Skip to main content

Minimum Viable Model to Demonstrate Value Proposition of Ontologies for Model-Based Systems Engineering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends and Advances in Model Based Systems Engineering
  • 1894 Accesses

Abstract

With increasing connectivity and digitalization, systems continue to become increasingly more complex. To meet this challenge, the model-based systems engineering community has begun exploring the use of ontologies to scope the modeling effort and demonstrate the value of MBSE without resorting to full-blown modeling. To this end, this paper presents a minimum viable model (MVM) approach to system modeling. In the MVM approach, a system model with the requisite structure and just enough semantics is created to resolve semantic inconsistencies in the model, achieve interoperability, and answer a few key questions at the right level of detail posed by stakeholders from the systems acquisition and engineering communities. The larger intent is to have potential customers buy into the viability of an ontology-enabled approach to MBSE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Doan, A., J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. 2004. Ontology Mapping: A Machine Learning Approach. In Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbook on Information Systems, ed. S. Staab and R. Studer. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., and M. Gruninger. 1994. Ontologies for Enterprise Integration. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Toronto, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronmo, R., and J. Oldevik. 2005. An Empirical Study of the UML Model Transformation Tool (UMT). In Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N., and C. Welty. 2000. Towards a Methodology for Ontology-Based MDE. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on MDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiya, H., and M. Saeki. 2005. Ontology Based Requirements Analysis: Lightweight Semantic Processing Approach. In QSIC 2005, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Quality Software, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madni, A.M., C.C. Madni, and W. Lin. 1998. IDEONâ„¢/IPPD: An Ontology for Systems Engineering Process Design and Management. In Proceeding of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, Oct. 11–14, pp. 2597–2602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madni, A.M., W. Lin, and C.C. Madni. 1999. IDEONâ„¢: An Ontology for Modeling and Managing Distributed Enterprises. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Systems Engineering, Las Vegas, Nevada, Aug 10-12, pp. SE199-SE204.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. IDEONâ„¢: An Extensible Ontology for Designing, Integrating, and Managing Collaborative Distributed Enterprises in Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering 4 (1): 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Human-agent Collaboration: Ontology and Framework for Designing Adaptive Human-agent Collaboration Architectures, Proc. of 12th INCOSE International Symposium, Las Vegas, NV, July 28 – Aug. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayk, I., and A.M. Madni. 2006. The Role of Ontology in System-of-Systems Acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2006 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, San Diego, CA, June 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, N., and M.A. Musen. 2000. PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orellana, D.W., and A.M. Madni. 2014. Human System Integration Ontology: Enhancing Model Based Systems Engineering to Evaluate Human-System Performance, Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER 2014) (Eds. Azad M. Madni, et al.) Redondo Beach, CA, March 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parreiras, F.S., S. Staab, and A. Winter. 2007. On Marrying Ontological and Metamodeling Technical Spaces, ESEC/FSE’07, September 3–7. Croatia: Cavtat near Dubrovnik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeki, M., and H. Kaiya. 2002. On Relationships among Models, Meta Models, and Ontologies, DSM 2006 Gruninger, M. and Lee, J. Ontology: Applications and Design. Communications of ACM, 45(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievers, M., 2019. Several Personal Discussions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J.F. 2001. Signs, Processes, and Language Games — Foundations for Ontology. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS’01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumme, G. 2005. Ontology Merging with Formal Concept Analysis. In Y. Kalfoglou, M. Schorlemmer, A. Sheth, S. Staab, and M. Uschold, eds., Semantic Interoperability and Integration, no. 04391 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrasse, M.N., M. Savonnet, G. Becker, and E. Leclercq. 2002. A UML-Based Meta-Modeling Architecture with Example Frameworks, WISME, Workshop on Software Model Engineering, Dresden, Germany, Available at URL http://www.metamodel.com/wisme-2002/terrasse.pdf.

  • Van Ruijven, L.C. 2014. Ontology for Systems Engineering as a Base for MBSE., INCOSE IS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wand, Y. 1996. Ontology as a Foundation for Meta-Modelling and Method Engineering. Information and Software Technology 38 (4): 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges productive discussions on ontologies and MBSE with Michael Sievers of the University of Southern California and helpful feedback of Carla Madni of Intelligent Systems Technology, Inc., who reviewed the final draft. I also want to acknowledge Shatad Purohit of the University of Southern California who reviewed earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azad M. Madni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Madni, A.M. (2022). Minimum Viable Model to Demonstrate Value Proposition of Ontologies for Model-Based Systems Engineering. In: Madni, A.M., Boehm, B., Erwin, D., Moghaddam, M., Sievers, M., Wheaton, M. (eds) Recent Trends and Advances in Model Based Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82083-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82083-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82082-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82083-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics