Abstract
In this article, we add to the theoretical understanding of populist foreign policy by proposing the model of populist neo-imperialism. Built on an in-depth study of contemporary Turkey, the model postulates that populist right-wing parties in countries with an imperial past pursue a foreign policy with specific shared features. In immigration, trade and regional integration, the policy of populist neo-imperialism defies empirical typologies derived from European right-wing populists. Three empirical case studies (Russia, United Kingdom, France) based on secondary material confirm the model’s transferability while highlighting necessary conditions for populist neo-imperialism to be chosen: economic strength, political dominance and prior elites’ neglect of the imperial past. Moreover, the cases show that populist neo-imperialists are willing to stomach losses to their popularity to establish and maintain their foreign policy, indicating the “thick” ideological motivations that drive them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsLiterature
Akcay, Ü. (2018). Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis (Working Paper 100). Institute for International Political Economy, Berlin School of Economics and Law.
Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2015). Populists in power. Routledge.
Arat-Koç, S. (2018). Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’: ‘White’ vs. ‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology, 42(4), 391–408.
Balfour, R., Emmanouilidis, J. A., Fieschi, C., Grabbe, H., Hill, C., Lochocki, T., Mendras, M., Mudde, C., Niemi, M. K., Schmidt, J., & Stratulat, C. (2016). Europe’s troublemakers. The populist challenge to foreign policy. European Policy Centre. https://wms.flexious.be/editor/plugins/imagemanager/content/2140/PDF/2016/Europe_s_troublemakers_complete_book.pdf
Balzer, H. (2019). Public opinion paradoxes? Russians are increasingly dubious about the costs of Putin’s foreign policies (PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 595). http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-
Beaumont, P. (2017). Brexit, Retrotopia and the perils of post-colonial delusions. Global Affairs, 3(4–5), 379–390.
Bershidsky, L. (2018, August 22). Russians get a revisionist view of Soviet Union’s end. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-08-22/yeltsin-s-role-in-soviet-union-gets-the-revisionist-treatment
Canovan, M. (2002). Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 25–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
Chryssogelos, A.-S. (2010). Undermining the west from within: European populists, the US and Russia. European View, 9(2), 267–277.
Corke, S., Finkel, A., Kramer, D. J., Robbins, C. A., & Schenkkan, N. (2014). Democracy in crisis: Corruption, media, and power in Turkey. Freedom House.
Daddow, O. (2019). GlobalBritainTM: The discursive construction of Britain’s post-Brexit world role. Global Affairs, 5(1), 5–22.
Davutoğlu, A. (2013, March 9). Speech at the meeting organized by the foreign economic relations board. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-ahmet-davutoglu_nun-dis-ekonomik-iliskiler-kurulu-tarafindan-duzenlenen-toplantida-yaptiklari-konusma_-9.tr.mfa
Davutoğlu, A. (2010, January 4). Speech at the Opening of the 2nd Ambassadors’ Conference. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-ahmet-davutoglu_nun-ikinci-buyukelciler-konferansi-acilis-oturumunda-yaptigi-konusm-_-4-ocak-2010_-ankara.tr.mfa
Davutoğlu, A. (2011, December 23). Speech at the Opening of the 4th Ambassadors’ Conference. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sn_-ahmet-davutoglu_nun-iv_-buyukelciler-konferansi-acis-konusmasi_-23-aralik-2011.tr.mfa
Demirtaș, B. (2013). Turkey and the Balkans: Overcoming prejudices, building bridges, and constructing a common future. Perceptions, 18(2), 163–184.
Dennison, S., & Pardijs, D. (2016). The World according to Europe’s insurgent parties: Putin, migration and people power. European Council on Foreign Relations.
Destradi, S., & Plagemann, J. (2019). Populism and International Relations: (Un)predictability, personalisation, and the reinforcement of existing trends in world politics. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 711–730.
Dodson, M., & Dorraj, M. (2008). Populism and foreign policy in Venezuela and Iran. Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy & International Relations, 9, 71–87.
Drezner, D. W. (2017). The angry populist as foreign policy leader: Real change or just hot air. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 41, 23–44.
Erdoğan, R. T. (2018a, February 10). Speech at the Conference “Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the death of Sultan Abdulhamid”. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/90385/vefatinin-100-yilinda-sultan-abdulhamidi-anlamak-konulu-konferansta-yaptiklari-konusma
Erdoğan, R. T. (2018b, September 25). Speech at the United Nations General Assembly. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/98783/73-birlesmis-milletler-genel-kurulunda-yaptiklari-konusma
Erdoğan, R. T. (2019, March 19). Speech at an AKP campaign rally in Kocaeli. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/102567/-turkiye-dunyanin-bir-ucundaki-milyonlar-icin-baris-huzur-ve-guvenin-semboludur-
Fella, S. (2007). Britain: Imperial legacies, institutional constraints and new political opportunities. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.). Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 181–197). Palgrave Macmillan.
Flood, C., & Frey, H. (1998). Questions of decolonization and post-colonialism in the ideology of the French extreme right. Journal of European Studies, 28(109–110), 69–88.
Frahm, O., & Hoffmann, K. (2020). Dual agent of transition: How Turkey perpetuates and challenges neo-patrimonial patterns in its post-Soviet neighbourhood. East European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1733982
Freeden, M. (2017). After the Brexit referendum: Revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(1), 1–11.
Gegout, C. (2017). The persistence of the French Pré-Carré. In C. Gegout (Ed.), Why Europe intervenes in Africa: Security, prestige and the legacy of colonialism (pp. 135–207). Oxford University Press.
Hadiz, V. R., & Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 399–411.
Hanioğlu, M. Ş. (2017). Nationalism and Kemalism. Princeton University Press.
Hawkins, K. A., Aguilar, R., Jenne, E., Kocijan, B., Rovira Kaltwasser, C., & Castanho Silva, B. (2019). Global Populism Database: Populism Dataset for Leaders 1.0. http://populism.byu.edu
Hürriyet Daily News. (2012, September 6). Premier vows to pray in Damascus mosque ‘soon’. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/premier-vows-to-pray-in-damascus-mosque-soon-29505
Içduygu, A., & Ayaşlı, E. (2019). Geri Dönüş Siyaseti: Suriyeli Mültecilerin Dönüş Göçü İhtimali ve Gelecek Senaryoları. MiReKoc Working Papers.
International Crisis Group. (2016, November 30). Turkey’s Refugee Crisis: The Politics of Permanence (Europe Report 241). https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/241-turkey-s-refugee-crisis-the-politics-of-permanence_0.pdf
Kalin, I. (2010). US–Turkish relations under Obama: Promise, challenge and opportunity in the 21st century. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies, 12(1), 93–108.
Kane, C., & McCulloch, C. (2017). Populism and foreign policy: Deepening divisions and decreasing efficiency. Global Politics Review, 3(2), 39–52.
Kenny, M. (2017). Back to the populist future? Understanding nostalgia in contemporary ideological discourse. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(3), 256–273.
Kirişçi, K. (2009). The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: The rise of the trading state. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 29–56.
Kriesi, H.-P. (2012). Populism as an ideology. University of Zurich.
Kyle, J., & Gultchin, L. (2019). Populists in power around the World. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. https://institute.global/insight/renewing-centre/populists-power-around-world
Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018). Regional international organizations as a strategy of autocracy: The Eurasian Economic Union and Russian foreign policy. International Affairs, 94(5), 1037–1058.
Magcamit, M. (2017). Explaining the three-way linkage between populism, securitization, and realist foreign policies: President Donald Trump and the pursuit of “America first” doctrine. World Affairs, 180(3), 6–35.
Makovsky, A. (2019, March 13). Turkey’s Refugee Dilemma: Tiptoeing Toward Integration. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2019/03/13/467183/turkeys-refugee-dilemma/
Malakhov, V. S. (2014). Russia as a new immigration country: Policy response and public debate. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(7), 1062–1079.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
Murinson, A. (2006). The strategic depth doctrine of Turkish foreign policy. Middle Eastern Studies, 42(6), 945–964.
Ongur, H. O. (2015). Identifying Ottomanisms: The discursive evolution of Ottoman pasts in the Turkish presents. Middle Eastern Studies, 51(3), 416–432.
Öniş, Z. (2011). Multiple faces of the “New” Turkish foreign policy: Underlying dynamics and a critique. Insight Turkey, 13(1), 47–65.
Özbay, C., Erol, M., Terzioglu, A., & Umut Türem, Z. U. (Eds.). (2016). The making of neoliberal Turkey. Routledge.
Özkırımlı, U. (2011). The changing nature of nationalism in Turkey: Actors, discourses, and the struggle for hegemony. In A. Kadıoğlu & E. F. Keyman (Eds.), Symbiotic antagonisms: Competing nationalisms in Turkey (pp. 82–100). University of Utah Press.
Özkırımlı, U. (2019, January 23). Turkey’s Afrin offensive an instrument of domestic politics. Ahval News. https://ahvalnews.com/afrin/turkeys-afrin-offensive-instrument-domestic-politics
Özpek, B. B., & Yaşar, N. T. (2018). Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule. Turkish Studies, 19(2), 198–216.
Panizza, F. (2005). Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). Verso.
Park, B. (2014). Turkey’s ‘New’ foreign policy: Newly influential or just over-active? Mediterranean Politics, 19(2), 161–164.
Plagemann, J., & Destradi, S. (2018). Populism and foreign policy: The case of India. Foreign Policy Analysis, 15(2), 283–301.
Połońska-Kimunguyi, E., & Kimunguyi, P. (2017). ‘Gunboats of soft power’: Boris on Africa and post-Brexit ‘Global Britain. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(4), 325–349.
Reynié, D. (2011). The ethnosocialist transition of the national front in France. Études, 415(11), 463–472.
Rooduijn, M., Kessel, S. van, Froio, C., Pirro, A., Lange, S. de, Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. http://www.popu-list.org
Saraçoğlu, C., & Demirkol, Ö. (2015). Nationalism and foreign policy discourse in Turkey under the AKP rule: Geography, history and national identity. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(3), 301–319.
Sayarı, S. (2016). Back to a predominant party system: The November 2015 snap election in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 21(2), 263–280.
Schori Liang, C. (2007). Europe for the Europeans: The foreign and security policy of the populist radical right. Ashgate.
Sherlock, T. (2019). Russian society and foreign policy: Mass and Elite orientations After crimea. Problems of Post-Communism.
Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110.
Tipaldou, S., & Casula, P. (2018). Populist justifications for war? The Russian intervention in eastern Ukraine. Revista CIDOB D’afers Internacionals, 119, 135–159.
Trenin, D. V. (2011). Post-Imperium: A Eurasian Story. Carnegie Endowment.
Uzer, U. (2018). Glorification of the past as a political tool: Ottoman history in contemporary Turkish politics. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 9(4), 339–357.
Verbeek, B., & Zaslove, A. (2017). Populism and foreign policy. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.
Vieira, A. (2017). A tale of two unions: Russia-Belarus integration experience and its lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(1), 41–53.
Wellings, B. (2017). The Anglosphere in the Brexit Referendum. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique. French Journal of British Studies, 22(2), 1–14.
Yabanci, B. (2016). Populism as the problem child of democracy: The AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 591–617.
Yilmaz, I., & Bashirov, G. (2018). The AKP after 15 years: Emergence of Erdoganism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 39(9), 1812–1830.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frahm, O., Lehmkuhl, D. (2022). Populist Neo-Imperialism: A New Take on Populist Foreign Policy. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80802-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80803-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)