Skip to main content

Application of Image Entropy Analysis for the Quality Assessment of Stitched Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Image Processing, Pattern Recognition and Communication Systems (CORES 2021, IP&C 2021, ACS 2021)

Abstract

Image stitching is one of the relevant operations useful in virtual reality as well as in remote sensing applications which is used for the generation of panoramic images. The quality of the obtained panoramic images may be decreased due to the presence of various factors, e.g., geometric distortions, blur, ghosting, or colour distortions. Since the distortion types specific for the stitched images are different than those that may be found in the databases used for general-purpose image quality assessment, the development of new quality metrics, as well as the testing image databases, are necessary. One of the recently proposed methods for the evaluation of the stitched images is based on the comparison of 36 features of the constituent and finally stitched images, including shape parameters of the Generalized Gaussian Distribution (GGD) and the eigenvalues of a bivariate distribution obtained from the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). Although this method, known as Stitched Image Quality Evaluation (SIQE), provides a high correlation with subjective scores for the ISIQA dataset developed by its authors, its verification has been originally made assuming the use of only 20% of images for testing and 80% for training. Nevertheless, a noticeably smaller correlation with subjective quality scores obtained for the whole dataset may be meaningfully increased, employing an additional image entropy analysis proposed in the paper. The obtained results are encouraging and the proposed extension of the SIQE metric increases significantly both the Pearson’s Linear Correlation Coefficient and Rank-Order Correlations with Mean Opinion Scores provided in the ISIQA database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellavia, F., Colombo, C.: Dissecting and reassembling color correction algorithms for image stitching. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27(2), 735–748 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2017.2757262

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheung, G., Yang, L., Tan, Z., Huang, Z.: A content-aware metric for stitched panoramic image quality assessment. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW). IEEE (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccvw.2017.293

  3. Duan, H., Liu, Y., Huang, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, H.: Image stitching algorithm for drones based on SURF-GHT. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 569, 052025 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/569/5/052025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hou, J., Lin, W., Zhao, B.: Content-dependency reduction with multi-task learning in blind stitched panoramic image quality assessment. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/icip40778.2020.9191241

  5. Jung, K., Hong, J.: Quantitative assessment method of image stitching performance based on estimation of planar parallax. IEEE Access 9, 6152–6163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3048759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Madhusudana, P.C., Soundararajan, R.: Subjective and objective quality assessment of stitched images for virtual reality. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 28(11), 5620–5635 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2019.2921858

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Niu, Y., Zhang, H., Guo, W., Ji, R.: Image quality assessment for color correction based on color contrast similarity and color value difference. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 28(4), 849–862 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2016.2634590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paalanen, P., Kämäräinen, J.-K., Kälviäinen, H.: Image based quantitative mosaic evaluation with artificial video. In: Salberg, A.-B., Hardeberg, J.Y., Jenssen, R. (eds.) SCIA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5575, pp. 470–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02230-2_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Preiss, J., Fernandes, F., Urban, P.: Color-image quality assessment: from prediction to optimization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(3), 1366–1378 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2014.2302684

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Qureshi, H., Khan, M., Hafiz, R., Cho, Y., Cha, J.: Quantitative quality assessment of stitched panoramic images. IET Image Proc. 6(9), 1348–1358 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2011.0641

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Solh, M., AlRegib, G.: MIQM: a novel multi-view images quality measure. In: 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. IEEE (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/qomex.2009.5246953

  12. Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., Simoncelli, E.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2003.819861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong, P., Liu, X., Gao, C., Zhou, Z., Gao, C., Liu, Q.: A real-time stitching algorithm for UAV aerial images. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (ICCSEE 2013). Atlantis Press (2013). https://doi.org/10.2991/iccsee.2013.405

  14. Xu, W., Mulligan, J.: Performance evaluation of color correction approaches for automatic multi-view image and video stitching. In: 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540202

  15. Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., Zhang, D.: FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(8), 2378–2386 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2011.2109730

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Okarma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Okarma, K., Kopytek, M. (2022). Application of Image Entropy Analysis for the Quality Assessment of Stitched Images. In: Choraś, M., Choraś, R.S., Kurzyński, M., Trajdos, P., Pejaś, J., Hyla, T. (eds) Progress in Image Processing, Pattern Recognition and Communication Systems. CORES IP&C ACS 2021 2021 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81523-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics