Skip to main content

Populist Neo-Imperialism: A New Take on Populist Foreign Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this article, we add to the theoretical understanding of populist foreign policy by proposing the model of populist neo-imperialism. Built on an in-depth study of contemporary Turkey, the model postulates that populist right-wing parties in countries with an imperial past pursue a foreign policy with specific shared features. In immigration, trade and regional integration, the policy of populist neo-imperialism defies empirical typologies derived from European right-wing populists. Three empirical case studies (Russia, United Kingdom, France) based on secondary material confirm the model’s transferability while highlighting necessary conditions for populist neo-imperialism to be chosen: economic strength, political dominance and prior elites’ neglect of the imperial past. Moreover, the cases show that populist neo-imperialists are willing to stomach losses to their popularity to establish and maintain their foreign policy, indicating the “thick” ideological motivations that drive them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • Akcay, Ü. (2018). Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis (Working Paper 100). Institute for International Political Economy, Berlin School of Economics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2015). Populists in power. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arat-Koç, S. (2018). Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’: ‘White’ vs. ‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology, 42(4), 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, R., Emmanouilidis, J. A., Fieschi, C., Grabbe, H., Hill, C., Lochocki, T., Mendras, M., Mudde, C., Niemi, M. K., Schmidt, J., & Stratulat, C. (2016). Europe’s troublemakers. The populist challenge to foreign policy. European Policy Centre. https://wms.flexious.be/editor/plugins/imagemanager/content/2140/PDF/2016/Europe_s_troublemakers_complete_book.pdf

  • Balzer, H. (2019). Public opinion paradoxes? Russians are increasingly dubious about the costs of Putin’s foreign policies (PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 595). http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-

  • Beaumont, P. (2017). Brexit, Retrotopia and the perils of post-colonial delusions. Global Affairs, 3(4–5), 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bershidsky, L. (2018, August 22). Russians get a revisionist view of Soviet Union’s end. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-08-22/yeltsin-s-role-in-soviet-union-gets-the-revisionist-treatment

  • Canovan, M. (2002). Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 25–44). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssogelos, A.-S. (2010). Undermining the west from within: European populists, the US and Russia. European View, 9(2), 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corke, S., Finkel, A., Kramer, D. J., Robbins, C. A., & Schenkkan, N. (2014). Democracy in crisis: Corruption, media, and power in Turkey. Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daddow, O. (2019). GlobalBritainTM: The discursive construction of Britain’s post-Brexit world role. Global Affairs, 5(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davutoğlu, A. (2013, March 9). Speech at the meeting organized by the foreign economic relations board. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-ahmet-davutoglu_nun-dis-ekonomik-iliskiler-kurulu-tarafindan-duzenlenen-toplantida-yaptiklari-konusma_-9.tr.mfa

  • Davutoğlu, A. (2010, January 4). Speech at the Opening of the 2nd Ambassadors’ Conference. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-ahmet-davutoglu_nun-ikinci-buyukelciler-konferansi-acilis-oturumunda-yaptigi-konusm-_-4-ocak-2010_-ankara.tr.mfa

  • Davutoğlu, A. (2011, December 23). Speech at the Opening of the 4th Ambassadors’ Conference. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sn_-ahmet-davutoglu_nun-iv_-buyukelciler-konferansi-acis-konusmasi_-23-aralik-2011.tr.mfa

  • Demirtaș, B. (2013). Turkey and the Balkans: Overcoming prejudices, building bridges, and constructing a common future. Perceptions, 18(2), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, S., & Pardijs, D. (2016). The World according to Europe’s insurgent parties: Putin, migration and people power. European Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destradi, S., & Plagemann, J. (2019). Populism and International Relations: (Un)predictability, personalisation, and the reinforcement of existing trends in world politics. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 711–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, M., & Dorraj, M. (2008). Populism and foreign policy in Venezuela and Iran. Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy & International Relations, 9, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, D. W. (2017). The angry populist as foreign policy leader: Real change or just hot air. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 41, 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan, R. T. (2018a, February 10). Speech at the Conference “Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the death of Sultan Abdulhamid”. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/90385/vefatinin-100-yilinda-sultan-abdulhamidi-anlamak-konulu-konferansta-yaptiklari-konusma

  • Erdoğan, R. T. (2018b, September 25). Speech at the United Nations General Assembly. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/98783/73-birlesmis-milletler-genel-kurulunda-yaptiklari-konusma

  • Erdoğan, R. T. (2019, March 19). Speech at an AKP campaign rally in Kocaeli. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/102567/-turkiye-dunyanin-bir-ucundaki-milyonlar-icin-baris-huzur-ve-guvenin-semboludur-

  • Fella, S. (2007). Britain: Imperial legacies, institutional constraints and new political opportunities. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.). Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 181–197). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, C., & Frey, H. (1998). Questions of decolonization and post-colonialism in the ideology of the French extreme right. Journal of European Studies, 28(109–110), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frahm, O., & Hoffmann, K. (2020). Dual agent of transition: How Turkey perpetuates and challenges neo-patrimonial patterns in its post-Soviet neighbourhood. East European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1733982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (2017). After the Brexit referendum: Revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegout, C. (2017). The persistence of the French Pré-Carré. In C. Gegout (Ed.), Why Europe intervenes in Africa: Security, prestige and the legacy of colonialism (pp. 135–207). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R., & Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanioğlu, M. Ş. (2017). Nationalism and Kemalism. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. A., Aguilar, R., Jenne, E., Kocijan, B., Rovira Kaltwasser, C., & Castanho Silva, B. (2019). Global Populism Database: Populism Dataset for Leaders 1.0. http://populism.byu.edu

  • Hürriyet Daily News. (2012, September 6). Premier vows to pray in Damascus mosque ‘soon’. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/premier-vows-to-pray-in-damascus-mosque-soon-29505

  • Içduygu, A., & Ayaşlı, E. (2019). Geri Dönüş Siyaseti: Suriyeli Mültecilerin Dönüş Göçü İhtimali ve Gelecek Senaryoları. MiReKoc Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Crisis Group. (2016, November 30). Turkey’s Refugee Crisis: The Politics of Permanence (Europe Report 241). https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/241-turkey-s-refugee-crisis-the-politics-of-permanence_0.pdf

  • Kalin, I. (2010). US–Turkish relations under Obama: Promise, challenge and opportunity in the 21st century. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies, 12(1), 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, C., & McCulloch, C. (2017). Populism and foreign policy: Deepening divisions and decreasing efficiency. Global Politics Review, 3(2), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2017). Back to the populist future? Understanding nostalgia in contemporary ideological discourse. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(3), 256–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirişçi, K. (2009). The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: The rise of the trading state. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H.-P. (2012). Populism as an ideology. University of Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, J., & Gultchin, L. (2019). Populists in power around the World. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. https://institute.global/insight/renewing-centre/populists-power-around-world

  • Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. V. (2018). Regional international organizations as a strategy of autocracy: The Eurasian Economic Union and Russian foreign policy. International Affairs, 94(5), 1037–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magcamit, M. (2017). Explaining the three-way linkage between populism, securitization, and realist foreign policies: President Donald Trump and the pursuit of “America first” doctrine. World Affairs, 180(3), 6–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makovsky, A. (2019, March 13). Turkey’s Refugee Dilemma: Tiptoeing Toward Integration. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2019/03/13/467183/turkeys-refugee-dilemma/

  • Malakhov, V. S. (2014). Russia as a new immigration country: Policy response and public debate. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(7), 1062–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murinson, A. (2006). The strategic depth doctrine of Turkish foreign policy. Middle Eastern Studies, 42(6), 945–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongur, H. O. (2015). Identifying Ottomanisms: The discursive evolution of Ottoman pasts in the Turkish presents. Middle Eastern Studies, 51(3), 416–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öniş, Z. (2011). Multiple faces of the “New” Turkish foreign policy: Underlying dynamics and a critique. Insight Turkey, 13(1), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özbay, C., Erol, M., Terzioglu, A., & Umut Türem, Z. U. (Eds.). (2016). The making of neoliberal Turkey. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkırımlı, U. (2011). The changing nature of nationalism in Turkey: Actors, discourses, and the struggle for hegemony. In A. Kadıoğlu & E. F. Keyman (Eds.), Symbiotic antagonisms: Competing nationalisms in Turkey (pp. 82–100). University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkırımlı, U. (2019, January 23). Turkey’s Afrin offensive an instrument of domestic politics. Ahval News. https://ahvalnews.com/afrin/turkeys-afrin-offensive-instrument-domestic-politics

  • Özpek, B. B., & Yaşar, N. T. (2018). Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule. Turkish Studies, 19(2), 198–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, F. (2005). Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. (2014). Turkey’s ‘New’ foreign policy: Newly influential or just over-active? Mediterranean Politics, 19(2), 161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plagemann, J., & Destradi, S. (2018). Populism and foreign policy: The case of India. Foreign Policy Analysis, 15(2), 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Połońska-Kimunguyi, E., & Kimunguyi, P. (2017). ‘Gunboats of soft power’: Boris on Africa and post-Brexit ‘Global Britain. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(4), 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynié, D. (2011). The ethnosocialist transition of the national front in France. Études, 415(11), 463–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M., Kessel, S. van, Froio, C., Pirro, A., Lange, S. de, Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. http://www.popu-list.org

  • Saraçoğlu, C., & Demirkol, Ö. (2015). Nationalism and foreign policy discourse in Turkey under the AKP rule: Geography, history and national identity. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(3), 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayarı, S. (2016). Back to a predominant party system: The November 2015 snap election in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 21(2), 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schori Liang, C. (2007). Europe for the Europeans: The foreign and security policy of the populist radical right. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherlock, T. (2019). Russian society and foreign policy: Mass and Elite orientations After crimea. Problems of Post-Communism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipaldou, S., & Casula, P. (2018). Populist justifications for war? The Russian intervention in eastern Ukraine. Revista CIDOB D’afers Internacionals, 119, 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, D. V. (2011). Post-Imperium: A Eurasian Story. Carnegie Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzer, U. (2018). Glorification of the past as a political tool: Ottoman history in contemporary Turkish politics. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 9(4), 339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, B., & Zaslove, A. (2017). Populism and foreign policy. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, A. (2017). A tale of two unions: Russia-Belarus integration experience and its lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(1), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellings, B. (2017). The Anglosphere in the Brexit Referendum. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique. French Journal of British Studies, 22(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabanci, B. (2016). Populism as the problem child of democracy: The AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 591–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, I., & Bashirov, G. (2018). The AKP after 15 years: Emergence of Erdoganism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 39(9), 1812–1830.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ole Frahm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frahm, O., Lehmkuhl, D. (2022). Populist Neo-Imperialism: A New Take on Populist Foreign Policy. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics