Advertisement

Virtual Imaging for Patient Information on Radiotherapy Planning and Delivery for Prostate Cancer

Conference paper
  • 146 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12722)

Abstract

The provision of information on radiotherapy (RT) planning and delivery for patient with cancer is a vital issue in improving not only patients’ satisfaction but also patients’ compliance to treatment. In the present study, patients with prostate cancer receiving RT were randomised to have the provision of information on RT planning and delivery using Virtual Reality (VR) prior to RT or on the last day of RT. Bladder and rectal volumes and separations were measured prior to starting RT, weekly during RT and on the last day of RT. A quality of life questionnaire was completed prior to RT, halfway through RT, at the end of RT and at 3 and 6 months after RT in order to assess side effects. Bladder volumes decreased towards the end of RT but no differences were seen between patients in either cohort. The scores of the quality of life questionnaire showed only a statistical difference at 3 months after RT with lower scores (less intense side effects) for patients in Cohort 1. Although this study failed to show that provision of information to patients receiving RT using VR improves compliance, VT tools were very welcomed by patients as a means of providing information on RT planning and delivery. In the future, this study may provide cancer centres with an useful tool to audit local protocols regarding patient preparations and training for prostate RT.

Keywords

Virtual environment for radiotherapy training Compliance to prostate radiotherapy Bladder volume Computed tomography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. 1.
    Stam, M.R., van Lin, E.N.J.T., van der Vight, L.P., Kaander, J.H.A.M., Visser, A.G.: Bladder filling variation during radiation treatment of Prostate cancer: can the use of a bladder ultrasound scanner and biofeedback optimize bladder filling. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 65, 371–377 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakamura, N., et al.: Variability in bladder volumes of full bladders in definitive radiotherapy for cases of localized prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 36(186), 637–42 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-010-2105-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonet, M., Cayetano, L., Núñez, M., Jovell-Fernández, E., Aguilar, A., Ribas, Y.: Assessment of acute bowel function after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: is it accurate enough? Clin. Transl. Oncol. 20(5), 576–583 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1749-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bacon, C.G., Giovannucci, E., Testa, M., Glass, T.A., Kawachi, I.: The association of treatment-related symptoms with quality-of-life outcomes for localized prostate carcinoma patients. Cancer 94, 862–71 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen, H., Nielsen, B.K., Boejen, A., Vestergaard, A.: Teaching cancer patients the value of correct positioning during radiotherapy using visual aids and practical exercises. J. Cancer Educ. 33(3), 680–685 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1122-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berger, O., Grønberg, B.H., Loge, J.H., Kaasa, S., Sand, K.: Cancer patients’ knowledge about their disease and treatment before, during and after treatment: a prospective, longitudinal study. BMC Cancer 18, 381 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4164-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mallinger, J.B., Griggs, J.J., Shields, C.G.: Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ. Couns. 57, 342–9 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stewart-Lord, A., Brown, M., Noor, S., Cook, J., Jallow, O.: The utilisation of virtual images in patient information giving sessions for prostate cancer patients prior to radiotherapy. Radiography 22, 269–273 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2016.05.002
  9. 9.
    Jimenez, Y.A., Wang, W., Stuart, K., Cumming, S., Thwaites, D., Lewis, S.: Breast cancer patients’ perceptions of a virtual learning environment for pretreatment education. J. Cancer Educ. 33(5), 983–990 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1183-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips, R, Ward, J.W., Beavis, A.W.: Immersive visualization training of radiotherapy treatment. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 111, 390–396 (2011). https://europepmc.org/article/med/15718766
  11. 11.
    Boejen, A., Grau, C.: Virtual reality in radiation therapy training. Surg. Oncol. 20, 185–8 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2010.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jimenez, Y.A., Lewis, S.J.: Radiation therapy patient education using VERT: combination of technology with human care. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 65, 158–62 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kane, P.: Simulation-based education: a narrative review of the use of VERT in radiation therapy education. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 65, 131–136 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sulé-Suso, J., et al.: Pilot study on virtual imaging for patient information on radiotherapy planning and delivery. Radiography 21, 273–7 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marquess, M., et al.: A pilot study to determine if the use of a virtual reality education module reduces anxiety and increases comprehension in patients receiving radiation therapy. J. Radiat. Oncol. 6(3), 317–322 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-017-0298-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jimenez, Y.A., Cumming, S., Wang, W., Stuart, K., Thwaites, D.I., Lewis, S.J.: Patient education using virtual reality increases knowledge and positive experience for breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Support. Care Cancer 26(8), 2879–2888 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4114-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chapman, K., James, S.: A review of results from patient experience surveys during the introduction of group pre-radiotherapy patient information sessions. Radiography 22, 237–43 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2016.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patel, D., Muren, L.P., Mehus, A., Kvinnsland, Y., Ulvang, D.M., Villanger, K.P.: A virtual reality solution for evaluation of radiotherapy plans. Radiother. Oncol. 82, 218–21 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.11.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dearnaley, D., Syndikus, I., Mossop, H., et al.: Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet 17, 1047–60 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30102-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson, A.J.: Volume of n-dimensional ellipsoid. Sci. Acta Xaveriana 1, 101–106 (2010). http://oaji.net/articles/2014/1420-1415594291.pdf
  21. 21.
    Chan, E., et al.: Tri-axial ellipsoid volume calculation: a method for bladder volume estimation. J. Med. Imag. Rad. Sci. 44, 46–7 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2012.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Doherty, Ú.M., et al.: Variability of bladder filling in patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the prostate. Radiother. Oncol. 79, 335–40 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krol, R., McColl, G.M., Hopman, W.P.M., Smeenk, R.J.: Anal and rectal function after intensity-modulated prostate radiotherapy with endorectal balloon. Radiother. Oncol. 128, 364–8 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stasi, M., et al.: Emptying the rectum before treatment delivery limits the variations of rectal dose-volume parameters during 3DCRT of prostate cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 80, 363–70 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.007
  25. 25.
    Nakai, Y., et al.: Quality of life worsened the most severely in patients immediately after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Res. Rep. Urol. 10, 169–80 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S168651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nakamura, K., Konishi, K., Komatsu, T., Ishiba, R.: Quality of life after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: comparison with other modalities. Int. J. Urol. 26, 950–4 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14026CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cancer CentreUniversity Hospitals of North MidlandsStoke-on-TrentUK
  2. 2.Guy Hilton Research CentreKeele UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK
  3. 3.Proton Beam Therapy CentreThe Christie NHS TrustManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations