Skip to main content

Time-Inconsistent Stopping Under Distorted Probabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Time-Inconsistent Control Theory with Finance Applications

Part of the book series: Springer Finance ((FINANCE))

  • 1146 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we study stopping strategies in the presence of distorted probabilities, in both discrete and continuous time. Probability distortion is a salient ingredient for a number of important models in behavioral economics, including cumulative prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky (Econometrica 47:263–291, 1979), Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:297–323, 1992)) and rank-dependent utility (Quiggin (Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3:323–343, 1982), Schmeidler (Econometrica 57:571–587, 1989)). Contrary to the expected utility theory, in the prospect theory model, economic agents do not weight outcomes by their objective probabilities but rather by transformed probabilities. These transformed probabilities (or decision weights) allow the model to capture economic behavior observed in experimental settings showing that people tend to overweight small probabilities and underweight large probabilities. Similarly, rank-dependent expected utility overweighs unlikely extreme outcomes. Importantly, in a dynamic context probability weighting makes the decision maker’s problem inherently time inconsistent. Mathematically, the reward functional with probability distortion involves the so-called Choquet integral (Choquet (Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 5:131–295, 1954)), instead of the conventional expectation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Choquet, G. (1954). Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 5, 131–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, S., & Strack, P. (2015). Until the bitter end: On prospect theory in a dynamic context. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1618–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, S., & Strack, P. (2018). Never, ever getting started: On prospect theory without commitment. Working paper. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2765550

  • He, X. D., Strub, M. S., & Zariphopoulou, T. (2021). Forward rank-dependent performance criteria: Time-consistent investment under probability distortion. Mathematical Finance, 31(2), 683–721.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Jin, H., & Zhou, X. Y. (2021). Consistent investment of sophisticated rank-dependent utility agents in continuous time. Mathematical Finance, 31, 1–40. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12315.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y.-J., & Nguyen-Huu, A. (2018). Time-consistent stopping under decreasing impatience. Finance and Stochastics, 22(1), 69–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y.-J., Nguyen-Huu, A., & Zhou, X. Y. (2020). General stopping behaviors of naïve and noncommitted sophisticated agents, with application to probability distortion. Mathematical Finance, 30(1), 310–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57(3), 571–587.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. Q., & Zhou, X. Y. (2013). Optimal stopping under probability distortion. The Annals of Applied Probability, 23(1), 251–282.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. Y. (2010). Mathematicalising behavioural finance. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010 (ICM 2010), pp. 3185–3209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Björk, T., Khapko, M., Murgoci, A. (2021). Time-Inconsistent Stopping Under Distorted Probabilities. In: Time-Inconsistent Control Theory with Finance Applications. Springer Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81843-2_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics