Abstract
A materialist foundation underlays much interpretation of protected places, including colonial sites. Interpretation in the twenty-first century values relevance by bringing to light connections between material resources and visitors’ personal meanings and values. The nature of personal and collective meaning today involves exploration of contemporary significance of past peoples, their actions, and sites in the face of diverse audience experiences and perspectives recognizing that historical, cultural, and environmental legacies evolve through time. We explore ways in which archaeological interpretation takes place at Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, a reconstructed colonial fur trade post managed by the US National Park Service in the North American Pacific Northwest.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alawadi, K. (2017). Place attachment as a motivation for community preservation: The demise of an old, bustling, Dubai community. Urban Studies, 54(13), 2973–2997.
Atalay, S. (2006). Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. American Indian Quarterly, 30(3–4), 280–310.
Bartoy, K. M. (2012). Teaching through rather than about: Education in the context of public archaeology. In R. Skeates, C. McDavid, & J. Carman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public archaeology (pp. 552–565). Oxford University Press.
Beaule, C. D. (Ed.). (2017). Frontiers of colonialism. University Press of Florida.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
Burnham, H. J. (1947). Government grants and patents in Vancouver, Washington. Oregon Historical Quarterly, 48(2), 7–44.
Caywood, L. R. (1955). Final report, Fort Vancouver excavations. US National Park Service.
Chisholm, A. G., Leone, M. P., & Bentley, B. T. (2007). Archaeology in the classroom: Using a dig box to understand the past. Social Education, 71(5), 272–277.
Church, M. (2017). The cultural context of commerce: Historical anthropology along the Mountain Branch of the Santa Fe Trail. In M. Purser & M. Warner (Eds.), Historical archaeology through a western lens (pp. 235–273). University of Nebraska Press.
Clark, J. G. (1998). Should kids dig? Society for American Archaeology Bulletin, 16(5), 9–12. Electronic document. https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-publications/publications/saa-bulletin/1998/saa-bulletin-16(5)-final.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.
Clearman, A. C. (2020). Engaging communities in archaeology on private property in an urban neighborhood: The search for the first (1825–1829) Fort Vancouver, Vancouver, Washington. M.S. thesis, Portland State University.
Cotter, J. L., & Jelks, E. B. (1957). Historic site archaeology at Jamestown. American Antiquity, 22(4), 387–389.
DeCorse, C. R., & Beier, Z. J. M. (Eds.). (2018). British forts and their communities: Archaeological and historical perspectives. University Press of Florida.
Gazin-Schwartz, A., & Holtorf, C. (Eds.). (1999). Archaeology and Folklore. Routledge.
Glendinning, M. (2005). Digging into history: Authentic learning through archaeology. The History Teacher, 38(2), 209–223.
González-Ruibal, A. (2010). Colonialism and European archaeology. In J. Lydon & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.), Handbook of postcolonial archaeology (pp. 39–50). Left Coast Press.
Grima, R. (2016). But isn’t all archaeology ‘public’ archaeology? Public Archaeology, 15(1), 50–58.
Jameson, J. H. (2016). Management and interpretation of world heritage through community engagement. In Furnace, The Postgraduate Journal of the Ironbridge International Institute for Cultural Heritage, Issue 5 (pp. 6–13). University of Birmingham.
Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34–37.
Lewis, D. G., & Connolly, T. J. (2019). White American violence on tribal peoples on the Oregon Coast. Oregon Historical Quarterly, 120(4), 368–381.
Little, K. L. (2016). A search for Hawaiian cultural persistence in the Hudson’s Bay Company’s Fort Vancouver. Master’s thesis, Department of Applied Anthropology, Northern Arizona University.
Marks, J. (2011). Defining a unique model of public engagement and evaluating its implementation at the 2011 NPS Fort Vancouver Public Archaeology Field School. Master’s thesis, Institute of Archaeology, University College London.
Matsuda, A. (2016). A consideration of public archaeology theories. Public Archaeology, 15(1), 40–49.
Miles, J. N. (2005). The life and death of A. J. Bolon, 1826–1855. The Pacific Northwest Quarterly, 97(1), 31–38.
Nassaney, M. S. (2019). Cultural identity and materiality at French Fort St. Joseph (20BE23), Niles, Michigan. Historical Archaeology, 53(1), 56–72.
National Association for Interpretation (NAI). (2009). Standards and practices for interpretive methods. Electronic document. http://www.interpnet.com/nai/docs/BP-Methods-Jan09.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2020.
National Park Service (NPS). (2017). Foundations of 21st century interpretation, 2017 edition. Interpretive Development Program, Stephen T. Mather Training Center, National Park Service, Harpers Ferry.
Powell, R. B., Depper, G. L., & Wright, B. A. (2017). Interpretive training needs in the 21st century: A needs assessment of interpreters in the National Park Service. Journal of Interpretation Research, 22(2), 20–34.
Quimby, G. I. (1966). Indian culture and european trade goods: The archaeology of the historic period in the Western Great Lakes region. University of Wisconsin Press.
Richardson, L.-J., & Almansa-Sánchez, J. (2015). Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics. World Archaeology, 47(2), 194–211.
Schaepe, D. M., Angelbeck, B., Snook, D., & Welch, J. R. (2017). Archaeology as therapy: Connecting belongings, knowledge, time, space, and well-being. Current Anthropology, 58(4), 502–533.
Sinclair, D. L. (2005). Part III, Riptide on the Columbia: A military community between the wars, Vancouver, Washington and the Vancouver National Historic Reserve, 1928–1942, with suggestions for further research. Report to Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, National Park Service, Vancouver, WA, from Center for Columbia River History, Vancouver.
Sinclair, D. L. (2019). At the heart of the city: Stories of Vancouver Barracks. Report to Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, National Park Service, Vancouver, WA, from Portland State University Department of History, Vancouver.
Sofaer Derevenski, J. (2000). Preface. In J. S. Derevenski (Ed.), Children and material culture (pp. xv–xvii). Routledge.
Taber, E. C., Wilson, D. C., Cromwell, R., Wynia, K., & Knowles, A. (2019). Transfer-printed Gastroliths and identity at Fort Vancouver’s village. Historical Archaeology, 53(1), 86–102.
Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage (3rd ed.). University of North Carolina Press.
Tobin, T. J. (2020). Indian education in the northwest. In M. M. Jacob, S. Running, & H. Johnson (Eds.), On Indian ground: A return to indigenous knowledge: Generating hope, leadership, and sovereignty through education, the northwest (pp. 1–20). Information Age Publishing.
van der Linde, S. J., van den Dries, M. H., & Wait, G. (2018). Putting the soul into archaeology – Integrating interpretation into practice. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(3), 181–186.
Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (WA-OSPI). (2013). Washington State K-12 social studies learning standards.
Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (WA-OSPI). (2019). Washington State K-12 social studies learning standards.
Watson, B. M. I. (2010). Lives lived West of the divide: A biographical dictionary of Fur Traders working west of the Rockies, 1793–1858. University of British Columbia.
Whaley, G. H. (2005). Oregon, Illahee, and the Empire Republic: A case study of American colonialism, 1843–1858. The Western Historical Quarterly, 36(2), 157–178.
Wilson, D. C. (2015). A Mongrel Crowd of Canadians, Kanakas, and Indians: The United States National Park Service Public Archaeology Programme and Fort Vancouver’s village. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 2(3), 221–237.
Wilson, D. C. (2018). The fort and the village: Landscape and identity in the colonial period of Fort Vancouver. In C. R. DeCorse & Z. J. M. Beier (Eds.), British forts and their communities: Archaeological and historical perspectives (pp. 91–125). University Press of Florida.
Wilson, D. C., & Langford, T. E. (2011). Exploring Fort Vancouver. University of Washington Press.
Wilson, D. C., Wynia, K. A., Clearman, A., & Paddock, C. (2020). Archaeological overview and assessment, Fort Vancouver National Historic Site and the Vancouver National Historic Reserve, Clark County, Washington and Clackamas County, Oregon. Northwest Cultural Resources Institute Report No. 21. National Park Service, Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, Vancouver.
Wright, A. P. (2015). Private property, public archaeology: Resident communities as stakeholders in American archaeology. World Archaeology, 47(2), 212–224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, D.C., Clearman, A., Hosken, K. (2022). Decolonizing Fort Vancouver Through Archaeological Interpretation. In: Jameson, J.H., Baugher, S. (eds) Creating Participatory Dialogue in Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Interpretation: Multinational Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81957-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81957-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81956-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81957-6
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)