Skip to main content

Unsupervised Data-Driven Methods for Damage Identification in Discontinuous Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Structural Health Monitoring Based on Data Science Techniques

Part of the book series: Structural Integrity ((STIN,volume 21))

Abstract

Before investing in long-term monitoring or reinforcement of structures, it is essential to understand underlying damage mechanisms and consequences for structural stability. Approaches combining nondestructive evaluation and finite element modeling have been successful in producing qualitative diagnoses for damage to existing structures. However, the real-world impact of such methods will hinge upon a reduced computational burden and improved accuracy of comparison between models and physical infrastructure. This chapter describes a new approach based on unsupervised learning to perform quantitative damage state inversion from sparse datasets. Discrete element modeling was used to simulate the response of masonry walls and other structures under settlement loading. Point cloud representations of the structures, consistent with modern computer vision pipelines used for documentation, were used to generate a low-dimensional manifold based on the Wasserstein metric. This manifold is used to train a Gaussian process model which can then be interrogated to infer loading conditions from the damage state. This method is shown to quantitatively reproduce the loading conditions for masonry structures and was validated against laboratory-scale, experimental masonry walls. Although the approach is demonstrated here for settlement-induced cracking, it has important implications for the broader field of data-driven diagnostics for discontinuous media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Glisic B, Inaudi D (2008) Fibre optic methods for structural health monitoring. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Trust for Historic Preservation T.: The Greenest Building (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Trust for Historic Preservation T.: Atlas of ReUrbanism (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen MJ (2013) In situ change analysis and monitoring through terrestrial laser scanning. J Comput Civ Eng 29:4014040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ISO (2005) C.S.N.: 13822 Bases for design of structures—Assessment of existing structures. CEN Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roca P (2004) Considerations on the significance of history for the structural analysis of ancient constructions. Structural analysis of masonry historical constructions, Balkema, Amsterdam, pp 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bayraktar A, Altunicsik AC, Sevim B, Türker T (2011) Seismic response of a historical masonry minaret using a finite element model updated with operational modal testing. J Vib Control 17:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russo S (2013) Testing and modelling of dynamic out-of-plane behaviour of the historic masonry façade of Palazzo Ducale in Venice, Italy. Eng Struct 46:130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson DR, Burnham K (2004) Model selection and multi-model inference, 2nd edn. Springer, NY

    Google Scholar 

  10. Watt DS (2009) Building pathology: principles and practice. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chamberlin TC (1965) The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 80:754–759

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harris SY (2001) Building pathology: deterioration, diagnostics, and intervention. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anzani A, Binda L, Carpinteri A, Invernizzi S, Lacidogna G (2010) A multilevel approach for the damage assessment of historic masonry towers. J Cult Herit 11:459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alessandri C, Garutti M, Mallardo V, Milani G (2015) Crack patterns induced by foundation settlements: Integrated analysis on a renaissance masonry palace in Italy. Int J Archit Herit 9:111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milani G, Valente M, Alessandri C (2017) The narthex of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem: a non-linear finite element approach to predict the structural damage. Comput Struct

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wood RL, Mohammadi ME, Barbosa AR, Abdulrahman L, Soti R, Kawan CK, Shakya M, Olsen MJ (2017) Damage assessment and modeling of the five-tiered pagoda-style Nyatapola temple. Earthq Spectra 33:S377–S384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramos LF, Lourenço PB (2004) Modeling and vulnerability of historical city centers in seismic areas: a case study in Lisbon. Eng Struct 26:1295–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Michiels T, Napolitano R, Adriaenssens S, Glisic B (2017) Comparison of thrust line analysis, limit state analysis and distinct element modeling to predict the collapse load and collapse mechanism of a rammed earth arch. Eng Struct 148:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Douglas I, Napolitano R, Garlock M, Glisic B (2019) Reconsidering the vaulted forms of Cuba’s National School of Ballet. In: Structural analysis of historical constructions, pp 2150–2158. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russo V, Lignola GP, Vassallo E, Zinno A (2010) Second World War damages of the architectural heritage: St. Maria Del Popolo Agli Incurabili Church in Naples. In: Advanced Materials Research. pp 1137–1142

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor J (2005) An integrated approach to risk assessments and condition surveys. J Am Inst Conserv 44:127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Napolitano RK, Glisic B (2018) Minimizing the adverse effects of bias and low repeatability precision in photogrammetry software through statistical analysis. J Cult Herit 31:46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patias P, Kaimaris D, Georgiadis C, Stamnas A, Antoniadis D, Papadimitrakis D (2013) 3D mapping of cultural heritage: special problems and best practices in extreme case-studies. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci II-5, pp 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barsanti SG, Remondino F, Fenández-Palacios BJ, Visintini D (2014) Critical factors and guidelines for 3D surveying and modelling in cultural heritage. Int J Herit Digit Era 3:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Napolitano R, Glisic B (2019) Methodology for diagnosing crack patterns in masonry structures using photogrammetry and distinct element modeling (accepted). Eng Struct

    Google Scholar 

  26. Binda L, Gambarotta L, Lagomarsino S, Modena C (1999) A multilevel approach to the damage assessment and seismic improvement of masonry buildings in Italy. Seism. damage to Mason. Build. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 170–195

    Google Scholar 

  27. Napolitano R, Hess M, Glisic B (2019) Quantifying the differences in documentation and modeling levels for building pathology and diagnostics. Arch Comput Methods Eng 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  28. Béjar Alonso J (2013) K-means vs Mini Batch K-means: a comparison

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yilmaz U (2009) The Earth Mover’s Distance

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rubner Y, Tomasi C, Guibas LJ (2000) The earth mover’s distance as a metric for image retrieval. Int J Comput Vis 40:99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lupu N, Selios L, Warner Z (2017) A new measure of congruence: the earth mover’s distance. Polit Anal 25:95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams CKI, Rasmussen CE (1996) Gaussian processes for regression. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 514–520

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou L, Yan G, Ou J (2013) Response surface method based on radial basis functions for modeling large-scale structures in model updating. Comput Civ Infrastruct Eng 28:210–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia Z, Tang J (2013) Characterization of dynamic response of structures with uncertainty by using Gaussian processes. J Vib Acoust 135:51006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wan H-P, Ren W-X (2014) Parameter selection in finite-element-model updating by global sensitivity analysis using Gaussian process metamodel. J Struct Eng 141:4014164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nadler B, Lafon S, Coifman R, Kevrekidis IG (2008) Diffusion maps—a probabilistic interpretation for spectral embedding and clustering algorithms. Lect Notes Comput Sci Eng 58:238–260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Letellier R, Eppich R (2015) Recording, documentation and information management for the conservation of heritage places. Routledge, Milton Park

    Google Scholar 

  40. Agisoft LLC (2014) Agisoft PhotoScan user manual: professional edition

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sapirstein P (2016) Accurate measurement with photogrammetry at large sites. J Archaeol Sci 66:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on work in part supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant no. DGE-1656466. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Science Foundation. Additional support was provided by the Dean’s Fund for Innovation at Princeton and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The present research was completed as part of the Itasca Educational Partnership under the mentorship of Dr. Jim Hazzard.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Napolitano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Napolitano, R., Reinhart, W., Glisic, B. (2022). Unsupervised Data-Driven Methods for Damage Identification in Discontinuous Media. In: Cury, A., Ribeiro, D., Ubertini, F., Todd, M.D. (eds) Structural Health Monitoring Based on Data Science Techniques. Structural Integrity, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81716-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81716-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81715-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81716-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics