Abstract
Populism is mostly seen as inimical to institutions, even more so in cases like Venezuela, where populism is intertwined with authoritarianism. This is why research on populist regimes rarely extends to institutional aspects of legitimacy and regime durability. We address this blind spot and show that durable populist regimes have an institutional side, too, even in a context of extreme personalism and severe repression. We lay out how crucial features of populism like the personal myth of the populist leader are reproduced and institutionalized from above on the level of symbols, discourse and mass beliefs. Accordingly, we contend that the institutional side of a populist regime is to be found mainly on the ideational level. Authoritarianism needs not to be a hindrance in this regard, to the contrary: Manipulation and control of public discourse eventually help strengthening and reproducing the regime’s ‘third face of power’ through symbolic and narrative structures. This becomes evident considering the Venezuelan case. After the election of Hugo Chávez to the presidency in 1998, the country entered a period of populism with increasingly authoritarian traits. Until his death in 2013, Chávez used his charismatic appeal to build a personal myth that outlasted his presidency. This myth and the ideational legacies left by him became further entrenched by his successor, Nicolás Maduro, in such a way that Venezuela can be regarded as an institutionalized authoritarian-populist regime.
Keywords
- Venezuela
- Chávez
- Institutionalization
- Ideas
- Charisma
- Authoritarianism
- Populism
This research was supported by a grant from the Bavarian University Center for Latin America (BAYLAT).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsLiterature
Albertazzi, D. (2015). Populists in power. Routledge.
Angosto-Ferrández, L. F. (2016). The afterlives of Hugo Chávez as political symbol. Anthropology Today, 32(5), 8–12.
Arenas, N. (2016). Nicolás Maduro: ¿populismo sin carisma? Cuadernos Del Cendes, 33(92), 113–128.
Azpuru, D., & Zechmeister, E. (2013, June 24). Latin Americans’ perceptions of the United States and China. Americas Quarterly. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/news/062413.AB-AmericasQuarterly.pdf
Bergen Granell, F. M. v. (2016). Auge y declive de la hegemonía chavista. Colección Visión Venezuela. UCAB Ediciones.
Boeckh, A., & Graf, P. (2007). El comandante en su laberinto: el ideario bolivariano de Hugo Chávez. In G. Maihold (Ed.), Venezuela en retrospectiva: Los pasos hacia el régimen chavista (pp. 151–178). Vervuert.
Brewer-Carías, A. R. (2010). Dismantling democracy in Venezuela: The Chávez Authoritarian Experiment. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, M. (Ed.). (2009). The Bolívarian Revolution. Simón Bolívar: Introduction by Hugo Chávez. Verso.
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
Buxton, J. (2018). Venezuela: Deeper into the Abyss. Revista De Ciencia Política, 38(2), 409–428.
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(2), 2–16.
Conniff, M. L. (Ed.). (2012). Populism in Latin America (2nd ed.). University of Alabama Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uniregensburg/Doc?id=10603216
Coppedge, M. (1994). Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford University Press.
Coronil, F. (1997). The magical state: Nature, money, and modernity in Venezuela. University of Chicago Press.
Corrales, J., & Penfold, M. (2015). Dragon in the Tropics: The Legacy of Hugo Chávez (2nd ed.). Brookings Institution Press.
Dieterich, H. (2006). El socialismo del siglo XXI: La democracia participativa. Gara Egunkaria.
EIU [Economist Intelligence Unit]. (2018, June 25). Maduro attempts to secure regime’s internal stability. https://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=1216866705&Country=Venezu
El Universal. (2020). Hinterlaces: 36% de los venezolanos apoya al PSUV. https://www.eluniversal.com/politica/62018/hinterlaces-36-de-los-venezolanos-apoya-al-psuv
España, L. P. (2015). Aumento de la pobreza y acciones para su superación. In A. Freitez Landaeta, M. J. González, & R. G. Zúñiga Álvarez (Eds.), Una mirada a la situación social de la población venezolana (pp. 23–33). Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.
García-Guadilla, M. P., & Mallen, A. (2018). Polarization, participatory democracy, and democratic erosion in Venezuela’s twenty-first century socialism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218817733
Gil Yepes, J. A. (2015). Poder, petróleo y pobreza. Editorial Libros Marcados.
Gott, R., & Bartoli, G. (2005). Hugo Chávez and the Bolivarian Revolution. Verso.
Greif, A., & Kingston, C. (2011). Institutions: Rules or Equilibria. In N. Schofield (Ed.), Political economy of institutions, democracy and voting (pp. 13–43). Springer.
Handlin, S. (2016). Mass organization and the durability of competitive authoritarian regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 49(9), 1238–1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628186
Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Hernández, L. A. (2018). El culto a Hugo Chávez en Venezuela: ¿Santo, ser vergatario o muerto poderoso? Ciências Sociais E Religião, 20(28), 114–128.
Hidalgo, M. (2014). The 2012 and 2013 presidential elections in Venezuela. Electoral Studies, 34, 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.12.007
Kestler, T. (2009). Parteien in Venezuela: Repräsentation, Partizipation und der politische Prozess (Dissertation). Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Nomos.
Krauze, E. (2012). Redeemers: Ideas and power in Latin America (H. Heifetz & N. Wimmer, Trans.). Harper Perennial.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Latouche, M. A. (2006). Los dilemas de la representación: Hacia una revisión de la crisis del sistema político venezolano contemporáneo. Revista Venezolana De Análisis De Coyuntura, 12(2), 11–27.
Lauth, H.-J. (2007). Transformation. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (pp. 144–157). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90407-8_11
Levitsky, S., & Loxton, J. (2018). Populism and competitive authoritarianism in Latin America. In C. de La Torre (Ed.), Routledge International Handbooks. The Routledge Handbook of Global Populism (pp. 334–350). Routledge.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781353
López Maya, M. (2014). Venezuela: The political crisis of Post-Chavismo. Social Justice, 40(4), 68–87.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. Macmillan.
Mazzuca, S. L. (2013). The rise of rentier populism. Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0034
McGuire, J. W. (1997). Peronism without Perón: Unions, parties, and democracy in Argentina. Stanford University Press.
Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The Constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Palgrave Macmillan.
Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2011). The nature, determinants, and consequences of Chávez’s Charisma: Evidence From a study of Venezuelan public opinion. Comparative Political Studies, 44(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010381076
Meza, A. (2013, November 23). El profeta Chávez. El País. https://elpais.com/internacional/2013/11/23/actualidad/1385161969_472312.html
Michelutti, L. (2016). We are all Chávez. Latin American Perspectives, 44(1), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X16666023
Moe, T. M. (2005). Power and political institutions. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 215–233.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
Monaldi, F., & Penfold, M. (2014). Institutional collapse: The rise and decline of democratic governance in Venezuela. In F. Rodríguez & R. Hausmann (Eds.), Venezuela before Chávez: Anatomy of an economic collapse (pp. 285–320). Pennsylvania State University Press.
Muñoz, B. (2013, July 13). Después de Chávez. https://gatopardo.com/reportajes/la-muerte-de-chavez-en-venezuela/
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Ore, D. (2014). ‘Chavista’ school books stoke passions in Venezuela. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-education/chavista-school-books-stoke-passions-in-venezuela-idUSKBN0ED1OM20140602
Pantoulas, D., & McCoy, J. (2019). Venezuela: An unstable equilibrium. Revista De Ciencia Política (Santiago), 39(2), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2019000200391
Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populism and liberal democracy: A comparative and theoretical analysis (1st ed.).
Pierson, P. (2016). Power in historical institutionalism. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti, & A. Sheingate (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 124–141). Oxford University Press.
Pollak-Eltz, A. (2004). Maria Lionza: Mito y culto venezolano ayer y hoy (3rd ed.). Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.
PSUV [Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela]. (2010). Libro rojo - Documentos fundamentales del PSUV. http://www.PSUV.org.ve/temas/biblioteca/libro-rojo/
PSUV [Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela]. (2014). III Congreso: Por el legado del Comandante Supremo Hugo Chávez la militancia psuvista entra en debate. https://issuu.com/alexismejias5/docs/psuv_iii_congreso_acta_de_decisione
Ramos Jiménez, A. (2011, January–June). La ‘revolución’ que no fue. Desgobierno y autoritarismo en la Venezuela de Chávez. Estudios Políticos, 38, 69–91.
Roberts, K. M. (2006). Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 38(2), 127–148.
Safar, E. (2016). El Aló Presidente y las cadenas de radio y televisión: Espejos de la pasión autoritaria del presidente Chávez. In M. Bisbal (Ed.), La comunicación bajo asedio: Balance de 17 años (pp. 226–249). Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.
Salmerón, M., & Salmerón, C. (2019). ¿Por qué Nicolás Maduro sigue en el poder pese al colapso de Venezuela? https://www.cidob.org/es/content/download/72131/2265645/version/6/file/NOTES%20211_MELISSA%20SALMER%C3%93N%20%26%20CARLOS%20SALMER%C3%93N_CAST.pdf
Schlemmer, T. (2019). Die Macht der Populisten – Populisten an der Macht. Vierteljahrshefte Für Zeitgeschichte, 67(3), 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1515/vfzg-2019-0031
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage.
Shepsle, K. A. (1979). Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110770
von Soest, C., & Grauvogel, J. (2015). How do non-democratic regimes claim legitimacy? Comparative insights from post-Soviet countries (GIGA Working Paper No. 277).
Taggart, P. A. (2000). Populism. Concepts in the Social Sciences. Open University Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/mh051/99086747.html
Taylor, J. M. (1981). Eva Perón, the Myths of a Woman (Pbk). University of Chicago Press.
Urbinati, N. (2015). A Revolt against Intermediary Bodies. Constellations, 22(4), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12188
Waldmann, P. (1974). Der Peronismus 1943–1955. Saarbrücken, University, Habil.-Schr., 1973, Hoffmann und Campe.
Weingast, B. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review, 91(2), 245–263.
Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.
Zúquete, J. P. (2008). The missionary politics of Hugo Chávez. Latin American Politics and Society, 50(1), 91–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kestler, T., Latouche, M. (2022). Venezuela: The Institutionalization of Authoritarian Populism. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80802-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80803-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)