Abstract
Many political scientists conceptualise populism as paradigmatically encapsulated by the charismatic populist leader. Their political strategy aims, according to this conceptualisation, to construct two antagonistic blocks by claiming to represent ‘the people’ against the members of the elite who belong to the establishment, and consequently, they produce division in society. In such a characterization of ‘the people,’ political scientists frequently forget that populist leaders rally their bases against former divisions: and often with those who were excluded from being political subjects against the confines of political subjecthood and citizenship in previous periods. To theorize the relationship between historic divisions and populism and to engage with the otherwise homogenised people/el pueblo, we examine how supporters of Chávez articulate their social/political struggles as epistemic/ontological struggles. Using this theoretical framework, we raise questions as to the (ab)use of populism studies for engaging with el pueblo as an object instead of as a subject coming into contradictory political being.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands - La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
Anzaldúa, G. (2002). Now let us shift … The path of conocimiento … inner work, public acts. In A. Keating & G. Anzaldúa (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (pp. 540–578). Routledge.
Arditi, B. (2007). Politics on the edges of liberalism: Difference, populism, revolution, agitation. Edinburgh University Press.
Buxton, J. (2005). Venezuela’s contemporary political crisis in historical context. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 24(3), 328–347.
Cannon, B. (2018). Must we talk about populism? Interrogating populism’s conceptual utility in a context of crisis. New Political Science, 40(3), 477–496.
Caula, S. (2000, December 9). Cultura democrática. El Universal.
Ciccariello-Maher, G. (2010). Jumpstarting the decolonial engine: Symbolic violence from Fanon to Chavez. Theory & Event, 13(1).
Ciccariello-Maher, G. (2019). Populism, universalism, and democracy in Latin America. In L. Jenco, M. Idris, & M. Thomas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative political theory (pp. 504–524). Oxford University Press.
Coordinadora Democrática. (2002). Resumen Bases para un Acuerdo Democrático de Reconstrucción Nacional: 05 de Julio. http://www.urru.org/papers/resumen_bases_acuerdo_reconstruccion.htm
Coordinadora Democrática. (2003). Propuesta de Consensos para Políticas Públicas. In C. C. P. d. l. C. Democrática (Ed.), Coordinadora Democrática (pp. 61). Coordinadora Democrática.
Coronil, F. (1997). The magical state: Nature, money, and modernity in Venezuela. University of Chicago Press.
Coronil, F., & Skurski, J. (1991). Dismembering and remembering the nation: The semantics of political violence in Venezuela. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 33(2), 288–337.
Duno Gottberg, L. (2004). Mob outrages: Reflections on the media construction of the masses in Venezuela (April 2000–January 2003). Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 13(1), 115–135.
ILOStat. (2020). International labour organization statistics. Available from ILO Retrieved 30/06/2020, from ILO https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/country-profiles/
Kim, S. (2019). Radical democracy and left populism after the squares: ‘Social movement’ (Ukraine), Podemos (Spain), and the question of organization. Contemporary Political Theory, 5, 1–22.
Laclau, E. (2006). Why constructing a people is the main task of radical politics. Critical Inquiry, 32, 646–680.
Lara, M. P. (2018). A conceptual analysis of the term ‘populism.’ Thesis Eleven, 149(1), 31–47.
Lorde, A. (2015). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In C. Moraga & G. Anzaldúa (Eds.), This bridge called my back, writings by radical women of color (4th ed., pp. 94–101). State University of New York (SUNY) Press.
Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270.
McKean, B. L. (2016). Toward an inclusive populism? On the role of race and difference in Laclau’s politics. Political Theory, 44(6), 797–820.
Motta, S. (2011). Notes towards prefigurative epistemologies. In S. Motta & A. G. Nilsen (Eds.), Social movements in the global south: Dispossession, development and resistance (pp. 178–199). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Motta, S. (2011). Populism’s Achilles’ heel: Popular democracy beyond the liberal state and the market economy in Venezuela. Latin American Perspectives, 38(1), 28–46.
Motta, S. (2014). Latin America: Reinventing revolutions, an “other” politics in practice and theory. In R. Stahler-Sholk, H. E. Vanden, & M. Becker (Eds.), Rethinking Latin American social movements: Radical action from below (pp. 21–42). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Motta, S. (2016). Decolonising critique: From prophetic negation to prefigurative affirmation. In A. C. Dinerstein (Ed.), Social sciences for an other politics: Women theorizing without parachutes (pp. 33–48). Palgrave.
Motta, S. (2017). Latin America as political science’s other. Social Identities, 23(6), 701–717.
Motta, S. (2018). Liminal subjects: Weaving (our) liberations. Rowman & Littlefield International, Limited.
Motta, S., & Seppälä, T. (2016). Feminized resistances. Journal of Resistance Studies, 2(2), 5–32.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
Stavrakakis, Y., Kioupkiolis, A., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., & Siomos, T. (2016). Contemporary left-wing populism in Latin America: Leadership, horizontalism, and postdemocracy in Chávez’s Venezuela. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(3), 51–76.
Uribe, G., & Lander, E. (1995). Acción social, efectividad simbólica y nuevos ámbitos de lo político. In E. Lander (Ed.), Neoliberalismo, sociedad civil y democracia. ensayos sobre América Latina (pp. 15–58).
Vázquez, R. (2012). Towards a decolonial critique of modernity. Buen Vivir, relationality and the task of listening. Capital, Poverty, Development, Denktraditionen Im Dialog: Studien Zur Befreiung Und Interkulturalität, 33, 241–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Motta, S.C., Gonzalez Torres, Y. (2022). Popular Sovereignty and (Non)recognition in Venezuela: On the Coming into Political Being of ‘el Pueblo’. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80802-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80803-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)