Skip to main content

Teachers and Students in the Digital Age: Attitude to Online Learning, Analysis of Aspects of Communication and Meaning Transfer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021”

Abstract

This research examines the problem of the attitude of students and teachers to the online learning format, to which many universities in the world were forced to switch due to the COVID-19 pandemic occurred in 2020. This research aims to study how teachers and students relate to the online learning format, as well as to analyze aspects of communication and meaning transfer in online and classroom lessons. The object of the study was 104 students of higher educational institutions, as well as 38 teachers of higher educational institutions. Students answered questions from February 14 to March 3, 2021, and teachers from February 16 to March 12, 2021. The responses were collected using Google Forms. To study different aspects of the perception of online learning and aspects of transferring understanding of the content of academic disciplines among students of higher educational institutions, 2 original questionnaires were developed: a questionnaire for students, which included 17 questions, and a questionnaire for teachers, which included 21 questions. The questions concerned the attitude toward the online learning format, aspects of communication, and meaning transfer during class, as well as aspects of transferring the understanding of academic subjects. The results obtained indicate that teachers and students perceive the online learning format in different ways. Teachers have some difficulties in working in an online format, while students do not see significant difficulties in this format in terms of communication and understanding of academic subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tikhomirova LI, Dolgova LP (2020) The experience of distance learning for students of Altai State University in the conditions of COVID-19. ASEDU-2020: Advances in science, engineering and digital education, 012149, Krasnoyarsk. J Phys Conf Ser 1691. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012149

  2. Bezoluk S, Azarko E, Sannikova V, Derezko O (2020) The initiation of the students’ meaning formation via the meaning essay. In: Innovative technologies in science and education (ITSE-2020), 18059. E3S Web of conferences, vol 210. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018059

  3. Gonçalves SP, Sousa MJ, Pereira FS (2020) Distance learning perceptions from higher education students—the case of Portugal. Educ Sci 10(12):374. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter P (2015) The virtual university. Sci Soc 16(2):146–148. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201440016

  5. Corsby CLT, Bryant A (2020) “I felt like I was missing out on something”: an evaluation of using remote technology in the classroom. Educ Inf Technol 25:4897–4914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10207-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kartensi T (2013) The MOOC. What the research says. Int J Technol High Educ 10:23–37

    Google Scholar 

  7. Almarashdeh I (2016) Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: a technology perspective of user satisfaction in distance learning course. Comput Hum Behav 63:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Willermark S (2021) Who’s there? Characterizing interaction in virtual classrooms. J Educ Comput Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120988530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Suroedova E, Tushnova Y, Belousova E (2020) Agriculture faculty students’ meanings translation in conditions of the development of communicative competence. In: XIII International scientific and practical conference “State and prospects for the development of agribusiness—INTERAGROMASH 2020”, 15028. E3S Web of conferences, vol 175. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017515028

  10. Milman N (2014) Is online learning for all learners? Distance Learn 11(4):13–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Youde A (2020) “Face-to-face trumps everything”: an exploration of tutor perceptions, beliefs and practice within blended learning environments. Educ Sci 10(5):147. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abou-Khalil V, Helou S, Khalifé E, Chen MA, Majumdar R, Ogata H (2021) Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: effective student engagement strategies. Educ Sci 11(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferraro FV, Ambra FI, Aruta L, Iavarone ML (2020) Distance learning in the COVID-19 era: perceptions in Southern Italy. Educ Sci 10(12):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliveira T, Morgado L (2020) IImpacto da dinâmica emocional na aprendizagem em cursos a distância no ensino superior: O papel da presença emocional e das microlideranças. Revista Portuguesa de Educação 33(2):177–199. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.14331

  15. Galikyan I, Admiraal W, Kester L (2021) MOOC discussion forums: the interplay of the cognitive and the social. Comput Educ 165:104133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim D, Jung E, Yoon M, Chang Y, Park S, Kim D, Demir F (2021) Exploring the structural relationships between course design factors, learner commitment, self-directed learning, and intentions for further learning in a self-paced MOOC. Comput Educ 166:104171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deng R, Benckendorff P (2021) What are the key themes associated with the positive learning experience in MOOCs? An empirical investigation of learners’ ratings and reviews. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 18:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00244-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evgeny Pronenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pronenko, E., Tsakhilova, K., Popova, D., Belikova, M. (2022). Teachers and Students in the Digital Age: Attitude to Online Learning, Analysis of Aspects of Communication and Meaning Transfer. In: Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M. (eds) XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021”. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 247. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80946-1_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80946-1_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80945-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80946-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics