Skip to main content

Assessment of Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • 494 Accesses

Abstract

Despite its success and durability, about 20% of patients report unfavourable outcomes following their TKA. This is multifactorial with ongoing knee pain, limited function, and failure to meet preoperative expectations being the issues most likely to result in dissatisfaction. A systematic approach to evaluating problematic knees is essential to ascertain whether a revision surgery, a major undertaking, would solve the patient’s problems. In this chapter, we try to shed light on some practical aspects of evaluating patients presenting to revision knee clinics.

If I had an hour to solve a problem, I’d spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and 5 minutes thinking about solutions.

Albert Einstein

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beswick AD, et al. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000435.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker R, et al. Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(9):1433–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Toms AD, et al. The management of patients with painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(2):143–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh JA, et al. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020–2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(9):1134–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 17th Annual Report of the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey. [cited 2020 23rd Oct]. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2017th%20Annual%20Report%202020.pdf.

  6. Lum ZC, Shieh AK, Dorr LD. Why total knees fail-A modern perspective review. World J Orthop. 2018;9(4):60–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Le DH, et al. Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(7):2197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathis DT, et al. Reasons for failure in primary total knee arthroplasty—an analysis of prospectively collected registry data. J Orthop. 2021;23:60–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalson NS, et al. Investigation and management of prosthetic joint infection in knee replacement: a BASK surgical practice guideline. Knee. 2020;27(6):1857–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalson NS, et al. Revision knee replacement surgery in the NHS: a BASK surgical practice guideline. Knee. 2021;29:353–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalson NS, et al. Clinical prioritisation of revision knee surgical procedures: BASK working group consensus document. Knee. 2021;28:57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunaratne R, et al. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liebensteiner M, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty is better in patients with pre-operative complete joint space collapse. Int Orthop. 2019;43(8):1841–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dibra FF, et al. Don’t forget the hip! Hip arthritis masquerading as knee pain. Arthroplast Today. 2018;4(1):118–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malahias MA, et al. Association of lumbar degenerative disease and revision rate following total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Longo UG, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(2):620–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abdel MP, Parratte S, Budhiparama NC. The patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not is the question. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matar HE, et al. Overview of randomized controlled trials in total knee arthroplasty (47,675 Patients): what have we learnt? J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):1729-1736.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams D, et al. The relationship between alignment, function and loading in total knee replacement: in-vivo analysis of a unique patient population. J Biomech. 2020;112:110042.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Napier RJ, et al. A prospective evaluation of a largely cementless total knee arthroplasty cohort without patellar resurfacing: 10-year outcomes and survivorship. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clary CW, et al. The influence of total knee arthroplasty geometry on mid-flexion stability: an experimental and finite element study. J Biomech. 2013;46(7):1351–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hosam E. Matar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matar, H.E., Bloch, .V., Cameron, H.U., James, P.J. (2021). Assessment of Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81285-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81285-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81284-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81285-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics