Skip to main content

Environmental and Socio-Economic Sustainability of Packaging from Agricultural By-Products

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Innovations in Food Packaging

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science ((BRIEFSCHEFO))

  • 581 Accesses

Abstract

According to the circular economy and sustainable development concepts, this chapter aims to analyze the sustainability issues about agro-food by-products valorisation in order to obtain bio-based compounds as material for food packaging. The overview focuses on experimentations in which bio-polymers were processed and tested with the purpose of evaluating the characteristics and properties in terms of food preservation and active functions. Despite a lot of data about technical features were provided from these studies, in many cases, information on sustainable aspects were missed. This represents a crucial issue because any solution to be really sustainable needs to be assessed in an overall perspective with a life cycle approach. However, in the evaluation of the sustainability of bio-based compounds coming from the valorisation of agro-food by-products it is fundamental to consider elements such as availability in time and space, transports, impacts of processes, as well as, hidden costs along the chain and impact on local communities. At the same way, indirect effects of the packaging, such as the capacity of reducing food waste, should be also taken into account. In the chapter, a simulation about the possible way to assess sustainability of bio-based material was purposed by using life cycle assessment with a consequential approach. First of all, due to the fact that agro-food by-products derive from the same system of production of main agro-food product, the importance of setting an allocation procedure was highlighted from the study as a crucial issue before calculating impacts. Successively, the sustainable performances are accounted by including the avoided impacts related to the production of petroleum-based packaging material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This software is available at http://www.gabi-software.com.

Abbreviations

CO2:

Carbon dioxide

CNF:

Cellulose nanofibrils

DDGS:

Distiller-dried grains with solubles

GWP:

Global Warming Potential

GHG:

Greenhouse gases

HACCP:

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points

HDPE:

High density polyethylene

KNN:

k-Nearest Neighbour

LCA:

Life Cycle Assessment

LDPE:

Low density polyethylene

MAE:

Microwave assisted extraction

OOMW:

Olive oil mill wastewater

PHA:

Polyhydroxyalkanoates

PHBV:

Polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate

PLA:

Polylactic acid

PVA:

Polyvinyl alcohol

PE:

Polyethylene

PP:

Polypropylene

TRL:

Technology Readiness Levels

References

  • Adilah AN, Jamilah B, Noranizan MA, Hanani ZAN (2018) Utilization of mango peel extracts on the biodegradable films for active packaging. Food Pack Shelf Life 16:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andres AI, Petron MJ, Delgado-Adamez J, Lopez M, Timon M (2017) Effect of tomato pomace extracts on the shelf-life of modified atmosphere-packaged lamb meat. J Food Proc Preserv 41(4):e13018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13018

  • Avila LB, Vaz Fontes MR, da Rosa Zavareze E, Costa Moraes C, Machado Morais M, Silveira da Rosa G (2020) Recovery of bioactive compounds from jaboticaba peels and application into zein ultrafine fibers produced by electrospinning. Polym 12(12):2916. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122916

  • Banat R (2019) Olive pomace flour as potential organic filler in composite materials: a brief review. Am J Polym Sci 9(1):10–15. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajps.20190901.02

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benini L, Mancini L, Sala S, Manfredi S, Schau EM, Pant R (2014) Normalization method and data for environmental footprints. Report EUR 26842 EN. Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj A, Alam T, Sharma V, Alam MS, Hamid H, Deshwal GK (2020) Lignocellulosic agricultural biomass as a biodegradable and eco-friendly alternative for polymer-based food packaging. J Pack Technol Res 4(2):205–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-020-00089-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird N, Cowie A, Cherubini F, Jungmeier G (2011) Using a life cycle assessment approach to estimate the net greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy. IEA Bioenergy, Strategic Report, ExCo:2011:03

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, do Socorro Rocha Bastos M, Furtado RF, Kuzniar G, Boddu V, Cheng HN (2020) Evaluation of the properties of cellulose ester films that incorporate essential oils. Int J Polym Sci 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4620868. Article ID 4620868

  • Brennan L, Langley S, Verghese K, Lockrey S, Ryder M, Francis C, Phan-Le NT, Hill A (2020) The role of packaging in fighting food waste: a systematised review of consumer perceptions of packaging. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125276. 125276

  • Bugnicourt E, Cinelli P, Lazzeri A, Alvarez V (2014) Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): review of synthesis, characteristics, processing and potential applications in packaging. Expr Polym Lett 8(11):791–808. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2014.82

  • Cappelletti GM, Ioppolo G, Nicoletti GM, Russo C (2014) Energy requirement of extra virgin olive oil production. Sustainability 6(8):4966–4974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6084966

  • Cerón Gómez MM (2020) Development of bio-based active packaging material evaluating grapefruit seed and grape seed extract as antimicrobials. Dissertation, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisenga SM, Tolesa GN, Workneh TS, Owusu-Kwarteng J (2020) Biodegradable food packaging materials and prospects of the fourth industrial revolution for tomato fruit and product handling. Int J Food Sci 2020:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8879101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conte A, Cappelletti GM, Nicoletti GM, Russo C, Del Nobile MA (2015) Environmental implications of food loss probability in packaging design. Food Res Int 78:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.11.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Trigo I, Otero-Penedo P, Outeirino D, Paz A, Dominguez JM (2019) Valorization of chestnut (Castanea sativa) residues: characterization of different materials and optimization of the acid-hydrolysis of chestnut burrs for the elaboration of culture broths. Waste Manag 87:472–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.028

  • Cucurachi S, Scherer L, Guinée J, Tukker A (2019) Life cycle assessment of food systems. One Earth 1(3):292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA (2012). Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • da Rosa GS, Vanga SK, Gariepy Y, Raghavan V (2019) Development of biodegradable films with improved antioxidant properties based on the addition of carrageenan containing olive leaf extract for food packaging applications. J Polym Environ 28(1):123–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-019-01589-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva e Silva N, de Souza Farias F, dos Santos Freitas MM, Pino Hernández EJG, Dantas VV, Enê Chaves Oliveira M, Joele MRSP, de Fátima Henriques Lourenço L (2021) Artificial intelligence application for classification and selection of fish gelatin packaging film produced with incorporation of palm oil and plant essential oils. Food Pack Shelf Life 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100611. 100611

  • de la Caba K, Guerrero P, Trung TS, Cruz-Romero M, Kerry JP, Fluhr J, Maurer M, Kruijssen F, Albalat A, Bunting S, Burt S, Little D, Newton R (2019) From seafood waste to active seafood packaging: an emerging opportunity of the circular economy. J Clean Prod 208:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Moraes Crizel T, de Oliveira Rios A, Alves VD, Bandarra N, Moldão-Martins M, Hickmann Flôres S (2018) Active food packaging prepared with chitosan and olive pomace. Food Hydrocoll 74:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2013) Recommendations. Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organizations (Text with EEA relevance) (2013/179/EU). Off J Eur Union L124:1–210

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2018) European Commission, Environmental Footprint Guidance document—guidance for the development of Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs), version 6.3

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Azapagic A, Finnveden G, Rydberg T, Weidema BP, Zamagni A (2016) Attributional and consequential LCA in the ILCD handbook. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(3):293–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1026-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input daa in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(3):161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2019) Crops statistics. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 17 April 2021

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (eds) (2007) Overview and methodology—ecoinvent report No. 1. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf. Available http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/manuals/EcoinventOverviewAndMethodology.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2021

  • Gaikwad KK, Lee JY, Lee YS (2016) Development of polyvinyl alcohol and apple pomace bio-composite film with antioxidant properties for active food packaging application. J Food Sci Technol 53(3):1608–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2104-9

  • Garcia-Lomillo J, Gonzalez-SanJose ML, Del Pino-Garcia R, Rivero-Perez MD, Muniz-Rodriguez P (2014) Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of wine byproducts and their potential uses in the food industry. J Agric Food Chem 62, 52:12595–12602. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf5042678

  • Garrido T, Etxabide A, LecetaI CS, de la Caba K, Guerrero P (2014) Valorization of soya by-products for sustainable packaging. J Clean Prod 64:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guggenberger G (2005). Humification and mineralization in soils. In: Varma A, Buscot F (eds) Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions. Soil biology, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliou L, Machado DC, Oliveira SS, Gouveia AR, Reis MAM, Campanari S, Villano M, Majone M (2016) Impact of fermentation residues on the thermal, structural, and rheological properties of polyhydroxy (butyrate-co-valerate) produced from cheese whey and olive oil mill wastewater. J Appl Polym Sci 133(2):42818. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IKP, PE (2002) GaBi 4—software-system and databases for life cycle engineering. Echterdingen, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework ISO 14040:2006. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006. International Organizationfor Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafarzadeh S, Jafari SM, Salehabadi A, Nafchi AM, Uthaya Kumar US, Khalil HPSA (2020) Biodegradable green packaging with antimicrobial functions based on the bioactive compounds from tropical plants and their by-products. Trends Food Sci Technol 100:262–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • JRC-IES (2010) International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer MK, Smith RC (2020) Recent advances in starch-based films toward food packaging applications: physicochemical, mechanical, and functional properties. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 19(6):3031–3083. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Coffin DR, Jin TZ, Latona N, Liu CK, Liu B, Zhang J, Liu L (2012) Biodegradable composites from polyester and sugar beet pulp with antimicrobial coating for food packaging. J Appl Polym Sci 126(S1):E362–E373. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Missio AL, Mattos BD, Otoni CG, Gentil M, Coldebella R, Khakalo A, Gatto DA, Rojas OJ (2020) Cogrinding wood fibers and tannins: surfactant effects on the interactions and properties of functional films for sustainable packaging materials. Biomacromolecul 21(5):1865–1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Kägi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Data v2.0. Ecoinvent report No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemes SA, Szabo K, Vodnar DC (2020) Applicability of agro-industrial by-products in intelligent food packaging. Coat 10(6):550. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10060550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nerantzis ET, Tataridis P (2006) Integrated enology-utilization of winery by-products into high added value products. e-J Sci Technol 1(3):79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojala E, Uusitalo V, Virkki-Hatakka T, Niskanen A, Soukka R (2016) Assessing product environmental performance with PEF methodology: reliability, comparability, and cost concerns. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(8):1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1090-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payen S, Basset-Mens C, Colin F, Roignant P (2017) Inventory of field water flows for agri-food LCA: critical review and recommendations of modelling options. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1331–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1353-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister S, Vionnet S, Levova T, Humbert S (2015) Ecoinvent 3: assessing water use in LCA and facilitating water footprinting. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1349–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0937-0

  • Porta R, Sabbah M, Di Pierro P (2020) Biopolymers as food packaging materials. Int J Mol Sci 21(14):4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144942

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Potrč S, Sterniša MAO, Smole Možina SAO, Knez Hrnčič M, Fras Zemljič L (2020) Bioactive characterization of packaging foils coated by chitosan and polyphenol colloidal formulations. Int J Mol Sci 21(7):2610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072610

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Wu Z, Shen M, Rong L, Liu W, Xiao W, Xie J (2021) Improve properties of sweet potato starch film using dual effects: combination Mesona chinensis Benth polysaccharide and sodium carbonate. LWT Food Sci Technol 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110679. 110679

  • Russo C, Cappelletti GM, Nicoletti GM, di Noia AE, Michalopoulos G (2016) Comparison of European olive production systems. Sustainability 8(8):825. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo C, Cappelletti GM, Nitkiewicz T (2019) Best environmental practices in agricultural sector: comparative LCA study of Italian and polish wheat cultivation. In: Salerno-Kochan R (ed) Quality science in the face of the challenges of innovative economy and sustainable development Nauki o zarządzaniu i jakości wobec wyzwań zrównoważonego rozwoju = Management and Quality Studies Facing Challenges of Sustainable Development. Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji—Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Radom, Krakòw, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá N, Mattos A, Silva LM, Brito E, Rosa M, Azeredo H (2020) From cashew byproducts to biodegradable active materials: bacterial cellulose-lignin-cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposite films. Int J Biol Macromolecul 161:1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salomone R, Cappelletti GM, Malandrino O, Mistretta M, Neri E, Nicoletti GM, Notarnicola B, Pattara C, Russo C, Saija G (2015) Life cycle assessment in the olive oil sector. In: Notarnicola B, Salomone R, Petti L, Renzulli P, Roma R, Cerutti A (eds) Life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11940-3_2

  • Sanchez-Garcia MD, Gimenez E, Lagaron JM (2008) Morphology and barrier properties of solvent cast composites of thermoplastic biopolymers and purified cellulose fibers. Carbohydr Polym 71(2):235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simkovic I, Kelnar I, Mendichi R, Bertok T, Filip J (2017) Composite films prepared from agricultural by-products. Carbohydr Polym 156:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sogut E, Seydim AC (2018) The effects of Chitosan and grape seed extract-based edible films on the quality of vacuum packaged chicken breast fillets. Food Pack Shelf Life 18:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza Filho PF, Zamani A, Ferreira JA (2020) Valorization of wheat byproducts for the co-production of packaging material and enzymes. Energies 13(6):1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutivisedsak N, Cheng HN, Dowd MK, Selling GW, Biswas A (2012) Evaluation of cotton byproducts as fillers for poly(lactic acid) and low density polyethylene. Ind Crops Prod 36(1):127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.08.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szabo K, Teleky BE, Mitrea L, Călinoiu LF, Martău GA, Simon E, Varvara RA, Vodnar DC (2020) Active packaging—poly(Vinyl alcohol) films enriched with tomato by-products extract. Coatings 10(2):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10020141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valdes A, Mellinas AC, Ramos M, Garrigos MC, Jimenez A (2014) Natural additives and agricultural wastes in biopolymer formulations for food packaging. Front Chem 2:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2014.00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Varžinskas V, Markevičiūtė Z (2020) Sustainable food packaging: materials and waste management solutions. Environ Res Eng Manag 76(3):154–164. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.76.3.27511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1(v3). The ecoinvent Centre, St. Gallen. Available https://www.ecoinvent.org/files/dataqualityguideline_ecoinvent_3_20130506.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2021

  • Wu H, Lei Y, Zhu R, Zhao M, Lu J, Xiao D, Jiao C, Zhang Z, Shen G, Li S (2019) Preparation and characterization of bioactive edible packaging films based on pomelo peel flours incorporating tea polyphenol. Food Hydrocoll 90:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.12.016

  • Yang HJ, Lee JH, Won M, Song KB (2016) Antioxidant activities of distiller dried grains with solubles as protein films containing tea extracts and their application in the packaging of pork meat. Food Chem 196:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Bai S, Wang Q (2018) Sustainable packaging biocomposites from polylactic acid and wheat straw: enhanced physical performance by solid state shear milling process. Compos Sci Technol 158:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zemljič LF, Plohl O, Vesel A, Luxbacher T, Potrč S (2020) Physicochemical characterization of packaging foils coated by Chitosan and polyphenols colloidal formulations. Int J Mol Sci 21(2):495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020495

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Hortal M, Dobon A, Bermudez JM, Lara-Lledo M (2015) The effect of active packaging on minimizing food losses: life cycle assessment (LCA) of essential oil component-enabled packaging for fresh beef. Pack Technol Sci 28(9):761–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2135

  • Zhao X, Mu Y, Dong H, Zhang H, Zhang H, Chi Y, Song G, Li H, Wang L (2020) Effect of cinnamaldehyde incorporation on the structural and physical properties, functional activity of soy protein isolate-egg white composite edible films. J Food Proc Preserv 45(2):e15143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15143

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa De Pilli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Pilli, T., Baiano, A., Lopriore, G., Russo, C., Cappelletti, G.M. (2021). Environmental and Socio-Economic Sustainability of Packaging from Agricultural By-Products. In: Sustainable Innovations in Food Packaging. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80936-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics