Abstract
Understanding system vulnerabilities to risk factors during operation is essential for developing dependable systems. By implication, assessing in-use risk factors requires monitoring system parameters that contribute to making probabilistic inferences. We argue, however, that naïve use of statistical data without regard to causality can yield surprising and often erroneous risk predictions. Making reliable risk predictions is further complicated by lack of full awareness of system states and the existence of unobservable parameters in complex systems. Overly conservative risk assessment leads to increased life-cycle cost and reduced system availability resulting from overly aggressive preventive maintenance or replenishment strategies, while overly optimistic risk assessment can lead to even higher life-cycle cost and potential harm when otherwise preventable failures occur. This paper discusses a causality-aware, dynamic risk assessment model based on hidden Markov model construct. This model employs the concept of hidden system states that account for otherwise unexplainable observations. The model is continuously evaluated during system operation and updated when new observations warrant reevaluation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Årnes, A., K. Sallhammar, K. Haslum, T. Brekne, M.E.G. Moe, and S.J. Knapskog. 2005. Real-Time Risk Assessment with Network Sensors and Intrusion Detection Systems. In Computational Intelligence and Security. CIS 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. Y. Hao et al., vol. 3802. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Baru, S. 2016. Bayesian Network Based Dynamic Operational Risk Assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 41.
Baum, L., and E. Petrie. 1966. Statistical Inference for Probabilistic Functions of Finite State Markov Chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37 (6): 1554–1563.
Dempster, A., N. Laird, and D. Rubin. 1977. Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39 (1): 1–38.
Department of Defense Risk Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs, 7th Edition, 2014
Ferson, S. 2005. Bayesian Methods in Risk Assessment. Unpublished Report Prepared for the Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres (BRGM), New York.
Homayoon, D., et al. 2009. Bayesian Inference for NASA Probabilistic Risk and Reliability Analysis. NASA Technical Report NASA/SP-2009-569, June 2009.
Huff, D. 1954. How to Lie with Statistics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Liu, S., and Y. Liu. 2016. Network Security Risk Assessment Method Based on HMM and aTtack Graph Model. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 517–522. New York: IEEE.
Madni, A.M. 2019. Minimum Viable MBSE Testbed for Exploring Models and Algorithms for System Resilience and Risk Assessment, SAE-TR-01/05/2020.
NASA Risk-Informed Decision-Making Handbook, NASA/SP-2010-576, 2010
Pearl, J. 2001. Causality Models, Reasoning, and Inference, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-77362-8.
———. 2009. Causal Inference in Statistics: An Overview. Statistical Surveys 3: 96–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sievers, M., Madni, A.M. (2022). Dynamic Causal Hidden Markov Model Risk Assessment. In: Madni, A.M., Boehm, B., Erwin, D., Moghaddam, M., Sievers, M., Wheaton, M. (eds) Recent Trends and Advances in Model Based Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82083-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82083-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82082-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82083-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)