Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Forensic Psychology

Abstract

All psychological professionals who work with offenders will encounter ethical dilemmas, typically ones that bring the interest of the individual prisoner or offender into conflict with the interests and values of the state or society. Forensic psychologists may find that they have to negotiate an ethical tension between the welfare of a vulnerable adult, the welfare of the society to which they may return, and the process of balancing these two groups of interests, while adhering to a process that is just and fair. In this chapter, we discuss some of the different kinds of ethical dilemmas that arise in forensic psychology and key processes and principles for holding ethics in mind in all decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, A. (2019). Being ethical psychologists in correction settings. In The Wiley international handbook of correctional psychology (pp. 30–44).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, A. (2018). Moral challenges for psychologists working in psychology and law. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(3), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzheimer Europe. (2010, March 29). Justice: The four common bioethical principles. https://www.alzheimer-europe.org/Ethics/Definitions-and-approaches/The-four-common-bioethical-principles/Justice.

  • American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. The American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889.

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society. (2018). Code of ethics and conduct. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/bps-code-ethics-and-conduct.

  • British Psychological Society Division of Forensic Psychology Working party on extremism. (2018). Ethical guidelines for applied psychological practice in the field of extremism, violent extremism and terrorism. Retrieved November 15, 2020, from https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/ethical-guidelines-applied-psychological-practice-field-extremism-violent-extremism.

  • Day, A., & White, J. (2008). Ethical practice from the perspective of the forensic psychologist: Commentary on the uses and value of the Australian Psychological Society (2007) code of ethics. Australian Psychologist, 43(3), 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. M., & Tappan, M. B. (1996). The narrative approach to moral development: From the epistemic subject to dialogical selves. Human Development, 39(2), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forde, R. A. (2017). Bad psychology: How forensic psychology left science behind. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Myers, S, & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospital: A national survey. The American Journal of Bioethics. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology., 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.66.2.348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Care Professions Council. (2016). Standards of conduct, performance and ethics. Retrieved November 15, 2020, from https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-conduct-performance-and-ethics/.

  • Human Rights Act 1998. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents. Accessed 11 February 2021.

  • Jahn, W. T. (2011). The 4 basic ethical principles that apply to forensic activities are respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 10(3), 225–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaslow, F. W. (1980). Ethical problems in prison psychology, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, S. J., & VandeCreek, L. D. (2012). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösel, F., Link, E., Schmucker, M., Bender, D., Breuer, M., Carl, L., Endres, J., & Lauchs, L. (2020). On the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment in prisons: A comparison of two different evaluation designs in routine practice. Sexual Abuse, 32(4), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871576.

  • Martindale, D. A., & Gould, J. W. (2012). Ethics in forensic practice. Chapter 3 (37–61), Volume 11, Forensic psychology, of the handbook of psychology (2nd ed.). I. Weiner, series editor; R. K. Otto, volume editor. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metwally, M. (2019). Forensic organizational psychology: Shedding light on the positive repercussions of ethical leadership in forensic medicine. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 9(1), 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niveau, G., & Welle, I. (2018). Forensic psychiatry, one subspeciality with two ethics? A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0266-5.

  • Patel, N. A., & Elkin, G. D. (2015). Professionalism and conflicting interests: The American Psychological Association’s involvement in torture. AMA Journal of Ethics, 17(10), 924–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfafflin, M., Robert, R., & Reiter-Theil, S. (2009). Evaluating clinical ethics consultation: A European perspective. Healthcare Ethics. HeinOnline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. W., Arnold, M. L., & Lawford, H. (2009). Growing towards care: A narrative approach to prosocial moral identity and generativity of personality in emerging adulthood. In Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 295–315).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, D., Gross, D., Frierson, C., Schubert, G. A., Schulze-Steinen, H., & Kersten, A. (2018). Ethics rounds: Affecting ethics quality at all organisational levels. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-104831.

  • Stams, G. J., Brugman, D., Dekovic, M., Van Rosmalen, L., Van Der Laan, P., & Gibbs, J. C. (2006). The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(5), 692–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger, L. H., Gutheil, T. G., & Brodsky, A. (1997). On wearing two hats: Role conflict in serving as both psychotherapist and expert witness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(4), 448–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappan, M. B. (1989). Stories lived and stories told: The narrative structure of late adolescent moral development. Human Development, 32(5), 300–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Birgden, A. (2007). Human rights and correctional clinical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 628–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading

  • Bowers, L., & Friendship, C. (2017). Forensic psychological risk assessments for the Parole Board. In Assessments in forensic practice: A handbook (pp. 103–121).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing Hansen, N., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Navigating the nuances: A matrix of considerations for ethical-legal dilemmas. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30(5), 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donohue, W. T., & Ferguson, K. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of professional ethics for psychologists: Issues, questions, and controversies. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirelle,G., Beattey, R. A., & Zapf, P. A. (2017). The ethical practice of forensic psychology: A casebook. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, H. N., & DeBow, D. M. (2003). Ethical principles and professional competencies. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.) & A. M. Goldstein (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 11). Forensic psychology (pp. 33–53). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, UK

    Estelle Moore & Gwen Adshead

Authors
  1. Estelle Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gwen Adshead
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwen Adshead .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Carlo Garofalo

  2. Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Jelle J. Sijtsema

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moore, E., Adshead, G. (2022). Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology. In: Garofalo, C., Sijtsema, J.J. (eds) Clinical Forensic Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80882-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80882-2_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80881-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80882-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation