Skip to main content

Par-4 in Chemoresistant Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers

  • 201 Accesses

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer; on the other hand, endometrial cancer is the most prevalent, with exceedingly poor prognostic when found to be recurring. In both cases, robust resistance to chemotherapeutic compounds, may they be genotoxic in nature or specifically targeting dysregulated pathways, drastically reduce our ability to treat these diseases. In order to overcome the chemoresistant nature of these neoplastic entities, novel therapeutic avenues must be explored. In that context, Par-4, a pro-apoptotic protein that has been reported to selectively induce cell suicide in cancer cells, appears to be of particular interest. This review aims to objectively assemble the available evidence, which predominantly emanates from non-gynecological tissues, and underline the convergent findings of past investigations, highlight divergences, and help direct future research endeavors. Considering that both of these tumors are characterized by prevalent mutations in the PI3K/Akt/PTEN axis as well as alterations in p53, our work provides a sharp focus on the regulatory role of these molecular pathways on Par-4 function. We hope this chapter will allow the potent abilities of Par-4 to be fully leveraged in these tissular contexts and augment the available armamentarium, so that we may eventually improve the prognostic of women afflicted with these diseases.

Keywords

  • Par-4
  • Chemoresistant tumors
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Endometrial cancer
  • Pathogenesis
  • Molecular mechanisms
  • Gynecological tissues
  • PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis
  • NF-kappaB
  • p53
  • Autophagy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. García-Cao I et al (2005) Tumour-suppression activity of the proapoptotic regulator Par4. EMBO Rep 6(6):577–583

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Prenzel T et al (2011) Estrogen-dependent gene transcription in human breast cancer cells relies upon proteasome-dependent monoubiquitination of histone H2B. Cancer Res 71(17):5739–5753

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Casolari DA et al (2011) Insulin-like growth factor-1 and 17β-estradiol down-regulate prostate apoptosis response-4 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 28(3):337–342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brasseur K, Gévry N, Asselin E (2017) Chemoresistance and targeted therapies in ovarian and endometrial cancers. Oncotarget 8(3):4008–4042

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao Y, Rangnekar VM (2008) Apoptosis and tumor resistance conferred by Par-4. Cancer Biol Ther 7(12):1867–1874

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jagtap JC et al (2015) Secretory prostate apoptosis response (par)-4 sensitizes multicellular spheroids (MCS) of glioblastoma multiforme cells to tamoxifen-induced cell death. FEBS open bio 5:8–19

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan J et al (2014) Par-4 downregulation confers cisplatin resistance in pancreatic cancer cells via PI3K/Akt pathway-dependent EMT. Toxicol Lett 224(1):7–15

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez-Marcos PJ et al (2009) Simultaneous inactivation of Par-4 and PTEN in vivo leads to synergistic NF-κB activation and invasive prostate carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(31):12962–12967

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvarez JV et al (2013) Par-4 downregulation promotes breast cancer recurrence by preventing multinucleation following targeted therapy. Cancer Cell 24(1):30–44

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagai MA et al (2010) Down-regulation of the candidate tumor suppressor gene PAR-4 is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Int J Oncol 37(1):41–49

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meynier S et al (2015) Role of PAR-4 in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 6(26):22641

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bray F et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Institute, N.C. (2018) Cancer stat facts: ovarian cancer

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li SS, Ma J, Wong AST (2018) Chemoresistance in ovarian cancer: exploiting cancer stem cell metabolism. J Gynecol Oncol 29(2):e32

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim S et al (2018) Tumor evolution and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol 2:20

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen VW et al (2003) Pathology and classification of ovarian tumors. Cancer 97(10 Suppl):2631–2642

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Köbel M et al (2010) Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 29(3):203–211

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seidman JD et al (2004) The histologic type and stage distribution of ovarian carcinomas of surface epithelial origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol 23(1):41–44

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shih Ie M, Kurman RJ (2004) Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol 164(5):1511–1518

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prat J (2012) Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Arch 460(3):237–249

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCluggage WG (2011) Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology 43(5):420–432

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho KR, Shih Ie M (2009) Ovarian cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 4:287–313

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Köbel M et al (2008) Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med 5(12):e232

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Auersperg N et al (2001) Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology. Endocr Rev 22(2):255–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bell DA (2005) Origins and molecular pathology of ovarian cancer. Mod Pathol 18(Suppl 2):S19–S32

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Piek JM et al (2001) Dysplastic changes in prophylactically removed fallopian tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer. J Pathol 195(4):451–456

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kindelberger DW et al (2007) Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: evidence for a causal relationship. Am J Surg Pathol 31(2):161–169

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Labidi-Galy SI et al (2017) High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube. Nat Commun 8(1):1093

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim J et al (2018) Cell origins of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancers (Basel) 10:11

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang X et al (1998) Allelotyping of endometriosis with adjacent ovarian carcinoma reveals evidence of a common lineage. Cancer Res 58(8):1707–1712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Prowse AH et al (2006) Molecular genetic evidence that endometriosis is a precursor of ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 119(3):556–562

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y et al (2016) TP53 mutations in epithelial ovarian cancer. Transl Cancer Res 5(6):650–663

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Risch HA et al (2006) Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(23):1694–1706

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Network CGAR (2011) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474(7353):609

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Bowtell DD (2010) The genesis and evolution of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 10(11):803–808

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Press JZ et al (2008) Ovarian carcinomas with genetic and epigenetic BRCA1 loss have distinct molecular abnormalities. BMC Cancer 8:17

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun J et al (2019) Large-scale integrated analysis of ovarian cancer tumors and cell lines identifies an individualized gene expression signature for predicting response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Cell Death Dis 10(9):661

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. du Bois A et al (2009) Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer 115(6):1234–1244

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lheureux S, Braunstein M, Oza AM (2019) Epithelial ovarian cancer: evolution of management in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 69(4):280–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ozols RF et al (2003) Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 21(17):3194–3200

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Karam A et al (2017) Fifth ovarian cancer consensus conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup: first-line interventions. Ann Oncol 28(4):711–717

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Boere IA, van der Burg ME (2012) Review of dose-intense platinum and/or paclitaxel containing chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Curr Pharm Des 18(25):3741–3753

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Burger RA et al (2011) Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365(26):2473–2483

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Perren TJ et al (2011) A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365(26):2484–2496

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ledermann J et al (2012) Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 366(15):1382–1392

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pujade-Lauraine E et al (2017) Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(9):1274–1284

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bray F et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lauby-Secretan B et al (2016) Body fatness and cancer—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 375(8):794–798

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Saed L et al (2019) The effect of diabetes on the risk of endometrial cancer: an updated a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 19(1):527

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Calle EE, Kaaks R (2004) Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 4(8):579–591

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hamilton CA et al (2006) Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer 94(5):642–646

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Robbins JR et al (2012) Is time to recurrence after hysterectomy predictive of survival in patients with early stage endometrial carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol 127(1):38–42

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Creutzberg CL et al (2003) Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 89(2):201–209

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zaino RJ (2009) FIGO staging of endometrial adenocarcinoma: a critical review and proposal. Int J Gynecol Pathol 28(1):1–9

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kurman RJ et al (2014) WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dedes KJ et al (2011) Emerging therapeutic targets in endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(5):261–271

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bokhman JV (1983) Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 15(1):10–17

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lax SF (2017) Pathology of endometrial carcinoma. Adv Exp Med Biol 943:75–96

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sorosky JI (2012) Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 120(2 Pt 1):383–397

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bell DW, Ellenson LH (2019) Molecular genetics of endometrial carcinoma. Annu Rev Pathol 14:339–367

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cheung LW et al (2011) High frequency of PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 mutations in endometrial cancer elucidates a novel mechanism for regulation of PTEN protein stability. Cancer Discov 1(2):170–185

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. McConechy MK et al (2012) Use of mutation profiles to refine the classification of endometrial carcinomas. J Pathol 228(1):20–30

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Levine RL et al (1998) PTEN mutations and microsatellite instability in complex atypical hyperplasia, a precursor lesion to uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Cancer Res 58(15):3254–3258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rudd ML et al (2011) A unique spectrum of somatic PIK3CA (p110alpha) mutations within primary endometrial carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 17(6):1331–1340

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Kuhn E et al (2012) Identification of molecular pathway aberrations in uterine serous carcinoma by genome-wide analyses. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(19):1503–1513

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Lax SF et al (2000) The frequency of p53, K-ras mutations, and microsatellite instability differs in uterine endometrioid and serous carcinoma: evidence of distinct molecular genetic pathways. Cancer 88(4):814–824

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tashiro H et al (1997) p53 gene mutations are common in uterine serous carcinoma and occur early in their pathogenesis. Am J Pathol 150(1):177–185

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Suarez AA, Felix AS, Cohn DE (2017) Bokhman redux: endometrial cancer "types" in the 21st century. Gynecol Oncol 144(2):243–249

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kandoth C et al (2013) Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 497(7447):67–73

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Charo LM, Plaxe SC (2019) Recent advances in endometrial cancer: a review of key clinical trials from 2015 to 2019. F1000Res 8

    Google Scholar 

  72. Keys HM et al (2004) A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 92(3):744–751

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Randall ME et al (2006) Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 24(1):36–44

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Randall ME et al (2019) Phase III trial: adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy versus vaginal brachytherapy plus paclitaxel/carboplatin in high-intermediate and high-risk early stage endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 37(21):1810–1818

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Matei D et al (2017) A randomized phase III trial of cisplatin and tumor volume directed irradiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. carboplatin and paclitaxel for optimally debulked, advanced endometrial carcinoma. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    Google Scholar 

  76. de Boer SM et al (2018) Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19(3):295–309

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Nagao S et al (2015) What is an appropriate second-line regimen for recurrent endometrial cancer? Ancillary analysis of the SGSG012/GOTIC004/Intergroup study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76(2):335–342

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Slomovitz BM et al (2010) A phase 2 study of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, everolimus, in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 116(23):5415–5419

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Oza AM et al (2011) Phase II study of temsirolimus in women with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a trial of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 29(24):3278–3285

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Matulonis U et al (2015) Phase II study of the PI3K inhibitor pilaralisib (SAR245408; XL147) in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 136(2):246–253

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Slomovitz BM et al (2015) Phase II study of everolimus and letrozole in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 33(8):930–936

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Fader AN et al (2018) Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin-paclitaxel versus carboplatin-paclitaxel-trastuzumab in uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu. J Clin Oncol 36:2044

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Prendergast EN et al (2019) Comprehensive genomic profiling of recurrent endometrial cancer: implications for selection of systemic therapy. Gynecol Oncol 154(3):461–466

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Kommoss S et al (2018) Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series. Ann Oncol 29(5):1180–1188

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Liu R et al (2020) PI3K/AKT pathway as a key link modulates the multidrug resistance of cancers. Cell Death Dis 11(9):1–12

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Manning BD, Toker A (2017) AKT/PKB signaling: navigating the network. Cell 169(3):381–405

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. St-Germain M-E et al (2004) Akt regulates COX-2 mRNA and protein expression in mutated-PTEN human endometrial cancer cells. Int J Oncol 24(5):1311–1324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Girouard J et al (2013) Involvement of Akt isoforms in chemoresistance of endometrial carcinoma cells. Gynecol Oncol 128(2):335–343

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Gagnon V et al (2004) AKT involvement in cisplatin chemoresistance of human uterine cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol 94(3):785–795

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kim D et al (2005) AKT/PKB signaling mechanisms in cancer and chemoresistance. Front Biosci 10(14):975

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Huang W-C, Hung M-C (2009) Induction of Akt activity by chemotherapy confers acquired resistance. J Formos Med Assoc 108(3):180–194

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Terakawa N, Kanamori Y, Yoshida S (2003) Loss of PTEN expression followed by Akt phosphorylation is a poor prognostic factor for patients with endometrial cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 10(2):203–208

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Goswami A et al (2005) Binding and phosphorylation of par-4 by akt is essential for cancer cell survival. Mol Cell 20(1):33–44

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Fabi F, Asselin E (2014) Expression, activation, and role of AKT isoforms in the uterus. Reproduction 148(5):R85–R95

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Coffman LG et al (2016) New models of hematogenous ovarian cancer metastasis demonstrate preferential spread to the ovary and a requirement for the ovary for abdominal dissemination. Transl Res 175:92–102. e2

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Pradeep S et al (2014) Hematogenous metastasis of ovarian cancer: rethinking mode of spread. Cancer Cell 26(1):77–91

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Chaudhry P et al (2014) Prostate apoptosis response-4 mediates TGF-β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell Death Dis 5(2):e1044

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Sheng Q et al (2010) An activated ErbB3/NRG1 autocrine loop supports in vivo proliferation in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Cell 17(3):298–310

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Davies S et al (2014) High incidence of ErbB3, ErbB4 and MET expression in ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol 33(4):402

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Mills GB, Yarden Y (2010) The rebirth of a phoenix: ovarian cancers are addicted to ErbB-3. Cancer Cell 17(3):217–218

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Bezler M, Hengstler JG, Ullrich A (2012) Inhibition of doxorubicin-induced HER3-PI3K-AKT signalling enhances apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. Mol Oncol 6(5):516–529

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Yang J et al (2019) Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer chemoresistance. Sci Rep 9(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  103. Gurumurthy S et al (2005) Phosphorylation of Par-4 by protein kinase A is critical for apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 25(3):1146–1161

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Taniguchi K, Karin M (2018) NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat Rev Immunol 18(5):309–324

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Napetschnig J, Wu H (2013) Molecular basis of NF-κB signaling. Annu Rev Biophys 42:443–468

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Moynagh PN (2005) The NF-κB pathway. J Cell Sci 118(20):4589–4592

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Chaturvedi M et al (2011) NF-κB addiction and its role in cancer:‘one size does not fit all’. Oncogene 30(14):1615–1630

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Hoesel B, Schmid JA (2013) The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer. Mol Cancer 12(1):1–15

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  109. Alberti C et al (2012) Ligand-dependent EGFR activation induces the co-expression of IL-6 and PAI-1 via the NFkB pathway in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncogene 31(37):4139–4149

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Schneider G et al (2010) Cross talk between stimulated NF-κB and the tumor suppressor p53. Oncogene 29(19):2795–2806

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Webster GA, Perkins ND (1999) Transcriptional cross talk between NF-κB and p53. Mol Cell Biol 19(5):3485–3495

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Pianetti S et al (2001) Her-2/neu overexpression induces NF-κB via a PI3-kinase/Akt pathway involving calpain-mediated degradation of IκB-α that can be inhibited by the tumor suppressor PTEN. Oncogene 20(11):1287–1299

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Koumakpayi I et al (2010) Hierarchical clustering of immunohistochemical analysis of the activated ErbB/PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signalling pathway and prognostic significance in prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 102(7):1163–1173

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Dan HC et al (2008) Akt-dependent regulation of NF-κB is controlled by mTOR and Raptor in association with IKK. Genes Dev 22(11):1490–1500

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Bai D, Vogt P (2008) Akt induces NF-κB activation by a phosphorylation cascade. AACR

    Google Scholar 

  116. Bai D, Ueno L, Vogt PK (2009) Akt-mediated regulation of NFκB and the essentialness of NFκB for the oncogenicity of PI3K and Akt. Int J Cancer 125(12):2863–2870

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Jinawath N et al (2010) Oncoproteomic analysis reveals co-upregulation of RELA and STAT5 in carboplatin resistant ovarian carcinoma. PLoS One 5(6):e11198

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Hernandez L et al (2010) Activation of NF-κB signaling by inhibitor of NF-κB kinase β increases aggressiveness of ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 70(10):4005–4014

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Harrington BS, Annunziata CM (2019) NF-κB signaling in ovarian cancer. Cancers 11(8):1182

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. House CD et al (2017) NFκB promotes ovarian tumorigenesis via classical pathways that support proliferative cancer cells and alternative pathways that support ALDH+ cancer stem–like cells. Cancer Res 77(24):6927–6940

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Godwin P et al (2013) Targeting nuclear factor-kappa B to overcome resistance to chemotherapy. Front Oncol 3:120

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Fulda S (2014) Molecular pathways: targeting inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in cancer—from molecular mechanism to therapeutic application. Clin Cancer Res 20(2):289–295

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Garcia-Cao I et al (2003) Genetic inactivation of Par4 results in hyperactivation of NF-κB and impairment of JNK and p38. EMBO Rep 4(3):307–312

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Qiu SG et al (1999) Negative regulation of Par-4 by oncogenic Ras is essential for cellular transformation. Oncogene 18(50):7115–7123

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Cheema SK et al (2003) Par-4 transcriptionally regulates Bcl-2 through a WT1-binding site on the bcl-2 promoter. J Biol Chem 278(22):19995–20005

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Saegusa M et al (2010) Transcriptional regulation of pro-apoptotic Par-4 by NF-κB/p65 and its function in controlling cell kinetics during early events in endometrial tumourigenesis. J Pathol 221(1):26–36

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Radhakrishnan SK, Kamalakaran S (2006) Pro-apoptotic role of NF-κB: implications for cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1766(1):53–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Ravi R et al (2001) Regulation of death receptor expression and TRAIL/Apo2L-induced apoptosis by NF-κB. Nat Cell Biol 3(4):409–416

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Zilfou JT, Lowe SW (2009) Tumor suppressive functions of p53. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1(5):a001883

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Buttitta F et al (1997) p53 alterations are predictive of chemoresistance and aggressiveness in ovarian carcinomas: a molecular and immunohistochemical study. Br J Cancer 75(2):230–235

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Mantovani F, Collavin L, Del Sal G (2019) Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell. Cell Death Differentiation 26(2):199–212

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Burikhanov R et al (2017) Chloroquine-inducible par-4 secretion is essential for tumor cell apoptosis and inhibition of metastasis. Cell Rep 18(2):508–519

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Samanta S et al (2020) Clinicopathological significance of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins in ovarian carcinoma. Sci Rep 10(1):1–12

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  134. Bifulco G et al (2012) Endoplasmic reticulum stress is activated in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 125(1):220–225

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Wang M et al (2009) Role of the unfolded protein response regulator GRP78/BiP in development, cancer, and neurological disorders. Antioxid Redox Signal 11(9):2307–2316

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Roller C, Maddalo D (2013) The molecular chaperone GRP78/BiP in the development of chemoresistance: mechanism and possible treatment. Front Pharmacol 4:10

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Kim J, Guan K-L (2019) mTOR as a central hub of nutrient signalling and cell growth. Nat Cell Biol 21(1):63–71

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Karsli-Uzunbas G et al (2014) Autophagy is required for glucose homeostasis and lung tumor maintenance. Cancer Discov 4(8):914–927

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Qu X et al (2003) Promotion of tumorigenesis by heterozygous disruption of the beclin 1 autophagy gene. J Clin Invest 112(12):1809–1820

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Kimmelman AC, White E (2017) Autophagy and tumor metabolism. Cell Metab 25(5):1037–1043

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Endo S et al (2017) Autophagy is required for activation of pancreatic stellate cells, associated with pancreatic cancer progression and promotes growth of pancreatic tumors in mice. Gastroenterology 152(6):1492–1506. e24

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. White E, DiPaola RS (2009) The double-edged sword of autophagy modulation in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15(17):5308–5316

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Sui X et al (2013) Autophagy and chemotherapy resistance: a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Cell Death Dis 4(10):e838–e838

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Pagotto A et al (2017) Autophagy inhibition reduces chemoresistance and tumorigenic potential of human ovarian cancer stem cells. Cell Death Dis 8(7):e2943

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Fukuda T et al (2015) The anti-malarial chloroquine suppresses proliferation and overcomes cisplatin resistance of endometrial cancer cells via autophagy inhibition. Gynecol Oncol 137(3):538–545

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Liu S, Li X (2015) Autophagy inhibition enhances sensitivity of endometrial carcinoma cells to paclitaxel. Int J Oncol 46(6):2399–2408

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Li X et al (2019) Autophagy: a novel mechanism of chemoresistance in cancers. Biomed Pharmacother 119:109415

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Thayyullathil F et al (2014) ROS-dependent prostate apoptosis response-4 (Par-4) up-regulation and ceramide generation are the prime signaling events associated with curcumin-induced autophagic cell death in human malignant glioma. FEBS Open bio 4:763–776

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Thayyullathil F et al (2020) Par-4 regulates autophagic cell death in human cancer cells via upregulating p53 and BNIP3. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1867:118692

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Burikhanov R et al (2009) The tumor suppressor Par-4 activates an extrinsic pathway for apoptosis. Cell 138(2):377–388

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Moreno-Bueno G et al (2007) Inactivation of the candidate tumor suppressor par-4 in endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 67(5):1927–1934

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Liu S et al (2008) Identification of novel epigenetically modified genes in human melanoma via promoter methylation gene profiling. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 21(5):545–558

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. de Bessa Garcia SA et al (2017) Prostate apoptosis response 4 (PAR4) expression modulates WNT signaling pathways in MCF7 breast cancer cells: a possible mechanism underlying PAR4-mediated docetaxel chemosensitivity. Int J Mol Med 39(4):809–818

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Kline CL et al (2009) Delivery of PAR-4 plasmid in vivo via nanoliposomes sensitizes colon tumor cells subcutaneously implanted into nude mice to 5-FU. Cancer Biol Ther 8(19):1831–1837

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Jagtap JC et al (2014) Expression and regulation of prostate apoptosis response-4 (Par-4) in human glioma stem cells in drug-induced apoptosis. PLoS One 9(2):e88505

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Chen X et al (2014) Fbxo45-mediated degradation of the tumor-suppressor Par-4 regulates cancer cell survival. Cell Death Differ 21(10):1535–1545

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Thayyullathil F et al (2013) Caspase-3 mediated release of SAC domain containing fragment from Par-4 is necessary for the sphingosine-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. J Mol Signal 8(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  158. Brasseur K et al (2016) Post-translational regulation of the cleaved fragment of Par-4 in ovarian and endometrial cancer cells. Oncotarget 7(24):36971

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. El-Guendy N et al (2003) Identification of a unique core domain of par-4 sufficient for selective apoptosis induction in cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol 23(16):5516–5525

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Gao S et al (2006) Androgen receptor and prostate apoptosis response factor-4 target the c-FLIP gene to determine survival and apoptosis in the prostate gland. J Mol Endocrinol 36(3):463–483

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Fischer U et al (1995) The HIV-1 rev activation domain is a nuclear export signal that accesses an export pathway used by specific cellular RNAs. Cell 82(3):475–483

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Xu D et al (2012) Sequence and structural analyses of nuclear export signals in the NESdb database. Mol Biol Cell 23(18):3677–3693

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Subhramanyam UKT et al (2017) Structural basis for the regulatory interactions of proapoptotic Par-4. Cell Death Differ 24(9):1540–1547

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  164. Wang AY, Liu H (2019) The past, present, and future of CRM1/XPO1 inhibitors. Stem Cell Investig 6:6

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Hebbar N, Shrestha-Bhattarai T, Rangnekar VM (2014) Cancer-selective apoptosis by tumor suppressor par-4. In: Anticancer genes. Springer, pp 155–166

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  166. Sells SF et al (1997) Expression and function of the leucine zipper protein Par-4 in apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 17(7):3823–3832

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Shrestha-Bhattarai T, Rangnekar VM (2010) Cancer-selective apoptotic effects of extracellular and intracellular Par-4. Oncogene 29(27):3873–3880

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Chaudhry P et al (2012) Prostate apoptosis response 4 (Par-4), a novel substrate of caspase-3 during apoptosis activation. Mol Cell Biol 32(4):826–839

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Fabi F et al (2018) Inhibition of CRM1 activity sensitizes endometrial and ovarian cell lines to TRAIL-induced cell death. Cell Commun Signal 16(1):39

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Treude F et al (2014) Caspase-8-mediated PAR-4 cleavage is required for TNFα-induced apoptosis. Oncotarget 5(10):2988

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Donninger H et al (2010) The Ras effector RASSF2 controls the PAR-4 tumor suppressor. Mol Cell Biol 30(11):2608–2620

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Filippakopoulos P et al (2010) Structural basis for Par-4 recognition by the SPRY domain-and SOCS box-containing proteins SPSB1, SPSB2, and SPSB4. J Mol Biol 401(3):389–402

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Gagnon V et al (2008) Akt and XIAP regulate the sensitivity of human uterine cancer cells to cisplatin, doxorubicin and taxol. Apoptosis 13(2):259–271

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Asselin E, Mills GB, Tsang BK (2001) XIAP regulates Akt activity and caspase-3-dependent cleavage during cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human ovarian epithelial cancer cells. Cancer Res 61(5):1862–1868

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Obexer P, Ausserlechner MJ (2014) X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein–a critical death resistance regulator and therapeutic target for personalized cancer therapy. Front Oncol 4:197

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Van Themsche C et al (2009) X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) regulates PTEN ubiquitination, content, and compartmentalization. J Biol Chem 284(31):20462–20466

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Carter BZ et al (2008) Triptolide sensitizes AML cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis via decrease of XIAP and p53-mediated increase of DR5. Blood 111(7):3742–3750

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. Schwalbe M et al (2010) Two-state conformational equilibrium in the Par-4 leucine zipper domain. Proteins 78(11):2433–2449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Wang G et al (2006) A novel isoform of prostate apoptosis response 4 (PAR-4) that co-distributes with F-actin and prevents apoptosis in neural stem cells. Apoptosis 11(3):315–325

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. McKenna MK et al (2018) Novel role of prostate apoptosis response-4 tumor suppressor in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 131(26):2943–2954

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Mota A, Oltra SS, Moreno-Bueno G (2020) Insight updating of the molecular hallmarks in ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Cancer Suppl 15:16–26

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  182. Prat J (2012) Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Arch 460(3):237–249

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Kurman RJ, Shih I-M (2010) The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer-a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol 34(3):433

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Jayson GC et al (2014) Ovarian cancer. Lancet 384(9951):1376–1388

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Bell DW, Ellenson LH (2019) Molecular genetics of endometrial carcinoma. Annu Rev Pathol 14:339–367

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Asselin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fabi, F., Adam, P., Asselin, E. (2021). Par-4 in Chemoresistant Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers. In: Rangnekar, V.M. (eds) Tumor Suppressor Par-4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80558-6_3

Download citation