Skip to main content

Adaptive Reuse Strategies in Durban Inner City Using Hybrid Mapping Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Inclusivity in Southern Africa

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 312 Accesses

Abstract

In Durban, South Africa, the apartheid planning legacy led to the creation of various development nodes within the city. Nevertheless, such nodes are most often developer-driven and do not cater to the needs of existing communities. The resultant effect is the lost and insurgent space created between urban nodes within the city. Insurgency can be seen in the form of informal settlements, self-help housing and urban homesteaders (squatters and homeless, using private property or government land). Sociocultural segregation, urban despair, insurgency and lost space now exist between these nodes. In response to these challenges, adaptive reuse of buildings and urban space represents a sustainable solution by extending buildings’ life and reducing the overall carbon footprint. Low-carbon emissions are a key component of sustainable urban environments and in turn contribute to mitigate the consequences of climate change. Such approach forms part of sustainable urban regeneration, with social and economic benefits to society. To develop sustainable urban neighbourhoods all stakeholders and inhabitants need to be meaning fully involved, towards more resilient cities. This paper applied a set of hybrid mapping tools—drone mapping, transect walks, sketches and observations—to capture lost and insurgent space. This helped defining lost and abandoned space within the study area, to understand how it is currently being used and evaluate its potential for adaptive reuse. By mapping spaces between development nodes in three case studies in Durban inner city, this paper seeks to analyse characteristics and factors that should be considered to determine the adaptive reuse potential of buildings, towards developing more inclusive and resilient cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The BURSAC project (Building Urban Resilience in African Cities) funded through a Royal Society Newton Advanced Fellowship, seeks to develop a decision-support framework for the development of self-reliant communities, understanding the issues of vulnerability, community resilience and adaptive capacity.

  2. 2.

    Ushaka Marine world is a 16-hectre theme park opened on the 30 April 2004 in Durban. It is located on the strip between the beachfront and the harbour and designed to resemble a traditional African Village (Fig. 12.3).

References

  • Babere NJ (2015) Social production of space: ‘lived space’ of informal livelihood operators; the case of dares salaam city Tanzania. Curr Urban Stud 3:286–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalişkan O, Marshall S (2011) “A joint framework for Urban morphology and design.” Built Environ 37(4):409–26. Alexandrine Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley G (1978) Conservation in the inner city: old buildings, new jobs? Built Environ 4(3):213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandekar H (Summer, 2005) Qualitative methods in planning research and practice. J Architectural Plann Res 22(2):129–137. Theme Issue: Planning Methods

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar L (2004) Operating a building for the next 20 years, Environment design guide. G E N 64:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson S, Nyamweru H, Dodman D (2015) Local and participatory approaches to building resilience in informal settlements in Uganda. Environ Urban 27(2):605–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C (2005) Planning methods and good city form. J Architectural Plann Res 22(2):138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • EThekwini Built Environment Performance Plan (BEPP) (2016) (2016–2017) eThekwini Municipality, eThekwini, South Africa. See http://devplan.kzncogta.gov.za/idp_reviewed_2016_17/IDPS/Durban/Adopted/eThekwini%20BEPP%202016-17%20%20.pdf (accessed 23/04/2018)

  • Frantzeskaki N (2016) Urban resilience. A concept for co-creating cities of the future. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Available at: http://urbact.eu/sites/default/files/resilient_europe_baseline_study.pdf

  • Freund B (2001) Contrasts in Urban segregation: a tale of two African cities, Durban (South Africa) and Abidjan (Cote d’Ivoire). J South African Stud 27(3):527–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govender V, Loggia C (2017) “Spatial mapping analysis of lost and insurgent spaces within the city of Durban”. Proceedings of the international conference for sustainable design of the built environment (SDBE 2017, London). ISBN: 978-1-9997971-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney K, Pieterse E, Govender T (2014) SA city futures futurehood: a project synthesis report. University of Cape Town, African Centre for Cities

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2012) Rebel cities. From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso, London-New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison P, Bobbins K, Culwick C, Humby TL, LaMantia C, Todes A, Weakley D (2014) “Urban resilience thinking for municipalities”. Report 1901 MR, University of the Witwatersrand, pp 52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindson D (1996) ‘The apartheid city: construction, decline and reconstruction’. Available at: http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers11-10/010005820.pdf

  • Holston J (2008) Insurgent citizenship, disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press, The United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Holston J (2009) Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City Soc 21(2):245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2009.01024.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen Y (2013) Planning the resilient city: concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities 31:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen Y (2011) Teaching sustainability: a multidisciplinary approach. Creative Educ 2. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.24055

  • Latta A (2014) Matter, politics and the sacred insurgent ecologies of citizenship. Cult Geogr 21(3):323–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. (trans: Nicholson-Smith D). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Originally published 1974. ISBN 0-631-14048-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Loggia C, Govender V (2020) A hybrid methodology to map informal settlements in Durban, South Africa. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers—engineering sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.19.00005

  • Lynch K (1960) The image of the city. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharaj B, Ramballi K (1998) Local economic development strategies in an emerging democracy: the case of Durban in South Africa. Urban Stud 35(1):131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098985113

  • McCormick K, Neij L, Anderberg S (2012) Sustainable urban transformation and the green urban economy. In: Simpson R, Zimmermann M (eds) The economy of green cities: a world compendium on the green urban economy Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M, Tang B (2018) Loose fit cities: the contribution of bottom-up architecture to urban design and planning. NY, Routledge, NY, New York, p 10017

    Google Scholar 

  • Nel D, Landman K, Du Plessis C (2013) “Exploring a methodological framework for understanding adaptive change in cities”. Proceedings of the 19th CIB world building congress: construction and society in Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Point Development Protocol (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell M (2002) Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58(2–3):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A (1982) The meaning of the built environment, Sage Publications Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekings J (2000) Introduction: urban studies in South Africa after apartheid. Int J Urban Reg Res 24(4):832–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishavan SN, Shishavan MN (2013) Comparative investigating of adaptive reuse and sustainable architecture with social approach. AlamCipta 6(2):101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Austin S (2016) Adaptable architecture; theory and practice. First published, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stokols D, Perez Lejano R, Hipp J (2013) Enhancing the resilience of human–environment systems: a social–ecological perspective. Ecol Soc 18(1):7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05301-180107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemthaner M (7–9 July 2011) The struggle to belong: dealing with diversity in 21st century urban settings, coming of age on the streets. An exploration of the livelihoods of street youth in Durban, international RC21 conference 2011, session nr. 30: diversity and space: youth geographies and spatial identities, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck J (2012) Walkable city: how downtown can save America, one step at a time. North Point Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardopoulos I (Oct 2019) Critical sustainable development factors in the adaptive reuse of urban industrial buildings. A fuzzy DEMATEL approach, sustainable cities and society, vol 50. p 101684

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser G, Kotze N (2008) The state and new-build gentrification in central Cape Town. S Afr, Urban Stud 45(12):2565–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström A (2013) The challenge of change: planning for social urban resilience. An analysis of contemporary planning aims and practice. Unpublished master’s dissertation in urban and regional planning. Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University

    Google Scholar 

Internet References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study is part of two research-funded projects: a Royal Society Newton Advanced Fellowship (ref. NA150082) and an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) award as part of the Newton Fund, and in collaboration with the National Research Foundation (NRF) (ref. UTSA150520118179/ n.101581) in South Africa (www.isulabantu.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viloshin Govender .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Govender, V., Loggia, C. (2021). Adaptive Reuse Strategies in Durban Inner City Using Hybrid Mapping Tools. In: Magidimisha-Chipungu, H.H., Chipungu, L. (eds) Urban Inclusivity in Southern Africa. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81511-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81511-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81510-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81511-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics