapping. Amazon Conservation Team, Brasilia. http://www.equipe.org.br/publicacoes_dentro.php?tipoid=1

  • Alvarenga AC (2010) Reflexões sobre as conseqüências da implantação de grandes empreendimentos no município de Anchieta, ES. Dissertação Mestrado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, UFES Vitória

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Larrain A, McCall MK (2019) Participatory mapping and participatory GIS (PGIS) for archaeological and cultural landscapes studies: a review. J Archaeol Theory Method 26(2):643–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9385-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa IBM (2010) O lugar no contexto das redes globais: o polo industrial e de serviços de Anchieta, ES – uma paisagem em transformação. Tese (Doutorado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo), FAUUSP São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentivoglio J, Bourguignon LN (2019) O antigo estado de coisas: apontamentos para a história dos povos indígenas no sul da província do Espírito Santo. História Revista 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5216/hr.v24i1.46582

  • Bethell L (ed) (1995) The Cambridge history of Latin America, vol 10. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodart C. das Neves, Madalena CP (2012) O papel do discurso na legitimação de grandes projetos industriais: os jornais locais e a Companhia Siderúrgica de Ubú/ES. Anais III Simpósio Nacional Discu

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodart C, das Neves, Marchiori C. da Ramos, (2011) Memória, identidade e resistência: o desenvolvimento econômico como ameaça. Revista Interdisciplinar De Cultura 20(1):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catacutan D, McGaw E, Llanza MA (eds) (2014) In equal measure: a user guide to gender analysis in agroforestry. Philippines. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sites/default/files/In%20equal%20measure_reduced.pdf

  • CEPEMAR (2009) Relatório de impacto ambiental da Companhia Siderúrgica de Ubu (CSU). Vitória, ES. https://iema.es.gov.br/Media/iema/Downloads/RIMAS/RIMAS_2009/2017.04.06%20-%20RIMA_UBU.pdf

  • Chambers R (2006) Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electr J Inform Syst Dev Countries 25(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin M, Threlkeld B (2001) Indigenous landscapes: a study in ethnocartography. Environmental Law Institute, Center for the Support of Native Lands, Washington DC. http://www.elistore.org/reports_detail.asp?ID=10805&topic=International

  • Colectivo Miradas Críticas del Territorio desde el Feminismo (2017) Mapeando el cuerpo-territorio: guía metodológica para mujeres que defienden sus territorios. Colectivo Miradas Críticas del Territorio, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • de Saint Hilaire A (1833) Voyages dans l’intérieur du Brésil. Gide, Paris. (IN: Mattos, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Casino VJ, Hanna SP (2006) Beyond the ‘binaries’: a methodological intervention for interrogating maps as representational practices. ACME 4(1):34–56

    Google Scholar 

  • do Carmo FF, Kamino LHY, Junior RT, de Campos IC, Silvino G, de Castro KJ da SX, Mauro ML, Rodrigues NUA, Miranda MP de S, Pinto CEF (2017) Fundão tailings dam failures: the environment tragedy of the largest technological disaster of Brazilian mining in global context. Perspect Ecol Conserv 15(3):145–151.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.06.002

  • Duin RS, Toinaike K, Alupki T, Opoya A (2014) Participatory mapping: engaged archaeology with the indigenous people of the Upper Maroni Basin, Northern Amazonia. Revista Amazônica 6(2):333–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira SRB (2017) Conflitos territoriais e a explicitação de matrizes de racionalidade divergentes: projetos desenvolvimentistas e a emergência de r-existências dos povos e comunidades tradicionais no Espírito Santo. In: Cruz VC, Oliveira D (eds) Geografia e giro descolonial: experiências, idéias e horizontes de renovação do pensamento crítico. Letra Capital, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardi G (2012) Mapas alternativos e educação geográfica. Rev. Percursos 13(2):39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Habegger S, Mancila I (2005) La cartografía social como estrategia para diagnosticar nuestro territorio. In: Celada B, Habegger S (eds) Interpretando a Freire. Haciendo camino desde la colectividad. Seminario de Paulo Freire. Colectivo Sur Ediciones, Málaga, pp 29–36. http://areaciega.net/index.php?/plain/Cartografias/car_tac/el-poder-de-la-cartografia-social

  • Haesbaert R (2001) Le mythe de la déterritorialisation. Géographie Et Cultures 40:53–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haesbaert R (2007) Identidades territoriais: entre a multiterritorialidade e a reclusão territorial (ou: do hibridismo cultural à essencialização das identidades). In: Araujo FGB, Haesbaert R (eds). Identidades e territórios: Questões e olhares contemporâneos. ACCESS, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Haesbaert R, Mason-Deese L (2020) Territory/ies from a Latin American perspective. J Lat Am Geogr 19(1):258–268. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2020.0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley JB (1992) Rereading the maps of the Columbian encounter. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 82(3):522–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger MJ (2009) Mapping indigenous histories: collaboration, cultural heritage, and conservation in the Amazon. Collab Anthropol 2:9–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2010) Censo demográfico 2010. IBGE | censo 2010 | sobre

    Google Scholar 

  • Iconoclasistas (2016) Manual of collective mapping. Critical cartographic resources for territorial processes of collaborative creation. Iconoclasistas, Buenos Aires. http://www.iconoclasistas.net/

  • IFAD (2009) Good practices in participatory mapping. International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome. https://www.ifad.org/documents/10180/d1383979-4976-4c8e-ba5d-53419e37cbcc

  • IJSN—Instituto Jones Dos Santos Neves (2011) Implantação de projetos de grande porte no Espírito Santo: análise do quadro socioeconômico e territorial na fronteira de expansão metropolitana sul capixaba. IJSN, Vitória, ES. 41. 78f

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J, Herlihy P, Tappan T, Hilburn A, Fahrenbruch M (2017) From cognitive maps to transparent static web maps: tools for indigenous territorial control in La Muskitia, Honduras. Cartographica 52(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López Sandoval MF, Robertsdotter A, Paredes M (2017) Space, power, and locality: the contemporary use of territorio in Latin American geography. J Lat Am Geogr 16:43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattos SM (2009) A aldeia de Iriritiba: a atual cidade de Anchieta no Espírito Santo. Habitus 7:5–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattos SM (2012) Comunidade Tupiniquim da Chapada do Á: um estudo. FUNAI (Fundação Nacional do Índio), Brasilia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattos SM (2016) Resistência e ação política: os índios “mansos” da Aldeia de Iriritiba, Anchieta, ES—Brasil. Paper presented at 30ª Reunião Brasileira de Antropologia, João Pessoa, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall MK (2016) Beyond ‘landscape’ in REDD+: The imperative for ‘territory.’ World Dev 85:58–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall MK (2021) Participatory mapping and PGIS: Secerning facts and values, representation and representativity. IJEPR Int J E-Planning Res 10(3):105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall MK, Álvarez Larrain A (2020) Mapeando con la gente: Buenas prácticas en cartografía participativa - lineamientos y aplicación. CIGA-UNAM, Morelia

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor L, Kroefges PC (2008) The land remembers: landscape terms and place names in Lowland Chontal of Oaxaca, Mexico. Lang Sci 30:291–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlove B (1993) The ethnography of maps: the cultural and social contexts of cartographic representation in Peru. Cartographica 30(1):29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preci A (2020) Fixing the territory, a turning point: The paradoxes of the Wichí maps of the Argentine Chaco. The Canadian Geographer/le Géographe Canadien 64(1):20–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffestin C (1997) Le rôle des sciences et des techniques dans les processus de territorialisation. Revue Européenne Des Sciences Sociales 35(108):93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffestin C (2012) Space, territory, and territoriality. Environment and Planning—D 30(1):121–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambaldi G (2005) Who owns the map legend? URISA J 17(1):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambaldi G, Kwaku Kyem PA, McCall MK, Weiner D (2006) Participatory Spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electr J Inform Syst Dev Countries 25(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos MHR, Ataide SG (2013) Luta pela preservação ambiental: dilemas e contradições. Revista Katálysis (florianópolis) 16(2):186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GAQ, Kotilainen J, Salo M (2020) Reterritorialization practices and strategies of campesinos in the urban frontier of Bogotá, Colombia. Land Use Policy 99:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sletto BI, Bryan J, Torrado M, Hale C, Barry D (2013) Territorialidad, mapeo participativo y política sobre los recursos naturales: la experiencia de América Latina. Cuadernos De Geografía - Revista Colombiana De Geografía 22(2):193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sletto B, Bryan J, Wagner A, Hale C (eds) (2020) Radical cartographies: participatory mapmaking from Latin America. University of Texas Press, Austin TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias TN (ed) (2009) Living proof: the essential data-collection guide for indigenous use-and-occupancy map surveys. Aboriginal Mapping Network, North Vancouver. http://nativemaps.org/node/3684

  • Tosi Roquette ME (2015) Mapeamento participativo em um contexto de conflito territorial: a experiência com a população indígena da Chapada do Á, Anchieta, ES, Brasil. Dissertação Mestrado em Geografia—UFES, Vitória

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2009) Building critical awareness of cultural mapping. A workshop facilitation guide. UNESCO, Paris. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001903/190314e.pdf

  • Zanotelli CL (2019) O complexo industrial de Anchieta no litoral sul do Espírito Santo e os latifúndios empresariais. In: Portuguez AP, Junior AO, Miyazaki VK (eds) Olhares da geografia Brasileira: dinâmicas ambientais e questões sociais na atualidade. Barlavento, Ituiutaba, MG

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tosi Roquette, M.E., McCall, M.K. (2021). Participatory Mapping: Supporting Community Identity Through a Focus on Territory. An Indigenous Tupiniquim Community in Espírito Santo, Brazil. In: McCall, M.K., Boni Noguez, A., Napoletano, B., Rico-Rodríguez, T. (eds) Territorialising Space in Latin America. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82222-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82222-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82221-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82222-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics