Skip to main content

Design Using Advanced Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seismic Design Methods for Steel Building Structures

Abstract

A rational and efficient seismic design method for plane and space steel moment resisting frames using advanced methods of analysis is presented. This method employs an advanced dynamic finite element analysis working in time domain that takes into account geometrical and material nonlinearities and member and frame imperfections. Seismic actions are in the form of accelerograms compatible with the elastic response spectra of EC8 for three performance levels. The design starts with assumed member sections for the frame, proceeds with the checking of drifts, member plastic rotation, damage and plastic hinge pattern for the three performance levels considered here and ends with the adjustment of member sizes iteratively so as the above response parameters to satisfy their limit values for every level. Thus, the method can sufficiently capture the limit states of displacements, strength, stability and damage of the structure and its members so that separate member capacity checks through the interaction equations of EC3 or the use of the approximate behavior factor of EC8 are not required. Numerical examples dealing with the seismic design of plane and space steel moment resisting frames are presented to illustrate the method and demonstrate its advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AISC (2005) Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC 13 (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation for California. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Beskos DE (1976) The lumping mass effect on frequencies of beam-columns. J Sound Vib 47:139–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beskos DE (1977) Framework stability by finite element method. J Struct Div ASCE 103:2273–2276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF (1998) Implementing advanced analysis for steel frame design. Prog Struct Eng Mater 1:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF, Kim SE (1997) LRFD steel design using advanced analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • EC3 (1992) Eurocode 3, Design of steel structures – Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, ENV 1993-1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC3 (2009) Eurocode 3, Design of steel structures – Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, EN 1993-1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC8 (1994) Eurocode 8, Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, ENV 1998-1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC8 (2004) Eurocode 8, Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • El Hafez MB, Powell GH (1973) Computer aided ultimate load design of unbraced multistorey steel frames, Report no. EERC 73-3. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 273 (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioncu V, Mazzolani F (2002) Ductility of seismic resistant steel structures. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecea D, Dinu F, Dubina D (2002) Performance criteria for MR steel frames in seismic zones. In: Lamas A, Da Silva LS (eds) Proceedings of EUROSTEEL 2002 Conference, Coimbra, Portugal. Multicomp, Lisbon, pp 1269–1278

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakaliagos A (1994) Pseudo-dynamic testing of a full scale three storey one bay steel moment resisting frame: experimental and analytical results. Report EUR 15605 EN. ELSA Laboratory, Safety Technology Institute, Joint Research Centre, Commission of the European Communities, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabalis DL, Cokkinides GJ, Rizos DC, Mulliken JS (1993) An interactive computer code for generation of artificial earthquake records. In: Khozeimeh K (ed) Computing in civil engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 1122–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SE, Chen WF (1996a) Practical advanced analysis for unbraced steel frame design. J Struct Eng ASCE 122:1259–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SE, Chen WF (1996b) Practical advanced analysis for braced steel frame design. J Struct Eng ASCE 122:1266–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SE, Lee J (2002) Improved refined plastic-hinge analysis accounting for lateral torsional buckling. J Constr Steel Res 58:1431–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SE, Park MH, Choi SH (2001) Direct design of three-dimensional frames using practical advanced analysis. Eng Struct 23:1491–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak HG, Kim DY, Lee HW (2001) Effect of warping in geometric nonlinear analysis of spatial beams. J Constr Steel Res 57:729–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre J (1996) A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liew JYR, Chen WF, Chen H (2000) Advanced inelastic analysis of frame structures. J Constr Steel Res 55:245–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidis G, Bazeos N, Beskos DE (2003) Effects of higher modes and seismic frequency content on the accuracy of pushover analysis of steel frames. In: Mazzolani FM (ed) Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA 2003). Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 547–550

    Google Scholar 

  • PEER (2009) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Strong Ground Motion Database, Berkeley, CA. http://peer.berkeley.edu/

  • Powell GH, Allahabadi R (1988) Seismic damage prediction by deterministic methods: concepts and procedures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16:719–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash V, Powell GH, Campbell S (1993) DRAIN-2DX, Base program description and user guide, Version 1.10, Report No UCB/SEMM-93/17. University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash V, Powell GH, Campbell S (1994) DRAIN-3DX, base program description and user guide, Version 1.10, Report No UCB/SEMM-94/08. University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • SAP 2000 (2007) Structural analysis program 2000, static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures, Version 11. Computers and Structures Inc, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • SEAOC (1999) Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary, 7th edn. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Surovek AE (2012) Advanced analysis in steel frame design. ASCE, Reston, VA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trahair NS (1993) Flexural-torsional buckling of structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulos AA (2005) Seismic design of steel structures using advanced methods of analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, Patras, Greece (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulos AA, Beskos DE (2006) Seismic design of plane steel frames using advanced methods of analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:1077–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulos AA, Beskos DE (2009) Seismic design of space steel frames using advanced methods of analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:194–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulos AA, Kamaris GS (2020) Seismic design of space steel frames using advanced static inelastic (pushover) analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 137:106309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulos AA, Bazeos N, Beskos DE (2008) Seismic design of irregular space steel frames using advanced methods of analysis. Steel Compos Struct 8:53–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wongkaew K, Chen WF (2002) Consideration of out of plane buckling in advanced analysis for planar steel frame design. J Constr Steel Res 58:943–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemian RD, McGuire W, Deierlein GG (1992a) Inelastic limit states design. Part I: planar frame studies. J Struct Eng ASCE 118:2532–2549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemian RD, McGuire W, Deierlein GG (1992b) Inelastic limit states design. Part II: three dimensional frame study. J Struct Eng ASCE 118:2550–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papagiannopoulos, G.A., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D., Beskos, D.E. (2021). Design Using Advanced Analysis. In: Seismic Design Methods for Steel Building Structures. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80687-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics