Abstract
Despite its success and durability, about 20% of patients report unfavourable outcomes following their TKA. This is multifactorial with ongoing knee pain, limited function, and failure to meet preoperative expectations being the issues most likely to result in dissatisfaction. A systematic approach to evaluating problematic knees is essential to ascertain whether a revision surgery, a major undertaking, would solve the patient’s problems. In this chapter, we try to shed light on some practical aspects of evaluating patients presenting to revision knee clinics.
If I had an hour to solve a problem, I’d spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and 5 minutes thinking about solutions.
Albert Einstein
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beswick AD, et al. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000435.
Becker R, et al. Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(9):1433–41.
Toms AD, et al. The management of patients with painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(2):143–50.
Singh JA, et al. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020–2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(9):1134–40.
17th Annual Report of the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey. [cited 2020 23rd Oct]. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2017th%20Annual%20Report%202020.pdf.
Lum ZC, Shieh AK, Dorr LD. Why total knees fail-A modern perspective review. World J Orthop. 2018;9(4):60–4.
Le DH, et al. Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(7):2197–200.
Mathis DT, et al. Reasons for failure in primary total knee arthroplasty—an analysis of prospectively collected registry data. J Orthop. 2021;23:60–6.
Kalson NS, et al. Investigation and management of prosthetic joint infection in knee replacement: a BASK surgical practice guideline. Knee. 2020;27(6):1857–65.
Kalson NS, et al. Revision knee replacement surgery in the NHS: a BASK surgical practice guideline. Knee. 2021;29:353–64.
Kalson NS, et al. Clinical prioritisation of revision knee surgical procedures: BASK working group consensus document. Knee. 2021;28:57–63.
Gunaratne R, et al. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–60.
Liebensteiner M, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty is better in patients with pre-operative complete joint space collapse. Int Orthop. 2019;43(8):1841–7.
Dibra FF, et al. Don’t forget the hip! Hip arthritis masquerading as knee pain. Arthroplast Today. 2018;4(1):118–24.
Malahias MA, et al. Association of lumbar degenerative disease and revision rate following total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2020.
Longo UG, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(2):620–32.
Abdel MP, Parratte S, Budhiparama NC. The patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not is the question. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):117–24.
Matar HE, et al. Overview of randomized controlled trials in total knee arthroplasty (47,675 Patients): what have we learnt? J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):1729-1736.e1.
Williams D, et al. The relationship between alignment, function and loading in total knee replacement: in-vivo analysis of a unique patient population. J Biomech. 2020;112:110042.
Napier RJ, et al. A prospective evaluation of a largely cementless total knee arthroplasty cohort without patellar resurfacing: 10-year outcomes and survivorship. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):205.
Clary CW, et al. The influence of total knee arthroplasty geometry on mid-flexion stability: an experimental and finite element study. J Biomech. 2013;46(7):1351–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matar, H.E., Bloch, .V., Cameron, H.U., James, P.J. (2021). Assessment of Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81285-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81285-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81284-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81285-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)